Multiple MyelomaPhase 2NCT01237249
Study of Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Older Than 65 Years With Sequential Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade (MPV) Followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) Versus Alternating Velcade/Melphalan/Prednisone (MPV) With Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone
A Phase 2 study testing Melphalan, Prednisone and Velcade in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by PETHEMA Foundation at 63 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
This is a national, multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative study designed to compare, first, the TTP of the two treatment schemes proposed (MPV followed by Rd or MPV alternating with Rd) in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Melphalan, Prednisone and Velcade
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 63 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to May 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent obtained before starting any study-specific procedure.
- Symptomatic elderly MM newly diagnosed by EBMT criteria older than 65 years.
- Performance status (ECOG) ≤ 2.
- Have pre-treatment clinical laboratory values meeting the following criteria within 14 days of randomization:
- platelet count ≥ 75x109/L
- haemoglobin ≥ 8g/dL
Show all 9Show fewer
- absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.0x109/L
- Serum bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL and alkaline phosphatise ≤ 2.5 x ULN AST, ALT ≤ 2.5 x ULN
- Serum creatinine ≤2,5 mg/dl
Who cannot join
- Patient previously received treatment with Velcade or Revlimid.
- Patient previously received treatment for Multiple Myeloma.
- Patient has ≥ Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy within 14 days before enrolment.
- Patient has hypersensitivity to bortezomib, boron, mannitol or lenalidomide.
- Patient has received other investigational drugs with 28 days before enrolment.
- Patient had a myocardial infarction within 6 months of enrolment or has New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities.
- Patient currently is enrolled in another clinical research study and/or is receiving an investigational agent for any reason.
- Radiation therapy within 30 days before randomization, at least patient has had antialgic radiation. Radiation therapy will be afterwards permitted during the treatment period if it is indicated due to the presence of plasmacytomas
Trial locations and contacts
63 sites in 1 country.
63 sites in 1 country
Spain63 sites
Hospital Principe de Asturias
Alcalá de Henares, Madrid
Fundación Hospital Alcorcón
Alcorcón
Hospital de Badalona Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona
H. Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona
Barcelona, Barcelona
ICO - Duran i Reynals, Hospitalet de Llobregat
Barcelona, Barcelona
Hospital Clinic i Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona
Hospital de Cruces
Bilbao
Complejo Hospitalario de Cáceres
Cáceres
Hospital Puerta del Mar
Cadiz
Hospital General de Castellón
Castellon, Castellón
Hospital General
Ciudad Real
Hospital Virgen de la Luz
Cuenca
Hospital Donostia
Donostia / San Sebastian
Hospital Francesc Borja
Gandia
ICO - Josep Trueta
Girona
Hospital General de Guadalajara
Guadalajara
H. de Jerez
Jerez de la Frontera
Complejo Hospitalario León
León
Hospital Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, Madrid
Clínica Puerta de Hierro
Madrid
Hospital 12 de Octubre. Madrid
Madrid
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid
Hospital de Fuenlabrada
Madrid
Hospital de la Princesa
Madrid
Hospital de Madrid, S.A.- Norte Hospital General
Madrid
Hospital del Tajo
Madrid
Hospital Infanta Leonor
Madrid
Hospital Infanta Sofia
Madrid
Hospital la Paz
Madrid
Hospital Severo Ochoa
Madrid
Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid
MD Anderson
Madrid
Complejo Hospital Costa del Sol
Málaga
Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme
Málaga
Althaia
Manresa
Hospital General Univeristario Morales Messeguer
Murcia
Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca
Murcia
Hospital de la Diputación de Navarra
Navarra
Hospital de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín
Palma de Gran Canaria
H. Son Llatzer
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands
Complejo Asistencial Son Dureta
Palma de Mallorca
Clínica Universitaria de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre
Hospital Virgen del Camino
Pamplona
Corporació Sanitaria Parc Taulí
Sabadell
Hospital Clínico de Salamanca
Salamanca
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Santa Cruz de Tenerife
Hoaspital Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela
Hospital General de Segovia
Segovia
Complejo Hospitalario Regional Virgen del Rocío
Seville
Hospital Joan XXIII
Tarragona, Tarragona
Hospital Nuestra Señora del Prado
Toledo
Hospital Virgen de la Salud
Toledo
Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset
Valencia, Valencia
Hospital Arnau de Vilanova
Valencia
Hospital Clínico de Valencia.
