Influenza, HumanPhase 3ZORONCT01231620
A Study of Intravenous Zanamivir Versus Oral Oseltamivir in Adults and Adolescents Hospitalized With Influenza
A Phase 3 study testing Zanamivir and Oseltamivir in people with Influenza, Human, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 170 sites in 28 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test the safety and efficacy of zanamivir given intravenously and how well it works at two different doses in hospitalized adolescents and adults with flu. Zanamivir will be compared with oseltamivir, which is used for treating flu. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza, Human
- What is being tested?
- Zanamivir and Oseltamivir
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 626 participants
- Where
- 170 sitesin 28 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Jan 2011to 18 Mar 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female aged 16 years; a female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is:
- of non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is post- menopausal); or,
- of child-bearing potential, has a negative pregnancy test at Baseline, and agrees to use protocol specified methods of birth control while on study.
- Vital signs criteria defined as 3 or more of the following at Baseline:
- Presence of fever [oral temperature of 38°C or equivalent] at Baseline. However, this requirement is waived if the subject has a history of fever within in the 24 hours prior to Baseline; or, if the subject reported symptoms of feverishness at some time during the 48 hours prior to Baseline.
- AND at least 2 out of the following 4:
Show all 15Show fewer
- Oxygen saturation <95% on room air by trans-cutaneous method or need for any supplemental oxygenation or ventilatory support, or increase in oxygen supplementation requirement of ≥2 litres for subjects with chronic oxygen dependency. For those subjects with a history of chronic hypoxia (without supplemental oxygen), an oxygen saturation of at least 3% below the patient's historical baseline oxygen saturation will satisfy this criterion.
- Respiration rate >24 breaths per minute. For those subjects who require ventilatory support or oxygen supplementation, this requirement is waived.
- Heart rate >100 beats per minute.
- Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg.
- Onset of influenza symptoms within 6 days prior to study enrolment. Symptoms may include cough, dyspnea, sore throat, feverishness, myalgias, headache, nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, congestion), fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia, nausea and vomiting.
- Clinical symptoms of influenza with positive influenza diagnostic test result or strong suspicion of influenza illness based on clinical symptoms and local surveillance information.
- Subjects willing and able to give written informed consent to participate in the study and to adhere to the procedures stated in the protocol, or legally acceptable representative willing and able to give written informed consent on behalf of the subject for minors, unconscious adults and those incapable of consenting themselves due to their medical condition, or included as permitted by local regulatory authorities, IRB/IECs or local laws.
- Severity of any medical illness that, in the Investigator's judgement, justifies hospitalization of the subject for treatment and supportive care
- French subjects: In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category
Who cannot join
- Subjects who have taken more than a total of 3 days (6 doses) of approved anti-influenza therapy in the period from onset of symptoms and prior to enrolment.
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are not likely to survive beyond 48 hours from Baseline.
- Subjects who are considered to require concurrent therapy with another influenza antiviral medication.
- Subjects who are known or suspected to be hypersensitive to any component of the study medications.
- Subjects with creatinine clearance ≤10 mL/min who are not being treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).
- Subjects who require Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) at Baseline
Show all 15Show fewer
- Subjects who require routine/intermittent hemodialysis or continuous peritoneal dialysis (due to inability to provide appropriate dosing schedule for oseltamivir) at Baseline. CRRT modalities are allowed.
- Liver toxicity criteria based on local laboratory results obtained within 24 hours of Baseline:
- ALT or AST 3xULN and bilirubin 2xULN
- ALT 5xULN
- Underlying chronic liver disease with evidence of severe liver impairment.
- History of severe cardiac disease or clinically significant arrhythmia (either on ECG or by history) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, will interfere with the safety of the individual subject.
- Females who are pregnant or are breastfeeding.
- Treatment with investigational parenteral anti-influenza drugs (IV peramivir, IV zanamivir or IV oseltamivir) in the 4 weeks prior to Baseline.
- French and Korean subjects: the French or Korean subject has participated in any study using an investigational drug during the previous 30 days.
Trial locations and contacts
170 sites in 28 countries.
