Eosinophilic AsthmaPhase 3NCT01285323
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab in Patients With Eosinophilic Asthma
A Phase 3 study testing Reslizumab in people with Eosinophilic Asthma, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 104 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether reslizumab is more effective than placebo in reducing the number of clinical asthma exacerbations (CAEs) in patients with eosinophilic asthma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Eosinophilic Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Reslizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 464 participants
- Where
- 104 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2011to Apr 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient is male or female, 12 through 75 years of age, with a previous diagnosis of asthma. Patients 12 through 17 years of age are excluded from participating in Germany, India, Argentina, and Korea; patients 66 through 75 years of age are excluded from participating in India and Korea.
- The patient has had at least 1 asthma exacerbation requiring oral, intramuscular (im), or intravenous (iv) corticosteroid use for at least 3 days over the past 12 months before screening.
- The patient has a current blood eosinophil level of at least 400/μL.
- The patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration.
- The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5 5 at the screening and baseline (before the 1st dose of study drug) visits.
- The patient is taking inhaled fluticasone at a dosage of at least 440 μg, or equivalent, daily. Chronic oral corticosteroid use (no more than 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) is allowed. If a patient is on a stable dose, eg, 2 weeks or more of oral corticosteroid treatment at the time of study enrollment, the patient must remain on this dose throughout the study. The patient's baseline asthma therapy regimen (including, but not limited to, inhaled corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids up to a maximum dose of 10 mg prednisone daily or equivalent, leukotriene antagonists, 5-lipoxygenase inhibitors, or cromolyn) must be stable for 30 days prior to screening and baseline and must continue without dosage changes throughout the study.
Show all 12Show fewer
- All female patients must be surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or must have a negative pregnancy test (ß-human chorionic gonadotropin [ß-HCG]) at screening (serum) and baseline (urine).
- Female patients of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study. Acceptable methods of contraception include barrier method with spermicide, abstinence, intrauterine device (IUD), or steroidal contraceptive (oral, transdermal, implanted, and injected). NOTE: Partner sterility alone is not acceptable for inclusion in the study.
- Written informed consent is obtained. Patients 12 through 17 years old, where participating, must provide assent.
- The patient is in reasonable health (except for diagnosis of asthma) as judged by the investigator, and as determined by a medical history, medical examination, ECG evaluation (at screening), serum chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis.
- The patient must be willing and able to understand and comply with study restrictions, requirements, and procedures, as specified by the study center, and to remain at the study center for the required duration during the study period, and willing to return to the study center for the follow-up evaluation as specified in this protocol.
- Patients who experience an asthma exacerbation during the screening period will be considered to have failed screening and cannot be randomly assigned to study drug. Patients may be rescreened 1 time only.
Who cannot join
- The patient has a clinically meaningful co-morbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety.
- The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome.
- The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or lung cancer). Patients with pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis) will also be excluded.
- The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening).
- The patient is using systemic immunosuppressive, immunomodulating, or other biologic agents (including, but not limited to, anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-α, or anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF] mAb) within 6 months prior to screening.
- The patient has previously received an anti-hIL-5 monoclonal antibody (eg, reslizumab, mepolizumab, or benralizumab).
Show all 10Show fewer
- The patient has any aggravating medical factors that are inadequately controlled (eg, rhinitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and uncontrolled diabetes).
- The patient has participated in any investigative drug or device study within 30 days prior to screening.
- The patient has participated in any investigative biologics study within 6 months prior to screening.
- Other exclusion criteria apply.
Trial locations and contacts
104 sites in 15 countries.
