Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)Phase 3NCT01323790
Assessment of Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Non-cancer-related Pain and Opioid-induced Constipation
A Phase 3 study testing NKTR-118 in people with Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC), run by AstraZeneca at 120 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect and safety of NKTR-118 treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with non-cancer-related pain, including those patients that have inadequate response to laxative therapy (LIR). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 84 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
- What is being tested?
- NKTR-118
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 700 participants
- Where
- 120 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2011to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 84 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Provision of written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.
- Self-reported active symptoms of OIC at screening (<3 SBMs/week and experiencing ≥1 reported symptom of hard/lumpy stools, straining, or sensation of incomplete evacuation/anorectal obstruction in at least 25% of BMs over the previous 4 weeks); and Documented confirmed OIC (<3 SBMs/week on average over the 2-week OIC confirmation period.
- Receiving a stable maintenance opioid regimen consisting of a total daily dose of 30 mg to 1000 mg of oral morphine, or equianalgesic amount(s) of 1 or more other opioid therapies for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to screening for non-cancer-related pain with no anticipated change in opioid dose requirement over the proposed study period as a result of disease progression.
- Willingness to stop all laxatives and other bowel regimens including prune juice and herbal products throughout the 2-week OIC confirmation period and the 12-week treatment period, and to use only bisacodyl as rescue medication if a BM has not occurred within at least 72 hours of the last recorded BM.
Who cannot join
- Patients receiving Opioid regimen for treatment of pain related to cancer.
- History of cancer within 5 years from first study visit with the exception of basal cell cancer and squamous cell skin cancer.
- Medical conditions and treatments associated with diarrhea, intermittent loose stools, or constipation.
- Other issues to the gastrointestinal tract that could impose a risk to the patient.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Trial locations and contacts
120 sites in 8 countries.
120 sites in 8 countries
United States68 sites
Research Site
Anderson, South Carolina
Research Site
Austin, Texas
Research Site
Baltimore, Maryland
Research Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Research Site
Bellevue, Ohio
Research Site
Bradenton, Florida
Research Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Research Site
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Research Site
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
Research Site
Chino, California
Research Site
Clinton, Utah
Research Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Research Site
Conyers, Georgia
Research Site
Council Bluffs, Iowa
Research Site
Delray Beach, Florida
Research Site
Downingtown, Pennsylvania
Research Site
Florissant, Missouri
Research Site
Freehold, New Jersey
Research Site
Gainesville, Florida
Research Site
Great Neck, New York
Research Site
Hartsdale, New York
Research Site
Henderson, Nevada
Research Site
Houston, Texas
Research Site
Hurst, Texas
Research Site
Jackson, Tennessee
Research Site
Jenkintown, Pennsylvania
Research Site
John's Creek, Georgia
Research Site
Jonesboro, Arkansas
Research Site
La Jolla, California
Research Site
Lincoln, California
Research Site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Research Site
Livonia, Michigan
Research Site
Marshall, Texas
Research Site
Mesa, Arizona
Research Site
Miami, Florida
Research Site
Miami Springs, Florida
Research Site
Milan, Tennessee
Research Site
Mobile, Alabama
Research Site
Modesto, California
Research Site
Morrisville, North Carolina
Research Site
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
Research Site
North Little Rock, Arkansas
