AzTrials
AzTrials

Neoplasms, OvarianPhase 2NCT01227928

Efficacy and Safety of Pazopanib Monotherapy After First-line Chemotherapy in Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer in Asian Women

A Phase 2 study testing Pazopanib in people with Neoplasms, Ovarian, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 15 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to determine whether therapy with pazopanib is effective and safe in Asian women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer whose cancer has not progressed on first-line chemotherapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Neoplasms, Ovarian
What is being tested?
Pazopanib
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
145 participants
Where
15 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Sep 2010to Jan 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • written informed consent
  • At least 18 years old.
  • Histologically confirmed, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage II-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma that was treated with surgical debulking and at least five cycles of platinum-taxane doublet chemotherapy.
  • Study randomization at least 3 weeks and not more than 12 weeks from the date of the last chemotherapy dose, and all major toxicities from the previous chemotherapy must have resolved.
  • No evidence of disease progression
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of less than or equal to 2
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Able to swallow and retain oral medication.
  • Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal system function as follows:
  • Hematologic
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at least 1.5 X 10^9/L
  • Hemoglobin at least 9 g/dL (or 5.59 mmol/L)
  • Platelets at least 100 X 10^9/L
  • Prothrombin time (PT) or international normalized ratio (INR) up to 1.2 X ULN
  • Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) up to 1.2 X ULN Hepatic
  • Total bilirubin up to 1.5 X ULN
  • AST and ALT up to 2.5 X ULN Renal
  • Serum creatinine up to 1.5 mg/dL
  • Or, if greater than 1.5 mg/dL:
  • Calculated creatinine clearance at least 50 mL/min Urine Protein
  • Urine protein is 0, trace, or +1 determined by dipstick urinalysis, or < 1.0 gram determined by 24-hour urine protein analysis.
  • Non-childbearing potential (i.e., physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant) OR childbearing potential, and agrees to use adequate contraception.

Who cannot join

  • Either (a) bulky disease, or (b) any residual disease which in the opinion of the investigator will need imminent second-line therapy
  • Synchronous primary endometrial carcinoma, or a past history of primary endometrial carcinoma, are excluded unless certain conditions are met.
  • Clinically significant gastrointestinal abnormalities
  • Prolongation of corrected QT interval (QTc) > 480 msecs
  • History of any one or more cardiovascular conditions within the past 6 months prior to randomization
  • Poorly controlled hypertension
Show all 15Show fewer
  • History of cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attacks), pulmonary embolism or untreated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) within the past 6 months prior to randomization
  • Major surgery (including interval debulking) or trauma within 28 days, or minor surgical procedures within 7 days, prior to randomization, or has any non-healing wound, fracture, or ulcer.
  • Evidence of active bleeding or bleeding diathesis.
  • Hemoptysis within 6 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Endobronchial metastases.
  • Serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical (e.g., uncontrolled infection), psychiatric, or other condition that could interfere with subject's safety, provision of informed consent, or compliance to study procedures.
  • Investigational or anti-VEGF anticancer therapy prior to study randomization.
  • Known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to pazopanib.
  • Prior or concurrent invasive malignancies that currently or within the last 5 years show/ed activity of disease (except ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer, or concurrent endometrial cancer FIGO stages IA/B)

Trial locations and contacts

15 sites in 4 countries.

15 sites in 4 countries

China11 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100021

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100044

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100853

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310006

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jinan, Shandong, 250012

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shanghai, 200032

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shenyang, Liaoning, 110022

Other trials in China

Taiwan2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Taipei, 104

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Taipei, 112

Other trials in Taiwan

Hong Kong1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

South Korea1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seoul, 135-710

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Pazopanib Monotherapy in Asian Women Who Have Not Progressed After First-line Chemotherapy for Advanced Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma - An Extension Study to VEG110655

This is a study to determine whether therapy with pazopanib is effective and safe in Asian women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer whose cancer has not progressed on first-line chemotherapy.

Read the detailed description

This study is an extension study to the VEG110655 study. The parent study, VEG110655, was designed to evaluate whether pazopanib 800 mg daily for 52 weeks will prolong progression free survival (PFS) in women diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer. These women will have obtained stable disease, a complete remission, or a partial remission after debulking surgery and at least five cycles of chemotherapy (taxane/platinum). This extension study will evaluate safety and efficacy outcomes of pazopanib monotherapy and placebo in an Asian population with the same indication as the parent study.

Being tested
Pazopanib, Placebo comparator
Keywords
tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma, primary peritoneal cancer, ovarian cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, gynecologic cancer, anti-angiogenesis, pazopanib
Medical subject headings
Ovarian Neoplasms, Fallopian Tube Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PazopanibDrug

    Pazopanib 800 mg daily for 24 months

  • Placebo comparatorDrug

    Placebo 800 mg daily for 24 months

Study groups in NCT01227928
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
pazopanibExperimentalexperimental medication
Receives: Drug: Pazopanib
placeboPlacebo comparatorplacebo comparator
Receives: Drug: Placebo comparator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    PFS is defined as the time interval between randomization and evidence of progressive disease (PD), as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, or death, whichever occurred first. A visit-based analysis approach to determine participants' dates of progression was applied in the analysis method. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis were censored at the date associated with the last visit with adequate assessment.

    Measured: From randomization until evidence of progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first (average of 15.2 months)

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Overall Survival

    Overall survival is defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.

    Measured: From randomization until death due to any cause (average of 29.4 months)

  2. PFS by Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Criteria

    PFS by GCIG criteria is defined as the time from the randomization date to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) per GCIG criteria or death due to any cause. Per GCIG criteria, an objective progression is defined as the earliest event of either tumor progression based on RECIST v1.0 or confirmed CA-125 progression. A participant is counted as "Progressed per RECIST" if the radiological PD per RECIST occurred prior to or on the same day as CA-125 progression. A participant is counted as "Progressed per CA-125" if the radiological PD occurred after CA-125 progression. Per RECIST, PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were alive and had not progressed at the time of analysis were censored at the date associated with the last visit with adequate assessment.

