Multiple MyelomaPhase 3NIMBUSNCT01311687
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Pomalidomide in Combination With Low-Dose Dexamethasone Versus High-Dose Dexamethasone in Subjects With Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Companion Study
A Phase 3 study testing pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Celgene at 94 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in subjects with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- pomalidomide and Dexamethasone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 455 participants
- Where
- 94 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Mar 2011to 29 Aug 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be ≥ 18 years of age
- Subjects must have documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma and have measurable disease
- Subjects must have undergone prior treatment with ≥ 2 treatment lines of anti-myeloma therapy
- Subjects must have either refractory or relapsed and refractory disease defined as documented disease progression during or within 60 days of completing their last myeloma therapy
- All subjects must have received at least 2 consecutive cycles of prior treatment that included lenalidomide and bortezomib
- All subjects must have failed treatment with both lenalidomide and bortezomib in one of the following ways: 1) Documented progressive disease on or within 60 days of completing treatment with lenalidomide and/or bortezomib, or 2) In case of prior response [≥ partial response (PR)] to lenalidomide or bortezomib, subjects must have relapsed within 6 months after stopping treatment with lenalidomide and/or bortezomib-containing regimens, or 3) Subjects who have not had a ≥ minimal response (MR) and have developed intolerance/toxicity after a minimum of two cycles of lenalidomide- and/or bortezomib-containing regimen
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients must have received adequate prior alkylator therapy
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0, 1, or 2
- Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must not become pregnant for 28 days prior to initiation of study drug, during the study, and for 28 days after discontinuation
- Females must agree to abstain from breastfeeding during study participation and 28 days after study drug discontinuation
- Males must agree to use a latex condom during any sexual during the study and for 28 days following discontinuation from this study
- Males must also agree to refrain from donating semen or sperm while on pomalidomide and for 28 days after discontinuation from this study
Who cannot join
- Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,000/μL
- Platelet count < 75,000/ μL for subjects in whom < 50% of bone marrow nucleated cells are plasma cells
- Creatinine clearance < 45 mL/min
- Corrected serum calcium > 14 mg/dL
- Hemoglobin ≤ 8 g/dL
Show all 24Show fewer
- Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT)/ aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or transaminase, serum glutamic pyruvic (SGPT)/ alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Serum total bilirubin > 2.0 mg/dL
- Previous therapy with pomalidomide
- Hypersensitivity to thalidomide, lenalidomide, or dexamethasone
- Resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
- Peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2
- Subjects who received an allogeneic bone marrow or allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant
- Subjects who are planning for or who are eligible for stem cell transplant
- Subjects with any one of the following: 1) Congestive heart failure, 2) Myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to starting study treatment, 3) Unstable or poorly controlled angina pectoris, including Prinzmetal variant angina pectoris
- Subjects who received any of the following within the last 14 days of initiation of study treatment: 1) Plasmapheresis, 2) Major surgery, 3) Radiation therapy, 4) Use of any anti-myeloma drug therapy
- Use of any investigational agents within 28 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) of treatment
- Subjects with conditions requiring chronic steroid or immunosuppressive treatment
- Any condition including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study
- Incidence of gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of pomalidomide
- Subjects unable or unwilling to undergo antithrombotic prophylactic treatment
- Any serious medical condition, laboratory abnormality, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subjects from signing the informed consent form
- Pregnant or breastfeeding females
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity or active infectious hepatitis A, B, or C
Trial locations and contacts
94 sites in 16 countries.
