AzTrials
AzTrials

Tobacco Use DisorderLIMNCT01333202

Fresh Lime Alone for Smoking Cessation

A study testing Fresh lime in people with Tobacco Use Disorder, run by Thai Health Professional Alliance Against Tobacco at 1 site in Thailand.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether fresh lime alone is effective for smoking cessation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Tobacco Use Disorder
What is being tested?
Fresh lime
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Mar 2009to Sep 2009
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age over 18
  • Smoked regularly at least one year prior to study entry
  • Had the desire to quit smoking
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Having current dental problems
  • Active peptic ulcer disease
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Citrus allergy
  • Pregnancy
  • Use of illicit drugs
  • Participation in another clinical trial and/or using any first-line smoking cessation aids within the past 30 days

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Thailand1 site
  • Panyananthaphikkhu Chonprathan Medical Center

    Ban Plak Raet, Nondhaburi, 11120

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Fresh Lime Alone for Smoking Cessation

The purpose of this study is to determine whether fresh lime alone is effective for smoking cessation.

Read the detailed description

Smoking is the major preventable cause of chronic medical diseases and death worldwide. Significant efforts led by World Health Organization (WHO) and several countries have been made to help current smokers to quit, particularly in the developing countries, where their smoking rates continued to rise. Clinical practice guidelines were therefore developed to guide all healthcare personnel in those countries to provide treatment for smokers. However, despite that, only a small number of smokers were able to quit successfully. A large number of smokers who are poor and heavily addicted to nicotine remain and have no access to any effective smoking cessation aids. Although there are several effective medications available for smoking cessation nowadays, the high price of them completely keeps poor smokers away from using them. Alternative and cheaper smoking cessation aids are therefore necessary. During the past decade, certain herbal remedies have been introduced in smoking cessation in Thailand. One of them that have been used widely without any supporting evidence is the fresh lime (Citrus aurantifolia), the well-known native citrus to Southeast Asia. It is anecdotally claimed to be effective and safe in smoking cessation. The present study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of fresh lime as a smoking cessation aid compared with those of nicotine gum.

Being tested
Fresh lime
Keywords
Fresh lime, nicotine gum, smoking cessation, craving
Medical subject headings
Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fresh limeOther

    Also called Fresh lime (Citrus aurantifolia)

    fresh lime were used every time the participants began to crave cigarettes and as often as they needed. To correctly use it, fresh lime needed to be washed and cut into several small pieces by 1st cutting each lime into quarters and then each quarter further into 4 pieces. When needed, subjects were told to suck each piece of lime and thereafter chew the lime skin. To maintain freshness, the remaining slices were to be covered with plastic wrap and stored in the refrigerator as soon as possible.

Study groups in NCT01333202
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fresh limeExperimentalThose who were randomly assigned to receive fresh lime were instructed to use it every time they began to crave cigarettes and as often as they needed. Fresh lime needed to be washed and cut into several small pieces by 1st cutting each lime into quarters and then each quarter further into 4 pieces. When needed, subjects were told to suck each piece of lime and thereafter chew the lime skin. To maintain freshness, the remaining slices were to be covered with plastic wrap and stored in the refrigerator as soon as possible. All participants in this group had to report the number of fresh lime slices used per day in the self-report card.
Receives: Other: Fresh lime
Nicotine gumActive comparatorThe dosage of nicotine gum used in this group was primarily based on the participants' FTND scores. Those with FTND score of 4 or above were given 4-mg nicotine gum. The 2-mg gum was assigned only to light smokers. Appropriate gum use by "chew and park" technique was instructed to all subjects in this group. They were advised to use the gum whenever they began to crave a cigarette but not to exceed more than 20 pieces per day. All participants in this group also had to report the total number pieces of gum used per day in the self-report card. Like the lime use group, phone calls were also made every 2-3 days during the initial month of study to remind them of technique and record keeping.
Receives: Other: Fresh lime

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. continuous abstinence rate (CAR) of lime group and gum group

    CAR from week 9 through week 12 of treatment was defined as proportion of participants who self-reported having refrained from smoking any tobacco products and confirmed by exhaled CO concentration of 10 ppm or less at all previous measurement points between week 9 and week 12 of treatment.