170 sites in 28 countries
United States40 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
GSK Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
GSK Investigational Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
GSK Investigational Site
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18105
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35249
GSK Investigational Site
Bismarck, North Dakota, 58504
GSK Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
GSK Investigational Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7215
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
GSK Investigational Site
Chula Vista, California, 91911
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
GSK Investigational Site
Council Bluffs, Iowa, 51503
GSK Investigational Site
Escondido, California, 92025
GSK Investigational Site
Fullerton, California, 92835
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
GSK Investigational Site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
GSK Investigational Site
La Jolla, California, 92037
GSK Investigational Site
La Mesa, California, 91942
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109
GSK Investigational Site
Louisville, Kentucky, 40241
GSK Investigational Site
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
GSK Investigational Site
Missoula, Montana, 59802
GSK Investigational Site
Oak Park, Illinois, 60302
GSK Investigational Site
Oceanside, California, 92056
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
GSK Investigational Site
Peoria, Illinois, 61637
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023
GSK Investigational Site
Roanoke, Virginia, 24013
GSK Investigational Site
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
GSK Investigational Site
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093
GSK Investigational Site
Stamford, Connecticut, 06902
GSK Investigational Site
Sunrise, Florida, 33323
GSK Investigational Site
Toledo, Ohio, 43608
GSK Investigational Site
Topeka, Kansas, 66604
GSK Investigational Site
Troy, Michigan, 48085
GSK Investigational Site
Valhalla, New York, 10595
China14 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Beijing, 100015
GSK Investigational Site
Beijing, 100044
GSK Investigational Site
Changchun, Jilin, 130041
GSK Investigational Site
Changsha, Hunan, 410005
GSK Investigational Site
Chengdu, 610041
GSK Investigational Site
Chongqing, 400016
GSK Investigational Site
Guangzhou, 510120
GSK Investigational Site
Haikou, Hainan, 570311
GSK Investigational Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
GSK Investigational Site
Hangzhou, 310016
GSK Investigational Site
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006
GSK Investigational Site
Shanghai, 200025
GSK Investigational Site
Tianjin, 300052
GSK Investigational Site
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032
Spain12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alicante, 03010
GSK Investigational Site
Badalona, 08916
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08003
GSK Investigational Site
Granada, 18012
GSK Investigational Site
Granada, 18014
GSK Investigational Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08907
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28007
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28040
GSK Investigational Site
Madrid, 28046
GSK Investigational Site
Murcia, 30003
GSK Investigational Site
Oviedo, 33006
GSK Investigational Site
Pama de Mallorca, 07010
Australia9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
GSK Investigational Site
Bedford Park, South Australia, 5043
GSK Investigational Site
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
GSK Investigational Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
GSK Investigational Site
Herston, Queensland, 4029
GSK Investigational Site
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004
GSK Investigational Site
Melbourne, Victoria, 3050
GSK Investigational Site
Perth, Western Australia, 6000
GSK Investigational Site
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145
Canada9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, T1Y 6J4
GSK Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
GSK Investigational Site
Chicoutimi, Quebec, G7H 5H6
GSK Investigational Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H2W1T8
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
GSK Investigational Site
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 3R9
India7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560010
GSK Investigational Site
Civil Lines, 141001
GSK Investigational Site
Lucknow, 226003
GSK Investigational Site
Lucknow, 226005
GSK Investigational Site
Pune, 411004
GSK Investigational Site
Pune, 411018
GSK Investigational Site
Trivandrum, 695029
New Zealand7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Auckland, 1001
GSK Investigational Site
Auckland, 1701
GSK Investigational Site
Auckland
GSK Investigational Site
Christchurch, 8001
GSK Investigational Site
Hamilton, 3204
GSK Investigational Site
Hastings, 4120
GSK Investigational Site
Newtown
France6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Dijon, 21079
GSK Investigational Site
Limoges, 87042
GSK Investigational Site
Nîmes, 30029
GSK Investigational Site
Orléans, 45067
GSK Investigational Site
Poitiers, 86021
GSK Investigational Site
Tours, 37044
South Africa6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bellville, 7530
GSK Investigational Site
Die Wilgers, 0041
GSK Investigational Site
Les Marais, 0084
GSK Investigational Site
Middelburg, Mpumalanga, 1055
GSK Investigational Site
Panorama, 7500
GSK Investigational Site
Worcester, 6850
Germany5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Erlangen, Bavaria, 91054
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
GSK Investigational Site
Homburg, Saarland, 66421
GSK Investigational Site
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053
GSK Investigational Site
Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, 89081
Hungary5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Debrecen, 4031
GSK Investigational Site
Kaposvár, 7400
GSK Investigational Site
Miskolc, 3529
GSK Investigational Site
Székesfehérvár, 8000
GSK Investigational Site
Szombathely, 9700
Mexico5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aguascalientes, 20230
GSK Investigational Site
Chihuahua City, 31238
GSK Investigational Site
Cuautitlán, Estado de México, State of Mexico, 54800
GSK Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280
GSK Investigational Site
San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, 66480
Russia5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Barnaul, 656024
GSK Investigational Site
Barnaul, 656038
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 191167
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 197022
GSK Investigational Site
Smolensk, 214006
South Korea5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Guro Gu, 152703
GSK Investigational Site
Gyeonggi-do, 442-723
GSK Investigational Site
Kangwon-do, 220-701
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 150-030
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 150-950
Belgium4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1070
GSK Investigational Site
Brussels, 1090
GSK Investigational Site
Leuven, 3000
GSK Investigational Site
Liège, 4000
Czechia4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brno, 625 00
GSK Investigational Site
Brno-Bohunice, 625 00
GSK Investigational Site
Hradec Králové, 500 05
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 180 01
Poland4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chorzów, 41-500
GSK Investigational Site
Dębica, 39-200
GSK Investigational Site
Trzebnica, 55-100
GSK Investigational Site
Warsaw, 01-201
United Kingdom4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bristol, BS2 8HW
GSK Investigational Site
Cardiff, CF14 4XW
GSK Investigational Site
Liverpool, L7 8XP
GSK Investigational Site
Manchester, M13 9WL
Denmark3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aarhus N, 8200
GSK Investigational Site
Hvidovre, DK-2650
GSK Investigational Site
Odense C, 5000
Hong Kong3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Kwun Tong
GSK Investigational Site
Shatin
GSK Investigational Site
Tuenmen
Brazil2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Rio de Janeiro, 21040-900
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 01308-050
Greece2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chaïdári, 12462
GSK Investigational Site
Goudi, Athens, 11527
Norway2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bergen, 5053
GSK Investigational Site
Trondheim, 7030
Slovakia2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bratislava, 833 05
GSK Investigational Site
Martin, 036 59
Thailand2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bangkok, 10400
GSK Investigational Site
Bangkok, 10700
About this study
Official title: A Phase III International, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 300 mg or 600 mg of Intravenous Zanamivir Twice Daily Compared to 75 mg of Oral Oseltamivir Twice Daily in the Treatment of Hospitalized Adults and Adolescents With Influenza
The purpose of this study is to test the safety and efficacy of zanamivir given intravenously and how well it works at two different doses in hospitalized adolescents and adults with flu. Zanamivir will be compared with oseltamivir, which is used for treating flu.
