Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT01283971
A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) Versus Adalimumab in Combination With Methotrexate (MTX) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis And an Inadequate Response to Treatment With Only One Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Inhibitor
A Phase 4 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], adalimumab and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 170 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
This randomized, parallel-group study will assess the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) versus adalimumab, both in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], adalimumab and methotrexate
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 170 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- May 2011to Aug 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- Rheumatoid arthritis of >/= 6 months duration (according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria)(according to ACR criteria)
- Inadequate response due to inefficacy of treatment (for at least 3 months) with only one approved Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-agent other than adalimumab Depending on the TNF-inhibitor, last dose of TNF-inhibitor should have been 1 to 8 weeks before randomization to the study
- On methotrexate treatment for >/=12 weeks immediately prior to baseline, with stable dose (10-25 mg/week) for the last 8 weeks
- Disease Activity Score (DAS28) >3.2 at baseline
- Oral corticosteroids (</=10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are permitted if the dose has been stable for >/=6 weeks prior to baseline.
Who cannot join
- Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned surgery within 6 months following randomization
- Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Functional class IV (ACR criteria)
- History of severe allergic reaction to human, humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
- Known active current or history of recurrent infection (including tuberculosis)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active)
- Body weight >150 kg
- Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies
- Previous treatment with tocilizumab
- Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to baseline.
Trial locations and contacts
170 sites in 12 countries.
170 sites in 12 countries
United States107 sites
Study site
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Study site
Arlington, Virginia, 22205
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Study site
Austin, Texas, 78731
Study site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Study site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Study site
Battle Creek, Michigan, 49015
Study site
Biloxi, Mississippi, 39531
Study site
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606
Study site
Brooklyn, New York, 11201
Study site
Carrollton, Texas, 75007
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Study site
Clarksburg, West Virginia, 26301
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Study site
Clifton, New Jersey, 07012
Study site
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404
Study site
Covina, California, 91723
Study site
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502
Study site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Study site
Escondido, California, 92025
Study site
Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720
Study site
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232
Study site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334
Study site
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804
Study site
Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132
Study site
Frederick, Maryland, 21702
Study site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408
Study site
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
Study site
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Study site
Hamden, Connecticut, 06518
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77004
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77034
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77070
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77074
Study site
Huntington Beach, California, 92646
Study site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Study site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Study site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
Study site
Jupiter, Florida, 33458
Study site
Kennewick, Washington, 99336
Study site
La Mesa, California, 91942
Study site
Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035
Study site
Lakewood, California, 90712
Study site
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40515
Study site
Long Beach, California, 90806
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Study site
Manalapan, New Jersey, 07726
Study site
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Study site
Melbourne, Florida, 32901
Study site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38104
Study site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
Study site
Mesquite, Texas, 75150
Study site
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Study site
Moline, Illinois, 61265
Study site
Monroe, Louisiana, 71203
Study site
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572
Study site
Naples, Florida, 34102
Study site
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903
Study site
New York, New York, 10016
Study site
New York, New York, 10029-6574
Study site
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Study site
Norwich, Connecticut, 06360
Study site
Ocala, Florida, 34474
Study site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109
Study site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Study site
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Study site
Palm Habor, Florida, 34684
Study site
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684
Study site
Petoskey, Michigan, 49770
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19152
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85027
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15237
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617
