Difficult AirwayPhase 4NCT01328405
Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway Versus the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)-Proseal
A Phase 4 study testing Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in people with Difficult Airway and Anesthesia; Functional, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Introduction: The air-QⓇ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) is a newer supraglottic airway. It is approved for use as a primary airway and as an aid for intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Difficult Airway, Anesthesia; Functional
- What is being tested?
- Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to Apr 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who are 18 years or greater may be included if they presenting for any elective surgery or procedure to take place in any anesthetic location and require placement of a LMA for their surgery or procedure.
Who cannot join
- non-English speaking
- pregnant
- are a minor
- are a prisoner
- have impaired decision-making capacity or any condition for which the primary anesthesia team deems intubation with a tracheal tube to be necessary
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
About this study
Official title: The Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway Versus the LMA-Proseal: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Airway Seal Pressure
Introduction:
The air-QⓇ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) is a newer supraglottic airway. It is approved for use as a primary airway and as an aid for intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. A unique feature of this device as compared to other airways on the market is the size of the inner diameter (ID) and length of its airway tube. Direct placement of tracheal tubes > 7.5 mm ID through the airway tube is possible.
Read more
The ProSealTM LMA is considered the gold standard for supraglottic devices with respect to airway seal pressure. On average, it is reported to be approximately 28 cmH2O. This is significantly higher than that of the first generation LMA, the LMA-ClassicTM, which has a maximum seal pressure of 20 cmH2O, but averages 16-18 cmH2O in actual practice.
In this study the investigators aim to test whether the air-QⓇ creates an airway seal pressure that is similar to the LMA-ProSealTM, whether the position of the air-QⓇ in relation to the vocal cords, as assessed by fiberoptic endoscopy, is similar to that of the LMA-ProSealTM and whether airway morbidity is similar between the air-QⓇ and the LMA-ProSealTM.
Read the detailed description
Introduction:
The air-QⓇ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, Fl.) is a newer supraglottic airway. It is approved for use as a primary airway and as an aid for intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. A unique feature of this device as compared to other airways on the market is the size of the inner diameter (ID) and length of its airway tube. Direct placement of tracheal tubes > 7.5 mm ID through the airway tube is possible.
The ProSealTM LMA (LMA North America, La Jolla, CA) is considered the gold standard for supraglottic devices with respect to airway seal pressure. On average, it is reported to be approximately 28 cmH2O. This is significantly higher than that of the first generation LMA, the LMA-ClassicTM, which has a maximum seal pressure of 20 cmH2O, but averages 16-18 cmH2O in actual practice.
Pilot data from 50 insertions of the air-QⓇ at our institution places the device intermediate to the two aforementioned LMAs with regard to seal pressure, with a mean seal pressure of 23 (12-30) cmH2O.
Specific Aims:
- To test whether the air-QⓇ creates an airway seal pressure that is similar to the LMA-ProSealTM.
- To test whether the position of the air-QⓇ in relation to the vocal cords, as assessed by fiberoptic endoscopy, is similar to that of the LMA-ProSealTM.
- To test whether airway morbidity is similar between the air-QⓇ and the LMA-ProSealTM
Study design:
Prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled trial
Methods:
The patient will be met in the pre-operative area by the attending anesthesiologist, who interviews and examines the patient. A full explanation of the general anesthetic, including risks and benefits, will be given and informed consent obtained. An intravenous catheter will be placed and patients will be premedicated as needed at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. In the operating room, the patient will undergo standard monitoring per established American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) guidelines. After a period of breathing 100% oxygen by facemask, anesthesia will be induced intravenously typically with fentanyl 0.5-1.5 mcg.kg -1 (a fast acting narcotic) and propofol (a potent sedative/amnestic agent) 2-3 mg.kg -1. After eyelash reflex is lost (i.e. the patient is asleep and not breathing), the patient will typically be ventilated with a facemask to demonstrate the patency of the airway. The LMA will then be placed using a standard technique. The cuff of the LMA will be inflated and the adequacy of placement assessed by presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide and adequate chest rise. The airway seal pressure will then be assessed by closing the APL valve on the anesthesia machine with a fresh gas flow of 5 liters/minute until an audible leak is observed. A stethoscope will be placed over the stomach while the valve is closed to listen for gastric insufflation. Administration of other anesthetic medication or muscle relaxants is at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and based on their clinical judgment and/or at the request of the surgeon. The anesthesia provider will not be blinded and will have access to all the monitors. The study deviates from routine care in that the choice of which LMA to use will be randomized by opening a sealed envelope prior to the start of the case. In addition, once the LMA has been placed and secured and the patient is stable from an anesthetic point of view, a flexible fiberoptic camera will be place into the airway tube of the LMA and the view of the patient's vocal cords in relation to the cuff of the LMA will be assessed.
At the conclusion of the case, when the patient is breathing on their own and is awake enough, as judged by the anesthesia provider, the LMA will be removed, as would be otherwise done as standard of care. The study LMA will be examined by a data collector for the presence of grossly visible blood or bile, and its presence or absence will be recorded. In the recovery area, once the patient is fully awake, as judged by the recovery staff, an observer will administer a standard oral questionnaire to the patient to determine if a sore throat, difficulty swallowing, or difficulty speaking is present. The patient will be called 24 hours later by the data collector and the same questionnaire will be administered.