    Measured: week 12

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Number of Participants with Adverse Events on each group

    All adverse events related to the use of nicotine gum and fresh lime during the 12-week treatment were measured as number and percent of participants in each group.

    Measured: week 12

  2. 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PAR) of lime and gum groups

    Point prevalence abstinence rate (PAR), which was defined as percentage of participants who were able to abstain from smoking any tobacco products during the preceding week, was evaluated at week 4, 8, 12 and 24.

    Measured: week 4

  3. 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PAR) of lime and gum groups

    Point prevalence abstinence rate (PAR), which was defined as percentage of participants who were able to abstain from smoking any tobacco products during the preceding week, was evaluated at week 4, 8, 12 and 24.

    Measured: week 8

  4. 7-day point prevalence abstinence (PAR) of lime and gum groups

    Point prevalence abstinence rate (PAR), which was defined as percentage of participants who were able to abstain from smoking any tobacco products during the preceding week, was evaluated at week 4, 8, 12 and 24.

    Measured: week 12

  5. continuous abstinence rates of the lime and gum groups

    CAR from week 9 through week 24 of the study was defined as proportion of participants who self-reported having refrained from smoking any tobacco products and confirmed by exhaled CO concentration of 10 ppm or less at all previous measurement points between week 9 and week 24.

    Measured: week 24

  6. intensity of craving using 100-mm VAS score

    Intensity of cravings after morning awakening among smokers in both groups were recorded on the day of clinic visits at week 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 of the study using 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Mean scores of those in the lime and gum groups was calculated and compared.

    Measured: week 2

  7. intensity of craving using 100-mm VAS score

    Intensity of cravings after morning awakening among smokers in both groups were recorded on the day of clinic visits at week 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 of the study using 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Mean scores of those in the lime and gum groups was calculated and compared.

    Measured: week 4

  8. intensity of craving using 100-mm VAS score

    Intensity of cravings after morning awakening among smokers in both groups were recorded on the day of clinic visits at week 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 of the study using 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Mean scores of those in the lime and gum groups was calculated and compared.

    Measured: week 8

  9. intensity of craving using 100-mm VAS score

    Intensity of cravings after morning awakening among smokers in both groups were recorded on the day of clinic visits at week 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 of the study using 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Mean scores of those in the lime and gum groups was calculated and compared.

    Measured: week 12

  10. intensity of craving using 100-mm VAS score

    Intensity of cravings after morning awakening among smokers in both groups were recorded on the day of clinic visits at week 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 of the study using 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Mean scores of those in the lime and gum groups was calculated and compared.

    Measured: week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2009
  3. Primary completionSep 2009
  4. Study completionSep 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01333202
Sponsor's protocol ID
50-00-0980-02/2552
Acronym
LIM
Status last verified
Aug 2010
First submitted
6 Apr 2011
Last updated
11 Apr 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Rungruanghiranya S, Ekpanyaskul C, Hattapornsawan Y, Tundulawessa Y. Effect of nicotine polyestex gum on smoking cessation and quality of life. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Nov;91(11):1656-62.

    PubMed 19127785
  • Lykkesfeldt J, Prieme H, Loft S, Poulsen HE. Effect of smoking cessation on plasma ascorbic acid concentration. BMJ. 1996 Jul 13;313(7049):91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7049.91. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8688760
  • Levin ED, Behm F, Carnahan E, LeClair R, Shipley R, Rose JE. Clinical trials using ascorbic acid aerosol to aid smoking cessation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993 Oct;33(3):211-23. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90108-3.

    PubMed 8261886

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fresh lime in people with Tobacco Use Disorder, run by Thai Health Professional Alliance Against Tobacco at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

continuous abstinence rate (CAR) of lime group and gum group (time frame: week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01333202, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2011.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in