Valencia
Hospital La Fe
Valencia
Hospital Txagorritxu
Vitoria-Gasteiz
Hospital Virgen de la Concha
Zamora
Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, Zaragoza
Hospital Clinico Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza
About this study
Official title: A National, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Phase IIb Study of Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Older Than 65 Years With Sequential Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade (MPV) Followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) Versus Alternating Velcade/Melphalan/Prednisone (MPV) With Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd).
This is a national, multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative study designed to compare, first, the TTP of the two treatment schemes proposed (MPV followed by Rd or MPV alternating with Rd) in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years. This comparison will be performing in terms of both efficacy and safety. Up to 120 patients will be included in each treatment arm and evaluated at scheduled visits in up to 3 study periods: Pre-treatment, Treatment and Follow-up.
Primary outcome measure:
Read more
- To evaluate the efficacy in terms of time to progression (TTP) at 18 months of MPV and Rd used as either in a sequential or alternating approach in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years.
- To evaluate the toxicity (safety and tolerability) of the sequential versus the alternating use of MPV and Rd.
Secondary outcome measure:
- To evaluate the response, duration of response, progression free survival (PFS), time to next therapy (TNT) and overall survival (OS) in the two different groups of patients.
- To identify, within the group of patients treated with the alternating scheme, the biological characteristics (including a comprehensive genomic analysis) of those patients resistant to one or the other, and patients refractory to both treatments
Read the detailed description
The Pre-treatment period includes Screening visit. After providing written informed consent form to participate in the study, patients will be evaluated for eligibility during a screening period of 14 days (Days -14 to -1). If patients meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized at the moment of entry in the trial in a 1:1 allocation to receive either MPV followed by Rd (Treatment Group A) or MPV alternating with Rd (Treatment Group B).
Patients in the Treatment Group A will receive nine cycles of MPV consisting on one 6-weeks cycle of Velcade (Bortezomib) as an intravenous bolus twice weekly (days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29 and 32) followed by a 10 day rest period (day 33 to 42), in combination with oral Melphalan, once daily on days 1 to 4 and oral Prednisone, once daily on days 1 to 4, followed by eight 4-weeks cycles of Velcade (Bortezomib) as an intravenous bolus on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 followed by a 6 day rest period (days 23 to 28), in combination with Melphalan and Prednisone per os once daily on days 1 to 4, followed by a 24-day rest period (days 5 to 28). After the nine MPV cycles, patients will receive nine cycles of Rd consisting on 4-weeks cycles, including Revlimid (lenalidomide), once daily on days 1-21 followed by a 7 day rest period (days 22 to 28) plus oral dexamethasone, once weekly on days 1,8,15 and 22, followed by a 6 day rest period (days 23 to 28).
Patients in the Treatment Group B will receive the same schedule of therapy, but the MPV cycles will be alternated with Rd cycles. In this treatment Group B, patients will be again randomized to start receiving either MPV or Rd as first cycle of therapy. Overall, patients will receive an identical number of cycles, nine cycles of MPV and nine of Rd. Patients randomized to Treatment Group A relapsing/progressing or with major toxicities under treatment with MPV will be crossover to receive Rd, but only after study coordinator approval.
During the Treatment Period, patients will be evaluated at day 1 of each cycle. After completion of the Treatment Period, all patients will be evaluated every 2 months thereafter.
