AzTrials
AzTrials

Muscular DystrophiesPhase 3DMD114044NCT01254019

A Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GSK2402968 in Subjects With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

A Phase 3 study testing GSK2402968 6mg/kg/week in people with Muscular Dystrophies, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 47 sites in 20 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether GSK2402968 is effective in the treatment of ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy resulting from a mutation thought to be corrected by exon 51 skipping. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Muscular Dystrophies
What is being tested?
GSK2402968 6mg/kg/week
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
186 participants
Where
47 sitesin 20 countries
Study dates
2 Dec 2010to 28 Jun 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ambulant subjects with Duchenne muscular dystrophy resulting from a mutation/deletion within the DMD gene, confirmed by a state-of-the-art DNA diagnostic technique covering all DMD gene exons, including but not limited to MLPA (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification), CGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridisation), SCAIP (Single Condition Amplification/Internal Primer) or H-RMCA (High-Resolution Melting Curve Analysis), and correctable by GSK2402968-induced DMD exon 51 skipping.
  • Males, aged at least 5 years, and with life expectancy of at least 1 year
  • Able to complete 6MWD test with minimal distance of at least 75m at each predrug visit. In addition, results of 6MWD must be within 20% of each other at each pre-drug visit
  • Receiving glucocorticoids for a minimum of 6 months immediately prior to screening, with no significant change in total daily dosage or dosing regimen for a minimum of 3 months immediately prior to screening and a reasonable expectation that total daily dosage and dosing regimen will not change significantly for the duration of the study
  • QTc <450msec (based on single or average QTc value of triplicate ECGs obtained over a brief recording period), or <480 msec for subjects with Bundle Branch Block. Note: QTc may be either QTcB or QTcF, and machine read or manual overread.
  • Subjects, where appropriate, must be willing to use adequate contraception (condoms or abstinence) for the duration of the study and for at least 5 months after the last dose of study drug.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Willing and able to comply with all protocol requirements and procedures,
  • Able to give informed assent and/or consent in writing signed by the subject and/or parent(s)/legal guardian (according to local regulations).
  • French subjects: In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category.

Who cannot join

  • Any additional missing exon for DMD that cannot be treated with GSK2402968
  • Current or history of liver or renal disease or impairment
  • Acute illness within 4 weeks of the first anticipated administration of study medication which may interfere with study assessments
  • Use of anticoagulants, antithrombotics or antiplatelet agents, previous treatment with investigational drugs, within 6 months of the first administration of study medication; and idebenone or other forms of Coenzyme Q10 within 1 month of the first administration of study medication.
  • Current or anticipated participation in any investigational clinical studies
  • Positive hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody test (if verified via RIBA or PCA testing), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test at screening,
  • Symptomatic cardiomyopathy. If subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction <45% at Screening, the investigator should discuss inclusion of subject in the study with the medical monitor,
  • Children in Care. The definition of a Child in Care is a child who has been placed under the control or protection of an agency, organisation, institution or entity by the courts, the government or a government body, acting in accordance with powers conferred on them by law or regulation. The definition of a child in care can include a child cared for by foster parents or living in a care home or institution, provided that the arrangement falls within the definition above. The definition of a child in care does not include a child who is adopted or has an appointed legal guardian.

Trial locations and contacts

47 sites in 20 countries.

47 sites in 20 countries

Brazil6 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Curitiba, Paraná, 80250-060

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14048-900

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rio de Janeiro, 21941-490

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santo André, São Paulo, 09060-650

  • GSK Investigational Site

    São Paulo, 05403-900

Other trials in Brazil

France5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lille, 59037

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Marseille, 13385

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nantes, 44093

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Paris, 75743

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

Germany5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79106

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37075

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 80337

Other trials in Germany

Italy5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ferrara, Emilia-Romagna, 44100

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Messina, Sicily, 98125

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Milan, Lombardy, 20122

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rome, Lazio, 00165

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rome, Lazio, 00168

Other trials in Italy

Japan4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hyōgo, 650-0017

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kumamoto, 860-8556

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saitama, 349-0196

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 187-8551

Other trials in Japan

Canada3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 4G5

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C9

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4

Other trials in Canada

Chile3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 7500539

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Santiago, 8330074

Other trials in Chile

Spain3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Esplugues de Llobregat. Barcelona, 08950

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Madrid, 28046

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

Czechia2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Brno, 613 00

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague

Other trials in Czechia

Argentina1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Buenos Aries, Buenos Aires, C1425AWC

Other trials in Argentina

Belgium1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Denmark1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Koebenhavn Oe, 2100

Other trials in Denmark

Hungary1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Budapest, 1095

Other trials in Hungary

Netherlands1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Leiden, 2333 ZA

Other trials in Netherlands

Norway1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Oslo, 0027

Other trials in Norway

Poland1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 02-097

Other trials in Poland

Russia1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 125412

Other trials in Russia

South Korea1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seoul, 110-744

Other trials in South Korea

Taiwan1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kaohsiung City, 80708

Other trials in Taiwan

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ankara, 06100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of GSK2402968 in Subjects With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

The purpose of this study is to determine whether GSK2402968 is effective in the treatment of ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy resulting from a mutation thought to be corrected by exon 51 skipping.

