AnemiaPhase 2NCT01309659
Trial To Evaluate the Efficacy of Intravenous Iron in Older Adults With Unexplained Anemia
A Phase 2 study testing iron sucrose in people with Anemia and Unexplained Anemia (UAE), run by Duke University at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment of unexplained anemia in older adults with a short course of weekly intravenous iron infusions can improve physical activity and therefore quality of life. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Anemia, Unexplained Anemia (UAE)
- What is being tested?
- iron sucrose
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2011to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 65 years old
- Hemoglobin concentration ≥ 9.0 g/dL and < 11.5 g/dL (women) or < 12.7 g/dL (men)
- Unexplained anemia
- Serum ferritin level ≥ 20 and ≤ 200 ng/mL
- Able to walk without the use of a walker, motorized device or the assistance of another person.
- Able to understand and willing to provide written informed consent in the absence of dementia
- Must be able to understand and speak in English
Who cannot join
- Red blood cell transfusions within the past 3 months
- Use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) in the past 3 months
- Intravenous Iron Infusions within the past 3 months
- Distance on baseline 6MWT (6 minute walk test) above the median for age and sex
- History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction in the past 3 months
- History of stroke or TIA (transient ischemic attack) the past 3 months
Show all 11Show fewer
- Uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic blood pressure > 100 mm Hg or systolic blood pressure > 160 mm Hg on 2 separate occasions)
- Positive fecal occult blood test within the screening period
- Elevated AST (aspartate aminotransferase) or ALT (alanine aminotransferase) ≥ 2x upper limit of normal
- Documented anaphylactic reaction to iron sucrose infusion in the past
- Subjects initiated on oral iron supplementation within the last 6 weeks, or those initiated on oral iron within the last 3 months who have had at least a one gram/dL improvement in Hb since starting oral iron supplementation
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Johns Hopkins University Geriatrics Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
University of Illinois, Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Case Western Reserve University Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Institute For Advanced Studies in Aging
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-Label, Wait-list Control Trial To Evaluate the Efficacy of Intravenous Iron in Older Adults With Unexplained Anemia and a Serum Ferritin Between 20 and 200 ng/mL
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment of unexplained anemia in older adults with a short course of weekly intravenous iron infusions can improve physical activity and therefore quality of life.
Read the detailed description
There is a tremendous morbidity and mortality associated with anemia in the elderly and the increasing proportion of elderly adults underscores the population's attributable risk of anemia. As a potentially modifiable factor, an urgent need exists to delineate the impact of anemia correction in the elderly. The Partnership for Anemia: Clinical and Translational Trials in the Elderly (PACTTE) consortium has been created to focus on treatment strategies for anemia in elderly patients. The data presented in this protocol provides a compelling rationale to evaluate the impact of a well-tolerated IV iron preparation in community dwelling older anemic adults with intermediate serum ferritin values.
Subjects will be 65 years or older adults with unexplained anemia and a serum ferritin between 20 and 200 ng/mL.
Subjects will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to either receive a 5 week course of treatment with intravenous iron immediately or to a waitlist control group who will receive treatment with intravenous iron following a 12 week observation period. Both groups will ultimately receive 200mg of intravenous iron sucrose weekly for 5 weeks to determine if this can lead to improvement in 6 Minute Walk Test results. The primary endpoint is change in 6 Minute Walk Test distances from baseline to 12 weeks. The procedures in this protocol will include the use of outcomes tools that have been selected for their ability to show improvement in quality of life in this patient population. Blood samples will also be collected for analysis both at the local lab (safety tests - eg hemoglobin or Hb) or at a central lab for research purposes.
- Conditions
- Anemia, Unexplained Anemia (UAE)
- Being tested
- iron sucrose
- Keywords
- Anemia, Unexplained anemia, elderly, geriatric, older adults, UAE, over 65, iron, pactte, pactee, aging, aged, old, older
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iron sucroseDrug
Also called Venofer®
Patients will receive intravenous iron sucrose preparation at a dose of 200 mg per week through a peripheral intravenous catheter.
iron sucroseDrug
Also called Venofer®
Following 12 weeks of observation patients will receive intravenous iron sucrose preparation at a dose of 200 mg per week through a peripheral intravenous catheter.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Intervention Group | Experimental | Subjects randomized to the immediate treatment group will be scheduled to begin treatment with IV iron infusion immediately (or within 2 business days). They will receive 200mg IV iron sucrose a week for 5 weeks followed by 19 weeks of follow up. Receives: Drug: iron sucrose |
| Wait List Control | Experimental | Subjects randomized to the wait list control group will have an observation visit at week 6 and week 12. After that they will begin treatment with IV iron infusion. They will receive 200mg IV iron sucrose a week for 5 weeks followed by 7 weeks of follow up Receives: Drug: iron sucrose |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Results
Subjects were asked to walk for 6 minutes, unassisted. The distance walked was recorded in meters at baseline (time of randomization) and 12 weeks after baseline (time of randomization). The change from baseline to 12 weeks, related to distance, is compared and documented.
