Laryngopharyngeal RefluxPhase 4NCT01328652
Dexlansoprazole to Treat Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Lingual Tonsil Hypertrophy
A Phase 4 study testing dexlansoprazole in people with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Hypertrophy of Lingual Tonsil, run by Advanced Center for Specialty Care at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Main Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that measurements of lingual tonsil tissue (LTT) thickness will decrease following treatment with once daily oral dexlansoprazole 60 mg in patients diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and lingual tonsil hypertrophy (LTH) compared to matched controls receiving… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux, Hypertrophy of Lingual Tonsil
- What is being tested?
- dexlansoprazole
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to Jan 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of LPR and LTH confirmed by 24-hour pharyngeal pH monitoring and CT of the tongue base, respectively
- Age > 20 and < 60 years
- Failure (in the opinion of the patient and treating physician) of current treatment regimen and willingness (by the patient) to discontinue all concurrent therapies for LPR whether prescription, over-the-counter, or herbal, and to remain off of these treatments for the entire course of the study
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or anticipated pregnancy (confirmation of non-pregnant status will be made by urine human chorionic gonadotropin level)
- Lactation
- History or diagnosis of moderate to severe hepatic disease (based on liver function testing performed at screening adjusted for age, gender, race, concomitant medications and comorbidities
- Current or within the previous (12 mo) usage of a proton pump inhibitor
- Concurrent use of any medications, which interact adversely with dexlansoprazole or other proton pump inhibitors (e.g., penicillins, digoxin, iron salts, azole antifungals, atazanavir, tacrolimus, clopidogrel, etc.)
- Allergy or sensitivity to dexlansoprazole (or other proton pump inhibitor) or cimetidine (or other H2 blocker)
Show all 10Show fewer
- History of laryngeal and/or pharyngeal surgery
- Preexisting voice or swallowing disorder not related to LPR
- Smoking
- Neoplastic or infectious processes that are systemic or localized to the head and neck region
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Advanced Center for Specialty Care
Chicago, Illinois, 60657
Michael Friedman, MD
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Dexlansoprazole to Treat Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Lingual Tonsil Hypertrophy
Main Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that measurements of lingual tonsil tissue (LTT) thickness will decrease following treatment with once daily oral dexlansoprazole 60 mg in patients diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and lingual tonsil hypertrophy (LTH) compared to matched controls receiving placebo.
Primary endpoints include:
Read more
- 24-hour oropharyngeal pH testing, pre- and post-treatment
- Mean lingual tonsil tissue (LTT) thickness, pre- and post-treatment, as determined by CT scan of the base of tongue
Secondary endpoints include:
- Reflux Finding Score (RFS) on pre- and post-treatment endoscopy of the oropharynx
- Subjective outcome metrics for assessing LPR-related symptoms and associated quality of life
- Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index
- Bed-partner assessment of snoring intensity according to a Visual Analog Scale
- Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
- Reflux Symptom Index (RSI)
Specific Aims: The primary objective of this study is to determine whether treatment of patients diagnosed with LPR and LTH with 3 months of PPI therapy reduces LTT thickness, as measured on CT scan of the tongue base.
The secondary objectives of this study are to:
- Evaluate changes in LPR-related symptoms and quality of life after therapy using the following subjective outcome metrics:
- Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index
- Bed-partner assessment of snoring intensity according to a Visual Analog Scale
- Epworth Sleepiness Scale
- Reflux symptom index
- Correlate changes in LTT thickness with the following secondary endpoints:
- Changes in the above subjective outcome metrics
- Changes in endoscopic findings of LPR
- Changes in 24-hour oropharyngeal pH study results
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE:
Detail: The backflow of gastric contents into the esophagus occurs in healthy people to a limited extent.[1] When the refluxed material transcends the upper esophageal sphincter and enters the laryngopharynx on a chronic basis, it is termed laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). LPR typically manifests as dysphonia, globus sensation, chronic cough, and throat irritation. Recent studies suggest that untreated LPR may be a cause of lingual tonsil hypertrophy (LTH), [2,3] which itself has been implicated as a contributing factor in obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).[4-6] Lingual tonsil tissue (LTT) is present to a variable degree in most individuals and tends to regress with age. Although standardized parameters for defining LTH have yet to be established, a recent study by Friedman et al [7] demonstrated that on average subjects with LPR, OSAHS, or both diseases had significantly thicker LTT on CT imaging than patients without either disease. Del Gaudio and coworkers [2] identified a trend between increasing severity of LTH and the frequency of reflux events, while Mamede et al [3] found a positive correlation between reflux symptoms and the degree of LTH.
