Chronic PainPhase 3NCT01223365
Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) in Patients Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time
A Phase 3 study testing Hydrocodone ER in people with Chronic Pain, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 54 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of hydrocodone extended-release tablets when used over a 12-month period in patients with chronic pain, as assessed by adverse events, clinical laboratory results, vital signs measurements, electrocardiogram results, physical examination findings, pure tone… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Hydrocodone ER
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 330 participants
- Where
- 54 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol.
- The patient has either completed Cephalon study 3079 or has chronic pain of at least 3 months duration prior to entering this study associated with any of the following conditions: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with other painful conditions may qualify for the study with permission from the Cephalon medical monitor or designee.
- Those patients who completed the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (study 3079) and are willing to re-titrate study drug to an effective dose of hydrocodone extended-release tablets are eligible to enter this study.
- The patient is able to speak English, willing to provide written informed consent, and sign a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study.
- The patient is 18 through 80 years of age (inclusive) at the time of entering this or the previous study (study 3079).
- Women of childbearing potential (not surgically sterile or 2 years postmenopausal), must use a medically accepted method of contraception and must agree to continue use of this method for the duration of the study and for 30 days after participation in the study, and have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
Who cannot join
- Patients who were enrolled in study 3079 but did not complete the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study may not be enrolled into this study.
- The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to the study drug or its excipients.
- The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse.
- The patient has a medical or psychiatric condition/disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data.
- The patient is taking a total (i.e., including around-the clock [ATC] and rescue medications) of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone or equivalent for 14 days prior to screening.
- The patient has a history of suicidality.
Show all 19Show fewer
- The patient has a diagnosis of chronic headache or migraine as the primary painful condition under study.
- The patient is expected to have surgery during the study and it is anticipated that the surgery will alleviate the patient's pain.
- The patient is pregnant or lactating.
- The patient has active malignancy.
- The patient has human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- In the judgment of the investigator, the patient has any clinically significant deviation from normal in the physical examination and/or clinical laboratory test values.
- The patient has cardiopulmonary disease that would, in the opinion of the investigator, significantly increase the risk of treatment with potent synthetic opioids.
- The patient has participated in a study involving an investigational drug in the previous 30 days (excluding those who participated in study 3079).
- The patient has received a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) within 14 days before the first treatment with study drug.
- The patient has any other medical condition or is receiving concomitant medication/therapy (e.g., regional nerve block) that would, in the opinion of the investigator, compromise the patient's safety or compliance with the study protocol, or compromise collected data.
- The patient is involved in active litigation in regard to the chronic pain currently being treated.
- The patient has a positive urine drug screen (UDS) for an illicit substance or medication not prescribed by the physician currently treating the chronic pain.
- The investigator feels that the patient is not suitable for the study.
Trial locations and contacts
54 sites in 1 country.
54 sites in 1 country
United States54 sites
Physician Alliance Research Center
Anaheim, California
Adam D. Karns, MD
Beverly Hills, California
Millennium Pain Center
Bloomington, Illinois
Beacon Clinical Research, LLC
Brockton, Massachusetts
Associated Pharmaceutical Research Center, Inc.
Buena Park, California
Providence Clinical Research
Burbank, California
Sterling Research Group, Ltd.
Cincinnati, Ohio
Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
Clearwater, Florida
Columbus Clinical Research
Columbus, Ohio
Community Research
Crestview Hills, Kentucky
KRK Medical Research
Dallas, Texas
Radiant Research
Dallas, Texas
Renaissance Clinical Research & Hypertension of Texas, PLLC
Dallas, Texas
Avail Clinical Research, LLC
DeLand, Florida
Brandywine Clinical Research
Downingtown, Pennsylvania
Pain Research of Oregon
Eugene, Oregon
AMH Feasterville Family Health Care Center
Feasterville-Trevose, Pennsylvania
HealthCare Research
Florissant, Missouri
Research Center of Fresno, Inc.
Fresno, California
Greenville Pharmaceutical Research
Greenville, South Carolina
Medstar Clinical Research
Houston, Texas
Rehabilitation Associates of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana
Pacific Coast Pain Management Center
Laguna Hills, California
South Orange County Surgical Medical Group
Laguna Hills, California
Clinical Research Center of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada
Drug Studies America
Marietta, Georgia
Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
Marietta, Georgia
Taylor Research, LLC
Marietta, Georgia
Horizon Research Group, LLC
Mobile, Alabama
Better Health Clinical Research, Inc.
Newnan, Georgia
Trident Institute of Medical Research, LLC
North Charleston, South Carolina
SP Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Meridian Clinical Research
Omaha, Nebraska
Aspen Clinical Research, LLC
Orem, Utah
Compass Research, LLC
Orlando, Florida
International Clinical Research, Inc.