Read the detailed description
The recent influenza pandemic has highlighted the need for alternative formulations for anti-influenza therapies. This will be an international Phase III, double-blind, double-dummy, 3-arm study to evaluate the efficacy, antiviral activity and safety of IV zanamivir 600 mg twice daily compared to oral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily, and 600 mg IV zanamivir twice daily compared to 300 mg IV zanamivir for 5 days in hospitalized subjects with laboratory confirmed or suspected influenza infection. For a given subject, the initial 5-day treatment course may be extended for up to 5 additional days if clinical symptoms or patient characteristics as assessed by the investigator warrant further treatment. Alternatively, if the investigator considers that a subject is failing to improve clinically on their randomized treatment, the investigator can choose to initiate the switch/rescue option (600 mg IV zanamivir twice daily) on any day from Day 6 through Day 10 for up to an additional 5 days of treatment. On switching treatments, subjects complete a maximum of 14 days of treatment and are followed-up to Post-Treatment +28 Days.
- Conditions
- Influenza, Human
- Being tested
- Zanamivir, Placebo to match zanamivir, Oseltamivir, Placebo to match oseltamivir
- Keywords
- Seasonal Influenza, Pandemic, Orthomyxoviridae Infections, Influenza, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Enzyme Inhibitors, Influenza, seasonal, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Zanamivir, Pharmacologic Actions, Antiviral Agents, Anti-Infective Agents, H1N1, Neuraminidase inhibitor, Influenza B virus
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human, Orthomyxoviridae Infections, Respiratory Tract Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ZanamivirDrug
Also called Relenza
Zanamivir aqueous solution, 10 mg/mL, will be provided as a single use, sterile clear, colorless preparation in 20 mL clear glass vials.
Placebo to match zanamivirDrug
Placebo to match IV zanamivir will be provided as a normal saline solution of a matched volume.
OseltamivirDrug
Also called Tamiflu
Oseltamivir will be provided as over-encapsulated 75 mg capsules.
Placebo to match oseltamivirDrug
Placebo to match oral oseltamivir will be provided as capsules with a common excipient of appropriate quality.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous (IV) Zanamivir 300mg Twice Daily | Experimental | 300mg of IV zanamivir infusion twice daily plus oral oseltamivir placebo twice daily Receives: Drug: Zanamivir; Drug: Placebo to match oseltamivir |
| Intravenous (IV) Zanamivir 600mg Twice Daily | Experimental | 600mg of IV zanamivir infusion twice daily plus oral oseltamivir placebo twice daily Receives: Drug: Zanamivir; Drug: Placebo to match oseltamivir |
| Oral Oseltamivir 75mg Twice Daily | Active comparator | 75mg oral oseltamivir twice daily plus intravenous placebo zanamivir twice daily Receives: Drug: Placebo to match zanamivir; Drug: Oseltamivir |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Clinical Response (TTCR) in Participants With Confirmed Influenza
Clinical response is defined as the resolution of at least 4 of the 5 vital signs (temperature, oxygen saturation, respiratory status, heart rate, systolic blood pressure) within the respective resolution criteria, maintained for at least 24 hours, or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first. This analysis was performed for Influenza positive population, for those with symptom onset less than or equal to (<=) 4 days, and for those on mechanical (mech) ventilation or in intensive care unit (ICU). 99 days is censored time for the participants who did not achieve TTCR.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Secondary outcomes (31)
Percentage of Participants With Respiratory Improvement
Respiratory Status (RS) is a component of TTCR. Response criteria included the return to the pre-morbid oxygen requirement (participants with chronic oxygen use), a need for supplemental oxygen (administered by any modality: ventilator, non-invasive ventilation, facemask, facetent, nasal canula, etc.) to no need for supplemental oxygen, or a respiratory rate of =<24 breaths/minute (without supplemental oxygen). Data are presented as the percentage of participants achieving respiratory improvement.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With All Cause and Attributable Mortality at Day 14, at Day 28, and at the End of Study Visit
The number of participants who died on or before Day 14, Day 28, and the End of Study Visit were summarized.