LTH in the setting of LPR is thought to result from the edema and inflammation brought about by chronic exposure of the tissues to the refluxed acid. The resulting thickened and inflamed LTT may narrow the retrolingual airway, increasing the likelihood of airway obstruction and apneic events. Theoretically, increases in negative intrathoracic pressure secondary to the obstruction may, in turn, facilitate further LPR.
While the treatment of reflux has been shown to decrease indices of OSAHS severity in some patients, [8-10] a direct causal relationship between LPR and OSAHS has not been proven. Similarly, more evidence is necessary to elucidate the exact relationship between LPR and LTH. No study to date has investigated whether treatment of LPR reduces LTH. The investigators hypothesize that adequate treatment of LPR using a PPI in patients with LTH will result in a significant reduction in LTT thickness as well as improvement in OSAHS symptoms, if present. The proposed study is a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to determine whether control of LPR reduces LTH and, as a corollary, improves OSAHS symptoms. Control of LPR will be determined by 24-hour oropharyngeal pH monitoring [11], and LTH will be measured on CT. While the length of time required for LTH regression to occur is not currently known, Reichel et al have found that 3 months of PPI therapy are typically necessary before improvement in LPR is seen. [12] Similarly, a study by Park et al showed a significantly greater rate of improvement or resolution of LPR symptoms when treatment with a PPI was for longer than 2 months. [13] PRELIMINARY STUDIES Preliminary Studies: In a previous study, the investigators utilized axial and sagittal CT images of the tongue base to measure LTT in patients with LPR, OSAHS, both conditions, or neither disease. The investigators found that patients with LPR, OSAHS, or LPR+OSAHS had significantly thicker LTT than patients without LPR or OSAHS. This study was presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and was published in the April 2010 issue of the journal Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:
Overview: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study at a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center.
Sample size: In order to achieve a power of 0.95, a sample size of 40 subjects per group (80 total) was determined based on an a priori power analysis. The sample size stated in the original concept was an estimate and was not determined statistically.
Procedures: The study protocol begins after a patient has been diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) on the basis of routine history, physical exam, and diagnostic studies including 24-hour oropharyngeal pH monitoring with the Dx-pH Monitoring System (Restech, San Diego, California). Prospective candidates for the study will be asked to undergo CT imaging of the tongue base. Those who are subsequently diagnosed with lingual tonsil hypertrophy (LTH), as determined by mean lingual tonsil tissue (LTT) thickness greater than 3.0 mm on axial and sagittal views, will be eligible for enrollment, providing they meet the additional inclusion criteria listed above. The enrollment period is expected to last 12 months, and the total duration of the study is expected to be 18 months.
Once an eligible patient has agreed to participate in the study and provided informed consent, s/he will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control group according to a 1:1 ratio. Patients as well as the practitioner administering treatment will be blinded to patient group assignments. Patients in the experimental group will be started on a 3-month regimen of once daily oral dexlansoprazole 60 mg. Patients in the control group will receive a placebo once daily by mouth for the same length of time. Following completion of the 3-month treatment regimen, patients from both groups will undergo repeat 24-hour oropharyngeal pH testing and CT of the tongue base. Endoscopic findings of LPR will also be recorded before, monthly during treatment and after treatment using the Reflux Finding Score (RFS). A 3-month treatment period was chosen based on previous studies, which have shown failure of symptom resolution after shorter lengths of time. Once enrolled, patients will be seen in clinic approximately every four weeks. Treatment with cimetidine 200 mg PO BID will be offered as a rescue medication to patients of either group whose LPR symptoms worsen during the study. Once started, cimetidine, as well as study drug (dexlansoprazole or placebo) will be continued for the duration of the study. At study conclusion, all patients will be re-evaluated for continued treatment, based on the effectiveness of dexlansoprazole (after unblinding) and need for rescue medication (dexlansoprazole and placebo). If cimetidine fails to offer relief, the subject will be withdrawn from the study and other treatment options will be offered.
The Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (CSAQLI), visual analog scale for snoring (VAS), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) will be used as subjective outcome metrics. These questionnaires are validated tools for assessing symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and associated quality of life. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), a validated instrument for assessing reflux symptoms, will also be administered along with the other questionnaires both prior to initiating therapy and again at the end of the 3-month period.