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (17)
Number of Participants Who Had a Hemoglobin Increase >= 1g/dL
To assess the efficacy of IV iron sucrose in improving Hemoglobin by at least 1 g/dL; an increase from baseline to week 12.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Trail Making Test Part B
To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on cognitive outcomes based on the Trail Making Test (TMT) Part B as measured by subjects drawing a line from 25 circled numbers to letters in 300 seconds. The change in seconds per completed circle from baseline to week 12.
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Self Reported Outcomes Measures as Reported by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS)
To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on self-reported outcomes measures by change in SF36 physical component score. The SF-36 form identifies self-report physical function and global measure of quality of life and is a multi-purpose, short-form health survey consisting of 36 questions. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) is a subscale of the SF-36 that correlates with physical health domains of the SF-36 ( Physical Function, Role-Physical, and Bodily Pain). The change is calculated and compared from baseline to week 12. The SF-36 PCS score is a norm based sore with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 where results above and below 50 are above and below the average, respectively, in the 2009 general US population.
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Serum Ferritin, Serum Iron, and Transferrin Saturation and the Change in Hemoglobin (HB)
Correlation between baseline serum ferritin, serum iron, and transferrin saturation and the change in HB from baseline to 12 weeks.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Frailty Component Related to Fatigue/ Exhaustion
Subjective fatigue/exhaustion: If any of the following three criteria are met, the patient will be classified as frail for fatigue/exhaustion:
- "In the past month, on average, have you been feeling unusually tired during the day?" is answered "yes" and indicated as "all of the time" or "most of the time."
- "In the past month, on average, have you felt unusually weak?" is answered "yes" and indicated as "all of the time" or "most of the time."
- Energy level on a scale of 0 (no energy) to 10 (most energy) reported as ≤ 3. If the subject answers YES to any of the above noted 3 questions, then they are classified as FRAIL.
The change in frailty for fatigue/ exhaustion is defined as changing from frail at baseline to not frail at week 12 as reported by the subject.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Speed of Processing
To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on cognitive outcomes based on speed of processing was derived using the z-scores of the following three tests: (1) TMT Part A seconds per completed circle, (2) simple reaction time from the CogState Detection Task, and (3) choice reaction time from the CogState Identification Task. The composite score for a subject at each time point was defined as the mean of the Z-scores for the three tests at the time point. For each subject, the Z-score for each test at time point was derived by subtracting the subject's score at the time point from the overall baseline mean of the test and then dividing by the overall baseline standard deviation of the test. Positive z-scores indicate a better performance compared to the baseline average.
Measured: Baseline, 12 Week
Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Composite Complex Attention/Executive Processing
To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on cognitive outcomes based on Complex attention/executive processing was derived using the z-scores of the following three tests: (1) TMT Part B seconds per completed circle, (2) time score from the CogState One Back Task, and (3) accuracy score from the CogState One Back Task. The composite score for a subject at each time point was defined as the mean of the Z-scores for the three tests at the time point. For each subject, the Z-score for each test at time point was derived by subtracting the overall baseline mean of the test from the subject's score at the time point (accuracy score) or by subtracting the subject's score at the time point from the overall baseline mean of the test (TMT and time score) and then dividing by the overall baseline standard deviation of the test.
Measured: Baseline, 12 week
Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Composite Learning and Memory
To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on cognitive outcomes based on Learning and memory was derived using the z-scores of the following three tests: (1) CogState ISL immediate recall score (total score from three learning trials), (2) CogState ISL immediate recall score from the first learning trial, and (3) CogState ISL delayed recall scores. The composite score for a subject at each time point was defined as the mean of the Z-scores for the three tests at the time point. For each subject, the Z-score for each test at time point was derived by subtracting the overall baseline mean of the test from the subject's score at the time point and then dividing by the overall baseline standard deviation of the test. Higher numbers indicated a better response.There is no scale, as the results are normalized variables.
Measured: Baseline, 12 week
Change in Self Reported Outcomes Measures as Reported by FACIT-AN Total Score
To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on self -reported outcomes measures by subjects answering 47 questions for patients with anemia and or fatigue. This test detects self-report functional changes and QoL. Change from baseline to 12 weeks. Scores range from 0-188 with higher scores indicating better function.