Study site
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Study site
Sacramento, California, 95816-5119
Study site
Saint Claire Shores, Michigan, 48081
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78217
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Study site
San Diego, California, 92108
Study site
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Study site
South Bend, Indiana, 46601
Study site
Spokane, Washington, 99204
Study site
Springfield, Illinois, 62704
Study site
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63117
Study site
Sugar Land, Texas, 77479
Study site
Syracuse, New York, 13210
Study site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Study site
Tamarac, Florida, 33321
Study site
Tampa, Florida, 33609
Study site
Toledo, Ohio, 43606
Study site
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Study site
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38802
Study site
Valdosta, Georgia, 31602
Study site
Washington, North Carolina, 27889
Study site
Westlake Village, California, 91361
Study site
Whittier, California, 90603
Study site
Whittier, California, 90606
Study site
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090
Study site
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610
Study site
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Study site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
Germany16 sites
Study site
Berlin, 14059
Study site
Düsseldorf, 40217
Study site
Erfurt, 99096
Study site
Erlangen, 91056
Study site
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Study site
Gommern, 39245
Study site
Hamburg, 22081
Study site
Hanover, 30625
Study site
Heidelberg, 69120
Study site
Herne, 44652
Study site
Hildesheim, 31134
Study site
München, 81541
Study site
Osnabrück, 49074
Study site
Regensburg, 93053
Study site
Rostock, 18059
Study site
Tübingen, 72076
France10 sites
Study site
Grenoble, 38042
Study site
Lille, 59037
Study site
Limoges, 87042
Study site
Metz, 57077
Study site
Montpellier, 34295
Study site
Mulhouse, 68070
Study site
Nantes, 44035
Study site
Orléans, 45000
Study site
Paris, 75651
Study site
Toulouse, 31059
Spain9 sites
Study site
A Coruña, La Coruña, 15006
Study site
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28007
Study site
Madrid, Madrid, 28046
Study site
Málaga, Malaga, 29010
Study site
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33006
Study site
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208
Study site
Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, 15706
Study site
Valenica, Valencia, 46009
Sweden6 sites
Study site
Gothenburg, 413 45
Study site
Huddinge, SE-141 86
Study site
Lund, 221 85
Study site
Malmö, 205 02
Study site
Umeå, 90185
Study site
Västerås, 72189
Italy5 sites
Study site
Florence, 50139
Study site
Milan, 20162
Study site
Pavia, 27100
Study site
Pisa, 56100
Study site
Roma, 00161
Russia5 sites
Study site
Kemerovo, 650099
Study site
Moscow, 115522
Study site
Moscow, 119049
Study site
Ufa, 450005
Study site
Ulyanovsk, 432063
Greece4 sites
Study site
Athens, 11527
Study site
Heraklion, 71110
Study site
Thessaloniki, 546 42
Study site
Thessaloniki, 54642
Denmark3 sites
Study site
Aalborg, 9000
Study site
Elsinore, 3000
Study site
Silkeborg, 8600
Finland3 sites
Study site
Helsinki, 00290
Study site
Hyvinkää, 05800
Study site
Jyväskylä, 40100
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study of the Reduction of Signs and Symptoms During Treatment With Tocilizumab Versus Adalimumab, Both in Combination With MTX, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Treatment With Only One TNF Inhibitor
This randomized, parallel-group study will assess the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) versus adalimumab, both in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients, already treated with MTX at stable doses, will be randomized to receive either RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks or adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks. All patients will receive methotrexate (10-25 mg weekly) and folate (at least 5 mg weekly). The anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], adalimumab, placebo to tocilizumab, placebo to adalimumab, methotrexate
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Drug
Also called RoActemra/Actemra
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.
adalimumabDrug
Adalimumab 40 mg SC every 2 weeks.
placebo to tocilizumabDrug
Placebo to tocilizumab IV every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.
placebo to adalimumabDrug
Placebo to adalimumab SC every 2 weeks for 24 weeks.
methotrexateDrug
Methotrexate 10-25 mg weekly.
folateDrug
Folate at least 5 mg weekly.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Experimental | Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenous (IV) every 4 weeks + Placebo to adalimumab subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. All participants received methotrexate 10-25 mg and folate at least 5 mg/kg weekly. Receives: Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]; Drug: placebo to adalimumab; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: folate |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Active comparator | Adalimumab 40 mg SC every 2 weeks + Placebo to tocilizumab IV every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. All participants received methotrexate 10-25 mg and folate at least 5 mg/kg weekly. Receives: Drug: adalimumab; Drug: placebo to tocilizumab; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: folate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Remission at Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (19)
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) Response at Week 24
ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 Response at Week 24
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response at Week 24
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) DAS28 Responses at Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR. DAS28 total score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 or a change from Baseline < -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity (LDAS) at Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. LDAS is defined as DAS28 ≤3.2.