    Measured: From randomization to the earliest date of disease progression per GCIG criteria or death due to any cause (average of 15.2 months)

  3. Number of Participants With Any Dose Reduction or Any Dose Interruption

    Dose interruptions or reductions may have been required following potential drug-related toxicities. As a general rule, if dose reduction of investigational product (IP) was necessary, the dose should have been reduced stepwise by 200 mg at each step, and the participant should have been monitored for 10 to 14 days. If toxicity recurred or worsened during this monitoring time, the IP could have been interrupted and/or the dose of IP further decreased, with continued monitoring for an additional 10 to 14 days, and so on. The cut off for these data was October 12, 2012.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  4. Number of Participants With Any Non-serious Adverse Event (AE) and Any Serious Adverse Event (SAE)

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalizaton or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. See the non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of specific events.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  5. Number of Participants With Any On-therapy AE and Any AE Related to Study Treatment

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. On-therapy AEs were those reported from the first day that randomized study drug was received to 28 days after the last dose of randomized study drug, and within 28 days of dose interruption. Relatedness was assessed by the Investigator.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  6. Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or 4 AE

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. The NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 3.0 was used to grade AEs per the following scale to assess severity: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5, death related to AE.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  7. Number of Participants With the Indicated On-therapy Grade 3-5 AEs

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. On-therapy AEs were those reported from the first day that randomized study drug was received to 28 days after the last dose of randomized study drug, and within 28 days of dose interruption. The NCI-CTCAE Version 3.0 was used to grade AEs per the following scale to assess severity: Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe; Grade 4, life-threatening or disabling AE; Grade 5, death related to AE. ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  8. Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment, Dose Interruption, and Dose Reduction

    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. Dose interruptions or reductions may have been required following potential drug-related toxicities. As a general rule, if dose reduction of investigational product (IP) was necessary, the dose should have been reduced stepwise by 200 mg at each step, and the participant should have been monitored for 10 to 14 days. If toxicity recurred or worsened during this monitoring time, the IP could have been interrupted and/or the dose of IP further decreased, with continued monitoring for an additional 10 to 14 days, and so on.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  9. Number of Participants With Any SAE, Any SAE Related to Study Treatment, and Any Fatal SAE

    An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalizaton or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. See the non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of specific events. Relatedness was assessed by the Investigator.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  10. Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Blood Pressure Shifts From Baseline

    Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Diatolic blood pressure (DBP) are measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A participant could have been counted in more than one shift category. Participants who experienced shifts in both SBP and DBP are represented under each individual parameter. A worst-case on-therapy shift is defined as the worst shift that occurred at any time during the treatment period.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  11. Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Shift From Baseline in Bazett's Corrected QT Interval (QTc)

    12-lead ECGs were obtained at the scheduled visits. A worst-case on-therapy shift is defined as the worst shift that occurred at any time during the treatment period. The QTc is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. In general, the faster the heart rate the shorter the QTc. If a QTc >=500 milliseconds (msec) was noted on a scheduled or unscheduled electrocardiogram (ECG), then two additional ECGs should have been obtained within 5 minutes to confirm the abnormality. The average QTc was determined from the three ECG tracings by manual evaluation and was used to determine continued eligibility.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  12. Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Hematology Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline Grade

    Grade shifts from Baseline were assessed as any grade increase (AGI), increase to Grade (G) 3 (ITG3), and increase to Grade 4 (ITG4). Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events), version 4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity. The CTCAE displays Grades (G) 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on the following general guideline: G1, mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; G2, moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); G3, severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; G4, Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.; G5, death related to AE.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  13. Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case On-therapy Chemistry Parameter Grade Shifts From Baseline Grade

    Grade shifts from Baseline were assessed as any grade increase (AGI), increase to Grade (G) 3 (ITG3), and increase to Grade 4 (ITG4). Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events), version 4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the toxicity. The CTCAE displays Grades (G) 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each toxicity based on the following general guideline: G1, mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated; G2, moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL); G3, severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL; G4, Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated.; G5, death related to AE.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

  14. Number of Participants With the Indicated Worst-case Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Shifts From Baseline Grades of 0, 1, and 2

    The ECOG performance status scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participant's disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. Grade 0, fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. Grade 1, restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. Grade 2, ambulatory and capable of all selfcare, but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 3, capable of only limited selfcare; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. Grade 4, completely disabled; cannot carry on any selfcare; totally confined to bed or chair. Grade 5, dead.

    Measured: From Week 1 until the end of the treatment period (up to Study Week 108)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Oct 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionOct 2012
  4. Study completionJan 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
145 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01227928
Sponsor's protocol ID
114012
Status last verified
Feb 2015
First submitted
21 Oct 2010
Last updated
3 Mar 2015
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Kim JW, Mahner S, Wu LY, Shoji T, Kim BG, Zhu JQ, Takano T, Park SY, Kong BH, Wu Q, Wang KL, Ngan HY, Liu JH, Wei LH, Mitrica I, Zhang P, Crescenzo R, Wang Q, Cox CJ, Harter P, du Bois A. Pazopanib Maintenance Therapy in East Asian Women With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results From AGO-OVAR16 and an East Asian Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Jan;28(1):2-10. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000602.

    PubMed 26588236

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Pazopanib in people with Neoplasms, Ovarian, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 15 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 21 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 15 sites in China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Jun 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (time frame: From randomization until evidence of progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first (average of 15.2 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01227928, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in