Cardiorenal SyndromePhase 4NCT01265615
Paricalcitol Versus Calcitriol for the Management of Renocardiac Syndrome in Renal Transplant Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Paricalcitol, Calcitriol and Cholecalciferol in people with Cardiorenal Syndrome and Chronic Allograft Nephropathy, run by Ural State Medical University at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
We hypothesize that paricalcitol and calcitriol in dose-dependent manner are effective for the management of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), protection and repair of kidney and heart, management of chronic renocardiac syndrome (CRS). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 75 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiorenal Syndrome, Chronic Allograft Nephropathy
- What is being tested?
- Paricalcitol, Calcitriol and Cholecalciferol
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 109 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2009to Sep 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 75 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 40-75
- Male
- History of chronic kidney disease and cardiorenal syndrome
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Female
- Acute illness
- Life-threat competitive illness
- Mental disorders
- Endocrinologic diseases (including diabetes mellitus, hyperparathyroidism, and other thyroid disorders)
- Need for dialyses
Show all 9Show fewer
- Hypercalcemia
- Concomitant use of hormone or cytokine medication
- Participation to any drug-investigation during the previous 60 days as checked with VIP check
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
Netherlands1 site
De Haar Research Foundation
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3071PR
About this study
Official title: Phase 4 Study of Paricalcitol and Calcitriol for Reparative Management of Chronic Allograft Dysfunction and Renocardiac Syndrome in Vitamin D Insufficient Renal Transplant Recipients
We hypothesize that paricalcitol and calcitriol in dose-dependent manner are effective for the management of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), protection and repair of kidney and heart, management of chronic renocardiac syndrome (CRS). We assume that paricalcitol can have some advantages if compare with calcitriol or cholecalciferol due to absence of calcemic and phosphatemic complications alongside with great beneficial potential.
Read the detailed description
Paricalcitol and calcitriol are identically effective for the management of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), protection and repair of kidney and heart, management of chronic renocardiac syndrome (CRS). Vitamin D can reduce progression of CAD. Activation of VDR in proximal part of nephron leads to rapid non-genomic beneficial effects with urgent multilevel protection of the most functionally important portion of kidney. Rising expression of VDR in distal portions of nephron stimulates slows genomic effects with some local repair responses.
Hormone D may stimulate recruitment and activity of the different origin stem-progenitor cells (SPCs) with beneficial effects on different stages of regeneration by force of para- and autocrine activity. SPCs are revealing mostly in interstitium and among fibroblast-like cells. Vitamin D did not confirm efficacy as a tool for management of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in human however it needs more research experimental evidences due to multifactorial influence on SPCs in human being including immunosuppressive and bone-marrow-related effects of cyclosporine in kidney transplant (Tx) patients. Paricalcitol and calcitriol can slow down migration and infiltration of MSC into interstitium and vessel wall. The side population of mature and SPCs (first of all, with bone-marrow and mesenchymal phenotype) is the most metabolically and functionally active portion of cells with high sensitivity to vitamin D receptor (VDR) activation that responsible for repair of tissue.
The most optimal scheme of treatment with vitamin D in patients with CAD and CRS is an administration of paricalcitol with dose 2-4 μg daily and supplemental intake of vitamin D including special diet, multivitamins, and others with optimal dose until 1800 international units (IU) but excluding insolation as a factor of skin carcinoma. High-dose medicinal intake of calcitriol (until 6 mcg and higher) showed relatively high efficacy but rather excessive level of complications mediated with mineral metabolism.
Paricalcitol and calcitriol may significantly improve contractility of myocardium and reduce cardiovascular risk, heart failure (HF) and hypertension with some beneficial effects on cardiorenal axis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
- Being tested
- Paricalcitol, Calcitriol, Cholecalciferol, Supplemental
- Keywords
- chronic allograft nephropathy, stem-progenitor cells, cardiorenal syndrome, calcitriol, paricalcitol, cholecalciferol, cardiac repair, renal repair
- Medical subject headings
- Cardio-Renal Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ParicalcitolDrug
Also called Zemplar
paricalcitol group (6-8 μg daily per os - orally - without special diet)
CalcitriolDrug
Also called Rocaltrol
calcitriol group (2-4 μg daily orally under with dietary restrictions of vitamin D)
CholecalciferolDrug
Also called Fosamax
cholecalciferol group (intake of cholecalciferol with recommended daily allowance equals 1200-2400 IU per day)
SupplementalDietary supplement
Also called Diet, sun, multivitamin drugs, food
intake of cholecalciferol in food and multivitamins, less than 400-900 IU per day
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Paricalcitol treatment | Active comparator | 6-8 μg daily per os (orally) without special diet Receives: Drug: Paricalcitol |
| Calcitriol treatment | Active comparator | 2-4 μg daily orally under with dietary restrictions of vitamin D Receives: Drug: Calcitriol |
| Cholecalciferol | Active comparator | alendronate sodium/ cholecalciferol capsules with recommended daily allowance equals 1200-2400 IU per day Receives: Drug: Cholecalciferol |
| Supplemental | Other | intake of cholecalciferol in food and multivitamins, less than 400-900 IU per day Receives: Dietary Supplement: Supplemental |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
Beyond 180 days, chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) was characterized by mean Banff degree (revised 2005/2007 criteria) with the data of renal biopsy material. Renal tissue was recovered during routined biopsy. We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades:
Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)
Measured: day 180 after Tx (transplantation)
Secondary outcomes (9)
Heart Failure (HF)
NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class verified with veloergometry probe and by NYHA clinical classification NYHA Class Symptoms I No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity, e.g. shortness of breath when walking, climbing stairs etc.
II Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. III Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity, e.g. walking short distances (20-100 m).
Comfortable only at rest. IV Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest. Mostly bedbound patients.
Measured: on day 180 after Tx (transplantation)
GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the abbreviated form of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation: eGFR = exp (5.228 - 1.154 × ln (serum creatinine) - 0.203 × ln (age). Concerning of GFR with Tc99m DTPA renography was used for the complex analysis of renal function. Camera based GFR estimated from Tc99m DTPA renography was named Gates GFR.
Measured: on day 180
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
CAD degree measured by Banff score after routine renal biopsy (revised 2005/2007 criteria). We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades:
Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)
Measured: on day 90
Serum Creatinine
After an overnight fast, plasma concentrations of hemoglobin, creatinine, cholesterol, glucose, total calcium, and phosphate were measured using an autoanalyzer as described by Adorini L. (2005)
Measured: on day 180 after Tx
Number of Circulating SP (Side Population) Stem-Progenitor Cells
Renal cells and solid tissue were obtained from the normal portion of cortex obtained from surgically removed kidneys or by standart biopsy on day 180. Cytofluorimetric analysis and immunofluorescence were performed as described by Oliver J.A. (2004). Sorting and analysis of different cells was done on a FACS (fluorescent activated cell sorting) and by flow cytometry. Cells were analyzed with EPICS systems (Beckman Coulter). Quantification of mRNA expression was achieved using Assays-on-Demand gene expression kits and the ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystem).
Measured: on day 180
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Myocardium
VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.
Measured: on day 180
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Kidney
VDR content was determined by using an ELISA developed in this laboratory. The protein concentration of the homogenates was determined by the method of Bradford (1976), using BSA as a standard.
Measured: on day 180
Systolic Blood Pressure
SBP measured by routine method
Measured: on day 180
Coronary Calcium Score
Bone mineral density assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the whole body, lumbar spine and hip was performed using Hologic scanners (QDR 1000W or QDR 2000). The total Agatston coronary calcium score (CCS) was measured as the sum of calcified plaque scores of all the coronary arteries. The amount of calcium present in the coronary arteries is scored according to the Agatson scale, as follows: 0 - no identifiable disease; 1 to 99 - mild disease; 100 to 399 - moderate disease; 400 or higher - severe disease.
Measured: on day 180
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2009
- Primary completionApr 2010
- Study completionSep 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiorenal SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 109 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ural State Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ural Institute of Cardiology, De Haar Research Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexander Kharlamov, Ural State Medical University
- Investigators
- Alexander Kharlamov, M.D., Principal investigator, Ural Institute of CardiologyAlexander Perrish, M.D., Principal investigator, Ural State Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01265615
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VDCRS03
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2010
- Last updated
- 9 Jun 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kharlamov AN, Perrish AN, Gabiskii IaL, Ronne Kh, Ivanova EIu. [Vitamin D in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome in patients with chronic nephropathy]. Kardiologiia. 2012;52(3):33-44. Russian.
PubMed 22839442
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jun 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 4 Study of Paricalcitol and Calcitriol for Reparative Management of Chronic Allograft Dysfunction and Renocardiac Syndrome in Vitamin D Insufficient Renal Transplant Recipients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01265615
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VDCRS03
- Keywords
- chronic allograft nephropathy, stem-progenitor cells, cardiorenal syndrome, calcitriol, paricalcitol, cholecalciferol, cardiac repair, renal repair
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 109 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ural State Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ural Institute of Cardiology, De Haar Research Foundation
- Study start
- Oct 2009
- Primary completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Jun 2011
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We hypothesize that paricalcitol and calcitriol in dose-dependent manner are effective for the management of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), protection and repair of kidney and heart, management of chronic renocardiac syndrome (CRS). We assume that paricalcitol can have some advantages if compare with calcitriol or cholecalciferol due to absence of calcemic and phosphatemic complications alongside with great beneficial potential.
Detailed description
Paricalcitol and calcitriol are identically effective for the management of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD), protection and repair of kidney and heart, management of chronic renocardiac syndrome (CRS). Vitamin D can reduce progression of CAD. Activation of VDR in proximal part of nephron leads to rapid non-genomic beneficial effects with urgent multilevel protection of the most functionally important portion of kidney. Rising expression of VDR in distal portions of nephron stimulates slows genomic effects with some local repair responses.