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in the Frailty Component as Determined by Self-reported Activity Level
To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on change in the frailty as measured by change in self-reported activity level. Frailty for activity level is classified by subjects responses to 6physical activity questions on the short version of the Minnesota Leisure Time Activity Questionnaire , were related to walking for exercise, moderately strenuous outdoor chores, dancing, bowling, and regular exercise. The Women's Health And Aging Study (WHAS) scoring algorithm was used to define frailty for self-reported activity level. The answers to these questions were used to calculate kilocalories (Kcals) per week, using the WHAS algorithm, which is further satisfied by by gender. For men, Kcals < 128 per week is frail. For women, Kcals < 90 per week is frail. This is a categorical measurement of yes or no. The outcome is the number of participants who were classified as "frail" at baseline and changed to "not frail" at week 12.
Measured: Baseline, 12 week
Change in Frailty Component as Determined by Grip Strength
To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on change in the frailty as measured by change in grip strength. Subjects squeeze the grip strength machine 3 times with each hand. For the frailty outcome the maximum grip strength from the dominant hand is used. (change from frail at baseline to not frail at week 12). Grip strength is stratified by gender and BMI. For men with (BMI <= 24 and a grip strength (GS) <= 29) or (BMI 24.1-28 and grip strength <= 30) or (BMI >28 and a grip strength <= 32) were classified as "frail". For women with (BMI <= 23 and a grip strength of <= 17) or (BMI 23.1-26 and a GS <= 17.3) or (BMI 26.1-29 and a GS <= 18) or (BMI > 29 and a GS <= 21) were classified as "frail".The outcome is the number of participants who were classified as "frail" at baseline and changed to "not frail" at week 12.
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Frailty Component as Determined by the 4 Meter Walk Speed
To quantify the impact of anemia treatment by IV iron sucrose on change in the speed of the 4 meter walk speed. Subjects are asked to walk as fast as they can for 4 meters. Frailty was determined by the subject's speed. (change from frail at baseline to not frail at week 12). 4 m walking speed is stratified by gender and height. For men, (height of <= 173 cm and a walking speed of <= 0.65 meter/sec) or a (height > 173, <= .76 meter/sec) were classified as "frail". For women, (height of <= 159 cm and a walking speed of <=.65 meter/sec) or (height >159 cm <= 0.76 meter/sec) were classified as "frail".The outcome is the number of participants who were classified as "frail" at baseline and changed to "not frail" at week 12.
Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor and the Change in HB From Baseline to 12 Weeks
Correlation between baseline soluble transferrin receptor and the change in hemoglobin from the baseline to 12 weeks.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor Index (Soluble Receptor/Log Ferritin) and the Change in Hemoglobin
Correlation between baseline soluble transferrin receptor index (soluble receptor/log ferritin) and the change in hemoglobin from baseline to 12 weeks.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Serum Ferritin, Serum Iron, and Transferrin Saturation and the Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Distance
Correlation between baseline serum ferritin, serum iron, and transferrin saturation and the change in 6 Minute Walk Test distance from baseline to 12 weeks.
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor and the Change in the 6 Meter Walk Test Distance
Correlation between baseline soluble transferrin receptor and the change in the 6 Meter Walk Test distance from baseline to 12 weeks
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor Index (Soluble Receptor/Log Ferritin) and the Change in the 6 Minute Walk Test Distance
Correlation between baseline soluble transferrin receptor index (soluble receptor/log ferritin) and the change in the 6 Minute Walk Test Distance from baseline to 12 weeks
Measured: baseline, 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionFeb 2013
- Study completionSep 2014
Why it stopped: Lack of Enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for AnemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Elizabeth Price, MD, Principal investigator, Stanford University MCStanley Schrier, MD, Study chair, Stanford UniversityAndrew Artz, MD, Principal investigator, University of Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01309659
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00028687
- Other IDs
- U01AG034661, PACTTE_01
- Status last verified
- Jan 2016
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2011
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-Label, Wait-list Control Trial To Evaluate the Efficacy of Intravenous Iron in Older Adults With Unexplained Anemia and a Serum Ferritin Between 20 and 200 ng/mL
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01309659
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00028687
- Conditions
- Anemia, Unexplained Anemia (UAE)
- Keywords
- Anemia, Unexplained anemia, elderly, geriatric, older adults, UAE, over 65, iron
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Lack of Enrollment
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Feb 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Sep 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment of unexplained anemia in older adults with a short course of weekly intravenous iron infusions can improve physical activity and therefore quality of life.
Detailed description
There is a tremendous morbidity and mortality associated with anemia in the elderly and the increasing proportion of elderly adults underscores the population's attributable risk of anemia. As a potentially modifiable factor, an urgent need exists to delineate the impact of anemia correction in the elderly. The Partnership for Anemia: Clinical and Translational Trials in the Elderly (PACTTE) consortium has been created to focus on treatment strategies for anemia in elderly patients. The data presented in this protocol provides a compelling rationale to evaluate the impact of a well-tolerated IV iron preparation in community dwelling older anemic adults with intermediate serum ferritin values.