- Conditions
- Difficult Airway, Anesthesia; Functional
- Being tested
- Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)Device
Also called Air-QⓇ intubating laryngeal mask(Mercury Medical,Clearwater, Fl.), LMA-Proseal TM(LMA North America,San Diego, Ca.)
Comparison of airway seal pressure, airway morbidity bronchoscopic view obtained between two different laryngeal mask airways.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Air-Q LMA | Experimental | Air-QⓇ intubating laryngeal mask (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, Fl.) Receives: Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) |
| Proseal LMA | Experimental | LMA-Proseal TM (LMA North America, San Diego, Ca.) Receives: Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Airway Seal Pressure
The airway seal pressure will then be assessed by closing the APL valve on the anesthesia machine with a fresh gas flow of 5 liters/minute until an audible leak is observed.
Measured: Intraoperative (day 1)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Grossly Visible Blood or Bile on LMA
At the conclusion of the case, when the patient is breathing on their own and is awake enough, as judged by the anesthesia provider, the LMA will be removed, as would be otherwise done as standard of care. The study LMA will be examined by a data collector for the presence of grossly visible blood or bile, and its presence or absence will be recorded.
Measured: Upon LMA removal
Glottic View
Once the LMA has been placed and secured and the patient is stable from an anesthetic point of view, a flexible fiberoptic camera will be place into the airway tube of the LMA and the view of the patient's vocal cords in relation to the cuff of the LMA will be assessed.
Measured: Intraoperative (day 1)
Airway Pathology
In the recovery area, once the patient is fully awake, as judged by the recovery staff, an observer will administer a standard oral questionnaire to the patient to determine if a sore throat is present.
Measured: Postoperative (day 1) in recovery room
Airway Pathology
The patient will be called 24 hours later by the data collector who will administer a standard oral questionnaire to the patient to determine if a sore throat is present.
Measured: Postoperative Day Two
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionApr 2010
- Study completionApr 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Difficult AirwayStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Wisconsin, MadisonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kristopher M Schroeder, MD, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Department of Anesthesiology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01328405
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2009-0012
- Status last verified
- Jul 2012
- First submitted
- 29 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Aug-Sep;52(7):739-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03016565.
PubMed 16103390Wong DT, McGuire GP. Endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask/supraglottic airway. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;54(6):489-91; author reply 491. doi: 10.1007/BF03022042. No abstract available.
PubMed 17541083
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway Versus the LMA-Proseal: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Airway Seal Pressure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01328405
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2009-0012
- Conditions
- Difficult Airway, Anesthesia; Functional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Aug 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction:
The air-QⓇ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) is a newer supraglottic airway. It is approved for use as a primary airway and as an aid for intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. A unique feature of this device as compared to other airways on the market is the size of the inner diameter (ID) and length of its airway tube. Direct placement of tracheal tubes > 7.5 mm ID through the airway tube is possible.
The ProSealTM LMA is considered the gold standard for supraglottic devices with respect to airway seal pressure. On average, it is reported to be approximately 28 cmH2O. This is significantly higher than that of the first generation LMA, the LMA-ClassicTM, which has a maximum seal pressure of 20 cmH2O, but averages 16-18 cmH2O in actual practice.
In this study the investigators aim to test whether the air-QⓇ creates an airway seal pressure that is similar to the LMA-ProSealTM, whether the position of the air-QⓇ in relation to the vocal cords, as assessed by fiberoptic endoscopy, is similar to that of the LMA-ProSealTM and whether airway morbidity is similar between the air-QⓇ and the LMA-ProSealTM.
Detailed description
Introduction:
The air-QⓇ Intubating Laryngeal Airway (ILA) (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, Fl.) is a newer supraglottic airway. It is approved for use as a primary airway and as an aid for intubation in situations of anticipated or unanticipated difficult airways. A unique feature of this device as compared to other airways on the market is the size of the inner diameter (ID) and length of its airway tube. Direct placement of tracheal tubes > 7.5 mm ID through the airway tube is possible.
The ProSealTM LMA (LMA North America, La Jolla, CA) is considered the gold standard for supraglottic devices with respect to airway seal pressure. On average, it is reported to be approximately 28 cmH2O. This is significantly higher than that of the first generation LMA, the LMA-ClassicTM, which has a maximum seal pressure of 20 cmH2O, but averages 16-18 cmH2O in actual practice.
Pilot data from 50 insertions of the air-QⓇ at our institution places the device intermediate to the two aforementioned LMAs with regard to seal pressure, with a mean seal pressure of 23 (12-30) cmH2O.
Specific Aims:
- To test whether the air-QⓇ creates an airway seal pressure that is similar to the LMA-ProSealTM.
- To test whether the position of the air-QⓇ in relation to the vocal cords, as assessed by fiberoptic endoscopy, is similar to that of the LMA-ProSealTM.