Measured: On or before Day 14, Day 28, End of Study Visit (assessed up to 42 days)
Change From Baseline in the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score and Each ADL Activity Score
The Katz ADL scores were collected for bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding activities and were assessed once daily during the treatment period/hospitalization and once at each post-treatment Clinic Visit. For the six individual activities, a score of 1 indicates independence, and a score of 0 indicates dependence. The total score is generated by adding the scores of all six activities. A total score of 6 indicates that the participant was independent; a total score of 0 indicates that the participant was very dependent. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose value collected on Study Day 1. Change from Baseline is defined as the difference at each time point (Day 5/6, and Day 10/11, and last day S/R if treatment was extended beyond 5 days) and the end of the study (post-treatment [PT] +28 Days) compared to Baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Time to Return to Pre-morbid Functional Status as Measured by the Katz ADL Score and Each ADL Activity Score
Pre-morbid functional status is defined as the best functional status in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment. Median time to return to pre-morbid functional status was assessed via the Katz ADL score (bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence, and feeding activities). For the six individual activities, a score of 1 indicates independence, and a score of 0 indicates dependence. The total score is generated by adding the scores of all six activities. A total score of 6 indicates that the participant was independent; a total score of 0 indicates that the participant was very dependent.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants Who Returned to Their Pre-morbid Functional Status as Assessed Per the Katz ADL Score and Each ADL Activity Score at the End of the Study
Pre-morbid functional status is defined as the best functional status in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment. The number of participants who returned to their pre-morbid functional status at the end of the study assessed per the Katz ADL score (bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, continence and feeding activities) is summarized.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Median Time to Return to the Pre-morbid Level of Activity as Measured by the 3-point Scale
Median time to return to pre-morbid level of activity was assessed once daily during treatment/hospitalization and once at each post-treatment assessment and was measured using the 3- point scale (bed rest, limited ambulation, or unrestricted).
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Symptoms of Influenza
Influenza clinical symptoms included nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, congestion), feverishness, cough, myalgias, fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia, dyspnea, headache, sore throat, nausea, and vomiting. Influenza symptoms were assessed once daily during inpatient hospitalization and once at each post-treatment assessment.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Median Time of Duration of Clinical Symptoms of Influenza
Influenza clinical symptoms included nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, congestion), feverishness, cough, myalgias, fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia, dyspnea, headache, sore throat, nausea, and vomiting. Influenza symptoms were assessed once daily during inpatient/hospitalization and once at each post-treatment assessment.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Complications of Influenza and Associated Antibiotic Use
The number of participants with complications of influenza and associated antibiotic use were summarized
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Ventilation Status: Modality of Invasive and Non-invasive Ventilator Support and Oxygen Supplementation
Ventilation status was assessed three times daily during the treatment period/hospitalization. Ventilation status was assessed once daily during inpatient/hospitization and once at each post-treatment clinic visit. The number of participants reported for machine-assisted: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), endotracheal mechanical ventilation, and supplemental oxygen delivery (SOD), no supplemental oxygen (O2) or ventilation support, Respiratory support at "any time (AT) on study" and at Baseline (Day 1) are summarized. Data for the "any time (AT) on study" time point was reported.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Median Time of Duration of Invasive and Non-invasive Ventilator Support and Oxygen Supplementation
Ventilation status was assessed three times daily during the treatment period/hospitalization. Ventilation status was assessed once daily during inpatient/hospitalization and once at each post-treatment clinic visit.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Time of Duration of Hospitalization and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay
Hospital duration and ICU duration was assessed from the first day of dosing. Hospital duration was calculated as the discharge date minus the admission date + 1. Hospital duration while on study was the earlier of discharge, completion, or withdrawal minus the later of the admission date or the study start date + 1. ICU duration-Modified was calculated as the original ICU duration minus ICU days prior to Study Day 1.