94 sites in 16 countries
France13 sites
CHU d'Angers
Angers, 49033
Centre Hospitalier de la cote basque
Bayonne, 64109
Centre Hospitalier Departemental
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85025
CHRU de Lille FR
Lille, 59037
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Marseille, 13009
CHRU Nantes
Nantes, 44093
Hopital Saint-Louis
Paris, 75475
CHU Hôpital St-Antoine
Paris, 75571
CHRU - Hopital du Haut Leveque
Pessac, 33604
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69310
Hopital Bretonneau
Tours, 37044
Hopital Purpan
Tulouse Cedex 9, 31059
CHU Nancy
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Australia10 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, QLD4102
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, 2050
Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Frankston Hospital
Frankston, Victoria, 3199
Alfred hospital
Melbourne, 3004
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
Nedlands, 6009
Calvary Mater Hospital
Waratah, NSW 2298
Border Medical Oncology
Wodonga, 3690
Wollongong Hospital
Wollongong, 2500
Canada10 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Center
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
Cross Cancer Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2
James Cancer Hospital
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
Juravinski Cancer Centre
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6C 6B5
Maisonneuve Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Royal Victoria Hospital McGill Department of Oncology(RVH)
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1
Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish Genl
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
British Columbia Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6
United Kingdom10 sites
Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Bournemouth, BH7 7DW
St James's University Hospital
Leeds, LS9 7TF
St.Bartholomew's Hospital
London, EC1A 7BE
King's College Hospital
London, SE5 9RS
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
Nottingham City Hospital
Nottingham, NG5 1PB
Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, PL6 8DH
Royal Hallamshire HospitalSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Sheffield, S10 2JF
The Royal Marsden Hospital
Sutton-Surrey, SM2 5PT
The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Germany9 sites
Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, 01307
Universitatsklinikum Essen
Essen, 45122
Askepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, 20099
Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Universitatsklinikum Jena
Jena, 07740
Universitatsklinikum Leipzig
Leipzig, 04103
University of Tubingen
Tübingen, 72076
Universitatsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, 89081
Universitatsklinikum Wurzburg
Würzburg, 97080
Italy9 sites
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna - Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, 40138
Clinica Ematologica- A.O.U. San Martino
Genova, 16132
Oncoematologia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale
Naples, 80131
AOU San Luigi Gonzaga
Orbassano, 10043
Universita degli Studi di Padova
Padova, 35128
Hospital Clinic
Placenza, 29100
Servizio di Ematologia, A.O. - Arcispedale S.Maria Nuova
Reggio Emilia, 42100
Univerita La Sapienza Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia
Rome, 00161
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Battista
Torino, 10126
Spain8 sites
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona (Barcelona), 08916
Hospital Clinic Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital de La Princesa
Madrid, 28006
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007
Hospital Donostia
San Sebastián (Guipuzcoa), 20014
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, 39008
Hospital de la Fe
Valencia, 46009
Sweden5 sites
Department of Hematology Hematology Centre
Gothenburg, S-413 45
University Hospital in Lund
Lund, 221 85
Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge
Stockholm, SE 17176
Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, SE-171 76
Overlakare Medocomcentrum, hematologi
Uppsala, 75185
Denmark4 sites
Hæmatologisk afd. B Aalborg Sygehus Syd
Aalborg, 9000
Aarhus University Hospital
Arhus C, DK-8000
Odense Universitetshospital
Odense C, 5000
Vejle Hospital
Vejle, 7100
Russia4 sites
State Institution Hematological Research, Centre of Russian Academy of Medical Science
Moscow, 125167
State Institution Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
Moscow, 125284
St. Petersburg Research Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
Saint Petersburg, 191024
State Educational Institution, Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Belgium3 sites
UZ Gent
Ghent, 9000
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000
CHU UCL Mont-Godinne-Dinant asbl
Yvoir, B-5530
Netherlands3 sites
VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, 3015 CE
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Switzerland3 sites
Medizinische Universitatsklinik
Bern, CH - 3010
Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve-HUG
Geneva, 1205
UniversitatSspital Zurich
Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Muticenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Pomalidomide in Combination With Low-dose Dexamethasone Versus High-dose Dexamethasone in Subjects With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in subjects with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- pomalidomide, Dexamethasone
- Keywords
- Myeloma, Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Refractory Myeloma, Resistant Multiple Myeloma, Treatment-resistant Multiple Myeloma, Pomalidomide, Lenalidomide-resistant, Bortezomib-resistant
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma, Neoplasms, Plasma Cell, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
pomalidomideDrug
Also called CC-4047, Pomalyst®
4 mg pomalidomide capsules administered orally
DexamethasoneDrug
40 mg dexamethasone (or 20 mg for participants > 75 years of age) tablets administered orally