Safety will be assessed by the monitoring of adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs measurements, and haematology and clinical chemistry test. Response to treatment will be based on EBMT an IMWG criteria. Response to treatment will be evaluated at day 1 of each induction cycle, and every 2 months during thereafter.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Melphalan, Prednisone, Velcade, Revlimid, Dexamethasone
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Velcade, Revlimid
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MelphalanDrug
PrednisoneDrug
VelcadeDrug
RevlimidDrug
DexamethasoneDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MPV followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) | Active comparator | Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade (MPV) followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) Receives: Drug: Melphalan; Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Velcade |
| Alternating MPV with Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone | Experimental | Alternating Velcade/Melphalan/Prednisone (MPV) with Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) Receives: Drug: Revlimid; Drug: Dexamethasone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To evaluate the efficacy in terms of time to progression (TTP) at 18 months of MPV and Rd used as either in a sequential or alternating approach in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years.
Measured: 18 months
To evaluate the toxicity (safety and tolerability) of the sequential versus the alternating use of MPV and Rd,in terms of adverse events presented in both groups of patients
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
To evaluate the response in both groups of patients
Measured: 1 year
To identify, within the group of patients treated with the alternating scheme, the biological characteristics (including a comprehensive genomic analysis) of those patients resistant to one or the other, and patients refractory to both treatments
Measured: 2 years
Duration of response in two groups of patients
Measured: 2 years
Progression free survival (PFS) in two different groups of patients
Measured: 18 months
Time to next therapy (TNT)
Measured: 2 years
Overall survival (OS) in the two different groups of patients
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionAug 2014
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- PETHEMA Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Janssen-Cilag Ltd., Celgene, TFS Trial Form Support
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01237249
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GEM2010MAS65
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 4 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 18 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Quwaider D, Corchete LA, Misiewicz-Krzeminska I, Sarasquete ME, Perez JJ, Krzeminski P, Puig N, Mateos MV, Garcia-Sanz R, Herrero AB, Gutierrez NC. DEPTOR maintains plasma cell differentiation and favorably affects prognosis in multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Apr 18;10(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0461-8.
PubMed 28420429Paiva B, Cedena MT, Puig N, Arana P, Vidriales MB, Cordon L, Flores-Montero J, Gutierrez NC, Martin-Ramos ML, Martinez-Lopez J, Ocio EM, Hernandez MT, Teruel AI, Rosinol L, Echeveste MA, Martinez R, Gironella M, Oriol A, Cabrera C, Martin J, Bargay J, Encinas C, Gonzalez Y, Van Dongen JJ, Orfao A, Blade J, Mateos MV, Lahuerta JJ, San Miguel JF; Grupo Espanol de Mieloma/Programa para el Estudio de la Terapeutica en Hemopatias Malignas (GEM/PETHEMA) Cooperative Study Groups. Minimal residual disease monitoring and immune profiling in multiple myeloma in elderly patients. Blood. 2016 Jun 23;127(25):3165-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-705319. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
PubMed 27118453Paiva B, Corchete LA, Vidriales MB, Puig N, Maiso P, Rodriguez I, Alignani D, Burgos L, Sanchez ML, Barcena P, Echeveste MA, Hernandez MT, Garcia-Sanz R, Ocio EM, Oriol A, Gironella M, Palomera L, De Arriba F, Gonzalez Y, Johnson SK, Epstein J, Barlogie B, Lahuerta JJ, Blade J, Orfao A, Mateos MV, San Miguel JF; Spanish Myeloma Group / Program for the Study of Malignant Blood Diseases Therapeutics (GEM / PETHEMA) Cooperative Study Groups. Phenotypic and genomic analysis of multiple myeloma minimal residual disease tumor cells: a new model to understand chemoresistance. Blood. 2016 Apr 14;127(15):1896-906. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-665679. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
PubMed 26755711
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A National, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Phase IIb Study of Treatment for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Older Than 65 Years With Sequential Melphalan/Prednisone/Velcade (MPV) Followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) Versus Alternating Velcade/Melphalan/Prednisone (MPV) With Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd).
