ColicLGGNCT01279265
Effect of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG (LGG) on Infant Colic
A study testing Nutramigen with Enflora and Nutramigen A+ in people with Colic and Inflammation, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare 2 currently marketed formulas in healthy full term babies: Nutramigen A+ (a hypoallergenic formula) and Nutramigen-Enflora (hypoallergenic formula with Lactobacillus GG (LGG)) during 3 months of formula feeding. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 weeks to 3 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colic, Inflammation
- What is being tested?
- Nutramigen with Enflora and Nutramigen A+
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2011to Jan 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 weeks to 3 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Sixty healthy full-term colicky infants (gestational age 32 wks to 41 wks)
Who cannot join
- chronic lung disease,
- diarrhea (stools that take the shape of a container > 5x daily)
- fever
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
About this study
Official title: Effect of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG (LGG) on Infant Crying, Intestinal Microbiota, and Intestinal Inflammation in Infants With Colic
This study will compare 2 currently marketed formulas in healthy full term babies: Nutramigen A+ (a hypoallergenic formula) and Nutramigen-Enflora (hypoallergenic formula with Lactobacillus GG (LGG)) during 3 months of formula feeding. The investigators' aims are to compare 3 outcomes in these babies: (1) normal baby crying time; (2) the composition of intestinal microbiota (bacteria in the stool); and (3) a lab test which measures the number of white blood cells in the large intestine (fecal calprotectin). The investigators predict that LGG supplementation (Nutramigen-Enflora) will facilitate its establishment as an important component of the neonatal intestinal microbial community and reduce fecal calprotectin.
- Conditions
- Colic, Inflammation
- Being tested
- Nutramigen with Enflora, Nutramigen A+
- Keywords
- Lactobacillus, Probiotic, Crying time, Fecal microbiota, Calprotectin, Colic, Infant Crying, Barr Diary, Breath Hydrogen, Clinical Design
- Medical subject headings
- Colic, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nutramigen with EnfloraDietary supplement
Hypoallergenic formula with probiotic - Lactobacillus GG
Nutramigen A+Dietary supplement
Also called (Nutramigen Lipil)
Hypoallergenic formula without lactobacillus
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Nutramigen Lipil with Enflora | Active comparator | Formula with probiotics (Lactobaccillus Rhamnosus GG) Receives: Dietary Supplement: Nutramigen with Enflora |
| Nutramigen A+ | Placebo comparator | Hypoallergenic formula without probiotics (Lactobaccillus Rhamnosus GG) Receives: Dietary Supplement: Nutramigen A+ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Daily Average Crying and Fussing Duration According to Barr Diary Records
The parent or guardian will complete a Barr diary to measure crying and fussing times of colicky infants . It is a daily timeline that records the number of minutes in five minute increments with fussiness and crying. The average colicky infant cries and fusses is more than 3 hours daily. If infants surpasses the 3 hours for more than three days (not consecutive) and are less than 3 months of age, they are considered to have colic.
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Fecal Microbiota
Analyze and identify bacteria in the stool of the subjects. We will use pyrosequencing to characterize the bacteria colonizing the stool. We will measure diversity by Shannon's diversity index in the two groups.
Measured: 90 days
Fecal Calprotectin
Test intestinal inflammation in the infants. Calprotectin is made by white blood cells called neutrophils. The number of neutrophils in the intestine is reflected by the fecal calprotectin level.
