Allergic RhinitisNCT01291381
Distinct Response of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ and IL-10-secreting Type I T Regulatory Cells to Cluster Specific Immunotherapy in Allergic Rhinitis Children
A study testing Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Pharmacotherapy in people with Allergic Rhinitis and Effects of Immunotherapy, run by Beijing Tongren Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
While allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) is highly effective for allergic diseases in children, the underlying immunological mechanisms are unclear. Regulatory T (Treg) cells may be crucial in induction of tolerance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 9 to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Rhinitis, Effects of Immunotherapy
- What is being tested?
- Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Pharmacotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Feb 2009to Oct 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 9 to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of Allergic rhinitis
- Han nationality
- Had a history of HDM-induced moderate or severe rhino-conjunctivitis of at least three years duration
- Had a positive skin prick test (SPT) result for Der p (ALK-Abello', Hørsholm, Denmark) with a wheal diameter of at least 6 mm
- Were positive for specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to Der p (Pharmacia CAP System, Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden), with a RAST value of at least 0.7 kU/L
Who cannot join
- Clinical diagnosis of asthma
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Regulatory T Cells in the Response to SIT in Allergic Rhinitis.
While allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) is highly effective for allergic diseases in children, the underlying immunological mechanisms are unclear. Regulatory T (Treg) cells may be crucial in induction of tolerance.
Our aim was to investigate the role of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells and IL-10-secreting type I T regulatory (Tr1) cells in the response to one year of cluster SIT to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus for allergic rhinitis in children.
CD4+CD25+Foxp3+regulatory T cells and IL-10-secreting type I T regulatory (Tr1) cells were analyzed in children allergic to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus during one year cluster specific immunotherapy (SIT) in a prospective and randomized study. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from 25 children receiving SIT and 21 receiving pharmacotherapy. The frequencies of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells and allergen-specific IL-10+IL-4-, IFN-γ+IL-4-, IL-4+IFN-γ-CD4+ T cells were measured by flow cytometry. Production of IL-4, IFN-r, and IL-10 in supernatants from allergen-stimulated PBMC culture was measured by ELISA. Finally, the suppressive effect of CD4+CD25highTreg cells from both groups was estimated.
Read the detailed description
Patients The design was a one-year, randomized open-label parallel group study in which patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive SIT with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract (Alutard SQ, ALK-Abello', Hørsholm, Denmark) or to observe with standard pharmacotherapy (control group).
The study participants included 50 house dust mite (HDM)-allergic children aged 9-13, who received SIT with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) extract for one year. These were compared with 21 HDM-allergic children aged 9-14 who served as controls. All children were of Han nationality and were recruited from the allergy clinic of Beijing TongRen Hospital. They had a history of HDM-induced moderate or severe rhino-conjunctivitis of at least three years duration. Each patient also had a positive skin prick test (SPT) result for Der p (ALK-Abello', Hørsholm, Denmark) with a wheal diameter of at least 6 mm, and were positive for specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to Der p (Pharmacia CAP System, Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden), with a RAST value of at least 0.7 kU/L. Children with a history of asthma or atopic dermatitis were excluded. The children undergoing immunotherapy were matched to atopic donors for age, sex, SPT response to Der p, total IgE and specific IgE to Der p levels (Table 1). The study protocol was approved by our institutional review board for human studies and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Immunotherapy protocol Children undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy were given Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract (Alutard SQ, ALK-Abello, Hørsholm, Denmark) according to a cluster protocol which we have described previously[15]. In the first six weeks, children underwent visits for up-dosing, receiving two injections one hour apart with an increasing dose every week. The highest concentration, given in the sixth week, had an allergenic activity of 100,000 SQ/ml and contained 9.8 μg/ml Der p1. After week six, the dosing interval was increased to one month and maintained until the end of the first year. For patients randomized to non-SIT group, persistent rhinitis was managed with pharmacotherapy including intranasal steroids and oral antihistamines. Intranasal steroids were kept at the same dose during the study and antihistamines were used as required. Blood samples were taken at the baseline and after one year treatment in both groups.
Clinical evaluation Symptoms of AR children were assessed by the Total 5 Symptom Score (T5SS), which includes rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and nasal and ocular pruritus. Each symptom was scored on a scale of 0-3 (0 = none, 3 = severe). Medication use was scored and recorded daily, as described previously [16]. Arbitrary scores were attributed to the drugs used (0.75 points for 1 puff of nasal corticosteroids and 1 points for 1 tablet of antihistamine). Patients were instructed to use local steroids only (plus antihistamines if they did not improve symptoms) and to report each administration or variation of the initial drug therapy in the diary. Patients were also instructed to stop drugs at least 7 days before blood sampling.