Overland Park, Kansas
MidAtlantic Pain Medicine Center
Pikesville, Maryland
Summit Research Network Inc.
Portland, Oregon
Wake Research Associates
Raleigh, North Carolina
Benchmark Research
San Angelo, Texas
Accelovance, Inc.
San Diego, California
Sarasota Pain Medicine Research LLC
Sarasota, Florida
Willis Knighton River Cities Clinical Research Center
Shreveport, Louisiana
S. Carolina Pharmaceutical Research
Spartanburg, South Carolina
Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
St Louis, Missouri
DCT-Sugarland, LLC dba Discovery Clinical Trials
Sugar Land, Texas
Tipton Medical and Diagnostic Center
Tipton, Pennsylvania
Bayview Research Group, LLC
Valley Village, California
Advanced Pain Consultants
Voorhees Township, New Jersey
Hillcrest Family Health Centers
Waco, Texas
Omega Medical Research
Warwick, Rhode Island
Clinical Research Center of Reading, LLP
West Reading, Pennsylvania
Gold Coast Research LLC
Weston, Florida
Upstate Clinical Research Associates
Williamsville, New York
About this study
Official title: A 12-Month, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 15 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours in Patients Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of hydrocodone extended-release tablets when used over a 12-month period in patients with chronic pain, as assessed by adverse events, clinical laboratory results, vital signs measurements, electrocardiogram results, physical examination findings, pure tone audiometry, and concomitant medication usage.
Read the detailed description
This was a Phase 3, open-label, nonrandomized study that consisted of a screening period, an open label titration period, and a 52 week, long term, open-label treatment period in patients with chronic pain. Patients were eligible to participate in this study if they had completed study C33237/3079 (NCT01240863) (these patients are hereafter referred to as rollover patients) or if they had not participated in study 3079 (these patients are hereafter referred to as either new opioid naïve or new opioid experienced patients).
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Being tested
- Hydrocodone ER
- Keywords
- moderate to severe pain, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain, Neuralgia, Postherpetic, Wounds and Injuries, Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Back Pain, Neck Pain, Osteoarthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hydrocodone ERDrug
Also called CEP-33237, Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release
Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets were administered at doses of 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 mg orally every 12 hours. During the open-label titration period, doses were adjusted until a stable pain control was achieved. In general, the dose of hydrocodone extended release tablets could be adjusted for efficacy or tolerability, as necessary, at any time during the open-label treatment period; however, participants were required to visit the study center before increasing the dose of study drug.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocodone ER | Experimental | Participants were titrated (or re-titrated for roll-over participants) at escalating dosages of extended-release hydrocodone tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg orally every 12 hours until deemed successful for managing their pain during the open-label titration period. Once a successful dose was identified, participants entered the 52 week open-label treatment period in which hydrocodone ER was administered at the successful dose (15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg) every 12 hours. Receives: Drug: Hydrocodone ER |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Participants With Adverse Experiences
An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Measured: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status
Data represents participants with PCS abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values.
Significance criteria:
- alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >=3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 6-43 U/L
- aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >=3 times ULN. Normal range is 9-36 U/L
- blood urea nitrogen (BUN): >=10.71 mmol/L
- creatinine: >=177 μmol/L
- uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L
- white blood cell count: <=3.0*10^9/L
- hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL
- hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L
- urine blood (hemoglobin): >=2 unit increase from baseline
- urine glucose: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Measured: Day 1 - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values.
Significance criteria
- Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline
- Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute
- Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg
- Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg
- Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg
- Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg
Measured: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status
A 12-lead ECG was conducted at screening, week 24, and week 52 or at the last postbaseline observation. For rollover participants, the ECG performed at the final visit of study 3079 served as the 1st ECG in study 3080. A qualified physician was responsible for interpreting the ECG. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared with baseline was considered an adverse event.
For overall results, the worst postbaseline finding for the participant was summarized.
Results below are formatted as Baseline ECG result - Overall ECG result.
Measured: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (the study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the last ECG in study 3079. During study ECGs were performed on weeks 24 and 52 of the open-label treatment period
Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status
Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to "no response" at 3 consecutive test frequencies.
Measured: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the baseline test in study 3079. During study covers both open-label titration and 52-week treatment periods
Secondary outcomes (4)
Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status
The PGA of the method of pain control consisted of a asking patients a single question to assess their method of pain control during the previous 24 hours as either poor, fair, good, or excellent (Rothman et al 2009).