Data analysis and Interpretation:
Statistical analysis will focus on determining whether lingual tonsil tissue size differs before and after therapy. Mean lingual tonsil tissue size will be calculated along with standard deviation and student t test will be used to determine statistical significance.
Analysis will also examine the mean change in four subjective metrics, (1) Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index, (2) Visual Analog Scale of snoring, (3) Epworth Sleepiness scale, and (4) Reflux Symptom Index. Again, means and standard deviations will be calculated and student t test will be used to assess statistical significance.
- Being tested
- dexlansoprazole
- Keywords
- LPR, LTH
- Medical subject headings
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
dexlansoprazoleDrug
Also called proton pump inhibitor, Dexilant
dexlansoprazole 60 mg once daily for 3 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Proton Pump Inhibitor | Experimental | Treatment with dexlansoprazole 60 mg once daily for 3 months Receives: Drug: dexlansoprazole |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lingual Tonsil Size
Lingual tonsil tissue size will be measured on computed tomography image at baseline and remeasured following CT imaging after 3 months of proton pump inhibitor therapy.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index
Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index measures the quality of life in sleep apnea patients.
Measured: 1, 2 and 3 months
Visual Analog Scale of snoring
Visual Analog Scale of snoring measures the loudness and disturbance factor related to snoring as documented by the bedpartner (when available)
Measured: 1, 2 and 3 months
Epworth Sleepiness scale
Epworth Sleepiness scale measures the daytime sleepiness caused by sleep disturbances and interruptions associated with sleep apnea or snoring.
Measured: 1, 2 and 3 months
Reflux Symptom Index
Reflux Symptom Index monitrors the physical signs and symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux during treatment obtained during fiberoptic endoscopy of the larynx, pharynx and esophagus.
Measured: 1, 2, and 3 months
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Continuous 24 hour laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionAug 2012 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Laryngopharyngeal RefluxStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Advanced Center for Specialty Care
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Takeda
- Investigators
- Michael Friedman, MD, Principal investigator, Head and Neck and Cosmetic Surgery Inc and Advanced Center for Specialty CareNinos J Joseph, BS, Study director, Advanced Center for Specialty Care
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01328652
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 004 10/10
- Status last verified
- Apr 2011
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 5 Apr 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Schwizer W, Hinder RA, Albertucci M. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Sep;87(9):1102-11.
PubMed 1519566DelGaudio JM, Naseri I, Wise JC. Proximal pharyngeal reflux correlates with increasing severity of lingual tonsil hypertrophy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;138(4):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.12.023.
PubMed 18359357Mamede RC, De Mello-Filho FV, Vigario LC, Dantas RO. Effect of gastroesophageal reflux on hypertrophy of the base of the tongue. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Apr;122(4):607-10. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.98362.
PubMed 10740190Dundar A, Ozunlu A, Sahan M, Ozgen F. Lingual tonsil hypertrophy producing obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 1996 Sep;106(9 Pt 1):1167-9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199609000-00022.
PubMed 8822724Suzuki K, Kawakatsu K, Hattori C, Hattori H, Nishimura Y, Yonekura A, Yagisawa M, Nishimura T. Application of lingual tonsillectomy to sleep apnea syndrome involving lingual tonsils. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2003;(550):65-71. doi: 10.1080/0365523031000057.
PubMed 12737346Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Shott SR, Kalra M, Poe SA, Chini BA, Amin RS. Comparison of lingual tonsil size as depicted on MR imaging between children with obstructive sleep apnea despite previous tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy and normal controls. Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Jun;36(6):518-23. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0149-7. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
PubMed 16596369Friedman M, Wilson MN, Pulver TM, Golbin D, Lee GP, Gorelick G, Joseph NJ. Measurements of adult lingual tonsil tissue in health and disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Apr;142(4):520-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.12.036.
PubMed 20304271Wise SK, Wise JC, DelGaudio JM. Gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Aug;135(2):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.012.
PubMed 16890078Friedman M, Gurpinar B, Lin HC, Schalch P, Joseph NJ. Impact of treatment of gastroesophageal reflux on obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007 Nov;116(11):805-11. doi: 10.1177/000348940711601103.
PubMed 18074664Senior BA, Khan M, Schwimmer C, Rosenthal L, Benninger M. Gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 2001 Dec;111(12):2144-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200112000-00012.
PubMed 11802013Farrokhi F, Hill EM, Sun G, et al. Dx-pH Monitoring: how does it compare to the standard pH probe? Am J Gastroenterol 2007;103:S2.