Measured: Day 1 to the end of the study (assessed up to 42 days)
Median Time to the Absence of Fever and Improved Respiratory Status, Oxygen Saturation, Heart Rate, and Systolic Blood Pressure
The absence of fever is defined as a non-axillary temperature recording <=36.6 degrees Celsius axillary, <= 37.2 degrees Celsius oral or <= 37.7 degrees Celsius core. Respiratory Status (RS) response criteria included the return to the pre-morbid oxygen requirement (participants with chronic oxygen use), or the need for supplemental oxygen (administered by any modality: ventilator, non-invasive ventilation, facemask, facetent, nasal canula, etc.) to no need for supplemental oxygen, or a respiratory rate =<24 breaths/minute (without supplemental oxygen). Oxygen saturation response criteria: >=95% (without supplemental oxygen). Heart rate response criteria: =<100 beats/minute. Systolic blood pressure response criteria: >=90 millimeters of mercury. Vital signs were assessed three times daily during the treatment period/hospitalization. Vital signs were assessed once daily during inpatient/hospitization and once at each post-treatment clinic visit.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Time to Virologic Improvement
Virologic improvement is defined as a 2 log drop in viral load or sustained undetectable viral ribonucleic acid (RNA) (on two successive occasions) as measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from nasopharyngeal samples. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected daily from Baseline through Day 5. If randomized treatment was continued beyond Day 5, samples were taken on Treatment Days 6, 8, 10 and on the last day of randomized treatment. For participants who utilized the Switch (S)/Rescue (R) option, samples were taken on S/R Day 1, S/R Day 3, S/R Day 5, or S/R Day 6, whichever was the last day of S/R treatment. Nasopharyngeal swabs were taken if the participant was symptomatic and continued to be hospitalized on the Post-Treatment +2, +5, +9, +16, and +28 day assessment.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Virus Culture From Nasopharyngeal Swabs Positive at Baseline
Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected daily from Baseline through Day 5. If randomized treatment was continued beyond Day 5, samples were taken on Treatment Day 6, Day 8, Day 10, Day 11, and the last day of randomized treatment. For participants who utilized the S/R option, samples were taken on S/R Day1, S/R Day3, S/R Day5, or S/R Day6, whichever was the last day of S/R treatment. Samples were taken if the participant was symptomatic and continued to be hospitalized on the Post-Treatment +2, +5, +9, +16 and +28Day assessment. Viral load was measured by Quantitative Virus Culture, log10 50% Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID50)/milliliter (mL). Baseline is defined as the pre-dose value collected on Study Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus Baseline value .
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 10, Day 11 and/or last day of randomized treatment, if randomized treatment was extended beyond 5 days, and S/R Day 5/6 (up to Day 14) if applicable
Change From Baseline Viral Load (Influenza A or B) by qPCR From Nasopharyngeal Swabs Positive at Baseline
Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected daily from Baseline through Day 5. If randomized treatment was continued beyond Day 5, samples were taken on Treatment Day 6, Day 8, Day 10, Day 11, and the last day of randomized treatment. For participants who utilized the S/R option, samples were taken on S/R Day 1, S/R Day 3, S/R Day 5, or S/R Day 6, whichever was the last day of S/R treatment. Samples were taken if the participant was symptomatic and continued to be hospitalized on the post-treatment +2, +5, +9, +16 and +28 day assessment. Viral load as measured by PCR. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose value collected on Study Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 10, Day 11 and/or last day of randomized treatment, if randomized treatment was extended beyond 5 days, and S/R Day 5/6 (up to Day 14) if applicable
Number of Participants With no Detectable Viral RNA and the Absence of Cultivable Virus in Lower Respiratory Samples (Bronchoalveolar Lavage Sample [BAL], Endotracheal Aspirate)
Lower respiratory samples included BAL and endotracheal aspirates. Endotracheal aspirates were requested in participants (par.) who were intubated. Upper (nasopharyngeal swabs) and lower (Endotracheal aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage samples) respiratory samples were collected daily from Baseline/Day 1 through Day 5 and Day 6 (if the last day of randomized treatment [trt]). Endotracheal aspirates were collected in participants who were intubated. If trt was continued beyond Day 5, additional samples were taken on Trt Day 6, Day 8, Day 10, and/or the day of the last dose of randomized trt, if applicable, and S/R Day 1, S/R Day 3, S/R Day 5, or S/R Day 6 if the last day of S/R trt. If the par. was symptomatic and hospitalized, samples were taken on the Post-Trt +2, +5, +9, +16 assessment days, and at the Post-Trt [PT]+28 Day assessment. Assessment of samples was done by quantitative RT-PCR and viral culture.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Time to no Detectable Viral RNA and the Absence of Cultivable Virus in Any Obtained Sample (Upper and Lower Respiratory Samples)
Upper (nasopharyngeal swabs) and lower (Endotracheal aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage samples, where available) respiratory samples were collected daily from Baseline/Day 1 through Day 5 and Day 6 (if the last day of randomized treatment). Endotracheal aspirates were collected in participants who were intubated. If treatment was continued beyond Day 5, additional samples were taken on Treatment Day 6, Day 8, Day 10, and/or the day of the last dose of randomized treatment, if applicable, and S/R Day 1, S/R Day 3, S/R Day 5, or S/R Day 6 if the last day of S/R treatment. If the participant was symptomatic and hospitalized, samples were taken on the Post-treatment+2, +5, +9, +16 assessment days, and at the Post-Treatment +28 Day. Assessment of samples was done by quantitative RT-PCR.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Resistance-associated Mutations Detected in the Neuraminidase (NA) and Hemagglutinin (HA) Gene of Influenza A and B Viruses in Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Endotracheal/BAL Samples
Nasopharyngeal swabs and endotracheal /BAL samples were collected for viral susceptibility analysis. Susceptibility analyses consisted of phenotyping and genotyping. Resistance mutations were detected by genotyping. Viral susceptibility to zanamivir and oral oseltamivir at Baseline and throughout treatment determined by NA and HA (gene of influenza A and B viruses) sequence analysis and NA enzyme inhibition. Number of participants with viral mutation events are summarized, this includes all resistance mutations (substitutions) i.e. those present at Baseline and those that emerged during treatment.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) Considered to be Related to Study Treatment
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse, or misuse. All AEs were assessed by the Investigator as related or not related to the study treatment.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Any Severe or Grade 3/4 AE
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse, or misuse. AEs that occurred during the study were evaluated by the Investigator and graded according to the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) table for grading the severity of AEs. Grade 3=severe; Grade 4=potentially life threatening.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants Who Permanently Discontinued the Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse, or misuse.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants Who Were Permanently Discontinued From the Study Due to an AE
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse, or misuse.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Any Severe or Grade 3/4 Treatment-related AE
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse, or misuse. AEs that occurred during the study were evaluated by the Investigator and graded according to the DAIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric AEs. Grade 3=severe; Grade 4=potentially life threatening. All AEs were assessed by the Investigator as related or not related to the study treatment.