Research Site
North Massapequa, New York
Research Site
Ocala, Florida
Research Site
Pell City, Alabama
Research Site
Peoria, Illinois
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona
Research Site
Pottstown, Pennsylvania
Research Site
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan
Research Site
San Antonio, Texas
Research Site
Sanford, Florida
Research Site
Sherwood, Arkansas
Research Site
Shreveport, Louisiana
Research Site
St. George, Utah
Research Site
St. Petersburg, Florida
Research Site
Stamford, Connecticut
Research Site
Sugarland, Texas
Research Site
Sun Lakes, Arizona
Research Site
Tampa, Florida
Research Site
Tucson, Arizona
Research Site
Voorhees Township, New Jersey
Research Site
Watertown, Massachusetts
Research Site
West Jordan, Utah
Research Site
West Palm Beach, Florida
Research Site
Wichita, Kansas
Research Site
Willingboro, New Jersey
Research Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Spain12 sites
Research Site
Almería
Research Site
Barcelona, Catalonia
Research Site
Centelles (barcelona), Catalonia
Research Site
Fuenlabrada, Madrid
Research Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalu?a
Research Site
Lleida
Research Site
Madrid
Research Site
Málaga, Andalusia
Research Site
Santiago de Compostela
Research Site
Valencia
Research Site
Valladolid
Research Site
Vic, Catalu?a
United Kingdom12 sites
Research Site
Ayrshire, AYR
Research Site
Barry, S Glam
Research Site
Bath, Somer
Research Site
Chesterfield, Derby
Research Site
Coventry, Warwks
Research Site
Derby, Derby
Research Site
Glasgow, Strath
Research Site
London, Gt Lon
Research Site
Norwich, Norflk
Research Site
Plymouth, Devon
Research Site
Royton, Lancashire
Research Site
Thornton-Cleveleys, Lancashire
Hungary10 sites
Research Site
Baja
Research Site
Budapest
Research Site
Kecskemét
Research Site
Miskolc
Research Site
Pusztaszer
Research Site
Sátoraljaújhely
Research Site
Szeged
Research Site
Szikszó
Research Site
Úrhida
Research Site
Zalaegerszeg
Belgium6 sites
Research Site
Antwerp
Research Site
Edegem, Belgium
Research Site
Leuven
Research Site
Moerkerke
Research Site
Mouscron
Research Site
Roeselare, Belgium
Croatia4 sites
Research Site
Bjelovar
Research Site
Osijek
Research Site
Susak
Research Site
Zagreb
Czechia4 sites
Research Site
Choceň
Research Site
Pardubice
Research Site
Prague
Research Site
Zlín
Sweden4 sites
Research Site
Gothenburg
Research Site
Lund
Research Site
Stockholm
Research Site
Vällingby
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NKTR-118 in Patients With Non-Cancer-Related Pain and Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect and safety of NKTR-118 treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with non-cancer-related pain, including those patients that have inadequate response to laxative therapy (LIR).
- Conditions
- Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
- Being tested
- NKTR-118, Placebo
- Keywords
- Non-Cancer-Related Pain, Opioid-Induced Constipation
- Medical subject headings
- Opioid-Induced Constipation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NKTR-118Drug
12.5 mg oral tablet once daily
NKTR-118Drug
25 mg oral tablet once daily
PlaceboDrug
Placebo to NKTR-118
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Oral treatment Receives: Drug: NKTR-118 |
| 2 | Experimental | Oral treatment Receives: Drug: NKTR-118 |
| 3 | Placebo comparator | Oral treatment Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Response (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug During Weeks 1 to 12
Responder was defined as having at least 3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/week with at least 1 SBM/week increase over baseline for at least 9 out of the 12 treatment weeks and 3 out of the last 4 treatment weeks during the double-blind treatment period. An SBM is a bowel movement occurring 24 hours or more since the last use of rescue medication.
Measured: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Secondary outcomes (10)
Response (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug in the LIR Subgroup During Weeks 1 to 12
Responder is defined as having at least 3 SBMs/week, with at least 1 SBM/week increase over baseline for at least 9 out of 12 weeks and at least 3 out of the last 4 weeks.