Being tested
GSK2402968 6mg/kg/week
Keywords
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, DMD, 968, GSK, Duchenne
Medical subject headings
Muscular Dystrophies, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GSK2402968 6mg/kg/weekDrug

    subcutaneous

Study groups in NCT01254019
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GSK2402968Experimental6mg/kg
Receives: Drug: GSK2402968 6mg/kg/week
PlaceboExperimentaldose-matched
Receives: Drug: GSK2402968 6mg/kg/week

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Muscle Function Using the 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) Test Assessed at Week 48

    During the 6MWD, participants were asked to walk, at their own preferred speed, up and down a fixed distance until they were told to stop after 6 minutes. The participants were warned of the time and were told that they may stop earlier if they feel unable to continue. The total distance walked within 6 minutes (or until the participant stopped in case of early termination of the test), the 6MWD, was recorded in meters as well as any falls. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Change From Baseline in the Linearized North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score at Week 48

    The NSAA is a functional scale devised from the Hammersmith Scale of Motor Ability specifically for use in ambulant children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). It consists of 17 activities graded 0 (unable to perform), 1 (performs with modifications), 2 (normal movement). The scale assesses activities required to remain functionally ambulant (e.g. rise from the floor), activities that can be difficult even early in the disease (e.g. standing on heels) and activities that are known to progressively deteriorate over time (stand from a chair, walk). NSAA total score was achieved by adding the responses of all activities, ranging from 0 to 34, with a score of 34 implying normal function and lower score implying more severe symptoms. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  2. Change From Baseline in the 4 Stair Climb (Ascent) Velocity at Week 48

    The participant was asked to ascend four steps. Time was recorded with a stopwatch from the initiation of movement until the participant stood on the fourth step. A flight of steps with handrail was used for this test. Number of stairs ascended per second was calculated as 4 divided by the time to ascend 4 complete stairs. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  3. Change From Baseline in the 10-meter Walk/Run Velocity at Week 48

    The participant was instructed to perform the test bare foot. No aids or orthoses were allowed. The participant was asked to traverse a marked 10-meter measured walkway as quickly as he safely could. Time was recorded to one tenth of a second with a stop watch from when his first foot crossed the start line until when the second foot crossed the finish line. If the wall was touched, it was noted how often. Care was taken to ensure that the participant was safe when completing this test. The assessor walked nearby to provide emergency help if needed, but did not support or provide manual assistance to the participant in any way. If the participant could not complete the 10-meter walk, the total distance was recorded. 10 minute walk/run speed was equal to 10 divided by time taken to complete 10 minute walk/run. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  4. Change From Baseline in the Timed Function Test Rise From Floor at Week 48

    The participant stood from a standardized supine position as quickly as possible when told to go. Time was recorded with a stopwatch from the initiation of movement until the assumption of upright standing. No aids or orthoses are allowed. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  5. Change From Baseline in the 4 Stair Climb (Descent) Velocity at Week 48

    The participant was asked to descend four steps. Time was recorded with a stopwatch from the initiation of movement until the participant stood on the fourth step. A flight of steps with handrail was used for this test. Number of stairs descended per second was calculated as 4 divided by the time to descend 4 complete stairs. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  6. Change From Baseline in Muscle Strength (Total Score) at Week 48

    Muscle strength was recorded by handheld myometry using a micro force evaluation testing 2 (FET2) myometer. Upper and lower limb proximal muscles were evaluated including knee flexors, knee extensors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, shoulder abductors and hip flexors. The muscle strength total score (pounds) was the sum of the 12 individual muscle strength tests. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  7. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to Loss of Ambulation

    All participants were ambulant when entered into the study; however they could have become non-ambulant at some time during the study. The date was recorded and the variable time to loss of ambulation was calculated as: time to loss of ambulation = date of loss of ambulation - date of first dose. Median and interquartile range i.e. 1st and 3rd quartile is presented.

