AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatitis BPhase 3TDF in CHBNCT01300234

Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) 300mg in Chinese Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)

A Phase 3 study testing Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets and Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in people with Hepatitis B, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 20 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a multi-centre, double blind, double dummy, randomised, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TDF 300mg QD versus ADV 10mg QD in Chinese subjects with CHB. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 69 years
Conditions the study is for
Hepatitis B
What is being tested?
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets and Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
512 participants
Where
20 sitesChina
Study dates
30 Mar 2011to 6 Dec 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 69 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • HBeAg positive/negative CHB with blood HBVDNA≥10^5 copies/mL and elevated ALT
  • Nucleoside and nucleotide naïve CHB subjects. Previous lamivudine treatment is allowed in less than 10% of the total study population

Who cannot join

  • subjects with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) potential or decompensated liver disease
  • subjects with acute liver disease due to other causes
  • subjects with medication history of immunosuppressive therapy, immunomodulatory therapy, systemic cytotoxic agents, chronic antiviral agents including Chinese herbal medicines known to have activity against HBV (e.g., lamivudine, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg)) within the previous 6 months prior to randomisation into this study

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 1 country.

20 sites in 1 country

China20 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100015

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100044

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100050

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Changchun, Jilin, 130021

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Changsha, Hunan, 410008

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chongqing, 400038

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fuzhou, 350025

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jinan, 250021

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shanghai, 200001

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shanghai, 200025

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shanghai, 200040

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shanghai, 201508

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430030

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Multi-centre, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Randomised, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TDF 300mg Once Daily (QD) Versus Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) 10mg QD in Chinese Subjects With CHB

This is a multi-centre, double blind, double dummy, randomised, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TDF 300mg QD versus ADV 10mg QD in Chinese subjects with CHB. This study is designed to demonstrate the superiority of TDF 300mg QD over ADV 10mg QD in treating Chinese subjects with CHB (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg] positive subjects and HBeAg negative subjects). It will also provide long-term efficacy and safety data (up to 240 weeks) for TDF 300 mg administered once daily.

Read the detailed description

This is a multi-centre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TDF 300mg QD versus ADV 10mg QD in Chinese subjects with CHB. Four hundred and ninety-four subjects with CHB (200 HBeAg positive subjects and 294 HBeAg negative subjects) will be randomised (1:1ratio) to either TDF 300mg QD or ADV 10mg QD treatment arms. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects with blood hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) <400copies/mL (Roche COBAS Taqman HBV test) at Week 48 in HBeAg positive subjects with CHB and HBeAg negative subjects with CHB. This is a two-part study. The first treatment period (baseline to Week 48) will investigate the effects of TDF and ADV on safety and efficacy endpoints; dosing will be double-blind. This period will be followed by 192 weeks in which all subjects will receive open-label TDF (Week 49 to Week 240). Subjects will undergo regular safety and efficacy assessments every 4 weeks for the first 12 weeks followed by every 12 weeks for a total of up to 5 years.

Conditions
Hepatitis B
Being tested
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets, Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets
Keywords
tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, chronic hepatitis B, adefovir dipivoxil
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis B, Hepatitis B, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tabletsDrug

    Also called TDF tablet

    white, almond-shaped, film-coated tablets containing 300mg of TDF

  • Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tabletsDrug

    Also called ADV tablet

    white to off-white, round, biconvex tablets containing 10mg of ADV

Study groups in NCT01300234
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
A (TDF tablets)ExperimentalTenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets
Receives: Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets
B (ADV tablets)Active comparatorAdefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets
Receives: Drug: Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) <400 Copies/Milliliter (mL) at Week 48

    The number of participants with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) <400 copies/milliliter (mL) at Week 48 in the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative population was assessed. HBeAg is a viral protein that is secreted by hepatitis B-infected cells. It is associated with chronic hepatitis B infections and is used as a marker of active viral disease and a participant's degree of infectiousness. A positive result indicates that the participant has high levels of virus in the blood and greater infectiousness. Usually, a negative result indicates that the participant has lower levels of virus in the blood and is less infectious. A "non-completers equal failures" approach is used for the analysis in ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed.