Measured: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Time (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours
Measured: 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Days Per Week With at Least 1 SBM During Weeks 1 to 12
Measured: 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Degree of Straining
A single-item straining question was asked via the eDiary: "How much did you strain during your bowel movement?" Patients responded on a 5 point Likert scale: 1=Not at all; 2=A little bit; 3=A moderate amount; 4=A great deal; 5=An extreme amount. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Scale)
Patients rated stool consistency through completion of the BSS after each BM. The 7 stool types are: 1. Separate hard lumps, like nuts (hard to pass); 2. Sausage-shaped, but lumpy; 3. Like sausage, but with cracks on its surface; 4. Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft; 5. Soft blobs with clear cut edges (passed easily); 6. Fluffy pieces with ragged edges, a mushy stool; 7. Watery, no solid pieces. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Percent Numbers of Days With a CSBM (Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement)
A single-item question on the completeness of evacuation, developed and validated through 1:1 interviews with OIC patients, was asked via the eDiary: "Did you feel like your bowels were completely empty after the bowel movement?" Patients provided a yes or a no response. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Mean Spontaneous Bowel Movements/Week
The number of spontaneous bowel movements/week was determined from the patient's eDiary.
Measured: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Time (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours in the Laxative Inadequate Response (LIR) Subgroup
Time to first post-dose laxation without the use of rescue laxatives within the last 24 hours was calculated in hours as: Date/Time of first post-dose laxation without rescue - First dose date/time.
Measured: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)
The PAC-SYM questionnaire is a 12-item questionnaire that evaluates the severity of symptoms of constipation in 3 domains (stool, rectal, and abdominal symptoms) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. Each domain score is the mean of the non-missing items for that domain. The total score is the mean of all non-missing items (ie, symptoms). The range of the domain or total score is 0 (response is 'absent' for each item) to 4 (response is 'very severe' for each item). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Satisfaction Domain
The PAC-QOL scale is a 28-item self-report instrument designed to evaluate the burden of constipation on patients' everyday functioning and well-being in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The instrument can be used to generate an overall score, but is also reported to assess 4 specific constipation-related domains including: 1) Worries and concerns (11 items), 2) Physical discomfort (4 items), 3) Psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and 4) Satisfaction (5 items). Each domain score is the mean of the non-missing items for that domain. The total score is the mean of all non-missing items. The range of the domain or total score is 0 (response is 'not at all' for each item) to 4 (response is 'extremely' for each item). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2011
- Primary completionSep 2012
- Study completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mark Sostek, Study director, AstraZeneca
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01323790
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D3820C00005
- Other IDs
- 2011-001986-41
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 2 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Lawson R, King F, Marsh K, Altincatal A, Cimen A. Impact of Treatment with Naloxegol for Opioid-Induced Constipation on Patients' Health State Utility. Adv Ther. 2016 Aug;33(8):1331-46. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0365-y. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
PubMed 27342744Tack J, Lappalainen J, Diva U, Tummala R, Sostek M. Efficacy and safety of naloxegol in patients with opioid-induced constipation and laxative-inadequate response. United European Gastroenterol J. 2015 Oct;3(5):471-80. doi: 10.1177/2050640615604543.
PubMed 26535126Chey WD, Webster L, Sostek M, Lappalainen J, Barker PN, Tack J. Naloxegol for opioid-induced constipation in patients with noncancer pain. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 19;370(25):2387-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310246. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
PubMed 24896818
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NKTR-118 in Patients With Non-Cancer-Related Pain and Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01323790
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D3820C00005
- Conditions
- Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
- Keywords
- Non-Cancer-Related Pain, Opioid-Induced Constipation
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 700 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Jun 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect and safety of NKTR-118 treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with non-cancer-related pain, including those patients that have inadequate response to laxative therapy (LIR).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Drug: NKTR-118Oral treatment |
| 2 | Experimental | Drug: NKTR-118Oral treatment |
| 3 | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboOral treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 84 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Provision of written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.
- Self-reported active symptoms of OIC at screening (<3 SBMs/week and experiencing ≥1 reported symptom of hard/lumpy stools, straining, or sensation of incomplete evacuation/anorectal obstruction in at least 25% of BMs over the previous 4 weeks); and Documented confirmed OIC (<3 SBMs/week on average over the 2-week OIC confirmation period.