Subjects will be 65 years or older adults with unexplained anemia and a serum ferritin between 20 and 200 ng/mL.
Subjects will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to either receive a 5 week course of treatment with intravenous iron immediately or to a waitlist control group who will receive treatment with intravenous iron following a 12 week observation period. Both groups will ultimately receive 200mg of intravenous iron sucrose weekly for 5 weeks to determine if this can lead to improvement in 6 Minute Walk Test results. The primary endpoint is change in 6 Minute Walk Test distances from baseline to 12 weeks. The procedures in this protocol will include the use of outcomes tools that have been selected for their ability to show improvement in quality of life in this patient population. Blood samples will also be collected for analysis both at the local lab (safety tests - eg hemoglobin or Hb) or at a central lab for research purposes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate Intervention Group | Experimental | Drug: iron sucroseSubjects randomized to the immediate treatment group will be scheduled to begin treatment with IV iron infusion immediately (or within 2 business days). They will receive 200mg IV iron sucrose a week for 5 weeks followed by 19 weeks of follow up. |
| Wait List Control | Experimental | Drug: iron sucroseSubjects randomized to the wait list control group will have an observation visit at week 6 and week 12. After that they will begin treatment with IV iron infusion. They will receive 200mg IV iron sucrose a week for 5 weeks followed by 7 weeks of follow up |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age ≥ 65 years old
- Hemoglobin concentration ≥ 9.0 g/dL and < 11.5 g/dL (women) or < 12.7 g/dL (men)
- Unexplained anemia
- Serum ferritin level ≥ 20 and ≤ 200 ng/mL
- Able to walk without the use of a walker, motorized device or the assistance of another person.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Red blood cell transfusions within the past 3 months
- Use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) in the past 3 months
- Intravenous Iron Infusions within the past 3 months
- Distance on baseline 6MWT (6 minute walk test) above the median for age and sex
- History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction in the past 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iron sucroseAlso: Venofer®Patients will receive intravenous iron sucrose preparation at a dose of 200 mg per week through a peripheral intravenous catheter. | Drug | Immediate Intervention Group |
| iron sucroseAlso: Venofer®Following 12 weeks of observation patients will receive intravenous iron sucrose preparation at a dose of 200 mg per week through a peripheral intravenous catheter. | Drug | Wait List Control |
Primary outcome
Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Results
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Subjects were asked to walk for 6 minutes, unassisted. The distance walked was recorded in meters at baseline (time of randomization) and 12 weeks after baseline (time of randomization). The change from baseline to 12 weeks, related to distance, is compared and documented.
17 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Had a Hemoglobin Increase >= 1g/dL
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Trail Making Test Part B
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Self Reported Outcomes Measures as Reported by Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS)
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Serum Ferritin, Serum Iron, and Transferrin Saturation and the Change in Hemoglobin (HB)
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Frailty Component Related to Fatigue/ Exhaustion
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Speed of Processing
Time frame: Baseline, 12 Week
Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Composite Complex Attention/Executive Processing
Time frame: Baseline, 12 week
Change in Cognitive Outcome Measures as Determined by Composite Learning and Memory
Time frame: Baseline, 12 week
Change in Self Reported Outcomes Measures as Reported by FACIT-AN Total Score
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in the Frailty Component as Determined by Self-reported Activity Level
Time frame: Baseline, 12 week
Change in Frailty Component as Determined by Grip Strength
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in Frailty Component as Determined by the 4 Meter Walk Speed
Time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor and the Change in HB From Baseline to 12 Weeks
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor Index (Soluble Receptor/Log Ferritin) and the Change in Hemoglobin
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Serum Ferritin, Serum Iron, and Transferrin Saturation and the Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Distance
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor and the Change in the 6 Meter Walk Test Distance
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Correlation Between Baseline Soluble Transferrin Receptor Index (Soluble Receptor/Log Ferritin) and the Change in the 6 Minute Walk Test Distance
Time frame: baseline, 12 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Anemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
The Safety and Efficacy of Daratumumab in Patients With Refractory Aplastic Anemia
Aplastic Anemia, Refractory
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study of YTS109 Cell Injection in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, Anti-CD19 STAR T-cell Therapy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Systematic Intraoperative Cell Salvage in On-Pump Cardiac Surgery Within a Mature Patient Blood Management Programme
Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Blood Transfusion
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingObservational study
Defining the Natural History of Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Fanconi Anemia
Fanconi Anemia, Inherited Bone Marrow Failure Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elizabeth Price, MD principal investigator
Stanford University MC
Stanley Schrier, MD study chair
Stanford University
Andrew Artz, MD principal investigator
University of Chicago
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing iron sucrose in people with Anemia and Unexplained Anemia (UAE), run by Duke University at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Sep 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Results (time frame: Baseline, 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2016.