Flow cytometry Peripheral blood was obtained by venous puncture and collected into preservative-free heparin. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by means of Ficoll-Plaque Plus density gradient centrifugation (Amersham Biosciences, NJ, USA). For intracellular detection of cytokine, PBMCs (2 × 106 cells/mL) were stimulated with 10 μg/mL Der p1 (D. pteronyssinus major allergen 1, Indoor Biotechnologies, United Kingdom) for 24 hours. Twenty-five ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), 1 μg/mL ionomycin and 1.7 μg/mL monensine were added at 37 °C for the final four hours of stimulation (all from Sigma, Missouri, USA).
For flow cytometry, PBMCs were surface stained at room temperature for 20 minutes with anti-CD4-PerCP and anti-CD25-PE, or isotype control (mouse IgG1-PerCP or IgG1-PE) (all from Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). For intracellular staining of Foxp3, cells were fixed and permeabilized with Foxp3 fixation/permeabilization buffer, then stained with anti-human Foxp3-FITC or isotype control (IgG1-FITC) (all from BioLegend, CA, USA). For the intracellular cytokine analysis, Der p1-stimulated PBMCs were surface stained with anti-CD3-APC and anti-CD8-PerCP, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS. After being permeabilized using FACS Permeabilizing Solution (BD Pharmingen, CA, USA), cells were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with anti-IL-4-PE plus anti-IFN-γ-FITC, or anti-IL-10-PE plus anti-IL-4-FITC, and each antibody was matched with a respective isotype IgG1 as a control (all from BD Pharmingen). Different T subsets were selected for detailed phenotypic analysis as follows: (1) Th1 cells: IFN-γ+IL-4-CD3+CD8- T cells; (2) Th2 cells: IL-4+IFN-γ-CD3+CD8- T cells; and (3) Tr1 cells: IL-10+IL-4-CD3+CD8- T cells. For each analysis, at least 20,000 events were collected. Analysis was conducted using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA).
ELISA PBMCs were resuspended at 2 × 106 cells/mL in RPMI-1640 medium and stimulated with 10 μg/mL Der p1 (D. pteronyssinus major allergen 1, Indoor Biotechnologies, United Kingdom). Cultures were incubated for 6 days at 37 ºC in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. Supernatants from allergen-stimulated PBMCs cultures were assayed for the presence of IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 by means of ELISA (R\&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA).
Isolation of CD4+CD25high Treg cells Heparinized blood was obtained from each of eight recruited SIT-treated children and eight AR controls for cell isolation and functional analysis. After non-CD4+ cells in the PBMCs were removed by LD column with a biotin-antibody cocktail and antibiotin microbeads, CD4+ T cells were isolated from the PBMCs by negative selection, and CD4+CD25+ T cells were positively selected from the CD4+ T cells. Finally, CD25- fractions were recovered using a MS-magnetic column using a human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell isolation kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). Cells with the highest CD25 expression (CD25high) were selected through incubation with a limiting quantity of anti-CD25 antibody beads (2 μl of anti-CD25 beads/107 cells)[17]. The mean purity of the isolated CD4+ was 95% (93-97%) and 76% (72-88%) for CD4+CD25high T cells being Foxp3-positive.
Suppressive capacity of CD4+CD25high Treg cells To evaluate the suppressive capacity of CD4+CD25high Treg cells, cell proliferation and cytokine were analyzed. CD4+CD25- T cells (responders) alone or mixed CD4+CD25- T cells and CD4+CD25high T cells (suppressors) at a ratio of 2:1 were cultured in a final volume of 200 µl RPMI-1640 medium with 10 µg/ml Der p1. Cultures were incubated for 6 days at 37 ºC in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Autologous irradiated PBMCs (3000 rad) were added at 2 × 105 as antigen-presenting cells to CD4+CD25- T cell cultures. In all cases, triplicate medium wells were included as negative controls. At day six, 100 µl of supernatant was removed for Th1 and Th2 cytokine (IFN-γ and IL-4) analysis with an ELISA kit (R\&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA). Cell proliferation of CD4+CD25- T cells was then assessed using a WST-8 (modified tetrazolium salt) cell proliferation kit (Cell Counting Kit-8, Dojin, Japan) according to the manufacturers' protocols. The proliferation result was expressed as absorbance at 450nm of the culture medium.