Measured: Baseline for new participants was Day 1, i.e. the first day of open-label titration. Baseline for rollover participants was the baseline in study 3079. Week 4 (end of titration, start of open-label treatment), Week 52, last visit up to Week 52
Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)
SOAPP-R is a clinician-rated scale used to assess each patient's risk of developing aberrant drug use behaviors while on long term opioid therapy. SOAPP-R consists of 24 questions that address 8 concepts: substance abuse history, medication related behaviors, antisocial behaviors/history, psychosocial problems, psychiatric history, physician patient relationship factors, emotional attachment to pain medications, and personal care and lifestyle issues (Butler et al 2008). Each question is answered using a 5 point Likert-like scale, with 0=never, 1=seldom, 2=sometimes, 3=often, and 4=very often for a total range of 0-96. The higher the overall score, the greater the probability the patient is at risk for displaying aberrant behaviors consistent with drug use.
An overall score of 18 or higher is considered positive for predicting aberrant drug related behavior, therefore the reported risk categories are
- <18 and
- <=18. Results indicate timeframe followed by risk cat
Measured: End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4 and 24 of the Open-label Treatment Period
Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status
The ABC was a clinician rated scale that consisted of a brief (21 item) questionnaire designed to track behaviors characteristic of addiction related to prescription opioid medications in chronic pain populations. Items were focused on observable behaviors noted both during and between clinic visits. Each affirmative response was counted as 1 point, and points were added to calculate the total score. All but 1 of the 21 items (the provider's impression) was used in calculating the total score, consequently resulting in scores ranging from 0 to 20 (0=no addiction-related behaviors seen and higher scores indicating an increasing number of addition-related behaviors seen). Participants with a total score of 3 or greater were classified as exhibiting inappropriate opioid use during the study.
Measured: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status
The COMM was a clinician-rated scale developed as a brief self-report measure of current aberrant drug-related behavior for patients with chronic pain who were already on long-term opioid therapy. A total score was calculated as the sum of the 17 questions. The total score ranged from 0 to 68. A score of 0 indicates no aberrant drug-related behaviors were seen. Patients with a total score of 9 or greater were classified as exhibiting aberrant drug-related behavior.
Measured: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionSep 2012
- Study completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 330 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sponsor's Medical Expert, MD, Study director, Cephalon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01223365
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C33237/3080
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 12-Month, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Hydrocodone Bitartrate Extended-Release Tablets (CEP-33237) at 15 to 90 mg Every 12 Hours in Patients Who Require Opioid Treatment for an Extended Period of Time
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01223365
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C33237/3080
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain
- Keywords
- moderate to severe pain, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 330 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Apr 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of hydrocodone extended-release tablets when used over a 12-month period in patients with chronic pain, as assessed by adverse events, clinical laboratory results, vital signs measurements, electrocardiogram results, physical examination findings, pure tone audiometry, and concomitant medication usage.
Detailed description
This was a Phase 3, open-label, nonrandomized study that consisted of a screening period, an open label titration period, and a 52 week, long term, open-label treatment period in patients with chronic pain. Patients were eligible to participate in this study if they had completed study C33237/3079 (NCT01240863) (these patients are hereafter referred to as rollover patients) or if they had not participated in study 3079 (these patients are hereafter referred to as either new opioid naïve or new opioid experienced patients).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocodone ER | Experimental | Drug: Hydrocodone ERParticipants were titrated (or re-titrated for roll-over participants) at escalating dosages of extended-release hydrocodone tablets at dosages of 15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg orally every 12 hours until deemed successful for managing their pain during the open-label titration period. Once a successful dose was identified, participants entered the 52 week open-label treatment period in which hydrocodone ER was administered at the successful dose (15, 30, 45, 60, or 90 mg) every 12 hours. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- The patient must be willing and able to successfully self-administer the study drug, comply with study restrictions, and return to the clinic for scheduled study visits as specified in this protocol.
- The patient has either completed Cephalon study 3079 or has chronic pain of at least 3 months duration prior to entering this study associated with any of the following conditions: diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, traumatic injury, complex regional pain syndrome, back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with other painful conditions may qualify for the study with permission from the Cephalon medical monitor or designee.
- Those patients who completed the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study (study 3079) and are willing to re-titrate study drug to an effective dose of hydrocodone extended-release tablets are eligible to enter this study.
- The patient is able to speak English, willing to provide written informed consent, and sign a written opioid agreement, to participate in this study.
- The patient is 18 through 80 years of age (inclusive) at the time of entering this or the previous study (study 3079).
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Patients who were enrolled in study 3079 but did not complete the 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study may not be enrolled into this study.
- The patient has known or suspected hypersensitivities, allergies, or other contraindications to the study drug or its excipients.
- The patient has a recent history (within 5 years) or current evidence of alcohol or other substance abuse.