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone | Experimental | Participants received 4 mg pomalidomide administered by mouth on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and 40 mg dexamethasone (or 20 mg for participants > 75 years of age) administered by mouth once per day on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression. Receives: Drug: pomalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone |
| High-Dose Dexamethasone | Active comparator | Participants received 40 mg dexamethasone (or 20 mg for participants > 75 years of age) administered by mouth once per day on Days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression. Receives: Drug: Dexamethasone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Primary Analysis
Progression-free survival was calculated as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG), or death on study, whichever occurred earlier. Progressive disease required 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 57 weeks.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) With a Later Cut-off Date
Progression-free survival was calculated as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG), or death on study, whichever occurred earlier. Progressive disease requires 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 74 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (22)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An adverse event is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen in a participant during the course of a study. A serious AE is any AE occurring at any dose that: • Results in death; • Is life-threatening; • Requires or prolongs existing inpatient hospitalization; • Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; • Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; • Constitutes an important medical event. The Investigator assessed the relationship of each AE to study drug and graded the severity according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0): Grade 1 = Mild (no limitation in activity or intervention required); Grade 2 = Moderate (some limitation in activity; no/minimal medical intervention required); Grade 3 = Severe (marked limitation in activity; medical intervention required, hospitalization possible); Grade 4 = Life-threatening; Grade 5 = Death.
Measured: From first dose of study drug through to 30 days after the last dose as of the end of the study (29 August 2017); maximum time on treatment was 297, 269, and 239 weeks in the Pomalidomide + LD-Dex, HD-Dex, and cross-over groups respectively.
Overall Survival - Primary Analysis
Overall survival is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 70 weeks.
Overall Survival With a Later Cut-off Date
Overall survival is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 93 weeks.
Overall Survival Based on the Final Dataset
Overall survival is calculated as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the participant was known to be alive for participants who were alive at the time of analysis and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 August 2017. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 324 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria
Objective response is defined as a best overall response of stringent complete response (SCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the Independent Response Adjudication Committee: SCR: CR and normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; CR: Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. In addition to the above, if present at baseline a ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Criteria
Objective response defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the Independent Response Adjudication Committee: CR requires all of the following: - Absence of original monoclonal paraprotein in serum and urine by immunofixation maintained at least 42 days. - <5% plasma cell in bone marrow aspirate and on bone marrow biopsy, if performed. - No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions. - Disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas. PR requires all of the following: - ≥ 50% reduction in level of serum monoclonal paraprotein, maintained at least 42 days. - Reduction in 24-hour urinary light chain extraction by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg, maintained at least 42 days. - For patients with non-secretory myeloma, ≥ 50% reduction in plasma cells in bone marrow aspirate and on biopsy, if performed, for at least 42 days. - ≥ 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. - No increase in size or number of lytic bone lesions.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Progression
Time to progression (TTP) is calculated as the time from randomization to the first documented progression confirmed by a blinded, independent Response Adjudication Committee and based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG). Progressive disease requires 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Response
Time to response is calculated as the time from randomization to the initial documented response (partial response or better) based on IMWG criteria. SCR: CR and normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; CR: Negative serum and urine on immunofixation, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤ 5% plasma cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥ 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; PR: ≥ 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by ≥ 90% or to < 200 mg/24 hours. If present at baseline a ≥ 50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Duration of Response
Duration of response (calculated for responders only) is defined as time from the initial documented response (partial response or better) to confirmed disease progression, based on IMWG criteria assessed by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to the First Hemoglobin Improvement
