LymphomaPhase 2NCT01216683
Bendamustine Hydrochloride and Rituximab With or Without Bortezomib Followed by Rituximab With or Without Lenalidomide in Treating Patients With High-Risk Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Follicular Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing rituximab, Bendamustin and bortezomib in people with Lymphoma, run by ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group at 227 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as bendamustine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- rituximab, Bendamustin and bortezomib
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 289 participants
- Where
- 227 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 9 Feb 2011to 2 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed (biopsy-proven) diagnosis of follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with no evidence of transformation to large cell histology
- Patients having both diffuse and follicular architectural elements are eligible if the histology is predominantly follicular (i.e., ≥ 50% of the cross-sectional area) and there is no evidence of transformation to a large cell histology
- Diagnostic confirmation (i.e., core needle or excisional lymph node biopsy) required if the interval since tissue diagnosis of low-grade malignant lymphoma is > 24 months
- Bone marrow biopsy alone not acceptable
- Stage II, III, or IV AND grade 1, 2, or 3a disease
- Must meet criteria for High Tumor Burden (higher risk) as defined by either the Groupe D'Etude des Lymphomes Follicularies (GELF) criteria OR the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) as defined below:
Show all 50Show fewer
- Patient must meet ≥ 1 of the following GELF criteria:
- Nodal or extranodal mass ≥ 7 cm
- At least 3 nodal masses > 3.0 cm in diameter
- Systemic symptoms due to lymphoma or B symptoms
- Splenomegaly with spleen > 16 cm by CT scan
- Evidence of compression syndrome (e.g., ureteral, orbital, gastrointestinal) or pleural or peritoneal serous effusion due to lymphoma (irrespective of cell content)
- Leukemic presentation (≥ 5.0 x 10^9/L malignant circulating follicular cells)
- Cytopenias (polymorphonuclear leukocytes < 1.0 X 10^9/L, hemoglobin < 10 g/dL, and/or platelets < 100 x 10^9/L)
- Patient must have a FLIPI-1 score of 3, 4, or 5 (1 point per criterion below):
- Age ≥ 60 years
- Stage III-IV disease
- Hemoglobin level < 12 g/dL
- > 4 nodal areas
- Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level above normal
- At least 1 objective measurable disease parameter
- Baseline measurements and evaluations (PET and CT) obtained within 6 weeks of randomization
- Measurable disease in the liver is required if the liver is the only site of lymphoma
- HIV-positive patients must meet all of the following criteria:
- HIV is sensitive to antiretroviral therapy
- Must be willing to take effective antiretroviral therapy if indicated
- No history of CD4 < 300 cells/mm³ prior to or at the time of lymphoma diagnosis
- No history of AIDS-defining conditions
- If on antiretroviral therapy, must not be taking zidovudine or stavudine
- Must be willing to take prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) during therapy and ≥ 2 months following completion of study therapy or until the CD4 cells recover to over 250 cells/mm³
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm³ (includes neutrophils and bands)
- Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm³
- Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL
- Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 5 x ULN
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN (patients with known Gilbert disease should contact the study PI)
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use 2 effective methods (1 highly effective and 1 additional effective method) of contraception ≥ 28 days before, during, and for ≥ 28 days after completing study treatment
- Must register into the mandatory RevAssist® program and be willing and able to comply with the requirements of RevAssist® (for patients randomized to arm C and proceed onto arm F)
- Patient must have improved their response or have had no interval change in their tumor measurements with restaging from Induction cycle 3 to 6 as determined at Cycle 6 restaging.
- Adequate organ function
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- Patients with a prior history of HBV infection, but immune, with only IgG hepatitis core antibody positive (HBcAb+), must receive antiviral prophylaxis (e.g., lamivudine 100 mg po daily) for ≥ 1 week prior to course 1 and throughout induction and continuation therapy and for ≥ 12 months after the last rituximab dose
- Additional requirements for Arm C induction patients registering to arm F:
- Patients must be willing to take deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. Subjects with a history of a thrombotic vascular event will be required to have full anticoagulation, therapeutic doses of low molecular weight heparin or warfarin to maintain an INR between 2.0 - 3.0, or any other accepted full anticoagulation regimen (e.g. direct thrombin inhibitors or Factor Xa inhibitors) with appropriate monitoring for that agent. Subjects without a history of a thromboembolic event are required to take a daily aspirin (81 mg or 325 mg) for DVT prophylaxis. Subjects who are unable to tolerate aspirin should receive low molecular weight heparin therapy or warfarin treatment or another accepted full anticoagulation regimen.