104 sites in 15 countries
United States15 sites
Teva Investigational Site 46
Bangor, Maine
Teva Investigational Site 53
Clearwater, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 44
Dallas, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 47
Denver, Colorado
Teva Investigational Site 69
El Paso, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 67
Fort Mill, South Carolina
Teva Investigational Site 41
Fresno, California
Teva Investigational Site 25
Lawrenceville, Georgia
Teva Investigational Site 59
Long Beach, California
Teva Investigational Site 57
Metairie, Louisiana
Teva Investigational Site 27
Miami, Florida
Teva Investigational Site 48
Mobile, Alabama
Teva Investigational Site 45
San Antonio, Texas
Teva Investigational Site 40
St Louis, Missouri
Teva Investigational Site 28
Waterbury, Connecticut
Ukraine14 sites
Teva Investigational Site 621
Dnipropetrovsk
Teva Investigational Site 629
Donetsk
Teva Investigational Site 635
Donetsk
Teva Investigational Site 630
Ivano-Frankivsk
Teva Investigational Site 620
Kharkiv
Teva Investigational Site 633
Kharkiv
Teva Investigational Site 622
Kyiv
Teva Investigational Site 623
Kyiv
Teva Investigational Site 624
Kyiv
Teva Investigational Site 625
Kyiv
Teva Investigational Site 628
Ternopil
Teva Investigational Site 626
Vinnytsia
Teva Investigational Site 631
Zaporizhzhya
Teva Investigational Site 632
Zaporizhzhya
Germany13 sites
Teva Investigational Site 360
Bad Wörishofen
Teva Investigational Site 361
Berlin
Teva Investigational Site 362
Berlin
Teva Investigational Site 366
Berlin
Teva Investigational Site 371
Bochum
Teva Investigational Site 365
Dresden
Teva Investigational Site 369
Frankfurt
Teva Investigational Site 370
Hamburg
Teva Investigational Site 372
Koblenz
Teva Investigational Site 367
Leipzig
Teva Investigational Site 368
Leipzig
Teva Investigational Site 363
Mainz
Teva Investigational Site 364
Mainz
Russia9 sites
Teva Investigational Site 543
Moscow
Teva Investigational Site 544
Moscow
Teva Investigational Site 554
Moscow
Teva Investigational Site 556
Moscow
Teva Investigational Site 558
Moscow
Teva Investigational Site 559
Moscow
Teva Investigational Site 557
Novosibirsk
Teva Investigational Site 540
Saint Petersburg
Teva Investigational Site 541
Saint Petersburg
Peru8 sites
Teva Investigational Site 223
Cercado de Lima, Lima
Teva Investigational Site 220
Lima
Teva Investigational Site 221
Lima
Teva Investigational Site 222
Lima
Teva Investigational Site 225
Lima
Teva Investigational Site 226
Lima
Teva Investigational Site 227
Lima
Teva Investigational Site 229
Lima
Brazil6 sites
Teva Investigational Site 150
Florianópolis
Teva Investigational Site 140
Porto Alegre
Teva Investigational Site 144
Porto Alegre
Teva Investigational Site 145
Porto Alegre
Teva Investigational Site 143
Porto Alegre, RS
Teva Investigational Site 142
Santo André
Mexico6 sites
Teva Investigational Site 203
Distrito Federal
Teva Investigational Site 204
Guadalajara, JAL
Teva Investigational Site 205
Mexico City
Teva Investigational Site 207
Mexico City
Teva Investigational Site 209
Monterrey
Teva Investigational Site 202
Tijuana, B.C.
South Korea6 sites
Teva Investigational Site 682
Gwangju
Teva Investigational Site 680
Seoul
Teva Investigational Site 681
Seoul
Teva Investigational Site 683
Seoul
Teva Investigational Site 686
Seoul
Teva Investigational Site 685
Suwon
Romania5 sites
Teva Investigational Site 523
Bucharest
Teva Investigational Site 524
Bucharest
Teva Investigational Site 520
Cluj-Napoca
Teva Investigational Site 521
Iași
Teva Investigational Site 522
Târgu Mureş
Taiwan5 sites
Teva Investigational Site 764
Kaohsiung City
Teva Investigational Site 765
Taichung
Teva Investigational Site 760
Taipei
Teva Investigational Site 761
Taipei
Teva Investigational Site 763
Taoyuan
Argentina4 sites
Teva Investigational Site 121
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire
Teva Investigational Site 126
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aire
Teva Investigational Site 123
Rosario-Santa Fe
Teva Investigational Site 120
San Miguel de Tucuman - Tucuma
Slovakia4 sites
Teva Investigational Site 563
Bradejov
Teva Investigational Site 561
Levice
Teva Investigational Site 560
Spišská Nová Ves
Teva Investigational Site 562
Topoľčany
Canada3 sites
Teva Investigational Site 104
Newmarket
Teva Investigational Site 102
Pointe-Claire
Teva Investigational Site 105
Windsor
France3 sites
Teva Investigational Site 343
Grenoble
Teva Investigational Site 342
Marseille
Teva Investigational Site 341
Montpellier
Greece3 sites
Teva Investigational Site 381
Alexandroupoli
Teva Investigational Site 380
Athens
Teva Investigational Site 382
Heraklion, Crete
About this study
Official title: A 12-Month, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) in the Reduction of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations in Patients (12-75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether reslizumab is more effective than placebo in reducing the number of clinical asthma exacerbations (CAEs) in patients with eosinophilic asthma.