Time to increased hemoglobin, defined as the time from randomization to at least one category improvement from Baseline in common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade for hemoglobin level. Hemoglobin categories are: 1) Normal; 2) CTCAE Grade 1: < lower limit of normal (LLN) to 10.0 g/dL; 3) CTCAE Grade 2: < 10.0 to <8.0 g/dL. Participants with CTCAE Grade 3 anemia or worse at Baseline were excluded from the study.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Improvement in Bone Pain
Time to improvement in bone pain is defined as the time from randomization to at least one category improvement from Baseline in bone pain category. Bone pain was categorized (from best to worst) according to answers to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20), Question 1, "Have you had bone aches or pain?": 1) Not at all, 2) A little, 3) Quite a bit, or 4) Very much.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Improvement in Renal Function
Time to improvement in renal function is defined as the time from randomization to at least one category improvement from Baseline in renal function. Renal Function was categorized as (from best to worst): - Normal: creatinine clearance ≥80 mL/min; - Grade 1: creatinine clearance ≥60 to <80 mL/min; - Grade 2 : creatinine clearance ≥45 to < 60 mL/min. Participants with creatinine clearance < 45 mL/min at baseline were excluded from the study.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Time to improvement in ECOG performance status defined as the time from randomization until at least a one category improvement from Baseline in ECOG performance status score. The categories of the ECOG Performance Status Scale are as follows: -0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; -1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry our work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work; -2: Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Patients with a score of 3, 4 or 5 were excluded from participating in the study.
Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating better functioning/support. Negative change from Baseline values indicate deterioration in functioning and positive values indicate improvement.
Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction in fatigue (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increases in fatigue (i.e. worsening of symptom).
Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is a 30-question tool used in clinical research to assess the overall quality of life in cancer patients. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact). The EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score indicating a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reductions in pain (i.e. improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increases in pain (i.e. worsening of symptom).
Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients with Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) is a 20-question tool used in clinical research to assess health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma patients. The QLQ-MY20 includes four domains (Disease Symptoms, Side-Effects of Treatment, Body Image and Future Perspective). The EORTC QLQ-MY20 Disease Symptoms Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score reflecting a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction (i.e. improvement) in symptoms and positive values indicate increase (i.e. worsening) of symptoms.
Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-MY20 Side Effects Domain
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients with Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) is a 20-question tool used in clinical research to assess health-related quality of life in multiple myeloma patients. The QLQ-MY20 includes four domains (Disease Symptoms, Side-Effects of Treatment, Body Image and Future Perspective). The EORTC QLQ-MY20 Side Effects Scale is scored between 0 and 100, with a high score reflecting a higher level of symptoms. Negative change from Baseline values indicate reduction in side effects (i.e.improvement in symptom) and positive values indicate increase in side effects (i.e. worsening of symptom).
Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Index Score
EQ-5D is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life (QOL). The EQ-5D descriptive health profile comprises five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 3 levels of response: No problem (1), some problems (2), and extreme problems (3). A unique EQ-5D health state is defined by combining one level from each of the five dimensions into a single utility index score. EQ-5D index values range from -0.59 to 1.00 where an EQ-5D score of 1.00 equals "perfect health", a score of 0 equals "death" and a score of -0.59 equals worst imaginable health state. A positive change from Baseline score indicates improvement in health status. A negative change from Baseline score indicates worsening in health status. Negative scores represent the possible though unlikely situation that a patient's QOL is worse than death, i.e. they would rather be dead than living with that QOL
Measured: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Time to First Worsening of Quality of Life (QOL) Domains
Time to worsening in quality of life domains was calculated as the time from Baseline to the first worsened minimally important difference (MID), defined as the smallest change in a QOL score considered important to patients that would lead the patient or clinician to consider a change in therapy. MID thresholds were calculated in Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) units using the Baseline QOL data. Based on the MID, participants were classified as worsened according to the following: For the EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status and functional scales and the EQ-5D health utility score, participants were classified as worsened if their change from Baseline score was less than -1 SEM. For the EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom scores (fatigue and pain) and EORTC QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms and side effects scales, participants were classified as worsened if their change from Baseline score was greater than 1 SEM. See previous outcome measures for definitions of each scale.