Statistics Statistical significance between groups was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney test. The significance of intra-group pre- and post-therapy changes were determined using a nonparametric Wilcoxon matched pairs test. The correlation coefficient r was generated using the Pearson correlation. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 13.0 statistical software. A 5% significance level was used (α = 0.05), power (1- β) equal to 90%. All tests were 2-tailed, and P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinitis, Effects of Immunotherapy
- Being tested
- Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Pharmacotherapy
- Keywords
- allergic rhinitis, peripheral tolerance, regulatory T cells, specific immunotherapy, Tr1 cells
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Allergic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dermatophagoides pteronyssinusDrug
Children undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy were given Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract (Alutard SQ, ALK-Abello, Hørsholm, Denmark) according to a cluster protocol
PharmacotherapyDrug
For patients randomized to non-SIT group, persistent rhinitis was managed with pharmacotherapy including intranasal steroids and oral antihistamines. Intranasal steroids were kept at the same dose during the study and antihistamines were used as required.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract | Active comparator | Children undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy were given Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract (Alutard SQ, ALK-Abello, Hørsholm, Denmark) according to a cluster protocol Receives: Drug: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus |
| Pharmacotherapy | Active comparator | Persistent rhinitis was managed with pharmacotherapy including intranasal steroids and oral antihistamines. Intranasal steroids were kept at the same dose during the study and antihistamines were used as required. Receives: Drug: Pharmacotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Symptom evaluation
Symptoms of AR children were assessed by the Total 5 Symptom Score (T5SS), which includes rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and nasal and ocular pruritus. Each symptom was scored on a scale of 0-3 (0 = none, 3 = severe).
Measured: Clinical results were based on the patient self-evaluation scores obtained at the beginning and after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2009
- Primary completionFeb 2010
- Study completionOct 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Allergic RhinitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Beijing Tongren HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tongren Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Luo Zhang, M.D, Principal investigator, Beijing Institiute of Otolaryngology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01291381
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2011-BIO-01
- Other IDs
- 81025007
- Status last verified
- Jan 2009
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2011
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Regulatory T Cells in the Response to SIT in Allergic Rhinitis.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01291381
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2011-BIO-01
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinitis, Effects of Immunotherapy
- Keywords
- allergic rhinitis, peripheral tolerance, regulatory T cells, specific immunotherapy, Tr1 cells
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tongren HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2009
- Primary completion
- Feb 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
While allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) is highly effective for allergic diseases in children, the underlying immunological mechanisms are unclear. Regulatory T (Treg) cells may be crucial in induction of tolerance.
Our aim was to investigate the role of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells and IL-10-secreting type I T regulatory (Tr1) cells in the response to one year of cluster SIT to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus for allergic rhinitis in children.
CD4+CD25+Foxp3+regulatory T cells and IL-10-secreting type I T regulatory (Tr1) cells were analyzed in children allergic to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus during one year cluster specific immunotherapy (SIT) in a prospective and randomized study. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected from 25 children receiving SIT and 21 receiving pharmacotherapy. The frequencies of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells and allergen-specific IL-10+IL-4-, IFN-γ+IL-4-, IL-4+IFN-γ-CD4+ T cells were measured by flow cytometry. Production of IL-4, IFN-r, and IL-10 in supernatants from allergen-stimulated PBMC culture was measured by ELISA. Finally, the suppressive effect of CD4+CD25highTreg cells from both groups was estimated.
Detailed description
Patients The design was a one-year, randomized open-label parallel group study in which patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive SIT with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract (Alutard SQ, ALK-Abello', Hørsholm, Denmark) or to observe with standard pharmacotherapy (control group).