Measured: 90 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2011
- Primary completionJan 2013
- Study completionJan 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ColicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mead Johnson Nutrition
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, J. Marc Rhoads, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Investigators
- J. M Rhoads, M.D., Principal investigator, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01279265
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSC-MS-10-0048
- Acronym
- LGG
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2011
- Last updated
- 11 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rhoads JM, Fatheree NY, Norori J, Liu Y, Lucke JF, Tyson JE, Ferris MJ. Altered fecal microflora and increased fecal calprotectin in infants with colic. J Pediatr. 2009 Dec;155(6):823-828.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
PubMed 19628216Rhoads JM, Collins J, Fatheree NY, Hashmi SS, Taylor CM, Luo M, Hoang TK, Gleason WA, Van Arsdall MR, Navarro F, Liu Y. Infant Colic Represents Gut Inflammation and Dysbiosis. J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;203:55-61.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.042. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
PubMed 30177353
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG (LGG) on Infant Crying, Intestinal Microbiota, and Intestinal Inflammation in Infants With Colic
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01279265
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LGG / HSC-MS-10-0048
- Conditions
- Colic, Inflammation
- Keywords
- Lactobacillus, Probiotic, Crying time, Fecal microbiota, Calprotectin, Colic, Infant Crying, Barr Diary
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mead Johnson Nutrition
- Study start
- Sep 2011
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Nov 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare 2 currently marketed formulas in healthy full term babies: Nutramigen A+ (a hypoallergenic formula) and Nutramigen-Enflora (hypoallergenic formula with Lactobacillus GG (LGG)) during 3 months of formula feeding. The investigators' aims are to compare 3 outcomes in these babies: (1) normal baby crying time; (2) the composition of intestinal microbiota (bacteria in the stool); and (3) a lab test which measures the number of white blood cells in the large intestine (fecal calprotectin). The investigators predict that LGG supplementation (Nutramigen-Enflora) will facilitate its establishment as an important component of the neonatal intestinal microbial community and reduce fecal calprotectin.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutramigen Lipil with Enflora | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Nutramigen with EnfloraFormula with probiotics (Lactobaccillus Rhamnosus GG) |
| Nutramigen A+ | Placebo comparator | Dietary Supplement: Nutramigen A+Hypoallergenic formula without probiotics (Lactobaccillus Rhamnosus GG) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 weeks to 3 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Sixty healthy full-term colicky infants (gestational age 32 wks to 41 wks)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- chronic lung disease,
- diarrhea (stools that take the shape of a container > 5x daily)
- fever
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nutramigen with EnfloraHypoallergenic formula with probiotic - Lactobacillus GG | Dietary supplement | Nutramigen Lipil with Enflora |
| Nutramigen A+Also: (Nutramigen Lipil)Hypoallergenic formula without lactobacillus | Dietary supplement | Nutramigen A+ |
Primary outcome
Daily Average Crying and Fussing Duration According to Barr Diary Records
Time frame: 90 days
The parent or guardian will complete a Barr diary to measure crying and fussing times of colicky infants . It is a daily timeline that records the number of minutes in five minute increments with fussiness and crying. The average colicky infant cries and fusses is more than 3 hours daily. If infants surpasses the 3 hours for more than three days (not consecutive) and are less than 3 months of age, they are considered to have colic.
2 secondary outcomes
Fecal Microbiota
Time frame: 90 days
Fecal Calprotectin
Time frame: 90 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Nov 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19628216Rhoads JM, Fatheree NY, Norori J, Liu Y, Lucke JF, Tyson JE, Ferris MJ. Altered fecal microflora and increased fecal calprotectin in infants with colic. J Pediatr. 2009 Dec;155(6):823-828.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30177353Rhoads JM, Collins J, Fatheree NY, Hashmi SS, Taylor CM, Luo M, Hoang TK, Gleason WA, Van Arsdall MR, Navarro F, Liu Y. Infant Colic Represents Gut Inflammation and Dysbiosis. J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;203:55-61.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.042. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Related trials for Colic
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparative Efficacy of IV Dexamethasone vs. Nebulized Terbutaline for Renal Colic Pain in the ED
Renal Colic
Recruiting
The Effect of Probiotics in Infantile Colic
Infantile Colic
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of Probiotic Limosilactobacillus Reuteri (L. Reuteri) on Crying and Fussing Time in Infants With Colic
Infantile Colic
Recruiting
Contribution of Preserving the Superior Left Colic Artery to the Vascularization of the Descending Colon Prior to Colorectal Anastomosis During Left-Sided or Rectal Resections for Colorectal or Ovarian Cancer. (Revascularisation Colique)
Rectal Cancer, Colon Cancer
Active, not recruiting
RELIEF-pathway in Patients With Upper Abdominal Pain
Abdominal Pain, Gallstone; Colic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
J. M Rhoads, M.D. principal investigator
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nutramigen with Enflora and Nutramigen A+ in people with Colic and Inflammation, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Nov 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Daily Average Crying and Fussing Duration According to Barr Diary Records (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01279265, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Nov 2015.