    Measured: Week 48

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Participants With HBV DNA <400 Copies/mL at Weeks 96, 144, 192, and 240

    The number of participants with HBV DNA <400 copies/mL in the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative population was assessed. HBeAg is a viral protein that is secreted by hepatitis B-infected cells. It is associated with chronic hepatitis B infections and is used as a marker of active viral disease and a participant's degree of infectiousness. A positive result indicates that the participant has high levels of virus in the blood and greater infectiousness. Usually, a negative result indicates that the participant has lower levels of virus in the blood and is less infectious. Week 96, 144, 192, and 240 data are not yet available, as this report includes data up to and including Week 48. A "non-completers equal failures" approach is used for the analysis in ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed.

    Measured: Weeks 96, 144, 192, and 240

  2. Change From Baseline of Log 10 Copies/mL HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240

    Change from Baseline of log 10 copies/mL HBV DNA at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240 in the HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative population was assessed. HBeAg is a viral protein that is secreted by hepatitis B-infected cells. It is associated with chronic hepatitis B infections and is used as a marker of active viral disease and a participant's degree of infectiousness. A positive result indicates that the participant has high levels of virus in the blood and greater infectiousness. Usually a negative result indicates that the participant has lower levels of virus in the blood and less infectious. Values at Day 0 were considered as Baseline values. Change from Baseline was calculated as post Baseline values minus Baseline values. A "non-completers equal failures" approach is used for the analysis in ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240

  3. Number of Participants With Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Normalization at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240 in Participants Who Had Abnormal ALT at Baseline

    Participants who had abnormal ALT at Baseline and had normalized ALT at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240 were assessed. This report includes data up to and including Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240. An increased level of ALT is referred to as abnormal ALT (the normal range is 0 to 48 units per liter [U/L]). Values at Day 0 were considered as Baseline values. A "non-completers equal failures" approach is used for the analysis in ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points (represented by n=X in the category titles) were analyzed.

    Measured: Baseline; Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240

  4. Number of Participants With Histological Improvement at Weeks 48 and 240 Who Had a Baseline Knodell Necroinflammatory Score (KNS) >=2.

    Histological improvement is defined as a reduction of >=2 points in the KNS with no increase in fibrosis at Week 48 and Week 240 in participants with Baseline KNS >=2 which was derived from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Practice Guidelines for Management of Chronic Hepatitis B (2009) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver Clinical Practice Guidelines Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection (2012). The Knodell scale consists of 5 domains: periportal +/- bridging necrosis (scored from best to worst: 0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 10); intralobular degeneration and focal necrosis (0 to 4); portal inflammation (0 to 4); and fibrosis (0 to 4). The necroinflammatory score (ranging from 0 [best] to 14 [worst]) is the combined score for necrosis (0 to 10) plus inflammation (0 to 4; the participant is scored for only one inflammatory condition). Liver biopsy slides within 6 months prior to randomization could be accepted as Baseline evaluation.

    Measured: Baseline; Week 48 and Week 240

  5. Number of HBeAg-positive Participants Achieving HBeAg Loss and HBeAg Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240.

    HBeAg loss is defined as a negative HBeAg result for those participants who were HBeAg positive at Baseline. Seroconversion to anti-HBe is defined as HBeAg loss and a positive anti-HBe result. This report includes data up to and including Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240.

    Measured: Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240

  6. Number of HBeAg-positive Participants Achieving Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Loss and HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240

    HBsAg loss is defined as negative HBsAg results for those participants with who were HBsAg positive at Baseline. Seroconversion to anti-HBs is defined as HBsAg loss and a positive anti-HBs result. This report includes data up to and including Week 240.

    Measured: Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240

  7. Number of HBeAg-negative Participants Achieving HBsAg Loss and HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192, 240

    HBsAg loss is defined as a negative HBsAg result for those participants with who were HBsAg positive at Baseline. Seroconversion to anti-HBs is defined as HBsAg loss and a positive anti-HBs result. This report includes data up to and including Week 240.

    Measured: Weeks 24, 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240

  8. Number of Participants Achieving Durable HBsAg Loss From Weeks 24 to Week 48

    Durable HBsAg loss is defined as the loss of HBsAg and no detectable HBV DNA and ALT normalization at any three consecutive visits at least 12 Weeks apart. This report includes data up to and including Week 48. A "non-completers equal failures" approach was used for the analysis in ITT population.

    Measured: Week 24 to Week 48

  9. Number of Participants Achieving Durable HBsAg Loss From Weeks 96 to Week 240

    Durable HBsAg loss is defined as the loss of HBsAg and no detectable HBV DNA and ALT normalization at any three consecutive visits at least 12 Weeks apart from Week 96 to 240. This report includes data up to and including Week 240. A "non-completers equal failures" approach was used for the analysis in ITT population.