Measured: Assessed on Day 1 of the first 6 treatment cycles.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study start11 Mar 2011
- Primary completion1 Mar 2013
- Study completion29 Aug 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CelgeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 455 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Celgene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lars Sternas, MD, PhD, Study director, Celgene
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01311687
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CC-4047-MM-003
- Other IDs
- 2010-019820-30
- Acronym
- NIMBUS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 24 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Moreau P, Weisel KC, Song KW, Gibson CJ, Saunders O, Sternas LA, Hong K, Zaki MH, Dimopoulos MA. Relationship of response and survival in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in the MM-003 trial randomized phase III trial (NIMBUS). Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 Dec;57(12):2839-2847. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1180685. Epub 2016 May 13.
PubMed 27173785Miguel JS, Weisel K, Moreau P, Lacy M, Song K, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Banos A, Oriol A, Alegre A, Chen C, Cavo M, Garderet L, Ivanova V, Martinez-Lopez J, Belch A, Palumbo A, Schey S, Sonneveld P, Yu X, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki M, Dimopoulos M. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM-003): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1055-1066. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70380-2. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
PubMed 24007748Siegel DS, Weisel KC, Dimopoulos MA, Baz R, Richardson P, Delforge M, Song KW, San Miguel JF, Moreau P, Goldschmidt H, Cavo M, Jagannath S, Yu X, Hong K, Sternas L, Zaki M, Palumbo A. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and moderate renal impairment: a pooled analysis of three clinical trials. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 Dec;57(12):2833-2838. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1177181. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
PubMed 27267105Weisel KC, Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Lacy MQ, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Banos A, Oriol A, Alegre A, Chen C, Cavo M, Garderet L, Ivanova V, Martinez-Lopez J, Knop S, Yu X, Hong K, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki MH, San Miguel J. Analysis of renal impairment in MM-003, a phase III study of pomalidomide + low - dose dexamethasone versus high - dose dexamethasone in refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2016 Jul;101(7):872-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.137083. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
PubMed 27081177Dimopoulos MA, Weisel KC, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Moreau P, Banos A, Oriol A, Garderet L, Cavo M, Ivanova V, Alegre A, Martinez-Lopez J, Chen C, Spencer A, Knop S, Bahlis NJ, Renner C, Yu X, Hong K, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki MH, San Miguel JF. Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. Haematologica. 2015 Oct;100(10):1327-33. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.117077. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
PubMed 26250580San Miguel JF, Weisel KC, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Moreau P, Banos A, Oriol A, Garderet L, Cavo M, Ivanova V, Alegre A, Martinez-Lopez J, Chen C, Renner C, Bahlis NJ, Yu X, Teasdale T, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki MH, Dimopoulos MA. Impact of prior treatment and depth of response on survival in MM-003, a randomized phase 3 study comparing pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2015 Oct;100(10):1334-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.125864. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
PubMed 26160879Weisel K, Dimopoulos M, Song KW, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Belch A, Schey S, Sonneveld P, Sternas L, Yu X, Amatya R, Gibson CJ, Zaki M, Jacques C, San Miguel J. Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone Improves Health-Related Quality of Life and Prolongs Time to Worsening in Relapsed/Refractory Patients With Multiple Myeloma Enrolled in the MM-003 Randomized Phase III Trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Sep;15(9):519-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
PubMed 26149712Song KW, Dimopoulos MA, Weisel KC, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Belch A, Schey S, Sonneveld P, Sternas L, Yu X, Amatya R, Monzini MS, Zaki M, Jacques C, San Miguel J. Health-related quality of life from the MM-003 trial of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2015 Feb;100(2):e63-7. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.112557. Epub 2014 Nov 25. No abstract available.