Reichel O, Dressel H, Wiederanders K, Issing WJ. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with esomeprazole for symptoms and signs associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Sep;139(3):414-20. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.06.003.
PubMed 18722223Park W, Hicks DM, Khandwala F, Richter JE, Abelson TI, Milstein C, Vaezi MF. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: prospective cohort study evaluating optimal dose of proton-pump inhibitor therapy and pretherapy predictors of response. Laryngoscope. 2005 Jul;115(7):1230-8. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000163746.81766.45.
PubMed 15995512
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Apr 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Dexlansoprazole to Treat Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Lingual Tonsil Hypertrophy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01328652
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 004 10/10
- Keywords
- LPR, LTH
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Advanced Center for Specialty CareUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Takeda
- Study start
- Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Main Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that measurements of lingual tonsil tissue (LTT) thickness will decrease following treatment with once daily oral dexlansoprazole 60 mg in patients diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and lingual tonsil hypertrophy (LTH) compared to matched controls receiving placebo.
Primary endpoints include:
- 24-hour oropharyngeal pH testing, pre- and post-treatment
- Mean lingual tonsil tissue (LTT) thickness, pre- and post-treatment, as determined by CT scan of the base of tongue
Secondary endpoints include:
- Reflux Finding Score (RFS) on pre- and post-treatment endoscopy of the oropharynx
- Subjective outcome metrics for assessing LPR-related symptoms and associated quality of life
- Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index
- Bed-partner assessment of snoring intensity according to a Visual Analog Scale
- Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
- Reflux Symptom Index (RSI)
Specific Aims: The primary objective of this study is to determine whether treatment of patients diagnosed with LPR and LTH with 3 months of PPI therapy reduces LTT thickness, as measured on CT scan of the tongue base.
The secondary objectives of this study are to:
- Evaluate changes in LPR-related symptoms and quality of life after therapy using the following subjective outcome metrics:
- Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index
- Bed-partner assessment of snoring intensity according to a Visual Analog Scale
- Epworth Sleepiness Scale
- Reflux symptom index
- Correlate changes in LTT thickness with the following secondary endpoints:
- Changes in the above subjective outcome metrics
- Changes in endoscopic findings of LPR
- Changes in 24-hour oropharyngeal pH study results
Detailed description
BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE:
Detail: The backflow of gastric contents into the esophagus occurs in healthy people to a limited extent.[1] When the refluxed material transcends the upper esophageal sphincter and enters the laryngopharynx on a chronic basis, it is termed laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). LPR typically manifests as dysphonia, globus sensation, chronic cough, and throat irritation. Recent studies suggest that untreated LPR may be a cause of lingual tonsil hypertrophy (LTH), [2,3] which itself has been implicated as a contributing factor in obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).[4-6] Lingual tonsil tissue (LTT) is present to a variable degree in most individuals and tends to regress with age. Although standardized parameters for defining LTH have yet to be established, a recent study by Friedman et al [7] demonstrated that on average subjects with LPR, OSAHS, or both diseases had significantly thicker LTT on CT imaging than patients without either disease. Del Gaudio and coworkers [2] identified a trend between increasing severity of LTH and the frequency of reflux events, while Mamede et al [3] found a positive correlation between reflux symptoms and the degree of LTH.
LTH in the setting of LPR is thought to result from the edema and inflammation brought about by chronic exposure of the tissues to the refluxed acid. The resulting thickened and inflamed LTT may narrow the retrolingual airway, increasing the likelihood of airway obstruction and apneic events. Theoretically, increases in negative intrathoracic pressure secondary to the obstruction may, in turn, facilitate further LPR.
While the treatment of reflux has been shown to decrease indices of OSAHS severity in some patients, [8-10] a direct causal relationship between LPR and OSAHS has not been proven. Similarly, more evidence is necessary to elucidate the exact relationship between LPR and LTH. No study to date has investigated whether treatment of LPR reduces LTH. The investigators hypothesize that adequate treatment of LPR using a PPI in patients with LTH will result in a significant reduction in LTT thickness as well as improvement in OSAHS symptoms, if present. The proposed study is a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial to determine whether control of LPR reduces LTH and, as a corollary, improves OSAHS symptoms. Control of LPR will be determined by 24-hour oropharyngeal pH monitoring [11], and LTH will be measured on CT. While the length of time required for LTH regression to occur is not currently known, Reichel et al have found that 3 months of PPI therapy are typically necessary before improvement in LPR is seen. [12] Similarly, a study by Park et al showed a significantly greater rate of improvement or resolution of LPR symptoms when treatment with a PPI was for longer than 2 months. [13] PRELIMINARY STUDIES Preliminary Studies: In a previous study, the investigators utilized axial and sagittal CT images of the tongue base to measure LTT in patients with LPR, OSAHS, both conditions, or neither disease. The investigators found that patients with LPR, OSAHS, or LPR+OSAHS had significantly thicker LTT than patients without LPR or OSAHS. This study was presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and was published in the April 2010 issue of the journal Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:
Overview: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study at a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center.