    Measured: Week 96 to Week 240

  10. Number of Participants With Virological Breakthrough at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240

    The number of HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative participants who had virological breakthrough at Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240 were assessed. Virological breakthrough is defined by >= one log increase in HBV DNA from NADIR (as determined by two sequential HBV DNA measurements at least one month apart or last on treatment measurement). A "non-completers equal failures" approach was used for the analysis in ITT population.

    Measured: Weeks 48, 96, 144, 192 and 240

  11. Number of Participants With Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE) and Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is Grade 4 (life threatening or disabling). Participants with any non-serious AEs and SAEs has been reported.

    Measured: Up to Week 240 treatment period and 24 weeks follow-up visit off treatment

  12. Number of Participants With the Indicated Grade 3 and Grade 4 Treatment-emergent (TE) Laboratory Abnormalities (LAs)

    TE grade 3 or grade 4 LAs are defined as values that increase by >=1 grade from Baseline (Day 0) to Grade 3 (severe) or 4 (potentially life threatening) at any post-Baseline value. The Gilead Grading Scale for Severity of Adverse Events and Laboratory Abnormalities, version 21, September 2011 was referred for grading. Laboratory parameters assessed included Sodium for hyponatremia and hypernatremia; Potassium for hypokalemia and hyperkalemia; glucose for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia non-fasting; Phosphate for hypophosphatemia; alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, creatinine kinase, hemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils, lymphocytes, prothrombin time and amylase.

    Measured: Up to Week 240

  13. Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent Laboratory Abnormalities for Serum Creatinine and Serum Phosphorus

    The Gilead Grading Scale for Severity of Adverse Events and Laboratory Abnormalities, version 21, September 2011 was referred for grading. Serum creatinine: Grade 1, > 133 to 177 micromoles per Liter (µmoles/Liter), Grade 2, >177 to 265 µmoles/Liter, Grade 3, >265 to 530 µmoles/Liter, Grade 4, >530 µmoles/Liter. Serum phosphorus: Grade 2, 0.63 to <0.80 millimoles per Liter (mmoles/L), Grade 3, 0.31 to <0.63 mmoles/L, Grade 4, <0.31 mmoles/L. The normal range for serum phosphorus was 0.8 to 1.45 mmoles/L; the upper limit for a Grade 2 abnormality is 0.80 mmoles/L. Therefore, no Grade 1 abnormalities could be attributed, as values were contained within the normal range. NA indicates the value was not available for the indicated time point.

    Measured: Up to Week 240

  14. Number of Participants in the Indicated Category for Renal Laboratory Abnormalities

    The Gilead Grading Scale for Severity of Adverse Events and Laboratory Abnormalities, version 21, September 2011 was used for grading. "Confirmed" is defined as two consecutive visits. mg=milligrams. dL=deciliter, G= Grade.

    Measured: Up to Week 240

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start30 Mar 2011
  3. Primary completion17 Oct 2012
  4. Study completion6 Dec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
512 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01300234
Sponsor's protocol ID
114648
Acronym
TDF in CHB
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
3 Feb 2011
Last updated
13 Jul 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Liang X, Gao Z, Xie Q, Zhang J, Sheng J, Cheng J, Chen C, Mao Q, Zhao W, Ren H, Tan D, Niu J, Chen S, Pan C, Tang H, Wang H, Mao Y, Jia J, Ning Q, Xu M, Wu S, Li J, Zhang X, Zhang W, Xiong C, Hou J. Long-term efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B: 5-year results. Hepatol Int. 2019 May;13(3):260-269. doi: 10.1007/s12072-019-09943-6. Epub 2019 Apr 11.

    PubMed 30977033
  • Hou JL, Gao ZL, Xie Q, Zhang JM, Sheng JF, Cheng J, Chen CW, Mao Q, Zhao W, Ren H, Tan DM, Niu JQ, Chen SJ, Pan C, Tang H, Wang H, Mao YM, Jia JD, Ning Q, Xu M, Wu SM, Li J, Zhang XX, Ji Y, Dong J, Li J. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs adefovir dipivoxil in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B after 48 weeks: a randomized controlled trial. J Viral Hepat. 2015 Feb;22(2):85-93. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12313. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

    PubMed 25243325

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) tablets and Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in people with Hepatitis B, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 20 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 20 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Aug 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) <400 Copies/Milliliter (mL) at Week 48 (time frame: Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01300234, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in