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Asthma
- Being tested
- Reslizumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Eosinophilia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ReslizumabDrug
Also called Cinquil, humanized monoclonal antibody, CEP-38072
Patients were administered intravenously over 15 to 30 minutes reslizumab at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg at baseline and once every 4 weeks relative to baseline over 48 weeks for a total of 13 doses.
PlaceboDrug
Matching placebo (acetate sucrose buffer), administered intravenously (iv) once every 4 weeks for a total of 13 doses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo administered intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for a total of 13 doses. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Experimental | Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg administered intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for a total of 13 doses. Receives: Drug: Reslizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs) During 12 Months of Treatment
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma:
- use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids.
- asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization.
CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors.
Results are offered as adjusted means.
Measured: Day 1 to Month 12
Frequency of Each of the Two Criteria for Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs)
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma:
- use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids.
- asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency.
Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals for the two criteria were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors.
Results are offered as adjusted means.
Measured: Day 1 to Month 12
Secondary outcomes (12)
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) At Week 16
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma obtained from pulmonary function tests. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration using a spirometer.
Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Week 16
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
FEV1 is a standard measurement of air movement in the lungs of patients with asthma obtained from pulmonary function tests. It is the volume of air expired in the first second of a forced expiration using a spirometer. During study (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average value used a mixed effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment group, visit, treatment and visit interaction, and stratification factors as fixed effects and participant as a random effect. Covariates for baseline values were also included in the model; for pulmonary function test analyses, covariates for height and sex were included as well.
Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) to Week 16
The AQLQ is a 32-item instrument administered as a self-assessment (Juniper et al 1992). The questionnaire is divided into 4 domains: activity limitation, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. Patients were asked to recall their experiences during the last 2 weeks and to respond to each question on a 7-point scale (1=severe impairment, 7=no impairment). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses. Five of the activity questions were "patient-specific," which means that each patient identified and scored 5 activities in which the patient was limited by asthma; these 5 activities were identified at the first visit and retained for all subsequent follow-up visits.
Positive change from baseline scores indicate improvement in quality of life.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Week 16
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The ACQ is a 7-item instrument that measures asthma control (Juniper et al 1999). Six questions are self-assessments; the seventh item, completed by a member of the study staff, is the result of the patient's FEV1 measurement. Each item has 7 possible answers on a scale of 0 to 6, and the total score is the mean of all responses (the total scale is therefore 0-6). A higher score is an indication of poorer asthma control. The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average ACQ was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements.
Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to First Clinical Asthma Exacerbation (CAE)
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma:
- use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids.
- asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization.
CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. The distributions were compared by a log rank test stratified by baseline usage of oral corticosteroid (yes or no) and geographical region (US or other).
Measured: Day 1 to Day 526 (longest treatment time plus 2 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The ASUI is an 11-item instrument designed to assess the frequency and severity of asthma symptoms and side effects, weighted by patient preferences (Revicki et al 1998). ASUI is a utility score that ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better asthma control; info obtained from questionnaire about asthma symptoms.
The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average ASUI was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements.
Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement in asthma symptoms. Information was obtained from questionnaire about asthma symptoms.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA) Use Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
SABA are used for quick relief of asthma symptoms. To measure SABA use, at each clinical visit patients were asked to recall their usage of SABA therapy within the last 3 days of the scheduled visit. If usage was confirmed, the number of puffs used was recorded. For the purpose of summaries, an average daily usage was evaluated by dividing the total number of puffs recorded over 3 days by 3.
The during treatment (Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16) average SABA use was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements.
Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in asthma control.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Count Over 16 Weeks and 52 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
The blood eosinophil counts were measured using a standard complete blood count (CBC) with differential blood test. Results of all differential blood tests conducted after randomization were blinded.
The during treatment average eosinophil count was estimated using a mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) with fixed effects (treatment, stratification factors, sex, visit, interaction of treatment and visit), covariates (height, baseline value), and patient as the random effect for the repeated measurements. The 'over 16 weeks' value used data from Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16. The 'over 52 weeks' value used all the during study time points listed in the Time Frame field.
Negative change from baseline values correlate to reduced asthma severity.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 or early withdrawal
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events TEAE)
An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an inability to carry out usual activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Measured: Day 1 (post-dose) to Week 65. The endpoint for adverse events was the last postbaseline observation, which included the 90 day follow-up visit.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) abnormal serum chemistry, hematology (except for eosinophil values), and urinalysis values.
Significance criteria:
- Blood urea nitrogen: >=10.71 mmol/L
- Creatinine: >=177 μmol/L
- Urate: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >=3*upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >=3*ULN
- GGT = gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase: >= 3*ULN
- Total bilirubin: >=34.2 μmol/L
- White blood cells (low): <=3.0*10^9/L
- White blood cells (high): >=20*10^9/L
- Hemoglobin (age >=18 years): M<=115, F<=95 g/dL
- Hematocrit (age >=18 years): M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L
- Eosinophils/leukocytes: >=10.0%
- Platelets: <=75*10^9/L
- Neutrophils: <=1.0*10^9/L
- Urinalysis: blood, ketones, glucose, and protein: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Measured: Week 4 to Week 52
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values.
Significance criteria
- Sitting pulse (high): >100 and increase of >= 30 beats/minute
- Sitting systolic blood pressure (low): <90 and decrease of >= 30 mmHg
- Sitting systolic blood pressure (high): >160 and increase of >= 30 mmHg
- Sitting diastolic blood pressure (low): <50 and decrease of >=12 mmHg (if 12-17 years old: <55 and decrease of >=12 mmHg 0
- Sitting diastolic blood pressure (high): >100 and increase of >=12 mmHg
- Respiratory rate (low): <6 breaths/minute
- Respiratory rate (high): >24 and increase of >=10 breaths/minute
- Body temperature (low): <35.8° Celsius
- Body temperature (high): >=38.1 and increase of >=1.1° Celsius
Measured: Week 4 to Week 52
Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study
Counts of participants with a positive anti-drug antibody (ADA) response during treatment is offered for the experimental treatment arm. Blood samples were collected for determination of ADAs before study drug infusion.
Measured: Baseline visit (prior to reslizumab exposure), Weeks 16, 32, 48 and 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2011
- Primary completionApr 2014
- Study completionApr 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Eosinophilic AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 464 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Expert, MD, Study director, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01285323
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C38072/3083
- Other IDs
- 2010-024006-35
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2011
- Last updated
- 9 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Nair P, Bardin P, Humbert M, Murphy KR, Hickey L, Garin M, Vanlandingham R, Chanez P. Efficacy of Intravenous Reslizumab in Oral Corticosteroid-Dependent Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):555-564. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.036. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
PubMed 31626990Carr WW, McDonald M, Meizlik P. Effect of intravenously administered reslizumab on spirometric lung age in patients with moderate-to-severe eosinophilic asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jul 1;40(4):240-249. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4225.
PubMed 31262379Han S, Kim S, Kim H, Suh HS. Cost-utility analysis of reslizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma inadequately controlled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists in South Korea. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Sep;35(9):1597-1605. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1605159. Epub 2019 May 16.