Measured: Week 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Score at Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. A higher value indicated higher disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 24
66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 24
68 joints are assessed for tenderness and joints are classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 24
The patient assessed their pain using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS at Week 24
The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS at Week 24
The physician global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 24
Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (a test for analysis of inflammatory and infectious disorders) and was analyzed at a central laboratory. The concentration of CRP was measured in milligram/liter (mg/L). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 24
Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (a test that assesses tissue inflammation) and was analyzed at a local laboratory. ESR was measured in millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24
The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis, consisting of 20 questions in 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. There are 4 possible responses for each question: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty and 3=unable to do. The score for each of the domains is the highest (worst) score in each domain. A patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains to calculate a valid HAQ-DI score which is the sum of domain scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Short Form (SF-36) Score at Week 24
The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) Score at Week 24
RAPID3 is a patient self reported assessment that combines the HAQ-DI [20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions answered on a 4-point scale where 0=without any difficulty to 3=unable to do} converted to a score of 0-10, the Patients Assessment of Pain [Over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain] converted to a score of 0-10 and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity [over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity] converted to a score of 0-10. The 3 individual scales are summed for a raw score of 0-30 which is divided by 3 to achieve a total possible adjusted score of 0-10. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 24
Blood was collected at Baseline and Week 24. The samples were sent to a central laboratory for Hemoglobin analysis reported in gram/deciliter (g/dL). A positive number change from Baseline (a higher hemoglobin level compared to Baseline) indicated improvement
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs), Discontinuation Due to AEs and Deaths
An adverse event was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events.
A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.
Measured: 32 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionAug 2012
- Study completionAug 2012
Why it stopped: The study was closed due to the slow enrollment rate.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01283971
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MA25522
- Other IDs
- 2010-023587-40
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2011
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study of the Reduction of Signs and Symptoms During Treatment With Tocilizumab Versus Adalimumab, Both in Combination With MTX, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Treatment With Only One TNF Inhibitor
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01283971
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MA25522
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study was closed due to the slow enrollment rate.
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Feb 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized, parallel-group study will assess the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) versus adalimumab, both in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients, already treated with MTX at stable doses, will be randomized to receive either RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks or adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks. All patients will receive methotrexate (10-25 mg weekly) and folate (at least 5 mg weekly). The anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Experimental | Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], Drug: placebo to adalimumab, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: folateTocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenous (IV) every 4 weeks + Placebo to adalimumab subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. All participants received methotrexate 10-25 mg and folate at least 5 mg/kg weekly. |
| Adalimumab + Methotrexate | Active comparator | Drug: adalimumab, Drug: placebo to tocilizumab, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: folateAdalimumab 40 mg SC every 2 weeks + Placebo to tocilizumab IV every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. All participants received methotrexate 10-25 mg and folate at least 5 mg/kg weekly. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- Rheumatoid arthritis of >/= 6 months duration (according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria)(according to ACR criteria)
- Inadequate response due to inefficacy of treatment (for at least 3 months) with only one approved Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-agent other than adalimumab Depending on the TNF-inhibitor, last dose of TNF-inhibitor should have been 1 to 8 weeks before randomization to the study
- On methotrexate treatment for >/=12 weeks immediately prior to baseline, with stable dose (10-25 mg/week) for the last 8 weeks
- Disease Activity Score (DAS28) >3.2 at baseline
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned surgery within 6 months following randomization
- Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Functional class IV (ACR criteria)
- History of severe allergic reaction to human, humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Also: RoActemra/ActemraTocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. | Drug | Tocilizumab + Methotrexate |
| adalimumabAdalimumab 40 mg SC every 2 weeks. | Drug | Adalimumab + Methotrexate |
| placebo to tocilizumabPlacebo to tocilizumab IV every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. | Drug | Adalimumab + Methotrexate |
| placebo to adalimumabPlacebo to adalimumab SC every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. | Drug | Tocilizumab + Methotrexate |
| methotrexateMethotrexate 10-25 mg weekly. | Drug | Adalimumab + Methotrexate, Tocilizumab + Methotrexate |
| folateFolate at least 5 mg weekly. | Drug | Adalimumab + Methotrexate, Tocilizumab + Methotrexate |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Remission at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
19 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) DAS28 Responses at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity (LDAS) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Change From Baseline in DAS28 Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Short Form (SF-36) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs), Discontinuation Due to AEs and Deaths
Time frame: 32 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
170 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], adalimumab and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 170 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 170 sites in United States, Germany, France, Spain, Sweden and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Remission at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2014.