PubMed 25425684
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Muticenter, Randomized, Open-label Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Pomalidomide in Combination With Low-dose Dexamethasone Versus High-dose Dexamethasone in Subjects With Refractory or Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01311687
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NIMBUS / CC-4047-MM-003
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Myeloma, Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma, Refractory Myeloma, Resistant Multiple Myeloma, Treatment-resistant Multiple Myeloma, Pomalidomide
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 455 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CelgeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 11 Mar 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Aug 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Apr 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of pomalidomide in combination with low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in subjects with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone | Experimental | Drug: pomalidomide, Drug: DexamethasoneParticipants received 4 mg pomalidomide administered by mouth on Days 1 to 21 of each 28-day treatment cycle and 40 mg dexamethasone (or 20 mg for participants > 75 years of age) administered by mouth once per day on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression. |
| High-Dose Dexamethasone | Active comparator | Drug: DexamethasoneParticipants received 40 mg dexamethasone (or 20 mg for participants > 75 years of age) administered by mouth once per day on Days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Must be ≥ 18 years of age
- Subjects must have documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma and have measurable disease
- Subjects must have undergone prior treatment with ≥ 2 treatment lines of anti-myeloma therapy
- Subjects must have either refractory or relapsed and refractory disease defined as documented disease progression during or within 60 days of completing their last myeloma therapy
- All subjects must have received at least 2 consecutive cycles of prior treatment that included lenalidomide and bortezomib
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
- Previous therapy with pomalidomide
- Hypersensitivity to thalidomide, lenalidomide, or dexamethasone
- Resistance to high-dose dexamethasone used in the last line of therapy
- Peripheral neuropathy ≥ Grade 2
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| pomalidomideAlso: CC-4047, Pomalyst®4 mg pomalidomide capsules administered orally | Drug | Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone |
| Dexamethasone40 mg dexamethasone (or 20 mg for participants > 75 years of age) tablets administered orally | Drug | High-Dose Dexamethasone, Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 57 weeks.
Progression-free survival was calculated as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG), or death on study, whichever occurred earlier. Progressive disease required 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) With a Later Cut-off Date
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 74 weeks.
Progression-free survival was calculated as the time from randomization to disease progression as determined by the Independent Response Adjudication Committee based on the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria (IMWG), or death on study, whichever occurred earlier. Progressive disease requires 1 of the following: • Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: o Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); o Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); o Bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute % ≥ 10%); • Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; • Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease.
22 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: From first dose of study drug through to 30 days after the last dose as of the end of the study (29 August 2017); maximum time on treatment was 297, 269, and 239 weeks in the Pomalidomide + LD-Dex, HD-Dex, and cross-over groups respectively.
Overall Survival - Primary Analysis
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 70 weeks.
Overall Survival With a Later Cut-off Date
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 93 weeks.
Overall Survival Based on the Final Dataset
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 29 August 2017. Maximum time on follow-up for survival was 324 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response According to European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Criteria
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Progression
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Response
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Duration of Response
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to the First Hemoglobin Improvement
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Improvement in Bone Pain
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Improvement in Renal Function
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Time to Improvement in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 01 March 2013. Maximum time on follow-up was 93 weeks.