The study participants included 50 house dust mite (HDM)-allergic children aged 9-13, who received SIT with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p) extract for one year. These were compared with 21 HDM-allergic children aged 9-14 who served as controls. All children were of Han nationality and were recruited from the allergy clinic of Beijing TongRen Hospital. They had a history of HDM-induced moderate or severe rhino-conjunctivitis of at least three years duration. Each patient also had a positive skin prick test (SPT) result for Der p (ALK-Abello', Hørsholm, Denmark) with a wheal diameter of at least 6 mm, and were positive for specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to Der p (Pharmacia CAP System, Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden), with a RAST value of at least 0.7 kU/L. Children with a history of asthma or atopic dermatitis were excluded. The children undergoing immunotherapy were matched to atopic donors for age, sex, SPT response to Der p, total IgE and specific IgE to Der p levels (Table 1). The study protocol was approved by our institutional review board for human studies and informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Immunotherapy protocol Children undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy were given Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract (Alutard SQ, ALK-Abello, Hørsholm, Denmark) according to a cluster protocol which we have described previously[15]. In the first six weeks, children underwent visits for up-dosing, receiving two injections one hour apart with an increasing dose every week. The highest concentration, given in the sixth week, had an allergenic activity of 100,000 SQ/ml and contained 9.8 μg/ml Der p1. After week six, the dosing interval was increased to one month and maintained until the end of the first year. For patients randomized to non-SIT group, persistent rhinitis was managed with pharmacotherapy including intranasal steroids and oral antihistamines. Intranasal steroids were kept at the same dose during the study and antihistamines were used as required. Blood samples were taken at the baseline and after one year treatment in both groups.
Clinical evaluation Symptoms of AR children were assessed by the Total 5 Symptom Score (T5SS), which includes rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and nasal and ocular pruritus. Each symptom was scored on a scale of 0-3 (0 = none, 3 = severe). Medication use was scored and recorded daily, as described previously [16]. Arbitrary scores were attributed to the drugs used (0.75 points for 1 puff of nasal corticosteroids and 1 points for 1 tablet of antihistamine). Patients were instructed to use local steroids only (plus antihistamines if they did not improve symptoms) and to report each administration or variation of the initial drug therapy in the diary. Patients were also instructed to stop drugs at least 7 days before blood sampling.
Flow cytometry Peripheral blood was obtained by venous puncture and collected into preservative-free heparin. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by means of Ficoll-Plaque Plus density gradient centrifugation (Amersham Biosciences, NJ, USA). For intracellular detection of cytokine, PBMCs (2 × 106 cells/mL) were stimulated with 10 μg/mL Der p1 (D. pteronyssinus major allergen 1, Indoor Biotechnologies, United Kingdom) for 24 hours. Twenty-five ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), 1 μg/mL ionomycin and 1.7 μg/mL monensine were added at 37 °C for the final four hours of stimulation (all from Sigma, Missouri, USA).
For flow cytometry, PBMCs were surface stained at room temperature for 20 minutes with anti-CD4-PerCP and anti-CD25-PE, or isotype control (mouse IgG1-PerCP or IgG1-PE) (all from Beckman Coulter, CA, USA). For intracellular staining of Foxp3, cells were fixed and permeabilized with Foxp3 fixation/permeabilization buffer, then stained with anti-human Foxp3-FITC or isotype control (IgG1-FITC) (all from BioLegend, CA, USA). For the intracellular cytokine analysis, Der p1-stimulated PBMCs were surface stained with anti-CD3-APC and anti-CD8-PerCP, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS. After being permeabilized using FACS Permeabilizing Solution (BD Pharmingen, CA, USA), cells were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature with anti-IL-4-PE plus anti-IFN-γ-FITC, or anti-IL-10-PE plus anti-IL-4-FITC, and each antibody was matched with a respective isotype IgG1 as a control (all from BD Pharmingen). Different T subsets were selected for detailed phenotypic analysis as follows: (1) Th1 cells: IFN-γ+IL-4-CD3+CD8- T cells; (2) Th2 cells: IL-4+IFN-γ-CD3+CD8- T cells; and (3) Tr1 cells: IL-10+IL-4-CD3+CD8- T cells. For each analysis, at least 20,000 events were collected. Analysis was conducted using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA).
ELISA PBMCs were resuspended at 2 × 106 cells/mL in RPMI-1640 medium and stimulated with 10 μg/mL Der p1 (D. pteronyssinus major allergen 1, Indoor Biotechnologies, United Kingdom). Cultures were incubated for 6 days at 37 ºC in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. Supernatants from allergen-stimulated PBMCs cultures were assayed for the presence of IFN-γ, IL-4, and IL-10 by means of ELISA (R\&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA).
Isolation of CD4+CD25high Treg cells Heparinized blood was obtained from each of eight recruited SIT-treated children and eight AR controls for cell isolation and functional analysis. After non-CD4+ cells in the PBMCs were removed by LD column with a biotin-antibody cocktail and antibiotin microbeads, CD4+ T cells were isolated from the PBMCs by negative selection, and CD4+CD25+ T cells were positively selected from the CD4+ T cells. Finally, CD25- fractions were recovered using a MS-magnetic column using a human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell isolation kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany). Cells with the highest CD25 expression (CD25high) were selected through incubation with a limiting quantity of anti-CD25 antibody beads (2 μl of anti-CD25 beads/107 cells)[17]. The mean purity of the isolated CD4+ was 95% (93-97%) and 76% (72-88%) for CD4+CD25high T cells being Foxp3-positive.