Sample size: In order to achieve a power of 0.95, a sample size of 40 subjects per group (80 total) was determined based on an a priori power analysis. The sample size stated in the original concept was an estimate and was not determined statistically.
Procedures: The study protocol begins after a patient has been diagnosed with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) on the basis of routine history, physical exam, and diagnostic studies including 24-hour oropharyngeal pH monitoring with the Dx-pH Monitoring System (Restech, San Diego, California). Prospective candidates for the study will be asked to undergo CT imaging of the tongue base. Those who are subsequently diagnosed with lingual tonsil hypertrophy (LTH), as determined by mean lingual tonsil tissue (LTT) thickness greater than 3.0 mm on axial and sagittal views, will be eligible for enrollment, providing they meet the additional inclusion criteria listed above. The enrollment period is expected to last 12 months, and the total duration of the study is expected to be 18 months.
Once an eligible patient has agreed to participate in the study and provided informed consent, s/he will be randomly assigned to the experimental or control group according to a 1:1 ratio. Patients as well as the practitioner administering treatment will be blinded to patient group assignments. Patients in the experimental group will be started on a 3-month regimen of once daily oral dexlansoprazole 60 mg. Patients in the control group will receive a placebo once daily by mouth for the same length of time. Following completion of the 3-month treatment regimen, patients from both groups will undergo repeat 24-hour oropharyngeal pH testing and CT of the tongue base. Endoscopic findings of LPR will also be recorded before, monthly during treatment and after treatment using the Reflux Finding Score (RFS). A 3-month treatment period was chosen based on previous studies, which have shown failure of symptom resolution after shorter lengths of time. Once enrolled, patients will be seen in clinic approximately every four weeks. Treatment with cimetidine 200 mg PO BID will be offered as a rescue medication to patients of either group whose LPR symptoms worsen during the study. Once started, cimetidine, as well as study drug (dexlansoprazole or placebo) will be continued for the duration of the study. At study conclusion, all patients will be re-evaluated for continued treatment, based on the effectiveness of dexlansoprazole (after unblinding) and need for rescue medication (dexlansoprazole and placebo). If cimetidine fails to offer relief, the subject will be withdrawn from the study and other treatment options will be offered.
The Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (CSAQLI), visual analog scale for snoring (VAS), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) will be used as subjective outcome metrics. These questionnaires are validated tools for assessing symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) and associated quality of life. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), a validated instrument for assessing reflux symptoms, will also be administered along with the other questionnaires both prior to initiating therapy and again at the end of the 3-month period.
Data analysis and Interpretation:
Statistical analysis will focus on determining whether lingual tonsil tissue size differs before and after therapy. Mean lingual tonsil tissue size will be calculated along with standard deviation and student t test will be used to determine statistical significance.
Analysis will also examine the mean change in four subjective metrics, (1) Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index, (2) Visual Analog Scale of snoring, (3) Epworth Sleepiness scale, and (4) Reflux Symptom Index. Again, means and standard deviations will be calculated and student t test will be used to assess statistical significance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Proton Pump Inhibitor | Experimental | Drug: dexlansoprazoleTreatment with dexlansoprazole 60 mg once daily for 3 months |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 59 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of LPR and LTH confirmed by 24-hour pharyngeal pH monitoring and CT of the tongue base, respectively
- Age > 20 and < 60 years
- Failure (in the opinion of the patient and treating physician) of current treatment regimen and willingness (by the patient) to discontinue all concurrent therapies for LPR whether prescription, over-the-counter, or herbal, and to remain off of these treatments for the entire course of the study
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Pregnancy or anticipated pregnancy (confirmation of non-pregnant status will be made by urine human chorionic gonadotropin level)
- Lactation
- History or diagnosis of moderate to severe hepatic disease (based on liver function testing performed at screening adjusted for age, gender, race, concomitant medications and comorbidities
- Current or within the previous (12 mo) usage of a proton pump inhibitor
- Concurrent use of any medications, which interact adversely with dexlansoprazole or other proton pump inhibitors (e.g., penicillins, digoxin, iron salts, azole antifungals, atazanavir, tacrolimus, clopidogrel, etc.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| dexlansoprazoleAlso: proton pump inhibitor, Dexilantdexlansoprazole 60 mg once daily for 3 months | Drug | Proton Pump Inhibitor |
Primary outcome
Lingual Tonsil Size
Time frame: 3 months
Lingual tonsil tissue size will be measured on computed tomography image at baseline and remeasured following CT imaging after 3 months of proton pump inhibitor therapy.