Measured: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Chemistry Laboratory Values Shifts From Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 Days
Samples for laboratory assessments were collected at Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, Day 5/6, Day 8, Day 10/11 (or last day of randomized treatment), switch/rescue (S/R) Day 1, S/R Day 3, and S/R Day 5/6 (last day of S/R treatment for those participants who utilized this option), Post-Treatment +2 (if hospitalized), and Post-Treatment +5, +16, and +28 Days. Clinical chemistry parameters included albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine amino transferase (ALT), aspartate amino tranferase (AST), total bilirubin, calcium, creatine kinase, chloride, carbon dioxide content (CO2), creatinine, potassium, magnesium, sodium. Per the DAIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric AEs, Grade (G) 1=mild, G2= moderate, G3=severe and G4=potentially life threatening. The number of participants with values that were G1, G2, G3 and G4 relative to the normal range are summarized.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values Shifts From Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 Days
Blood samples for laboratory assessments were collected at Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, Day 5/6, Day 8, Day 10/11 (or last day of randomized treatment), S/R Day 1, S/R Day 3, and S/R Day 5/6 (last day of S/R treatment for those participants who utilized this option), Post-Treatment +2 (if hospitalized), and Post-Treatment +5, +16, and +28 Days. Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count, and white blood cell (WBC) count. Per the DAIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric AEs, Grade (G) 1=mild, G2= moderate, G3=severe and G4=potentially life threatening. The number of participants with values that were G1, G2, G3 and G4 relative to the normal range for the indicated hematology parameters is summarized. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose value collected on Study Day 1.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent (TE) Grade (G) 3/4 Clinical Chemistry Toxicities
A toxicity was considered to be TE if it was greater than the Baseline grade, and if it had developed or increased post-Baseline in intensity (and prior to the last dose of investigational product). Clinical chemistry parameters included albumin, ALP, ALT, AST, total bilirubin, calcium, creatine kinase, chloride, CO2/bicarbonate, creatinine, potassium, magnesium and sodium. Per the DAIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric AEs, Grade 3=severe and Grade 4=potentially life threatening. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose value collected on Study Day 1.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent (TE) Grade 3/4 Hematology Toxicities
A toxicity was considered to be TE if it was greater than the Baseline grade, and if it had developed or increased post-Baseline in intensity (and prior to the last dose of investigational product). The hematology parameters included hemoglobin, lymphocytes, total neutrophils, platelet count, and WBC count. Per the DAIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric AEs, Grade 3=severe and Grade 4=potentially life threatening. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose value collected on Study Day 1.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Quantity of Oxygen Delivery Measured at Baseline (Day 1) and During the Study
Oxygen delivery were assessed three times daily at Baseline (Day 1) and during the treatment period/hospitalization (ideally at least 6 hours apart) and once daily during inpatient/hospitalization and once at Post +5 days, +16 days, and +28 days clinic visits. The median quantity of oxygen delivery during the study was not summarized since the data was not collected in a way to accurately calculate values. Baseline is defined as the pre-dose value collected on Study Day 1.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and during the study
Number of Participants Assessed as Normal/Abnormal (Clinically Significant [CS] and Not Clinically Significant [NCS]) for 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4
On Baseline/Day 1, a 12-lead ECG was obtained within approximately 24 hours prior to dosing. The number of participants with an ECG status of normal and abnormal CS or NCS, as determined by the Investigator, is reported. Normal=all ECG parameters within the accepted normal ranges. Abnormal=ECG findings outside of normal ranges. CS=ECG with a CS abnormality that meets exclusion criteria. NCS=ECG with an abnormality that is not CS nor meets exclusion criteria, per Investigator, based on reasonable standards of clinical judgment. In the original protocol ECGs were also done on Day 4, however, amendment 2 removed this requirement and therefore not all participants had Day 4 ECGs.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4
Serum Concentration of IV Zanamivir
Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at four time points to characterize peak concentration (end of infusion; C[EOI]) after the first dose on Day 1 and on Day 4 to characterize the pre-dose concentration (C[0]), the peak concentration C(EOI), and the trough concentration at 11-12 hours post-dose (C[12]) of zanamavir. Data was summarized by Creatinine clearance (CL) Category. The dose on Day 1 is the initial dose (unadjusted) and the dose on Day 4 is the maintenance dose.