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01237249
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GEM2010MAS65
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Velcade, Revlimid
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PETHEMA FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Janssen-Cilag Ltd., Celgene, TFS Trial Form Support
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a national, multicenter, open-label, randomized, comparative study designed to compare, first, the TTP of the two treatment schemes proposed (MPV followed by Rd or MPV alternating with Rd) in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years. This comparison will be performing in terms of both efficacy and safety. Up to 120 patients will be included in each treatment arm and evaluated at scheduled visits in up to 3 study periods: Pre-treatment, Treatment and Follow-up.
Primary outcome measure:
- To evaluate the efficacy in terms of time to progression (TTP) at 18 months of MPV and Rd used as either in a sequential or alternating approach in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years.
- To evaluate the toxicity (safety and tolerability) of the sequential versus the alternating use of MPV and Rd.
Secondary outcome measure:
- To evaluate the response, duration of response, progression free survival (PFS), time to next therapy (TNT) and overall survival (OS) in the two different groups of patients.
- To identify, within the group of patients treated with the alternating scheme, the biological characteristics (including a comprehensive genomic analysis) of those patients resistant to one or the other, and patients refractory to both treatments
Detailed description
The Pre-treatment period includes Screening visit. After providing written informed consent form to participate in the study, patients will be evaluated for eligibility during a screening period of 14 days (Days -14 to -1). If patients meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized at the moment of entry in the trial in a 1:1 allocation to receive either MPV followed by Rd (Treatment Group A) or MPV alternating with Rd (Treatment Group B).
Patients in the Treatment Group A will receive nine cycles of MPV consisting on one 6-weeks cycle of Velcade (Bortezomib) as an intravenous bolus twice weekly (days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29 and 32) followed by a 10 day rest period (day 33 to 42), in combination with oral Melphalan, once daily on days 1 to 4 and oral Prednisone, once daily on days 1 to 4, followed by eight 4-weeks cycles of Velcade (Bortezomib) as an intravenous bolus on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 followed by a 6 day rest period (days 23 to 28), in combination with Melphalan and Prednisone per os once daily on days 1 to 4, followed by a 24-day rest period (days 5 to 28). After the nine MPV cycles, patients will receive nine cycles of Rd consisting on 4-weeks cycles, including Revlimid (lenalidomide), once daily on days 1-21 followed by a 7 day rest period (days 22 to 28) plus oral dexamethasone, once weekly on days 1,8,15 and 22, followed by a 6 day rest period (days 23 to 28).
Patients in the Treatment Group B will receive the same schedule of therapy, but the MPV cycles will be alternated with Rd cycles. In this treatment Group B, patients will be again randomized to start receiving either MPV or Rd as first cycle of therapy. Overall, patients will receive an identical number of cycles, nine cycles of MPV and nine of Rd. Patients randomized to Treatment Group A relapsing/progressing or with major toxicities under treatment with MPV will be crossover to receive Rd, but only after study coordinator approval.
During the Treatment Period, patients will be evaluated at day 1 of each cycle. After completion of the Treatment Period, all patients will be evaluated every 2 months thereafter.
Safety will be assessed by the monitoring of adverse events, physical examinations, vital signs measurements, and haematology and clinical chemistry test. Response to treatment will be based on EBMT an IMWG criteria. Response to treatment will be evaluated at day 1 of each induction cycle, and every 2 months during thereafter.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MPV followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) | Active comparator | Drug: Melphalan, Drug: Prednisone, Drug: VelcadeMelphalan/Prednisone/Velcade (MPV) followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) |
| Alternating MPV with Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone | Experimental | Drug: Revlimid, Drug: DexamethasoneAlternating Velcade/Melphalan/Prednisone (MPV) with Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Written informed consent obtained before starting any study-specific procedure.
- Symptomatic elderly MM newly diagnosed by EBMT criteria older than 65 years.
- Performance status (ECOG) ≤ 2.