PubMed 30964365Bateman ED, Djukanovic R, Castro M, Canvin J, Germinaro M, Noble R, Garin M, Buhl R. Predicting Responders to Reslizumab after 16 Weeks of Treatment Using an Algorithm Derived from Clinical Studies of Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb 15;199(4):489-495. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1668OC.
PubMed 30346831Weinstein SF, Katial RK, Bardin P, Korn S, McDonald M, Garin M, Bateman ED, Hoyte FCL, Germinaro M. Effects of Reslizumab on Asthma Outcomes in a Subgroup of Eosinophilic Asthma Patients with Self-Reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Feb;7(2):589-596.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
PubMed 30193936Brusselle G, Germinaro M, Weiss S, Zangrilli J. Reslizumab in patients with inadequately controlled late-onset asthma and elevated blood eosinophils. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Apr;43:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
PubMed 28159511Castro M, Zangrilli J, Wechsler ME, Bateman ED, Brusselle GG, Bardin P, Murphy K, Maspero JF, O'Brien C, Korn S. Reslizumab for inadequately controlled asthma with elevated blood eosinophil counts: results from two multicentre, parallel, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 May;3(5):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00042-9. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
PubMed 25736990
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 12-Month, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Reslizumab (3.0 mg/kg) in the Reduction of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations in Patients (12-75 Years of Age) With Eosinophilic Asthma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01285323
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C38072/3083
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Asthma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 464 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2011
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jun 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether reslizumab is more effective than placebo in reducing the number of clinical asthma exacerbations (CAEs) in patients with eosinophilic asthma.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo administered intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for a total of 13 doses. |
| Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg | Experimental | Drug: ReslizumabReslizumab 3.0 mg/kg administered intravenously once every 4 weeks ( +-7 days) for a total of 13 doses. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- The patient is male or female, 12 through 75 years of age, with a previous diagnosis of asthma. Patients 12 through 17 years of age are excluded from participating in Germany, India, Argentina, and Korea; patients 66 through 75 years of age are excluded from participating in India and Korea.
- The patient has had at least 1 asthma exacerbation requiring oral, intramuscular (im), or intravenous (iv) corticosteroid use for at least 3 days over the past 12 months before screening.
- The patient has a current blood eosinophil level of at least 400/μL.
- The patient has airway reversibility of at least 12% to beta-agonist administration.
- The patient has an ACQ score of at least 1.5 5 at the screening and baseline (before the 1st dose of study drug) visits.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- The patient has a clinically meaningful co-morbidity that would interfere with the study schedule or procedures, or compromise the patient's safety.
- The patient has known hypereosinophilic syndrome.
- The patient has another confounding underlying lung disorder (eg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or lung cancer). Patients with pulmonary conditions with symptoms of asthma and blood eosinophilia (eg, Churg-Strauss syndrome, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis) will also be excluded.
- The patient is a current smoker (ie, has smoked within the last 6 months prior to screening).
- The patient is using systemic immunosuppressive, immunomodulating, or other biologic agents (including, but not limited to, anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) mAb, methotrexate, cyclosporin, interferon-α, or anti-tumor necrosis factor [anti-TNF] mAb) within 6 months prior to screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ReslizumabAlso: Cinquil, humanized monoclonal antibody, CEP-38072Patients were administered intravenously over 15 to 30 minutes reslizumab at a dosage of 3.0 mg/kg at baseline and once every 4 weeks relative to baseline over 48 weeks for a total of 13 doses. | Drug | Reslizumab 3.0 mg/kg |
| PlaceboMatching placebo (acetate sucrose buffer), administered intravenously (iv) once every 4 weeks for a total of 13 doses. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Frequency of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs) During 12 Months of Treatment
Time frame: Day 1 to Month 12
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma: * use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. * asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization. CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors. Results are offered as adjusted means.