- The patient has a medical or psychiatric condition/disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise collected data.
- The patient is taking a total (i.e., including around-the clock [ATC] and rescue medications) of more than 135 mg/day of oxycodone or equivalent for 14 days prior to screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocodone ERAlso: CEP-33237, Hydrocodone bitartrate extended-releaseHydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets were administered at doses of 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 mg orally every 12 hours. During the open-label titration period, doses were adjusted until a stable pain control was achieved. In general, the dose of hydrocodone extended release tablets could be adjusted for efficacy or tolerability, as necessary, at any time during the open-label treatment period; however, participants were required to visit the study center before increasing the dose of study drug. | Drug | Hydrocodone ER |
Primary outcome
Participants With Adverse Experiences
Time frame: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
An adverse event (AE) was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant (PCS) Abnormal Laboratory Values During the Open-Label Treatment Period by Participant Status
Time frame: Day 1 - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Data represents participants with PCS abnormal serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis values. Significance criteria: * alanine aminotransferase (ALT): >=3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). Normal range is 6-43 U/L * aspartate aminotransferase (AST): >=3 times ULN. Normal range is 9-36 U/L * blood urea nitrogen (BUN): >=10.71 mmol/L * creatinine: >=177 μmol/L * uric acid: M>=625, F>=506 μmol/L * white blood cell count: <=3.0*10^9/L * hemoglobin: M<=115, F<=95 g/dL * hematocrit: M<0.37, F<0.32 L/L * urine blood (hemoglobin): >=2 unit increase from baseline * urine glucose: >=2 unit increase from baseline
Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Vital Signs Values by Participant Status
Time frame: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period
Data represents participants with potentially clinically significant (PCS) vital sign values. Significance criteria * Pulse - high: >=120 and increase of >= 15 beats/minute from baseline * Pulse - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/minute * Systolic blood pressure - high: >=180 and increase >=20 mmHg * Systolic blood pressure - low: <=90 and decrease >=20 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - high: >=105 and increase of >=15 mmHg * Diastolic blood pressure - low: <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg
Shifts in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings From Baseline to Overall Study by Participant Status
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (the study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the last ECG in study 3079. During study ECGs were performed on weeks 24 and 52 of the open-label treatment period
A 12-lead ECG was conducted at screening, week 24, and week 52 or at the last postbaseline observation. For rollover participants, the ECG performed at the final visit of study 3079 served as the 1st ECG in study 3080. A qualified physician was responsible for interpreting the ECG. Any ECG finding that was judged by the investigator as a clinically meaningful change (worsening) compared with baseline was considered an adverse event. For overall results, the worst postbaseline finding for the participant was summarized. Results below are formatted as Baseline ECG result - Overall ECG result.
Participants With Clinically Significant (CS) Hearing Changes From Baseline in Pure Tone Audiometry Test Results by Patient Status
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was between Day -7 and -14 (study 3080 screening visit); baseline for rollover participants was the baseline test in study 3079. During study covers both open-label titration and 52-week treatment periods
Pure tone audiometry was performed by trained personnel. During the test, the patient wore headphones and was seated in a quiet room; trained personnel manipulated the audiometry equipment to test the patient's hearing. For serial audiograms, the criteria for a clinically significant (CS) hearing change were based on the guidance from the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) 1994 (Konrad-Martin et al 2005). These criteria included the following: greater than 20 decibels (dB) pure tone threshold shift at 1 frequency; greater than 10 dB shift at 2 consecutive test frequencies; or threshold response shifting to "no response" at 3 consecutive test frequencies.
4 secondary outcomes
Participant Global Assessment (PGA) of the Method of Pain Control by Participant Status
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was Day 1, i.e. the first day of open-label titration. Baseline for rollover participants was the baseline in study 3079. Week 4 (end of titration, start of open-label treatment), Week 52, last visit up to Week 52
Participants by Risk Category for Aberrant Drug Misuse Based on the Total Score in the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain - Revised (SOAPP-R)
Time frame: End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4 and 24 of the Open-label Treatment Period
Addiction Behavior Checklist (ABC) Total Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) Scores During Both the Open-Label Titration and Open-Label Treatment Periods by Participant Status
Time frame: Baseline for new participants was Day 1 of open-label titration; rollover participants baseline was in study 3079. End of Open-label Titration Period. Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 40, 44, 48, 52 and last visit up to week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sponsor's Medical Expert, MD study director
Cephalon
54 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Hydrocodone ER in people with Chronic Pain, run by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. at 54 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 54 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Participants With Adverse Experiences (time frame: Day 1 of open-label titration period - Week 52 of the open-label treatment period). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2017.