    Measured: Week 48

  8. Number of Participants Who Experienced Accidental Falls During 6MWD Assessments at Week 48

    The number of accidental falls occurring during the 6MWD were counted. Data has been presented for the number of participants who experienced accidental falls (from 0 to 1) during the 6MWD assessment.

    Measured: Week 48

  9. Change From Baseline in Creatine Kinase Serum Concentrations at Week 48

    Creatine kinase is a muscle-specific enzyme; its level in serum is considered to reflect the extent of muscle damage. In the blood samples drawn to this purpose, the serum level of creatine kinase were measured. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  10. Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Function Test Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 48

    The FEV1 is the volume of air forcefully exhaled in 1 second, whereas the FVC is the volume of air that can be maximally forcefully exhaled using non-invasive spirometry was conducted to determine actual and percentage values for FVC and FEV1. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  11. Number of Participants With Identified Mutation: DMD Exon 51 Skip (Upon Muscle Biopsies) at Week 48

    Biopsies were taken from their tibialis anterior muscle and few were taken from quadriceps. Total muscle ribonucleic acid (RNA) was isolated from muscle tissue sections and was analyzed by reverse transcriptase polymer chain reaction (RT-PCR). RT-PCR analysis focused on the area flanking the targeted exon 51 was performed to detect specific exon 51 skipping in muscle. Depending on the participants mutation different sets of DMD-gene specific RT and PCR primers were used. Sequence analysis was performed on isolated PCR products to confirm specific exon 51 skip band detection.

    Measured: Week 48

  12. Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Total Score at Week 48

    PedsQL version 3.0 scale is used to measure pediatric quality of life in children with neuromuscular disorders. The 25-item PedsQL encompasses 3 scales About My/My Childs Neuromuscular Disease (17 items), Communication (3 items), About Our Family Resources (5 items). A 5-point response scale is utilized (where 0=never a problem; 4=almost always a problem). It was assessed both by child and parent. PedsQL total score was calculated by reverse scoring individual items and linearly transforming the score to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicated better health-related quality of life. To reverse score individual items, the 0-4 scale items were transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Total score was then calculated as sum of items divided by number of items answered. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  13. Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Function Test Peak Cough Flow (PCF) and Peak Flow (PF) at Week 48

    The PF also called peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) is a participants maximum speed of expiration, as measured with a peak flow meter, a small, hand-held device used to monitor a participants ability to breathe out air. PCF was measured for participants wearing a nose clip and performing a maximum cough into a pocket peak flow meter. Baseline was defined as participants randomization assessment at Visit 3 (Day 0). Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the value at Week 48.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48

  14. Number of Participants Who Showed Improvement on Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Scale at Week 48

    The CGI-I is scored based on the clinician's reflection of the participant's current overall clinical condition compared to the overall clinical condition just prior to the initiation of medication use (i.e., the period prior to Randomization). The CGI-I is rated without regard to the clinician's belief that any clinical changes are or are not due to medication and without consideration of the etiology of the symptoms. The CGI-I is measured on a 7-point Likert scale (where 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse, 7=very much worse). The score ranged from 1-7, where lower score indicated more improvement and higher score indicated less improvement.

    Measured: Week 48

  15. Change From Baseline in Health Utilities Index (HUI) Scores at Week 48

    A 15-item HUI questionnaire assessed Health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Responses from 15-item HUI were used to quantify HRQoL according to 2 health status classification systems, HUI Mark 2 (HUI2) and HUI Mark 3 (HUI3). HUI2 assessed 7 HRQoL dimensions: sensation, mobility, emotion, cognition, self care, pain and fertility. HUI3 assessed 8 HRQoL dimensions: vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, cognition and pain. Both HUI2 (range from -0.03 to 1.0) and HUI3 (range from -0.36 to 1.0) utility scores were calculated using algorithms incorporating community-derived preference weights. A utility value of 1.0 represented perfect health and a utility value of 0.0 represented death. Lowest possible HUI2 score was -0.03 and for HUI3 score was -0.36, where scores less than 0 represented health states considered worse than death. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 48 value. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline (Randomization Visit, Day 0) and Week 48

  16. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Severe Adverse Events (SAE)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: Up to Follow-up (Week 68)

  17. Number of Participants With Vital Sign Data for Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Heart Rate (HR) of Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) at Any Visit Post-Baseline

    Blood pressure SBP, DBP and HR were recorded after five minutes of rest in a semi-supine position. The following changes from Baseline (Day 0) in vital signs were considered to be of potential clinical concern: DBP was defined as high (increase from Baseline >=20 and >=40 millimeters of mercury [mmHg] and low (decrease from Baseline >=20 and >=40 mmHg), SBP high (increase from Baseline >=10 and >=20 mmHg and low (decrease from Baseline >=10 and >=20 mmHg) and for HR high (increase from Baseline >=20 and >=40 beats per minute [bpm] and low (decrease from Baseline >=20 and >=40 bpm). Only those parameters for which a value of PCC was reported at any visit post-Baseline is presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  18. Number of Participants With Abnormal-clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Any Visit Post-Baseline