- Have pre-treatment clinical laboratory values meeting the following criteria within 14 days of randomization:
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient previously received treatment with Velcade or Revlimid.
- Patient previously received treatment for Multiple Myeloma.
- Patient has ≥ Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy within 14 days before enrolment.
- Patient has hypersensitivity to bortezomib, boron, mannitol or lenalidomide.
- Patient has received other investigational drugs with 28 days before enrolment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Melphalan | Drug | MPV followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) |
| Prednisone | Drug | MPV followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) |
| Velcade | Drug | MPV followed by Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) |
| Revlimid | Drug | Alternating MPV with Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone |
| Dexamethasone | Drug | Alternating MPV with Revlimid/Low Dose Dexamethasone |
Primary outcome
To evaluate the efficacy in terms of time to progression (TTP) at 18 months of MPV and Rd used as either in a sequential or alternating approach in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years.
Time frame: 18 months
To evaluate the toxicity (safety and tolerability) of the sequential versus the alternating use of MPV and Rd,in terms of adverse events presented in both groups of patients
Time frame: 6 months
6 secondary outcomes
To evaluate the response in both groups of patients
Time frame: 1 year
To identify, within the group of patients treated with the alternating scheme, the biological characteristics (including a comprehensive genomic analysis) of those patients resistant to one or the other, and patients refractory to both treatments
Time frame: 2 years
Duration of response in two groups of patients
Time frame: 2 years
Progression free survival (PFS) in two different groups of patients
Time frame: 18 months
Time to next therapy (TNT)
Time frame: 2 years
Overall survival (OS) in the two different groups of patients
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jan 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28420429Quwaider D, Corchete LA, Misiewicz-Krzeminska I, Sarasquete ME, Perez JJ, Krzeminski P, Puig N, Mateos MV, Garcia-Sanz R, Herrero AB, Gutierrez NC. DEPTOR maintains plasma cell differentiation and favorably affects prognosis in multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Apr 18;10(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0461-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27118453Paiva B, Cedena MT, Puig N, Arana P, Vidriales MB, Cordon L, Flores-Montero J, Gutierrez NC, Martin-Ramos ML, Martinez-Lopez J, Ocio EM, Hernandez MT, Teruel AI, Rosinol L, Echeveste MA, Martinez R, Gironella M, Oriol A, Cabrera C, Martin J, Bargay J, Encinas C, Gonzalez Y, Van Dongen JJ, Orfao A, Blade J, Mateos MV, Lahuerta JJ, San Miguel JF; Grupo Espanol de Mieloma/Programa para el Estudio de la Terapeutica en Hemopatias Malignas (GEM/PETHEMA) Cooperative Study Groups. Minimal residual disease monitoring and immune profiling in multiple myeloma in elderly patients. Blood. 2016 Jun 23;127(25):3165-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-705319. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26755711Paiva B, Corchete LA, Vidriales MB, Puig N, Maiso P, Rodriguez I, Alignani D, Burgos L, Sanchez ML, Barcena P, Echeveste MA, Hernandez MT, Garcia-Sanz R, Ocio EM, Oriol A, Gironella M, Palomera L, De Arriba F, Gonzalez Y, Johnson SK, Epstein J, Barlogie B, Lahuerta JJ, Blade J, Orfao A, Mateos MV, San Miguel JF; Spanish Myeloma Group / Program for the Study of Malignant Blood Diseases Therapeutics (GEM / PETHEMA) Cooperative Study Groups. Phenotypic and genomic analysis of multiple myeloma minimal residual disease tumor cells: a new model to understand chemoresistance. Blood. 2016 Apr 14;127(15):1896-906. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-08-665679. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
- Spanish Association of HematologyLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
63 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Melphalan, Prednisone and Velcade in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by PETHEMA Foundation at 63 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 63 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To evaluate the efficacy in terms of time to progression (TTP) at 18 months of MPV and Rd used as either in a sequential or alternating approach in newly diagnosed MM patients older than 65 years. (time frame: 18 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01237249, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2017.