Intestinal Behçet's DiseasePhase 3NCT01243671
A Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease
A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab in people with Intestinal Behçet's Disease, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 12 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
To investigate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab subcutaneous (sc) for Japanese subjects with intestinal Behçet's disease who are refractory to conventional therapies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Intestinal Behçet's Disease
- What is being tested?
- Adalimumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Intestinal Behçet's disease
- Patients with typical ulcer at ileocecal region
- Patients who have failed conventional treatment
Who cannot join
- Crohn's disease
- History of ileocecal resection
- History of tuberculosis (TB)
- Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
Japan12 sites
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46738
Chikushino-shi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46723
Kurume
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46728
Nagoya
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46725
Nishinomiya-shi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46730
Osaka
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46722
Sagamihara-shi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46726
Sakura
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 59578
Sapporo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46724
Takatsuki-shi
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46729
Tokyo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46737
Tokyo
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 46733
Yokohama
About this study
Official title: A Multi-Center Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease
To investigate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab subcutaneous (sc) for Japanese subjects with intestinal Behçet's disease who are refractory to conventional therapies.
- Conditions
- Intestinal Behçet's Disease
- Being tested
- Adalimumab
- Keywords
- Behçet's, intestinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AdalimumabBiological
Also called ABT-D2E7, Humira
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Experimental | Adalimumab 160 mg at Week 0, 80 mg at Week 2 and 40 mg every other week (eow) starting at Week 4 to Week 50, subcutaneous injection. After Week 52, participants could continue the treatment with 40 mg eow until the day before approval of adalimumab for intestinal Behçet's disease in Japan. Receives: Biological: Adalimumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Measured: 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (9)
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 52
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Measured: 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52
Complete remission was defined as both endoscopic improvement and global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms grades of 0. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion). Global assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life.
Measured: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Study participants completed a global assessment of their gastrointestinal symptoms (Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were excluded) during 2 weeks before assessment visit on a 5-grade scale. The investigator confirmed this assessment via interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Global assessment of grade 0 or ≤1 and improvement of ≥1 (from baseline) is presented.
Measured: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52
Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening (baseline) endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
Measured: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Participants assessed their abdominal pain, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal discomfort, abdominal fullness, etc) during 2 weeks before assessment visit in 5 grades. Investigator confirmed the assessment through interview with participants. Assessment is graded from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Improvement of ≥1 grade from baseline is also presented.
Measured: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52
Investigators assessed oral aphthous (mouth ulcers), skin symptoms, eye symptoms and vulval (genital) ulcers during 4 weeks before study visit via participant interview, using the following grades. Oral aphthous: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Skin (Erythema nodosum rash): 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Eye (Uveitis): 0=None; 1=one eye crisis in recent 4 weeks; 2=two eye crises in recent 4 weeks; 3=three eye crises in recent 4 weeks. Vulval (genital) ulcer: 0=None; 1=Symptom existed less than 2 weeks in recent 4 weeks; 2=Symptom existed 2 weeks or more in recent 4 weeks; 3=Symptom existed mostly in recent 4 weeks. Resolution was defined as: Behçet's disease symptoms other than gastrointestinal symptoms were graded 0 (disappeared).
Measured: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) is the standard questionnaire to assess the quality of life of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The IBDQ is a 32-item questionnaire consisting of 4 dimensions: bowel-related symptoms, systemic function, social function and emotional status. The responses to each question within each domain range from 1 (significant impairment) to 7 (no impairment), with total score ranging from 32 (very poor) to 224 (perfect health-related quality of life).
Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52
The Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey is a comprehensive quality of life scale. An increase in SF-36 score indicates alleviation of the disease and a decrease in score indicates aggravation of disease. The physical component reflects activity level, activity limitations, pain and rating of one's health. Score on the physical component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health). The mental component reflects vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health. Score on the mental component ranges from 0 (poorest health) to 100 (best health).
Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) normal range was defined as ≤0.3 mg/dL.
Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionMar 2012
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Intestinal Behçet's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Eisai Co., Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Morio Ozawa, MS, Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01243671
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M11-509
- Status last verified
- Jun 2014
- First submitted
- 17 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Inoue N, Kobayashi K, Naganuma M, Hirai F, Ozawa M, Arikan D, Huang B, Robinson AM, Thakkar RB, Hibi T. Long-term safety and efficacy of adalimumab for intestinal Behcet's disease in the open label study following a phase 3 clinical trial. Intest Res. 2017 Jul;15(3):395-401. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.395. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
PubMed 28670237Tanida S, Inoue N, Kobayashi K, Naganuma M, Hirai F, Iizuka B, Watanabe K, Mitsuyama K, Inoue T, Ishigatsubo Y, Suzuki Y, Nagahori M, Motoya S, Nakamura S, Arora V, Robinson AM, Thakkar RB, Hibi T. Adalimumab for the treatment of Japanese patients with intestinal Behcet's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;13(5):940-8.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
PubMed 25245624
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-Center Study of Adalimumab in Japanese Subjects With Intestinal Behçet's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01243671
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M11-509
- Conditions
- Intestinal Behçet's Disease
- Keywords
- Behçet's, intestinal
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Eisai Co., Ltd.
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Mar 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 May 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To investigate efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of adalimumab subcutaneous (sc) for Japanese subjects with intestinal Behçet's disease who are refractory to conventional therapies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adalimumab | Experimental | Biological: AdalimumabAdalimumab 160 mg at Week 0, 80 mg at Week 2 and 40 mg every other week (eow) starting at Week 4 to Week 50, subcutaneous injection. After Week 52, participants could continue the treatment with 40 mg eow until the day before approval of adalimumab for intestinal Behçet's disease in Japan. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Intestinal Behçet's disease
- Patients with typical ulcer at ileocecal region
- Patients who have failed conventional treatment
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Crohn's disease
- History of ileocecal resection
- History of tuberculosis (TB)
- Female subject who is pregnant or breast-feeding or considering becoming pregnant during the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AdalimumabAlso: ABT-D2E7, Humira | Biological | Adalimumab |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24
Time frame: 24 weeks
Marked improvement is defined as the combination of both global assessment of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and endoscopic improvement grades of ≤1. Global assessment of GI symptoms is a participant-assessed, investigator-confirmed grading of global symptoms from 0 to 4: 0=free of symptoms; 1=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks but did not affect participant's daily life; 2=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and slightly affected participant's daily life; 3=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and affected participant's daily life; 4=symptoms existed in past 2 weeks and critically affected participant's daily life. Endoscopic improvement was assessed in 4 grades compared to the screening endoscopy based on the longest diameter (none, ≥1 cm to <2 cm, ≥2 cm to <3 cm, ≥3 cm) of ileocecal largest open ulcer (area of mucosal defect). Grades are: 0=healing; 1=marked reduction (reduction to ≤1/4); 2=reduction (reduction to ≤1/2 - 1/4); 3=no change or worse (reduction less than 1/2 or expansion).
9 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 52
Time frame: 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Complete Remission at Week 24 and Week 52
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With a Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Grade 0 or ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement Grades 0, ≤1 and ≤2 at Week 24 and Week 52
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Abdominal Pain, Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal (GI) Symptoms Grade ≤1 and Improvement of ≥1 Grade at Week 24 and Week 52
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Resolution of Behçet's Disease Symptoms (Other Than Gastrointestinal Symptoms) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time frame: 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Summary Scores at Week 24 and Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Median Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 24 and Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28670237Inoue N, Kobayashi K, Naganuma M, Hirai F, Ozawa M, Arikan D, Huang B, Robinson AM, Thakkar RB, Hibi T. Long-term safety and efficacy of adalimumab for intestinal Behcet's disease in the open label study following a phase 3 clinical trial. Intest Res. 2017 Jul;15(3):395-401. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.3.395. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25245624Tanida S, Inoue N, Kobayashi K, Naganuma M, Hirai F, Iizuka B, Watanabe K, Mitsuyama K, Inoue T, Ishigatsubo Y, Suzuki Y, Nagahori M, Motoya S, Nakamura S, Arora V, Robinson AM, Thakkar RB, Hibi T. Adalimumab for the treatment of Japanese patients with intestinal Behcet's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 May;13(5):940-8.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.042. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
- Related infoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Intestinal Behçet's Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Baricitinib in the Treatment of Intestinal Behçet's Syndrome
Behcet Syndrome, Intestinal Type
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Morio Ozawa, MS study director
AbbVie
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab in people with Intestinal Behçet's Disease, run by AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott) at 12 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 May 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Marked Improvement at Week 24 (time frame: 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01243671, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2014.