Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2NCT01225393
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MLTA3698A in Combination With a Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Compared With Adalimumab in Combination With a DMARD in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
A Phase 2 study testing MLTA3698A, adalimumab and leflunomide in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Genentech, Inc. at 67 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
This is a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study enrolling patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- MLTA3698A, adalimumab and leflunomide
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 211 participants
- Where
- 67 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of RA according to the 1987 revised ACR Criteria for the Classification of RA for at least 6 months prior to screening
- Positive for rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody, or both
- Active disease, defined as: CRP >= 1.0 mg/dL; swollen joint count >= 6 (66 joint count); tender joint count >= 6 (68 joint count)
- Previous inadequate clinical response to at least one disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) consisting of either methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide (LFU)
- For patients currently receiving corticosteroids: Treatment at a stable dose during last 4 weeks prior to screening
- For patients currently receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Treatment at a stable dose during last 4 weeks prior to screening
- For patients currently receiving sulfasalazine or anti-malarials: Treatment initiated and continued for at least the last 6 months prior to screening and on a stable dose
- For patients of reproductive potential (males and females): Willing to use a highly effective birth control method for the duration of the study according to local guidelines
Who cannot join
- Pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study, or breastfeeding
- Clinically significant abnormal laboratory values or abnormal ECG or vital signs
- History of anaphylactic reactions
- Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA, or significant systemic involvement secondary to RA (including but not limited to vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis, or Felty's syndrome), however patients with secondary Sjogren's syndrome are eligible for the study
- History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA (e.g., gout, reactive arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthritis, Lyme disease) or other systemic autoimmune disorder (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma, inflammatory myopathy, mixed connective tissue disease, or other overlap syndrome)
- Current or recent (within 4 weeks prior to screening) infection, including signs, symptoms or serology of any infection, including HIV, hepatitis B or C, tuberculosis
- Administration of a live, attenuated vaccine within 1 month before dosing or anticipation that such a live attenuated vaccine will be required during the study
- Previous treatment with anti-TNF biologics or other biologic agents, including anti-CD20-directed therapy (e.g. rituximab), anti-IL6-directed therapy (e.g. tocilizumab), or T cell-directed therapy (e.g. abatacept)
Trial locations and contacts
67 sites in 10 countries.
67 sites in 10 countries
United States14 sites
Study site
Anniston, Alabama, 36207
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35216
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406
Study site
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320
Study site
Clarksburg, West Virginia, 26301
Study site
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232
Study site
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49009
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40515
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Study site
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Study site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Study site
Reno, Nevada, 89502
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78217
Study site
Upland, California, 91786
Mexico10 sites
Study site
Culiacán, 80000
Study site
Guadalajara, 44340
Study site
Guadalajara, 44600
Study site
Guadalajara, 44690
Study site
León, 37320
Study site
Mérida, 97000
Study site
Mexicali, 21100
Study site
México, 44620
Study site
Mexico City, 06700
Study site
Monterrey, NL, 64000
Germany8 sites
Study site
Bad Nauheim, 61231
Study site
Berlin, 14059
Study site
Cologne, 50924
Study site
Erfurt, 99096
Study site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Study site
Herne, 44649
Study site
Kiel, 24105
Study site
Zerbst, 39261
Peru8 sites
Study site
Lima, 41
Study site
Lima, Lima 1
Study site
Lima, Lima 25
Study site
Lima, Lima 27
Study site
Lima, Lima 34
Study site
Lima, Lima 41
Study site
San Isidro, L27 Lima
Study site
San Isidro, Lima 27
Poland7 sites
Study site
Bialystok, 15-099
Study site
Bialystok, 15-461
Study site
Elblag, 82-300
Study site
Kościan, 64-000
Study site
Krakow, 30-510
Study site
Lublin, 20-607
Study site
Warsaw, 02-653
Hungary5 sites
Study site
Békéscsaba, 5600
Study site
Budapest, 1027
Study site
Budapest, 1036
Study site
Debrecen, 4032
Study site
Veszprém, H-8200
Romania5 sites
Study site
Baia Mare, 430031
Study site
Bucharest, 010584
Study site
Bucharest, 011172
Study site
Cluj-Napoca, 400006
Study site
Galati, 800578
Spain4 sites
Study site
A Coruña, La Coruña, 15006
Study site
S. Cristobal de La Laguna, Tenerife, 38320
Study site
Seville, Sevilla, 41071
Study site
Torrelavega, Cantabria, 39300
Bulgaria3 sites
Study site
Sofia, 1233
Study site
Sofia, 1407
Study site
Sofia, 1505
Chile3 sites
Study site
Santiago, 00000
Study site
Santiago, 7501126
Study site
Santiago, 7510186
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MLTA3698A in Combination With a Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Compared With Adalimumab in Combination With a DMARD in Patient With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
This is a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study enrolling patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- MLTA3698A, adalimumab, leflunomide, methotrexate, placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MLTA3698ADrug
Subcutaneous repeating dose
adalimumabDrug
Subcutaneous repeating dose
leflunomideDrug
Stable dose if not on methotrexate
methotrexateDrug
Stable dose if not on leflunomide
placeboDrug
Subcutaneous repeating dose
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: MLTA3698A; Drug: leflunomide; Drug: methotrexate |
| B | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: adalimumab; Drug: leflunomide; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: placebo |
| C | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: leflunomide; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Baseline change in disease activity, assessed as the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or DAS28-(4)-ESR
Measured: Day 85
Incidence and severity of adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities as a measure of safety and tolerability of MLTA3698A
Measured: Length of study (through Day 85)
Secondary outcomes (12)
ACR20 response rate (the proportion of patients in each treatment group meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% responder criteria [ACR20] for their average response )
Measured: Day 85
ACR50 response rate (the proportion of patients in each treatment group meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50% responder criteria [ACR50] for their average response )
Measured: Day 85
ACR70 response rate (the proportion of patients in each treatment group meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70% responder criteria [ACR70] for their average response)
Measured: Day 85
Tender joint count
Measured: Day 85
Swollen joint count
Measured: Day 85
Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Measured: Day 85
Patient Global Assessment of Pain and Disease Activity
Measured: Day 85
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index
Measured: Day 85
Patient's Global Health or Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Measured: Day 85
European League Against Rheumatism response rate
Measured: Day 85
Serum C-reactive protein levels
Measured: Day 85
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Measured: Day 85
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionJul 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Genentech, Inc.The sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 211 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Genentech, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- John C. Davis, Jr., M.D., M.P.H., Study director, Genentech, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01225393
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ALT4864g
- Other IDs
- GA00932
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 18 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Kennedy WP, Simon JA, Offutt C, Horn P, Herman A, Townsend MJ, Tang MT, Grogan JL, Hsieh F, Davis JC. Efficacy and safety of pateclizumab (anti-lymphotoxin-alpha) compared to adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: a head-to-head phase 2 randomized controlled study (The ALTARA Study). Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Oct 30;16(5):467. doi: 10.1186/s13075-014-0467-3.