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Patients With Cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30) Global Health Status Domain
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning Domain
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning Domain
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Domain
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Pain Domain
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Patients With Multiple Myeloma (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Disease Symptoms
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-MY20 Side Effects Domain
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Utility Index Score
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 1 (Baseline), and Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6
Time to First Worsening of Quality of Life (QOL) Domains
Time frame: Assessed on Day 1 of the first 6 treatment cycles.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Oct 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 27173785Moreau P, Weisel KC, Song KW, Gibson CJ, Saunders O, Sternas LA, Hong K, Zaki MH, Dimopoulos MA. Relationship of response and survival in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in the MM-003 trial randomized phase III trial (NIMBUS). Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 Dec;57(12):2839-2847. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1180685. Epub 2016 May 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 24007748Miguel JS, Weisel K, Moreau P, Lacy M, Song K, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Banos A, Oriol A, Alegre A, Chen C, Cavo M, Garderet L, Ivanova V, Martinez-Lopez J, Belch A, Palumbo A, Schey S, Sonneveld P, Yu X, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki M, Dimopoulos M. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone alone for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM-003): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):1055-1066. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70380-2. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27267105Siegel DS, Weisel KC, Dimopoulos MA, Baz R, Richardson P, Delforge M, Song KW, San Miguel JF, Moreau P, Goldschmidt H, Cavo M, Jagannath S, Yu X, Hong K, Sternas L, Zaki M, Palumbo A. Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and moderate renal impairment: a pooled analysis of three clinical trials. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016 Dec;57(12):2833-2838. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1177181. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27081177Weisel KC, Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Lacy MQ, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Banos A, Oriol A, Alegre A, Chen C, Cavo M, Garderet L, Ivanova V, Martinez-Lopez J, Knop S, Yu X, Hong K, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki MH, San Miguel J. Analysis of renal impairment in MM-003, a phase III study of pomalidomide + low - dose dexamethasone versus high - dose dexamethasone in refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2016 Jul;101(7):872-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.137083. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26250580Dimopoulos MA, Weisel KC, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Moreau P, Banos A, Oriol A, Garderet L, Cavo M, Ivanova V, Alegre A, Martinez-Lopez J, Chen C, Spencer A, Knop S, Bahlis NJ, Renner C, Yu X, Hong K, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki MH, San Miguel JF. Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone. Haematologica. 2015 Oct;100(10):1327-33. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.117077. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26160879San Miguel JF, Weisel KC, Song KW, Delforge M, Karlin L, Goldschmidt H, Moreau P, Banos A, Oriol A, Garderet L, Cavo M, Ivanova V, Alegre A, Martinez-Lopez J, Chen C, Renner C, Bahlis NJ, Yu X, Teasdale T, Sternas L, Jacques C, Zaki MH, Dimopoulos MA. Impact of prior treatment and depth of response on survival in MM-003, a randomized phase 3 study comparing pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2015 Oct;100(10):1334-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2015.125864. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26149712Weisel K, Dimopoulos M, Song KW, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Belch A, Schey S, Sonneveld P, Sternas L, Yu X, Amatya R, Gibson CJ, Zaki M, Jacques C, San Miguel J. Pomalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone Improves Health-Related Quality of Life and Prolongs Time to Worsening in Relapsed/Refractory Patients With Multiple Myeloma Enrolled in the MM-003 Randomized Phase III Trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Sep;15(9):519-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25425684Song KW, Dimopoulos MA, Weisel KC, Moreau P, Palumbo A, Belch A, Schey S, Sonneveld P, Sternas L, Yu X, Amatya R, Monzini MS, Zaki M, Jacques C, San Miguel J. Health-related quality of life from the MM-003 trial of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2015 Feb;100(2):e63-7. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.112557. Epub 2014 Nov 25. No abstract available.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cemsidomide + Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
AZD0305 as Monotherapy or in Combination With Anticancer Agents in Participants With Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Assess Safety and Tolerability of OPN-6602 in Subjects With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed Multiple Myeloma, Refractory Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Effects of Cemsidomide in Combination With Elranatamab in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Subjects
Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Active, not recruiting
Real World Treatment Experience of Patients With Breast, Lung, or GI Cancer or Multiple Myeloma Using Remote Symptom Monitoring
Breast Cancer, Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lars Sternas, MD, PhD study director
Celgene
94 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Celgene at 94 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 94 sites in France, Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, Germany and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Primary Analysis (time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 07 September 2012. Maximum duration of follow-up for PFS assessments was 57 weeks.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01311687, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2018.