AzTrials
AzTrials

Papillary Thyroid CarcinomaNCT01311089

A Comparative Study of Robotic Thyroidectomy Using Transaxillary Approach Versus Conventional Open Thyroidectomy

An observational study of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Most patients with thyroid tumors are effectively treated surgically by practitioners experienced in the techniques of thyroidectomy. Many patients, especially women, undergoing thyroid surgery are concerned about the postoperative cosmetic appearance of the neck. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
How many people
169 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Jan 2011to Sep 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: 120 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent thyroidectomy at Yonsei University Health System were enrolled. 60patients were conventional open thyroidectomy group and 60 patients were robotic thyroidectomy group. All of these patients was over 20 years old.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent thyroidectomy
  • Age was over 20 years old

Who cannot join

  • Keloid
  • Previous neck or anterior chest operation history
  • The patients who underwent combined radical neck dissection
  • The patient with postoperative wound problem
  • The patient with underlying systemic disease which can make influences on the wound healing process
  • The patient who can not read and understand the questionnaire

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Severance Hospital

    Seoul, 120-752

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Comparative Study of Robotic Thyroidectomy Using Transaxillary Approach Versus Conventional Open Thyroidectomy : Postoperative Body Image Change and Cosmetic Satisfaction

Most patients with thyroid tumors are effectively treated surgically by practitioners experienced in the techniques of thyroidectomy. Many patients, especially women, undergoing thyroid surgery are concerned about the postoperative cosmetic appearance of the neck. Robotic thyroidectomy which can hide the operative scar was associated with a higher degree of patient cosmetic satisfaction.

Read the detailed description

Most patients with thyroid tumors are effectively treated surgically by practitioners experienced in the techniques of thyroidectomy. Many patients, especially women, undergoing thyroid surgery are concerned about the postoperative cosmetic appearance of the neck. Robotic thyroidectomy which can hide the operative scar was associated with a higher degree of patient cosmetic satisfaction. In this study, we designed a prospective study comparing the cosmetic satisfaction and the postoperative body image change which associated with patient self-esteem between robotic thyroidectomy and conventional open thyroidectomy group.

Medical subject headings
Thyroid Cancer, Papillary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01311089
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Robotic thyroidectomy groupRobotic thyroidectomy group is the patient group who underwent robot-assisted endoscopic thyroid surgery using a gasless, trans-axillary approach.
conventional open thyroidectomy groupConventional open thyroidectomy group is th patient group who underwent thyroid surgery via neck incision.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Mar 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionSep 2011
  4. Study completionSep 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
169 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01311089
Sponsor's protocol ID
1-2010-0055
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
8 Mar 2011
Last updated
27 Jan 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Tan CT, Cheah WK, Delbridge L. "Scarless" (in the neck) endoscopic thyroidectomy (SET): an evidence-based review of published techniques. World J Surg. 2008 Jul;32(7):1349-57. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9555-3.

    PubMed 18360737
  • Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery. 2009 Dec;146(6):1048-55. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

    PubMed 19879615
  • Jeong JJ, Kang SW, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Comparative study of endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) patients. J Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;100(6):477-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.21367.

    PubMed 19653245
  • Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Robot-assisted endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies using a gasless transaxillary approach. J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Aug;209(2):e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jun 12. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19632588
  • Chung YS, Choe JH, Kang KH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, Han W, Noh DY, Oh SK, Youn YK. Endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy. World J Surg. 2007 Dec;31(12):2302-6; discussion 2307-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9117-0.

    PubMed 17566819
  • Yoon JH, Park CH, Chung WY. Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an axillary approach: experience of 30 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006 Aug;16(4):226-31. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200608000-00006.

    PubMed 16921301
  • Inukai M, Usui Y. Clinical evaluation of gasless endoscopic thyroid surgery. Surg Today. 2005;35(3):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s00595-004-2929-8.

    PubMed 15772789
  • Ohgami M, Ishii S, Arisawa Y, Ohmori T, Noga K, Furukawa T, Kitajima M. Scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach for better cosmesis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000 Feb;10(1):1-4.

    PubMed 10872517
  • Ikeda Y, Takami H, Sasaki Y, Takayama J, Niimi M, Kan S. Comparative study of thyroidectomies. Endoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002 Dec;16(12):1741-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8830-x. Epub 2002 Jul 29.

    PubMed 12140635
  • Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Ahn YH, Soh EY, Chung WY. Differences in postoperative outcomes, function, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc. 2010 Dec;24(12):3186-94. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1113-z. Epub 2010 May 19.

    PubMed 20490558

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01311089, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in