AzTrials
AzTrials

Difficult AirwayPhase 4NCT01328405

Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Proseal

A Phase 4 study testing Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in people with Difficult Airway and Anesthesia; Functional, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Introduction: The air-QⓇ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) is a newer supraglottic airway. It is approved for use as a primary airway and as an aid for intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Difficult Airway, Anesthesia; Functional
What is being tested?
Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2009to Apr 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who are 18 years or greater may be included if they presenting for any elective surgery or procedure to take place in any anesthetic location and require placement of a LMA for their surgery or procedure.

Who cannot join

  • non-English speaking
  • pregnant
  • are a minor
  • are a prisoner
  • have impaired decision-making capacity or any condition for which the primary anesthesia team deems intubation with a tracheal tube to be necessary

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway Versus the LMA-Proseal: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Airway Seal Pressure

Introduction:

The air-QⓇ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) is a newer supraglottic airway. It is approved for use as a primary airway and as an aid for intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. A unique feature of this device as compared to other airways on the market is the size of the inner diameter (ID) and length of its airway tube. Direct placement of tracheal tubes > 7.5 mm ID through the airway tube is possible.

Read more

The ProSealTM LMA is considered the gold standard for supraglottic devices with respect to airway seal pressure. On average, it is reported to be approximately 28 cmH2O. This is significantly higher than that of the first generation LMA, the LMA-ClassicTM, which has a maximum seal pressure of 20 cmH2O, but averages 16-18 cmH2O in actual practice.

In this study the investigators aim to test whether the air-QⓇ creates an airway seal pressure that is similar to the LMA-ProSealTM, whether the position of the air-QⓇ in relation to the vocal cords, as assessed by fiberoptic endoscopy, is similar to that of the LMA-ProSealTM and whether airway morbidity is similar between the air-QⓇ and the LMA-ProSealTM.

Read the detailed description

Introduction:

The air-QⓇ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, Fl.) is a newer supraglottic airway. It is approved for use as a primary airway and as an aid for intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. A unique feature of this device as compared to other airways on the market is the size of the inner diameter (ID) and length of its airway tube. Direct placement of tracheal tubes > 7.5 mm ID through the airway tube is possible.

The ProSealTM LMA (LMA North America, La Jolla, CA) is considered the gold standard for supraglottic devices with respect to airway seal pressure. On average, it is reported to be approximately 28 cmH2O. This is significantly higher than that of the first generation LMA, the LMA-ClassicTM, which has a maximum seal pressure of 20 cmH2O, but averages 16-18 cmH2O in actual practice.

Pilot data from 50 insertions of the air-QⓇ at our institution places the device intermediate to the two aforementioned LMAs with regard to seal pressure, with a mean seal pressure of 23 (12-30) cmH2O.

Specific Aims:

  1. To test whether the air-QⓇ creates an airway seal pressure that is similar to the LMA-ProSealTM.
  2. To test whether the position of the air-QⓇ in relation to the vocal cords, as assessed by fiberoptic endoscopy, is similar to that of the LMA-ProSealTM.
  3. To test whether airway morbidity is similar between the air-QⓇ and the LMA-ProSealTM

Study design:

Prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled trial

Methods:

The patient will be met in the pre-operative area by the attending anesthesiologist, who interviews and examines the patient. A full explanation of the general anesthetic, including risks and benefits, will be given and informed consent obtained. An intravenous catheter will be placed and patients will be premedicated as needed at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. In the operating room, the patient will undergo standard monitoring per established American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) guidelines. After a period of breathing 100% oxygen by facemask, anesthesia will be induced intravenously typically with fentanyl 0.5-1.5 mcg.kg -1 (a fast acting narcotic) and propofol (a potent sedative/amnestic agent) 2-3 mg.kg -1. After eyelash reflex is lost (i.e. the patient is asleep and not breathing), the patient will typically be ventilated with a facemask to demonstrate the patency of the airway. The LMA will then be placed using a standard technique. The cuff of the LMA will be inflated and the adequacy of placement assessed by presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide and adequate chest rise. The airway seal pressure will then be assessed by closing the APL valve on the anesthesia machine with a fresh gas flow of 5 liters/minute until an audible leak is observed. A stethoscope will be placed over the stomach while the valve is closed to listen for gastric insufflation. Administration of other anesthetic medication or muscle relaxants is at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and based on their clinical judgment and/or at the request of the surgeon. The anesthesia provider will not be blinded and will have access to all the monitors. The study deviates from routine care in that the choice of which LMA to use will be randomized by opening a sealed envelope prior to the start of the case. In addition, once the LMA has been placed and secured and the patient is stable from an anesthetic point of view, a flexible fiberoptic camera will be place into the airway tube of the LMA and the view of the patient's vocal cords in relation to the cuff of the LMA will be assessed.

At the conclusion of the case, when the patient is breathing on their own and is awake enough, as judged by the anesthesia provider, the LMA will be removed, as would be otherwise done as standard of care. The study LMA will be examined by a data collector for the presence of grossly visible blood or bile, and its presence or absence will be recorded. In the recovery area, once the patient is fully awake, as judged by the recovery staff, an observer will administer a standard oral questionnaire to the patient to determine if a sore throat, difficulty swallowing, or difficulty speaking is present. The patient will be called 24 hours later by the data collector and the same questionnaire will be administered.

Being tested
Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)Device

    Also called Air-QⓇ intubating laryngeal mask(Mercury Medical,Clearwater, Fl.), LMA-Proseal TM(LMA North America,San Diego, Ca.)

    Comparison of airway seal pressure, airway morbidity bronchoscopic view obtained between two different laryngeal mask airways.

Study groups in NCT01328405
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Air-Q LMAExperimentalAir-QⓇ intubating laryngeal mask (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, Fl.)
Receives: Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)
Proseal LMAExperimentalLMA-Proseal TM (LMA North America, San Diego, Ca.)
Receives: Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Airway Seal Pressure

    The airway seal pressure will then be assessed by closing the APL valve on the anesthesia machine with a fresh gas flow of 5 liters/minute until an audible leak is observed.

    Measured: Intraoperative (day 1)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Grossly Visible Blood or Bile on LMA

    At the conclusion of the case, when the patient is breathing on their own and is awake enough, as judged by the anesthesia provider, the LMA will be removed, as would be otherwise done as standard of care. The study LMA will be examined by a data collector for the presence of grossly visible blood or bile, and its presence or absence will be recorded.

    Measured: Upon LMA removal

  2. Glottic View

    Once the LMA has been placed and secured and the patient is stable from an anesthetic point of view, a flexible fiberoptic camera will be place into the airway tube of the LMA and the view of the patient's vocal cords in relation to the cuff of the LMA will be assessed.

    Measured: Intraoperative (day 1)

  3. Airway Pathology

    In the recovery area, once the patient is fully awake, as judged by the recovery staff, an observer will administer a standard oral questionnaire to the patient to determine if a sore throat is present.

    Measured: Postoperative (day 1) in recovery room

  4. Airway Pathology

    The patient will be called 24 hours later by the data collector who will administer a standard oral questionnaire to the patient to determine if a sore throat is present.

    Measured: Postoperative Day Two

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Apr 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2009
  3. Primary completionApr 2010
  4. Study completionApr 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01328405
Sponsor's protocol ID
2009-0012
Status last verified
Jul 2012
First submitted
29 Mar 2011
Last updated
23 Oct 2015
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Aug-Sep;52(7):739-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03016565.

    PubMed 16103390
  • Wong DT, McGuire GP. Endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask/supraglottic airway. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;54(6):489-91; author reply 491. doi: 10.1007/BF03022042. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17541083

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in people with Difficult Airway and Anesthesia; Functional, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Aug 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Airway Seal Pressure (time frame: Intraoperative (day 1)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01328405, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in