- Receiving a stable maintenance opioid regimen consisting of a total daily dose of 30 mg to 1000 mg of oral morphine, or equianalgesic amount(s) of 1 or more other opioid therapies for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to screening for non-cancer-related pain with no anticipated change in opioid dose requirement over the proposed study period as a result of disease progression.
- Willingness to stop all laxatives and other bowel regimens including prune juice and herbal products throughout the 2-week OIC confirmation period and the 12-week treatment period, and to use only bisacodyl as rescue medication if a BM has not occurred within at least 72 hours of the last recorded BM.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients receiving Opioid regimen for treatment of pain related to cancer.
- History of cancer within 5 years from first study visit with the exception of basal cell cancer and squamous cell skin cancer.
- Medical conditions and treatments associated with diarrhea, intermittent loose stools, or constipation.
- Other issues to the gastrointestinal tract that could impose a risk to the patient.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NKTR-11812.5 mg oral tablet once daily | Drug | 1 |
| NKTR-11825 mg oral tablet once daily | Drug | 2 |
| PlaceboPlacebo to NKTR-118 | Drug | 3 |
Primary outcome
Response (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug During Weeks 1 to 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Responder was defined as having at least 3 spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs)/week with at least 1 SBM/week increase over baseline for at least 9 out of the 12 treatment weeks and 3 out of the last 4 treatment weeks during the double-blind treatment period. An SBM is a bowel movement occurring 24 hours or more since the last use of rescue medication.
10 secondary outcomes
Response (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug in the LIR Subgroup During Weeks 1 to 12
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Time (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Days Per Week With at Least 1 SBM During Weeks 1 to 12
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change From Baseline in Degree of Straining
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Stool Consistency (Bristol Stool Scale)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Percent Numbers of Days With a CSBM (Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Mean Spontaneous Bowel Movements/Week
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Time (in Hours) to First Post-dose Laxation Without the Use of Rescue Laxatives Within the Previous 24 Hours in the Laxative Inadequate Response (LIR) Subgroup
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) Satisfaction Domain
Time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jun 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27342744Lawson R, King F, Marsh K, Altincatal A, Cimen A. Impact of Treatment with Naloxegol for Opioid-Induced Constipation on Patients' Health State Utility. Adv Ther. 2016 Aug;33(8):1331-46. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0365-y. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26535126Tack J, Lappalainen J, Diva U, Tummala R, Sostek M. Efficacy and safety of naloxegol in patients with opioid-induced constipation and laxative-inadequate response. United European Gastroenterol J. 2015 Oct;3(5):471-80. doi: 10.1177/2050640615604543.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24896818Chey WD, Webster L, Sostek M, Lappalainen J, Barker PN, Tack J. Naloxegol for opioid-induced constipation in patients with noncancer pain. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 19;370(25):2387-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310246. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
- Clinical Study ProtocolLink provided by the sponsor.
- Clinical\_Study\_Report\_Synopsis\_D3820C00005Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
RecruitingPhase 4
Prevention of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Advanced Cancer
Constipation, Opioid-Induced
RecruitingObservational study
Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events for Naldemedine & Other Medications for Opioid Induced Constipation
Opioid-induced Constipation
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Naldemedine in Paediatric Participants Receiving Opioids
Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-controlled, Superiority Trial
OIC
RecruitingObservational study
Naldemedine in Clinical Practice in Cancer Patients With Opioid Induced CONstipation: Clinical Outcomes and Patient Experience
Cancer, Opioid Induced Constipation (OIC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark Sostek study director
AstraZeneca
120 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing NKTR-118 in people with Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC), run by AstraZeneca at 120 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 120 sites in United States, Spain, United Kingdom, Hungary, Belgium and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Jun 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Response (Responder/Non-responder) to Study Drug During Weeks 1 to 12 (time frame: Baseline (Week 1) to end of treatment (Week 12)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01323790, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2015.