- To test whether airway morbidity is similar between the air-QⓇ and the LMA-ProSealTM
Study design:
Prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled trial
Methods:
The patient will be met in the pre-operative area by the attending anesthesiologist, who interviews and examines the patient. A full explanation of the general anesthetic, including risks and benefits, will be given and informed consent obtained. An intravenous catheter will be placed and patients will be premedicated as needed at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. In the operating room, the patient will undergo standard monitoring per established American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) guidelines. After a period of breathing 100% oxygen by facemask, anesthesia will be induced intravenously typically with fentanyl 0.5-1.5 mcg.kg -1 (a fast acting narcotic) and propofol (a potent sedative/amnestic agent) 2-3 mg.kg -1. After eyelash reflex is lost (i.e. the patient is asleep and not breathing), the patient will typically be ventilated with a facemask to demonstrate the patency of the airway. The LMA will then be placed using a standard technique. The cuff of the LMA will be inflated and the adequacy of placement assessed by presence of end-tidal carbon dioxide and adequate chest rise. The airway seal pressure will then be assessed by closing the APL valve on the anesthesia machine with a fresh gas flow of 5 liters/minute until an audible leak is observed. A stethoscope will be placed over the stomach while the valve is closed to listen for gastric insufflation. Administration of other anesthetic medication or muscle relaxants is at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and based on their clinical judgment and/or at the request of the surgeon. The anesthesia provider will not be blinded and will have access to all the monitors. The study deviates from routine care in that the choice of which LMA to use will be randomized by opening a sealed envelope prior to the start of the case. In addition, once the LMA has been placed and secured and the patient is stable from an anesthetic point of view, a flexible fiberoptic camera will be place into the airway tube of the LMA and the view of the patient's vocal cords in relation to the cuff of the LMA will be assessed.
At the conclusion of the case, when the patient is breathing on their own and is awake enough, as judged by the anesthesia provider, the LMA will be removed, as would be otherwise done as standard of care. The study LMA will be examined by a data collector for the presence of grossly visible blood or bile, and its presence or absence will be recorded. In the recovery area, once the patient is fully awake, as judged by the recovery staff, an observer will administer a standard oral questionnaire to the patient to determine if a sore throat, difficulty swallowing, or difficulty speaking is present. The patient will be called 24 hours later by the data collector and the same questionnaire will be administered.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Air-Q LMA | Experimental | Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)Air-QⓇ intubating laryngeal mask (Mercury Medical, Clearwater, Fl.) |
| Proseal LMA | Experimental | Device: Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)LMA-Proseal TM (LMA North America, San Diego, Ca.) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who are 18 years or greater may be included if they presenting for any elective surgery or procedure to take place in any anesthetic location and require placement of a LMA for their surgery or procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- non-English speaking
- pregnant
- are a minor
- are a prisoner
- have impaired decision-making capacity or any condition for which the primary anesthesia team deems intubation with a tracheal tube to be necessary
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA)Also: Air-QⓇ intubating laryngeal mask(Mercury Medical,Clearwater, Fl.), LMA-Proseal TM(LMA North America,San Diego, Ca.)Comparison of airway seal pressure, airway morbidity bronchoscopic view obtained between two different laryngeal mask airways. | Device | Air-Q LMA, Proseal LMA |
Primary outcome
Airway Seal Pressure
Time frame: Intraoperative (day 1)
The airway seal pressure will then be assessed by closing the APL valve on the anesthesia machine with a fresh gas flow of 5 liters/minute until an audible leak is observed.
4 secondary outcomes
Grossly Visible Blood or Bile on LMA
Time frame: Upon LMA removal
Glottic View
Time frame: Intraoperative (day 1)
Airway Pathology
Time frame: Postoperative (day 1) in recovery room
Airway Pathology
Time frame: Postoperative Day Two
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16103390Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Aug-Sep;52(7):739-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03016565.
- Background: PubMed 17541083Wong DT, McGuire GP. Endotracheal intubation through a laryngeal mask/supraglottic airway. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;54(6):489-91; author reply 491. doi: 10.1007/BF03022042. No abstract available.
Related trials for Difficult Airway
Enrolling by invitation
Pediatric Intubation Simulations With Bougie
Difficult Airway Intubation
Not yet recruiting
Title of Study: Anesthesiologists' Learning Curves for Ultrasound Assessment of Difficult Airway
Airway Ultrasound, Difficult Airway Management
Not yet recruitingObservational study
LeHeR Maneuver vs Sniffing Position During Video Laryngoscopy in Predicted Difficult Airway
Difficult Airway, Difficult Intubation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sniffing Position vs Left Head Rotation (LeHeR) Maneuver for Glottic View During Direct Laryngoscopy
Difficult Intubation, Laryngoscopy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prediction of Difficult Mask Ventilation in Obese Population Undergoing Emergency Surgery
Difficult Airway Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kristopher M Schroeder, MD principal investigator
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Department of Anesthesiology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in people with Difficult Airway and Anesthesia; Functional, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Aug 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Airway Seal Pressure (time frame: Intraoperative (day 1)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01328405, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.