    ECG measurements were carried out and the clinical interpretation of the ECG by the investigator was recorded as normal, abnormal but not clinically significant and abnormal clinically significant. The PCC ranges include, QT interval corrected for heart rate by Bazett's formula (QTcB) or QT interval corrected for heart rate by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >450 milliseconds and any increase from Baseline of QTcB or QTcF. Participants were categorized as abnormal clinically significant based on the investigator's judgment and PCC ranges. Data has been presented for number of participants with abnormal clinically significant findings at any visit post-Baseline.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  19. Number of Participants With Hematology Parameters of PCC at Any Visit Post-Baseline

    Laboratory samples were collected for analysis of hematology parameters. The PCC values for hematology parameters: hematocrit was 1.02 x Upper limit of normal (ULN), for hemoglobin was 1.03 x ULN, for lymphocytes was 0.81 x lower limit of normal (LLN), for platelet count was 0.67 x LLN and 1.57 x ULN, for total neutrophils was 0.83 x LLN, and that for white blood cell count was 0.67 x LLN and value of 1.82 x ULN. Only those parameters for which a value of PCC was reported at any visit post-Baseline have been presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  20. Number of Participants With Coagulation Parameters of PCC at Any Visit Post-Baseline

    Laboratory samples were collected for analysis of coagulation parameters. The PCC values for coagulation parameters activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was 1.5 x ULN and aPTT ratio also known as international normalized ration (INR) was 1.2 x ULN. Only those parameters for which a value of PCC was reported at any visit post-Baseline is presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  21. Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Parameters of PCC at Any Visit Post-Baseline

    Laboratory samples were collected for analysis of chemistry parameters. The PCC values for chemistry parameters for alanine amino transferase (ALT) plus total bilirubin (TB) was >=1.5 x ULN for TB and >=2 x ULN for ALT, for albumin was 0.86 x LLN, for asparatate amino transferase (AST) was >=2 x ULN, for calcium was 0.91 x LLN and 1.06 x ULN, for glucose was 0.71 x LLN and 1.41 x ULN, for phosphorus was 0.80 x LLN and 1.14 x ULN, for sodium was 0.96 x LLN and 1.03 x ULN, for potassium was 0.86 x LLN and 1.10 x ULN and that for alkaline phosphatase was >=2x ULN. Only those parameters for which a value of PCC was reported at any visit post-Baseline is presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  22. Number of Participants With Urinalysis Data Outside the Reference Range (>Reference Range High) at Any Visit Post- Baseline

    Urine samples were collected for analysis of abnormal urine parameters. Quantitative examination included the assessment for urine albumin excretion rate, urine alpha-1-microglobulin, urine creatinine excretion-24 hour and urine protein excretion-24 hour. Only those parameters for which a value of >reference range high was reported at any visit post-Baseline is presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  23. Plasma Concentrations of GSK2402968 Following Subcutaneous Administration

    Blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were taken at Week 0 (Randomization) at 0.5, 1, 3 hours post-dose and at Week 8,12, 24, 36 and 47 at pre-dose, and between 1 and 4 hours post-dose. Data has been presented for plasma concentrations of GSK2402968 following subcutaneous administration.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0 at 0.5, 1 and 3 hours), Week 8 (pre-dose, 1-4 hours), Week 12 (pre-dose, 1-4 hours), Week 24 (pre-dose, 1-4 hours), Week 36 (pre-dose, 1-4 hours), Week 47 (pre-dose, 1-4 hours)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Dec 2010
  3. Primary completion28 Jun 2013
  4. Study completion28 Jun 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
186 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01254019
Sponsor's protocol ID
114044
Acronym
DMD114044
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
21 Oct 2010
Last updated
28 Jan 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Goemans N, Mercuri E, Belousova E, Komaki H, Dubrovsky A, McDonald CM, Kraus JE, Lourbakos A, Lin Z, Campion G, Wang SX, Campbell C; DEMAND III study group. A randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of an antisense oligonucleotide, drisapersen, in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 Jan;28(1):4-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

    PubMed 29203355

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing GSK2402968 6mg/kg/week in people with Muscular Dystrophies, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 47 sites in 20 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 47 sites in Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jan 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Muscle Function Using the 6 Minute Walking Distance (6MWD) Test Assessed at Week 48 (time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01254019, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in