Suppressive capacity of CD4+CD25high Treg cells To evaluate the suppressive capacity of CD4+CD25high Treg cells, cell proliferation and cytokine were analyzed. CD4+CD25- T cells (responders) alone or mixed CD4+CD25- T cells and CD4+CD25high T cells (suppressors) at a ratio of 2:1 were cultured in a final volume of 200 µl RPMI-1640 medium with 10 µg/ml Der p1. Cultures were incubated for 6 days at 37 ºC in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. Autologous irradiated PBMCs (3000 rad) were added at 2 × 105 as antigen-presenting cells to CD4+CD25- T cell cultures. In all cases, triplicate medium wells were included as negative controls. At day six, 100 µl of supernatant was removed for Th1 and Th2 cytokine (IFN-γ and IL-4) analysis with an ELISA kit (R\&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA). Cell proliferation of CD4+CD25- T cells was then assessed using a WST-8 (modified tetrazolium salt) cell proliferation kit (Cell Counting Kit-8, Dojin, Japan) according to the manufacturers' protocols. The proliferation result was expressed as absorbance at 450nm of the culture medium.
Statistics Statistical significance between groups was analyzed using a Mann-Whitney test. The significance of intra-group pre- and post-therapy changes were determined using a nonparametric Wilcoxon matched pairs test. The correlation coefficient r was generated using the Pearson correlation. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 13.0 statistical software. A 5% significance level was used (α = 0.05), power (1- β) equal to 90%. All tests were 2-tailed, and P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract | Active comparator | Drug: Dermatophagoides pteronyssinusChildren undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy were given Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract (Alutard SQ, ALK-Abello, Hørsholm, Denmark) according to a cluster protocol |
| Pharmacotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: PharmacotherapyPersistent rhinitis was managed with pharmacotherapy including intranasal steroids and oral antihistamines. Intranasal steroids were kept at the same dose during the study and antihistamines were used as required. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 9 to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of Allergic rhinitis
- Han nationality
- Had a history of HDM-induced moderate or severe rhino-conjunctivitis of at least three years duration
- Had a positive skin prick test (SPT) result for Der p (ALK-Abello', Hørsholm, Denmark) with a wheal diameter of at least 6 mm
- Were positive for specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to Der p (Pharmacia CAP System, Pharmacia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden), with a RAST value of at least 0.7 kU/L
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of asthma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dermatophagoides pteronyssinusChildren undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy were given Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract (Alutard SQ, ALK-Abello, Hørsholm, Denmark) according to a cluster protocol | Drug | Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract |
| PharmacotherapyFor patients randomized to non-SIT group, persistent rhinitis was managed with pharmacotherapy including intranasal steroids and oral antihistamines. Intranasal steroids were kept at the same dose during the study and antihistamines were used as required. | Drug | Pharmacotherapy |
Primary outcome
Symptom evaluation
Time frame: Clinical results were based on the patient self-evaluation scores obtained at the beginning and after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment.
Symptoms of AR children were assessed by the Total 5 Symptom Score (T5SS), which includes rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, and nasal and ocular pruritus. Each symptom was scored on a scale of 0-3 (0 = none, 3 = severe).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2011.
Related trials for Allergic Rhinitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Tolerability of Fluticasone Propionate 10% Nasal Insert in Participants With Chronic Allergic Rhinitis
Chronic Allergic Rhinitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Specific Immunotherapy With Mannan-Conjugated Allergoids for HDM-Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis_MM09-SIT-063.
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Specific Immunotherapy With Mannan-Conjugated Allergoids for HDM-Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis. MM09-SIT-063.
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Allergy, Asthma, and Atopic Eczema in Finland
Asthma, Asthma in Children
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prevelance of Bronchial Asthma and Allergic Rhinitis Among Children With Nephrotic Syndrom at Sohag University Hospital
Allergic Diseases in Nephrotic Children, Nephrotic Syndrom
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luo Zhang, M.D principal investigator
Beijing Institiute of Otolaryngology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Pharmacotherapy in people with Allergic Rhinitis and Effects of Immunotherapy, run by Beijing Tongren Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Symptom evaluation (time frame: Clinical results were based on the patient self-evaluation scores obtained at the beginning and after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2011.