Measured: Day 1 and Day 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study start15 Jan 2011
- Primary completion18 Mar 2015
- Study completion18 Mar 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Influenza, HumanStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 626 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01231620
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 114373
- Acronym
- ZORO
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
van Duijnhoven W, Van Dromme I, Haesendonckx S, Witek J, Leopold L. The Hospital Recovery Scale: A clinically useful endpoint in patients hospitalized with influenza. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Dec;123:106952. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106952. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
PubMed 36202198Marty FM, Vidal-Puigserver J, Clark C, Gupta SK, Merino E, Garot D, Chapman MJ, Jacobs F, Rodriguez-Noriega E, Husa P, Shortino D, Watson HA, Yates PJ, Peppercorn AF. Intravenous zanamivir or oral oseltamivir for hospitalised patients with influenza: an international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Feb;5(2):135-146. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30435-0. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
PubMed 28094141
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III International, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 300 mg or 600 mg of Intravenous Zanamivir Twice Daily Compared to 75 mg of Oral Oseltamivir Twice Daily in the Treatment of Hospitalized Adults and Adolescents With Influenza
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01231620
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZORO / 114373
- Conditions
- Influenza, Human
- Keywords
- Seasonal Influenza, Pandemic, Orthomyxoviridae Infections, Influenza, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Enzyme Inhibitors, Influenza, seasonal, Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 626 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Jan 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Mar 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Mar 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Nov 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test the safety and efficacy of zanamivir given intravenously and how well it works at two different doses in hospitalized adolescents and adults with flu. Zanamivir will be compared with oseltamivir, which is used for treating flu.
Detailed description
The recent influenza pandemic has highlighted the need for alternative formulations for anti-influenza therapies. This will be an international Phase III, double-blind, double-dummy, 3-arm study to evaluate the efficacy, antiviral activity and safety of IV zanamivir 600 mg twice daily compared to oral oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily, and 600 mg IV zanamivir twice daily compared to 300 mg IV zanamivir for 5 days in hospitalized subjects with laboratory confirmed or suspected influenza infection. For a given subject, the initial 5-day treatment course may be extended for up to 5 additional days if clinical symptoms or patient characteristics as assessed by the investigator warrant further treatment. Alternatively, if the investigator considers that a subject is failing to improve clinically on their randomized treatment, the investigator can choose to initiate the switch/rescue option (600 mg IV zanamivir twice daily) on any day from Day 6 through Day 10 for up to an additional 5 days of treatment. On switching treatments, subjects complete a maximum of 14 days of treatment and are followed-up to Post-Treatment +28 Days.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous (IV) Zanamivir 300mg Twice Daily | Experimental | Drug: Zanamivir, Drug: Placebo to match oseltamivir300mg of IV zanamivir infusion twice daily plus oral oseltamivir placebo twice daily |
| Intravenous (IV) Zanamivir 600mg Twice Daily | Experimental | Drug: Zanamivir, Drug: Placebo to match oseltamivir600mg of IV zanamivir infusion twice daily plus oral oseltamivir placebo twice daily |
| Oral Oseltamivir 75mg Twice Daily | Active comparator | Drug: Placebo to match zanamivir, Drug: Oseltamivir75mg oral oseltamivir twice daily plus intravenous placebo zanamivir twice daily |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Male or female aged 16 years; a female is eligible to enter and participate in the study if she is:
- Vital signs criteria defined as 3 or more of the following at Baseline:
- Onset of influenza symptoms within 6 days prior to study enrolment. Symptoms may include cough, dyspnea, sore throat, feverishness, myalgias, headache, nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, congestion), fatigue, diarrhea, anorexia, nausea and vomiting.
- Clinical symptoms of influenza with positive influenza diagnostic test result or strong suspicion of influenza illness based on clinical symptoms and local surveillance information.
- Subjects willing and able to give written informed consent to participate in the study and to adhere to the procedures stated in the protocol, or legally acceptable representative willing and able to give written informed consent on behalf of the subject for minors, unconscious adults and those incapable of consenting themselves due to their medical condition, or included as permitted by local regulatory authorities, IRB/IECs or local laws.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Subjects who have taken more than a total of 3 days (6 doses) of approved anti-influenza therapy in the period from onset of symptoms and prior to enrolment.
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, are not likely to survive beyond 48 hours from Baseline.
- Subjects who are considered to require concurrent therapy with another influenza antiviral medication.
- Subjects who are known or suspected to be hypersensitive to any component of the study medications.
