AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic PainPhase 3NCT01223365

Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) in Patients Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time

A Phase 3 study testing Hydrocodone ER in people with Chronic Pain, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 54 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of hydrocodone extended-release tablets when used over a 12-month period in patients with chronic pain, as assessed by adverse events, clinical laboratory results, vital signs measurements, electrocardiogram results, physical examination findings, pure tone… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Pain
What is being tested?
Hydrocodone ER
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
330 participants
Where
54 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2010to Sep 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol.
  • The patient has either completed Cephalon study 3079 or has chronic pain of at least 3 months duration prior to entering this study associated with any of the following conditions: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with other painful conditions may qualify for the study with permission from the Cephalon medical monitor or designee.
  • Those patients who completed the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (study 3079) and are willing to re-titrate study drug to an effective dose of hydrocodone extended-release tablets are eligible to enter this study.
  • The patient is able to speak English, willing to provide written informed consent, and sign a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study.
  • The patient is 18 through 80 years of age (inclusive) at the time of entering this or the previous study (study 3079).
  • Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who were enrolled in study 3079 but did not complete the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study may not be enrolled into this study.
  • The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to the study drug or its excipients.
  • The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse.
  • The patient has a medical or psychiatric condition/disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data.
  • The patient is taking a total (i.e., including around-the clock [ATC] and rescue medications) of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone or equivalent for 14 days prior to screening.
  • The patient has a history of suicidality.
Show all 19Show fewer
  • The patient has a diagnosis of chronic headache or migraine as the primary painful condition under study.
  • The patient is expected to have surgery during the study and it is anticipated that the surgery will alleviate the patient's pain.
  • The patient is pregnant or lactating.
  • The patient has active malignancy.
  • The patient has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • In the judgment of the investigator, the patient has any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination and/or clinical laboratory test values.
  • The patient has cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with potent synthetic opioids.
  • The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the previous 30 days (excluding those who participated in study 3079).
  • The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug.
  • The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data.
  • The patient is involved in active litigation in regard to the chronic pain currently being treated.
  • The patient has a positive urine drug screen (UDS) for an illicit substance or medication not prescribed by the physician currently treating the chronic pain.
  • The investigator feels that the patient is not suitable for the study.

Trial locations and contacts

54 sites in 1 country.

54 sites in 1 country

United States54 sites
  • Physician Alliance Research Center

    Anaheim, California

  • Adam D. Karns, MD

    Beverly Hills, California

  • Millennium Pain Center

    Bloomington, Illinois

  • Beacon Clinical Research, LLC

    Brockton, Massachusetts

  • Associated Pharmaceutical Research Center, Inc.

    Buena Park, California

  • Providence Clinical Research

    Burbank, California

  • Sterling Research Group, Ltd.

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.

    Clearwater, Florida

  • Columbus Clinical Research

    Columbus, Ohio

  • Community Research

    Crestview Hills, Kentucky

  • KRK Medical Research

    Dallas, Texas

  • Radiant Research

    Dallas, Texas

  • Renaissance Clinical Research & Hypertension of Texas, PLLC

    Dallas, Texas

  • Avail Clinical Research, LLC

    DeLand, Florida

  • Brandywine Clinical Research

    Downingtown, Pennsylvania

  • Pain Research of Oregon

    Eugene, Oregon

  • AMH Feasterville Family Health Care Center

    Feasterville-Trevose, Pennsylvania

  • HealthCare Research

    Florissant, Missouri

  • Research Center of Fresno, Inc.

    Fresno, California

  • Greenville Pharmaceutical Research

    Greenville, South Carolina

  • Medstar Clinical Research

    Houston, Texas

  • Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana

    Indianapolis, Indiana

  • Pacific Coast Pain Management Center

    Laguna Hills, California

  • South Orange County Surgical Medical Group

    Laguna Hills, California

  • Clinical Research Center of Nevada

    Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Drug Studies America

    Marietta, Georgia

  • Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC

    Marietta, Georgia

  • Taylor Research, LLC

    Marietta, Georgia

  • Horizon Research Group, LLC

    Mobile, Alabama

  • Better Health Clinical Research, Inc.