5 secondary outcomes
Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index
Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 months
Visual Analog Scale of snoring
Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 months
Epworth Sleepiness scale
Time frame: 1, 2 and 3 months
Reflux Symptom Index
Time frame: 1, 2, and 3 months
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Apr 2011.
- Background: PubMed 1519566Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Schwizer W, Hinder RA, Albertucci M. Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Sep;87(9):1102-11.
- Background: PubMed 18359357DelGaudio JM, Naseri I, Wise JC. Proximal pharyngeal reflux correlates with increasing severity of lingual tonsil hypertrophy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Apr;138(4):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.12.023.
- Background: PubMed 10740190Mamede RC, De Mello-Filho FV, Vigario LC, Dantas RO. Effect of gastroesophageal reflux on hypertrophy of the base of the tongue. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Apr;122(4):607-10. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.98362.
- Background: PubMed 8822724Dundar A, Ozunlu A, Sahan M, Ozgen F. Lingual tonsil hypertrophy producing obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 1996 Sep;106(9 Pt 1):1167-9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199609000-00022.
- Background: PubMed 12737346Suzuki K, Kawakatsu K, Hattori C, Hattori H, Nishimura Y, Yonekura A, Yagisawa M, Nishimura T. Application of lingual tonsillectomy to sleep apnea syndrome involving lingual tonsils. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2003;(550):65-71. doi: 10.1080/0365523031000057.
- Background: PubMed 16596369Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Shott SR, Kalra M, Poe SA, Chini BA, Amin RS. Comparison of lingual tonsil size as depicted on MR imaging between children with obstructive sleep apnea despite previous tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy and normal controls. Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Jun;36(6):518-23. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0149-7. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
- Background: PubMed 20304271Friedman M, Wilson MN, Pulver TM, Golbin D, Lee GP, Gorelick G, Joseph NJ. Measurements of adult lingual tonsil tissue in health and disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Apr;142(4):520-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.12.036.
- Background: PubMed 16890078Wise SK, Wise JC, DelGaudio JM. Gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Aug;135(2):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.012.
- Background: PubMed 18074664Friedman M, Gurpinar B, Lin HC, Schalch P, Joseph NJ. Impact of treatment of gastroesophageal reflux on obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007 Nov;116(11):805-11. doi: 10.1177/000348940711601103.
- Background: PubMed 11802013Senior BA, Khan M, Schwimmer C, Rosenthal L, Benninger M. Gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnea. Laryngoscope. 2001 Dec;111(12):2144-6. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200112000-00012.
- BackgroundFarrokhi F, Hill EM, Sun G, et al. Dx-pH Monitoring: how does it compare to the standard pH probe? Am J Gastroenterol 2007;103:S2.
- Background: PubMed 18722223Reichel O, Dressel H, Wiederanders K, Issing WJ. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with esomeprazole for symptoms and signs associated with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Sep;139(3):414-20. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2008.06.003.
Related trials for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
RecruitingPhase 2
Fosamprenavir for Laryngopharyngeal Upper Airway Tissue Treatment and Enzyme Reduction
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
The Johns Hopkins Heartburn Center Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Barrett Esophagus
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RA) on Gastric Emptying
Gastric Emptying, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists
Recruiting
New Topical tReatment Options for Symptomatic patiEnts With Nonerosive gastroesophageaL Reflux dIsease (The RELIEF Trial)
GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease), NERD
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Comparative Effectiveness of Alginate, Magaldrate, Sucralfate, Proton Pump Inhibitors, and Diet in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Friedman, MD principal investigator
Head and Neck and Cosmetic Surgery Inc and Advanced Center for Specialty Care
Ninos J Joseph, BS study director
Advanced Center for Specialty Care
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing dexlansoprazole in people with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Hypertrophy of Lingual Tonsil, run by Advanced Center for Specialty Care at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Michael Friedman, MD (312-236-3642, hednnek@aol.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lingual Tonsil Size (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01328652, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2011.