Hormone D may stimulate recruitment and activity of the different origin stem-progenitor cells (SPCs) with beneficial effects on different stages of regeneration by force of para- and autocrine activity. SPCs are revealing mostly in interstitium and among fibroblast-like cells. Vitamin D did not confirm efficacy as a tool for management of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in human however it needs more research experimental evidences due to multifactorial influence on SPCs in human being including immunosuppressive and bone-marrow-related effects of cyclosporine in kidney transplant (Tx) patients. Paricalcitol and calcitriol can slow down migration and infiltration of MSC into interstitium and vessel wall. The side population of mature and SPCs (first of all, with bone-marrow and mesenchymal phenotype) is the most metabolically and functionally active portion of cells with high sensitivity to vitamin D receptor (VDR) activation that responsible for repair of tissue.
The most optimal scheme of treatment with vitamin D in patients with CAD and CRS is an administration of paricalcitol with dose 2-4 μg daily and supplemental intake of vitamin D including special diet, multivitamins, and others with optimal dose until 1800 international units (IU) but excluding insolation as a factor of skin carcinoma. High-dose medicinal intake of calcitriol (until 6 mcg and higher) showed relatively high efficacy but rather excessive level of complications mediated with mineral metabolism.
Paricalcitol and calcitriol may significantly improve contractility of myocardium and reduce cardiovascular risk, heart failure (HF) and hypertension with some beneficial effects on cardiorenal axis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Paricalcitol treatment | Active comparator | Drug: Paricalcitol6-8 μg daily per os (orally) without special diet |
| Calcitriol treatment | Active comparator | Drug: Calcitriol2-4 μg daily orally under with dietary restrictions of vitamin D |
| Cholecalciferol | Active comparator | Drug: Cholecalciferolalendronate sodium/ cholecalciferol capsules with recommended daily allowance equals 1200-2400 IU per day |
| Supplemental | Other | Dietary Supplement: Supplementalintake of cholecalciferol in food and multivitamins, less than 400-900 IU per day |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 75 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 40-75
- Male
- History of chronic kidney disease and cardiorenal syndrome
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Female
- Acute illness
- Life-threat competitive illness
- Mental disorders
- Endocrinologic diseases (including diabetes mellitus, hyperparathyroidism, and other thyroid disorders)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ParicalcitolAlso: Zemplarparicalcitol group (6-8 μg daily per os - orally - without special diet) | Drug | Paricalcitol treatment |
| CalcitriolAlso: Rocaltrolcalcitriol group (2-4 μg daily orally under with dietary restrictions of vitamin D) | Drug | Calcitriol treatment |
| CholecalciferolAlso: Fosamaxcholecalciferol group (intake of cholecalciferol with recommended daily allowance equals 1200-2400 IU per day) | Drug | Cholecalciferol |
| SupplementalAlso: Diet, sun, multivitamin drugs, foodintake of cholecalciferol in food and multivitamins, less than 400-900 IU per day | Dietary supplement | Supplemental |
Primary outcome
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
Time frame: day 180 after Tx (transplantation)
Beyond 180 days, chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) was characterized by mean Banff degree (revised 2005/2007 criteria) with the data of renal biopsy material. Renal tissue was recovered during routined biopsy. We assessed antibody-mediated rejection, borderline changes, T-cell-mediated rejection, interstitial fibrosis and tubular atropthy, and other changes. Grades: Grade I. Mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) II. Moderate (26-50%) III. Severe (>50%) (may include non-specific vascular and glomerular sclerosis)
9 secondary outcomes
Heart Failure (HF)
Time frame: on day 180 after Tx (transplantation)
GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate)
Time frame: on day 180
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree
Time frame: on day 90
Serum Creatinine
Time frame: on day 180 after Tx
Number of Circulating SP (Side Population) Stem-Progenitor Cells
Time frame: on day 180
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Myocardium
Time frame: on day 180
VDR (Vitamin D Receptor) Expression in Kidney
Time frame: on day 180
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: on day 180
Coronary Calcium Score
Time frame: on day 180
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jun 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 22839442Kharlamov AN, Perrish AN, Gabiskii IaL, Ronne Kh, Ivanova EIu. [Vitamin D in the treatment of cardiorenal syndrome in patients with chronic nephropathy]. Kardiologiia. 2012;52(3):33-44. Russian.
- Ural Institute of CardiologyLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Cardiorenal Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Community Health Worker Nutrition Self-Management Support for Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Health
Hypertension (HTN), CKD - Chronic Kidney Disease
Recruiting
Optimised Cardiovascular and Renal Protection in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Monitoring of the Sympathetic/Vagal Balance Through Multiparametric Analysis of Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
Diabete Type 2, Heart Failure
Recruiting
Diuretics Alone vs. Aortix Endovascular Device for Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Cardiorenal Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Secukinumab on Cardiorenal Outcomes in Patients With Cardiorenal Metabolic Syndrome and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Cardiorenal Metabolic Syndrome, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexander Kharlamov, M.D. principal investigator
Ural Institute of Cardiology
Alexander Perrish, M.D. principal investigator
Ural State Medical University
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Paricalcitol, Calcitriol and Cholecalciferol in people with Cardiorenal Syndrome and Chronic Allograft Nephropathy, run by Ural State Medical University at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands, Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jun 2011). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CAD (Chronic Allograft Dysfunction) Degree (time frame: day 180 after Tx (transplantation)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01265615, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2015.