    Newnan, Georgia

  • Trident Institute of Medical Research, LLC

    North Charleston, South Carolina

  • SP Research

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

  • Meridian Clinical Research

    Omaha, Nebraska

  • Aspen Clinical Research, LLC

    Orem, Utah

  • Compass Research, LLC

    Orlando, Florida

  • International Clinical Research, Inc.

    Overland Park, Kansas

  • MidAtlantic Pain Medicine Center

    Pikesville, Maryland

  • Summit Research Network Inc.

    Portland, Oregon

  • Wake Research Associates

    Raleigh, North Carolina

  • Benchmark Research

    San Angelo, Texas

  • Accelovance, Inc.

    San Diego, California

  • Sarasota Pain Medicine Research LLC

    Sarasota, Florida

  • Willis Knighton River Cities Clinical Research Center

    Shreveport, Louisiana

  • S. Carolina Pharmaceutical Research

    Spartanburg, South Carolina

  • Sundance Clinical Research, LLC

    St Louis, Missouri

  • DCT-Sugarland, LLC dba Discovery Clinical Trials

    Sugar Land, Texas

  • Tipton Medical and Diagnostic Center

    Tipton, Pennsylvania

  • Bayview Research Group, LLC

    Valley Village, California

  • Advanced Pain Consultants

    Voorhees Township, New Jersey

  • Hillcrest Family Health Centers

    Waco, Texas

  • Omega Medical Research

    Warwick, Rhode Island

  • Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLP

    West Reading, Pennsylvania

  • Gold Coast Research LLC

    Weston, Florida

  • Upstate Clinical Research Associates

    Williamsville, New York

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A 12-Month, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 15 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours in Patients Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of hydrocodone extended-release tablets when used over a 12-month period in patients with chronic pain, as assessed by adverse events, clinical laboratory results, vital signs measurements, electrocardiogram results, physical examination findings, pure tone audiometry, and concomitant medication usage.

Read the detailed description

This was a Phase 3, open-label, nonrandomized study that consisted of a screening period, an open label titration period, and a 52 week, long term, open-label treatment period in patients with chronic pain. Patients were eligible to participate in this study if they had completed study C33237/3079 (NCT01240863) (these patients are hereafter referred to as rollover patients) or if they had not participated in study 3079 (these patients are hereafter referred to as either new opioid naïve or new opioid experienced patients).

Conditions
Chronic Pain
Being tested
Hydrocodone ER
Keywords
moderate to severe pain, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis
Medical subject headings
Chronic Pain, Neuralgia, Postherpetic, Wounds and Injuries, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Back Pain, Neck Pain, Osteoarthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hydrocodone ERDrug

    Also called CEP-33237, Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release

    Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets were administered at doses of 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 mg orally every 12 hours. During the open-label titration period, doses were adjusted until a stable pain control was achieved. In general, the dose of hydrocodone extended release tablets could be adjusted for efficacy or tolerability, as necessary, at any time during the open-label treatment period; however, participants were required to visit the study center before increasing the dose of study drug.

Study groups in NCT01223365
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hydrocodone ERExperimentalParticipants were titrated (or re-titrated for roll-over participants) at escalating dosages of extended-release hydrocodone tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg orally every 12 hours until deemed successful for managing their pain during the open-label titration period. Once a successful dose was identified, participants entered the 52 week open-label treatment period in which hydrocodone ER was administered at the successful dose (15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg) every 12 hours.
Receives: Drug: Hydrocodone ER

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Participants With Adverse Experiences

    An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.

    Measured: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period

  2. Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status

    Data represents participants with PCS abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values.