PubMed 25359150
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MLTA3698A in Combination With a Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Compared With Adalimumab in Combination With a DMARD in Patient With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01225393
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALT4864g
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 211 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Genentech, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study enrolling patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| A | Experimental | Drug: MLTA3698A, Drug: leflunomide, Drug: methotrexate |
| B | Active comparator | Drug: adalimumab, Drug: leflunomide, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: placebo |
| C | Placebo comparator | Drug: leflunomide, Drug: methotrexate, Drug: placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Diagnosis of RA according to the 1987 revised ACR Criteria for the Classification of RA for at least 6 months prior to screening
- Positive for rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody, or both
- Active disease, defined as: CRP >= 1.0 mg/dL; swollen joint count >= 6 (66 joint count); tender joint count >= 6 (68 joint count)
- Previous inadequate clinical response to at least one disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) consisting of either methotrexate (MTX) or leflunomide (LFU)
- For patients currently receiving corticosteroids: Treatment at a stable dose during last 4 weeks prior to screening
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pregnant, planning to become pregnant during the study, or breastfeeding
- Clinically significant abnormal laboratory values or abnormal ECG or vital signs
- History of anaphylactic reactions
- Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA, or significant systemic involvement secondary to RA (including but not limited to vasculitis, pulmonary fibrosis, or Felty's syndrome), however patients with secondary Sjogren's syndrome are eligible for the study
- History of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA (e.g., gout, reactive arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, seronegative spondyloarthritis, Lyme disease) or other systemic autoimmune disorder (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma, inflammatory myopathy, mixed connective tissue disease, or other overlap syndrome)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MLTA3698ASubcutaneous repeating dose | Drug | A |
| adalimumabSubcutaneous repeating dose | Drug | B |
| leflunomideStable dose if not on methotrexate | Drug | A, B, C |
| methotrexateStable dose if not on leflunomide | Drug | A, B, C |
| placeboSubcutaneous repeating dose | Drug | B, C |
Primary outcome
Baseline change in disease activity, assessed as the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or DAS28-(4)-ESR
Time frame: Day 85
Incidence and severity of adverse events and clinical laboratory abnormalities as a measure of safety and tolerability of MLTA3698A
Time frame: Length of study (through Day 85)
12 secondary outcomes
ACR20 response rate (the proportion of patients in each treatment group meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20% responder criteria [ACR20] for their average response )
Time frame: Day 85
ACR50 response rate (the proportion of patients in each treatment group meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50% responder criteria [ACR50] for their average response )
Time frame: Day 85
ACR70 response rate (the proportion of patients in each treatment group meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70% responder criteria [ACR70] for their average response)
Time frame: Day 85
Tender joint count
Time frame: Day 85
Swollen joint count
Time frame: Day 85
Investigator Global Assessment of Disease Activity
Time frame: Day 85
Patient Global Assessment of Pain and Disease Activity
Time frame: Day 85
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index
Time frame: Day 85
Patient's Global Health or Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time frame: Day 85
European League Against Rheumatism response rate
Time frame: Day 85
Serum C-reactive protein levels
Time frame: Day 85
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Time frame: Day 85
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Nov 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25359150Kennedy WP, Simon JA, Offutt C, Horn P, Herman A, Townsend MJ, Tang MT, Grogan JL, Hsieh F, Davis JC. Efficacy and safety of pateclizumab (anti-lymphotoxin-alpha) compared to adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis: a head-to-head phase 2 randomized controlled study (The ALTARA Study). Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Oct 30;16(5):467. doi: 10.1186/s13075-014-0467-3.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
R-2487 in Patients With Sjogren's Syndrome (SjD)
Sjogren's Syndrome, Sjögren
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John C. Davis, Jr., M.D., M.P.H. study director
Genentech, Inc.
67 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing MLTA3698A, adalimumab and leflunomide in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Genentech, Inc. at 67 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 67 sites in United States, Mexico, Germany, Peru, Poland and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Baseline change in disease activity, assessed as the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or DAS28-(4)-ESR (time frame: Day 85). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01225393, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2016.