AzTrials
AzTrials

InfectionPhase 3NCT01254344

Efficacy and Safety of Ertapenem Sodium (MK-0826) Following Colorectal Surgery in Chinese Adults (MK-0826-056)

A Phase 3 study testing ertapenem sodium, ceftriaxone sodium and metronidazole in people with Infection and Surgical Site Infection, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertapenem sodium compared with ceftriaxone sodium/metronidazole for the prophylaxis of surgical site infection following elective colorectal surgery in Chinese adults. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Infection, Surgical Site Infection
What is being tested?
ertapenem sodium, ceftriaxone sodium and metronidazole
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
599 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2010to Dec 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participant is scheduled to undergo elective colon or colorectal surgery by
  • laparotomy that is scheduled in advance with adequate time prior to surgery to
  • complete preoperative bowel preparation.
  • Participant is a Chinese adult between the ages of more than 18 years old and
  • less than 81 years old.
  • Participant is highly unlikely to conceive.

Who cannot join

  • Participant is undergoing emergency colon or colorectal surgery.
  • Participant requires a second planned colorectal surgery or other surgery requiring antibiotic prophylaxis within the 4-week follow-up period.
  • Participant is undergoing laparoscopic-assisted surgery.
  • Participant is undergoing an isolated rectal procedure.
  • Participant has a decompensated intestinal obstruction.
  • Participant has active inflammatory bowel disease involving the colon (i.e.,
Show all 18Show fewer
  • ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease).
  • Participant is scheduled to undergo an elective colorectal procedure for revision of a previous operation involving a large bowel resection.
  • Participant has a bacterial infection at the time of surgery.
  • Participant requires or is anticipated to need the administration of other (nonstudy therapy) systemic antimicrobial therapy within 1 week prior to surgery or at any time during this study.
  • Participant is anticipated to receive either antibiotic or antiseptic peritoneal lavage during the surgery.
  • Participant has a history of serious allergy, hypersensitivity (e.g., anaphylaxis), or any serious reaction to ertapenem sodium, ceftriaxone sodium, metronidazole, penicillin, or any cephalosporin, beta(β)-lactam, or nitroimidazole agents.
  • Participant is breast feeding or plans to breast feed prior to the completion of the study period.
  • Participant has neutropenia.
  • Participant with immunosuppression due to an underlying disease, chronic
  • immunosuppressive therapy, or use of high-dose corticosteroids.
  • Participant has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness.
  • Participant is considered unlikely to survive through the expected 4-week study period.

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator-Controlled Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of Ertapenem Sodium (MK-0826) Versus Ceftriaxone Sodium/Metronidazole for the Prophylaxis of Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Colorectal Surgery in Chinese Adults

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ertapenem sodium compared with ceftriaxone sodium/metronidazole for the prophylaxis of surgical site infection following elective colorectal surgery in Chinese adults. This study is designed to demonstrate that ertapenem sodium is non-inferior to ceftriaxone sodium/metronidazole in this participant population.

Being tested
ertapenem sodium, ceftriaxone sodium, placebo to metronidazole, metronidazole
Keywords
Colorectal surgery
Medical subject headings
Infections, Surgical Wound Infection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ertapenem sodiumDrug

    Also called MK-0826, INVANZ®

    Ertapenem sodium 1 g administered IV as a single dose over 30 minutes within 2 hours prior to the initial surgical incision

  • ceftriaxone sodiumDrug

    Also called Rocephin®

    Ceftriaxone sodium 2 g administered IV as a single dose over 30 minutes within 2 hours prior to the initial surgical incision

  • placebo to metronidazoleDrug

    Placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) administered IV as a single dose over 30 minutes within 2 hours prior to the initial surgical incision

  • metronidazoleDrug

    Also called Flagyl®

    Metronidazole 500 mg administered IV as a single dose over 30 minutes within 2 hours prior to the initial surgical incision

Study groups in NCT01254344
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ertapenem sodium 1 gExperimentalErtapenem sodium 1 g administered intravenously (IV) as a single dose followed by matching placebo to metronidazole administered IV as a single dose
Receives: Drug: ertapenem sodium; Drug: placebo to metronidazole
Ceftriaxone sodium 2 gActive comparatorCeftriaxone sodium 2 g administered intravenously (IV) as a single dose followed by metronidazole 500 mg administered IV as a single dose
Receives: Drug: ceftriaxone sodium; Drug: metronidazole

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Success of Prophylaxis

    Percentage of participants who have no signs or symptoms of infection at the surgical site, do not require surgical intervention for infection, and have no need for further antimicrobial therapy

    Measured: From study drug dose (day of surgery) up to 4 weeks post therapy

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response

    Percentage of participants who have no signs or symptoms of infection at the surgical site and do not require surgical intervention for infection

    Measured: 4 weeks posttreatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
599 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01254344
Sponsor's protocol ID
0826-056
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
3 Dec 2010
Last updated
22 Mar 2017
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: http://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/Merck%20Procedure%20on%20Clinical%20Trial%20Data%20Access%20Final\_Updated%20July\_9\_2014.pdf http://engagezone.msd.com/ds\_documentation.php

Publications

  • Leng XS, Zhao YJ, Qiu HZ, Cao YK, Zhu WH, Shen JF, Paschke A, Dai WM, Caldwell N, Wang J. Ertapenem prophylaxis of surgical site infections in elective colorectal surgery in China: a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Dec;69(12):3379-86. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku302. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

    PubMed 25151205

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing ertapenem sodium, ceftriaxone sodium and metronidazole in people with Infection and Surgical Site Infection, run by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Nov 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Success of Prophylaxis (time frame: From study drug dose (day of surgery) up to 4 weeks post therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01254344, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in