- Subjects with creatinine clearance ≤10 mL/min who are not being treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ZanamivirAlso: RelenzaZanamivir aqueous solution, 10 mg/mL, will be provided as a single use, sterile clear, colorless preparation in 20 mL clear glass vials. | Drug | Intravenous (IV) Zanamivir 300mg Twice Daily, Intravenous (IV) Zanamivir 600mg Twice Daily |
| Placebo to match zanamivirPlacebo to match IV zanamivir will be provided as a normal saline solution of a matched volume. | Drug | Oral Oseltamivir 75mg Twice Daily |
| OseltamivirAlso: TamifluOseltamivir will be provided as over-encapsulated 75 mg capsules. | Drug | Oral Oseltamivir 75mg Twice Daily |
| Placebo to match oseltamivirPlacebo to match oral oseltamivir will be provided as capsules with a common excipient of appropriate quality. | Drug | Intravenous (IV) Zanamivir 300mg Twice Daily, Intravenous (IV) Zanamivir 600mg Twice Daily |
Primary outcome
Time to Clinical Response (TTCR) in Participants With Confirmed Influenza
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Clinical response is defined as the resolution of at least 4 of the 5 vital signs (temperature, oxygen saturation, respiratory status, heart rate, systolic blood pressure) within the respective resolution criteria, maintained for at least 24 hours, or hospital discharge, whichever occurred first. This analysis was performed for Influenza positive population, for those with symptom onset less than or equal to (<=) 4 days, and for those on mechanical (mech) ventilation or in intensive care unit (ICU). 99 days is censored time for the participants who did not achieve TTCR.
31 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Respiratory Improvement
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With All Cause and Attributable Mortality at Day 14, at Day 28, and at the End of Study Visit
Time frame: On or before Day 14, Day 28, End of Study Visit (assessed up to 42 days)
Change From Baseline in the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score and Each ADL Activity Score
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Time to Return to Pre-morbid Functional Status as Measured by the Katz ADL Score and Each ADL Activity Score
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants Who Returned to Their Pre-morbid Functional Status as Assessed Per the Katz ADL Score and Each ADL Activity Score at the End of the Study
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Median Time to Return to the Pre-morbid Level of Activity as Measured by the 3-point Scale
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Symptoms of Influenza
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Median Time of Duration of Clinical Symptoms of Influenza
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Complications of Influenza and Associated Antibiotic Use
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Ventilation Status: Modality of Invasive and Non-invasive Ventilator Support and Oxygen Supplementation
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Median Time of Duration of Invasive and Non-invasive Ventilator Support and Oxygen Supplementation
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Time of Duration of Hospitalization and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay
Time frame: Day 1 to the end of the study (assessed up to 42 days)
Median Time to the Absence of Fever and Improved Respiratory Status, Oxygen Saturation, Heart Rate, and Systolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Time to Virologic Improvement
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Change From Baseline in Quantitative Virus Culture From Nasopharyngeal Swabs Positive at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 10, Day 11 and/or last day of randomized treatment, if randomized treatment was extended beyond 5 days, and S/R Day 5/6 (up to Day 14) if applicable
Change From Baseline Viral Load (Influenza A or B) by qPCR From Nasopharyngeal Swabs Positive at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 3, Day 5, Day 8, Day 10, Day 11 and/or last day of randomized treatment, if randomized treatment was extended beyond 5 days, and S/R Day 5/6 (up to Day 14) if applicable
Number of Participants With no Detectable Viral RNA and the Absence of Cultivable Virus in Lower Respiratory Samples (Bronchoalveolar Lavage Sample [BAL], Endotracheal Aspirate)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Time to no Detectable Viral RNA and the Absence of Cultivable Virus in Any Obtained Sample (Upper and Lower Respiratory Samples)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Resistance-associated Mutations Detected in the Neuraminidase (NA) and Hemagglutinin (HA) Gene of Influenza A and B Viruses in Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Endotracheal/BAL Samples
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) Considered to be Related to Study Treatment
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Any Severe or Grade 3/4 AE
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants Who Permanently Discontinued the Study Treatment Due to an AE
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants Who Were Permanently Discontinued From the Study Due to an AE
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With Any Severe or Grade 3/4 Treatment-related AE
Time frame: Up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Chemistry Laboratory Values Shifts From Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 Days
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Hematology Values Shifts From Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 Days
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent (TE) Grade (G) 3/4 Clinical Chemistry Toxicities
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Number of Participants With the Indicated Treatment-emergent (TE) Grade 3/4 Hematology Toxicities
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and up to 42 days
Median Quantity of Oxygen Delivery Measured at Baseline (Day 1) and During the Study
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and during the study
Number of Participants Assessed as Normal/Abnormal (Clinically Significant [CS] and Not Clinically Significant [NCS]) for 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) at Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4
Serum Concentration of IV Zanamivir
Time frame: Day 1 and Day 4
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36202198van Duijnhoven W, Van Dromme I, Haesendonckx S, Witek J, Leopold L. The Hospital Recovery Scale: A clinically useful endpoint in patients hospitalized with influenza. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Dec;123:106952. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106952. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28094141Marty FM, Vidal-Puigserver J, Clark C, Gupta SK, Merino E, Garot D, Chapman MJ, Jacobs F, Rodriguez-Noriega E, Husa P, Shortino D, Watson HA, Yates PJ, Peppercorn AF. Intravenous zanamivir or oral oseltamivir for hospitalised patients with influenza: an international, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Feb;5(2):135-146. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30435-0. Epub 2017 Jan 14.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Influenza, Human
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
170 sites in 28 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Zanamivir and Oseltamivir in people with Influenza, Human, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 170 sites in 28 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 170 sites in United States, China, Spain, Australia, Canada and 23 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Clinical Response (TTCR) in Participants With Confirmed Influenza (time frame: Up to 42 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01231620, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2018.