Frequency of Each of the Two Criteria for Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs)
Time frame: Day 1 to Month 12
An exacerbation event was considered a CAE if the patient met either or both of the criteria listed below and this was corroborated with at least 1 other measurement to indicate the worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of asthma: * use of systemic, or an increase in the use of inhaled, corticosteroid treatment for 3 or more days; or an increased 2 or more fold for at least 3 or more days for patient's already on corticosteroids. * asthma-related emergency treatment, such as an unscheduled visit to the physician's office or emergency room for nebulizer treatment or other urgent treatment to prevent worsening of asthma symptoms, or an asthma-related hospitalization CAEs were adjudicated by committee to assure consistency. Adjusted CAE rate and confidence intervals for the two criteria were based on Negative Binomial regression model adjusted for stratification factors. Results are offered as adjusted means.
12 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) At Week 16
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Week 16
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) to Week 16
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Week 16
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to First Clinical Asthma Exacerbation (CAE)
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 526 (longest treatment time plus 2 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI) Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Short-Acting Beta-Agonist (SABA) Use Over 16 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Blood Eosinophil Count Over 16 Weeks and 52 Weeks Using Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline, pre-dose), Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52 or early withdrawal
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events TEAE)
Time frame: Day 1 (post-dose) to Week 65. The endpoint for adverse events was the last postbaseline observation, which included the 90 day follow-up visit.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Lab Values
Time frame: Week 4 to Week 52
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Vital Signs Values
Time frame: Week 4 to Week 52
Participants With a Positive Anti-Reslizumab Antibody Status During Study
Time frame: Baseline visit (prior to reslizumab exposure), Weeks 16, 32, 48 and 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Nov 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31626990Nair P, Bardin P, Humbert M, Murphy KR, Hickey L, Garin M, Vanlandingham R, Chanez P. Efficacy of Intravenous Reslizumab in Oral Corticosteroid-Dependent Asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):555-564. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.036. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31262379Carr WW, McDonald M, Meizlik P. Effect of intravenously administered reslizumab on spirometric lung age in patients with moderate-to-severe eosinophilic asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2019 Jul 1;40(4):240-249. doi: 10.2500/aap.2019.40.4225.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30964365Han S, Kim S, Kim H, Suh HS. Cost-utility analysis of reslizumab for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma inadequately controlled with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-agonists in South Korea. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Sep;35(9):1597-1605. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1605159. Epub 2019 May 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30346831Bateman ED, Djukanovic R, Castro M, Canvin J, Germinaro M, Noble R, Garin M, Buhl R. Predicting Responders to Reslizumab after 16 Weeks of Treatment Using an Algorithm Derived from Clinical Studies of Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb 15;199(4):489-495. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201708-1668OC.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30193936Weinstein SF, Katial RK, Bardin P, Korn S, McDonald M, Garin M, Bateman ED, Hoyte FCL, Germinaro M. Effects of Reslizumab on Asthma Outcomes in a Subgroup of Eosinophilic Asthma Patients with Self-Reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Feb;7(2):589-596.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28159511Brusselle G, Germinaro M, Weiss S, Zangrilli J. Reslizumab in patients with inadequately controlled late-onset asthma and elevated blood eosinophils. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Apr;43:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25736990Castro M, Zangrilli J, Wechsler ME, Bateman ED, Brusselle GG, Bardin P, Murphy K, Maspero JF, O'Brien C, Korn S. Reslizumab for inadequately controlled asthma with elevated blood eosinophil counts: results from two multicentre, parallel, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 May;3(5):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00042-9. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
Related trials for Eosinophilic Asthma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled, Time-to-first Asthma Exacerbation Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of Benralizumab in Paediatric Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
Roll-over Study for Participants Who Have Completed a Previous Clinical Study With Benralizumab (Fasenra) and Benefit From Continued Treatment
Asthma, Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (EGPA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
SIM0718 Treatment of Asthma Clinical Study
Asthma; Eosinophilic
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of KT-621 Administered Orally to Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Eosinophilic Asthma
Eosinophilic Asthma
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Benralizumab Airway Remodeling Study in Severe Eosinophilic Asthmatics
Asthma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Expert, MD study director
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
104 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Reslizumab in people with Eosinophilic Asthma, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 104 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 104 sites in United States, Ukraine, Germany, Russia, Peru and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of Clinical Asthma Exacerbations (CAEs) During 12 Months of Treatment (time frame: Day 1 to Month 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01285323, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Nov 2021.