    Significance criteria:

    • alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >=3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 6-43 U/L
    • aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >=3 times ULN. Normal range is 9-36 U/L
    • blood urea nitrogen (BUN): >=10.71 mmol/L
    • creatinine: >=177 μmol/L
    • uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L
    • white blood cell count: <=3.0*10^9/L
    • hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL
    • hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L
    • urine blood (hemoglobin): >=2 unit increase from baseline
    • urine glucose: >=2 unit increase from baseline

    Measured: Day 1 - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period

  3. Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status

    Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values.

    Significance criteria

    • Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline
    • Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute
    • Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg
    • Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg
    • Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg
    • Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg

    Measured: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period

  4. Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status

    A 12-lead ECG was conducted at screening, week 24, and week 52 or at the last postbaseline observation. For rollover participants, the ECG performed at the final visit of study 3079 served as the 1st ECG in study 3080. A qualified physician was responsible for interpreting the ECG. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared with baseline was considered an adverse event.

    For overall results, the worst postbaseline finding for the participant was summarized.

    Results below are formatted as Baseline ECG result - Overall ECG result.

    Measured: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (the study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the last ECG in study 3079. During study ECGs were performed on weeks 24 and 52 of the open-label treatment period

  5. Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status

    Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to "no response" at 3 consecutive test frequencies.

    Measured: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the baseline test in study 3079. During study covers both open-label titration and 52-week treatment periods

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status

    The PGA of the method of pain control consisted of a asking patients a single question to assess their method of pain control during the previous 24 hours as either poor, fair, good, or excellent (Rothman et al 2009).

    Measured: Baseline for new participants was Day 1, i.e. the first day of open-label titration. Baseline for rollover participants was the baseline in study 3079. Week 4 (end of titration, start of open-label treatment), Week 52, last visit up to Week 52

  2. Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)

    SOAPP-R is a clinician-rated scale used to assess each patient's risk of developing aberrant drug use behaviors while on long term opioid therapy. SOAPP-R consists of 24 questions that address 8 concepts: substance abuse history, medication related behaviors, antisocial behaviors/history, psychosocial problems, psychiatric history, physician patient relationship factors, emotional attachment to pain medications, and personal care and lifestyle issues (Butler et al 2008). Each question is answered using a 5 point Likert-like scale, with 0=never, 1=seldom, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often for a total range of 0-96. The higher the overall score, the greater the probability the patient is at risk for displaying aberrant behaviors consistent with drug use.

    An overall score of 18 or higher is considered positive for predicting aberrant drug related behavior, therefore the reported risk categories are

    • <18 and
    • <=18. Results indicate timeframe followed by risk cat

    Measured: End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4 and 24 of the Open-label Treatment Period

  3. Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status

    The ABC was a clinician rated scale that consisted of a brief (21 item) questionnaire designed to track behaviors characteristic of addiction related to prescription opioid medications in chronic pain populations. Items were focused on observable behaviors noted both during and between clinic visits. Each affirmative response was counted as 1 point, and points were added to calculate the total score. All but 1 of the 21 items (the provider's impression) was used in calculating the total score, consequently resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 20 (0=no addiction-related behaviors seen and higher scores indicating an increasing number of addition-related behaviors seen). Participants with a total score of 3 or greater were classified as exhibiting inappropriate opioid use during the study.

    Measured: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52

  4. Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status

    The COMM was a clinician-rated scale developed as a brief self-report measure of current aberrant drug-related behavior for patients with chronic pain who were already on long-term opioid therapy. A total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 questions. The total score ranged from 0 to 68. A score of 0 indicates no aberrant drug-related behaviors were seen. Patients with a total score of 9 or greater were classified as exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior.

    Measured: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2012
  4. Study completionSep 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
330 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01223365
Sponsor's protocol ID
C33237/3080
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
15 Oct 2010
Last updated
5 Jun 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Hydrocodone ER in people with Chronic Pain, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 54 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 54 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Participants With Adverse Experiences (time frame: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in