- Females of childbearing potential (FCBP) must agree to use two reliable forms of contraception simultaneously or to practice complete abstinence from heterosexual intercourse during the following time periods related to this study/lenalidomide: 1) for at least 28 days before starting lenalidomide; 2) while participating in the study; and 3) for at least 28 days after discontinuation/stopping lenalidomide. The two methods of reliable contraception must include one highly effective method (i.e. intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal [birth control pills, injections, or implants], tubal ligation, partner's vasectomy) and one additional effective (barrier) method (i.e. latex condom, diaphragm, cervical cap). FCBP must be referred to a qualified provider of contraceptive methods if needed.
- Patient must agree to abstain from donating blood during study participation and for at least 28 days after discontinuation from protocol treatment.
- All males, regardless of whether they have undergone a successful vasectomy, must agree to use a latex condom during sexual contact with a female of childbearing potential, or to practice complete abstinence from heterosexual intercourse with any female of childbearing potential during the cycles of continuation therapy of which lenalidomide are taken and for at least 28 days after discontinuation/stopping lenalidomide. Patient must agree to abstain from donating blood, semen, or sperm during study participation and for at least 28 days after discontinuation from protocol treatment.
- Must register into the mandatory RevAssist® program and be willing and able to comply with the requirements of RevAssist®
Who cannot join
- Prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy for lymphoma
- Prednisone or other corticosteroids used for non-lymphomatous conditions will not be considered as prior chemotherapy
- A prior/recent short course (< 2 weeks) of steroids for symptom relief of lymphoma-related symptoms is allowed
- Recent history of malignancy except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer for which the patient has been disease-free for ≥ 2 years
- Pregnant or nursing
- Active, uncontrolled infections (afebrile for > 48 hours off antibiotics)
Show all 16Show fewer
- ≥ grade 2 neuropathy
- Myocardial infarction within the past 6 months
- NYHA class III-IV heart failure, uncontrolled angina, severe uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmias, or electrocardiographic evidence of acute ischemia or active conduction system abnormalities
- Serious medical or psychiatric illness likely to interfere with participation in this clinical study
- Known hypersensitivity to boron or mannitol
- Chronic carriers of hepatitis B virus (HBV) with positive hepatitis surface antigen (HBsAg +)
- Active, uncontrolled infections (afebrile for > 48 hours off antibiotics)
- ≥ grade 2 neuropathy
- Additional requirements for Arm C induction patients registering to arm F:
- Not pregnant or breast-feeding
Trial locations and contacts
227 sites in 1 country.
227 sites in 1 country
United States227 sites
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001
Summa Akron City Hospital/Cooper Cancer Center
Akron, Ohio, 44304
McFarland Clinic PC-William R Bliss Cancer Center
Ames, Iowa, 50010
Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106-0995
Langlade Hospital and Cancer Center
Antigo, Wisconsin, 54409
Fox Valley Hematology and Oncology
Appleton, Wisconsin, 54911
Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Georgia Regents University Medical Center
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
The Medical Center of Aurora
Aurora, Colorado, 80012
Rush - Copley Medical Center
Aurora, Illinois, 60504
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204
Ochsner Health Center-Summa
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Sanford Clinic North-Bemidgi
Bemidji, Minnesota, 56601
Illinois CancerCare-Bloomington
Bloomington, Illinois, 61701
Saint Joseph Medical Center
Bloomington, Illinois, 61701
Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center-Boise
Boise, Idaho, 83706
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Boulder Community Hospital
Boulder, Colorado, 80301
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Boulder
Boulder, Colorado, 80304
Toledo Clinic Cancer Centers-Bowling Green
Bowling Green, Ohio, 43402
Essentia Health Saint Joseph's Medical Center
Brainerd, Minnesota, 56401
Fairview Ridges Hospital
Burnsville, Minnesota, 55337
Graham Hospital Association
Canton, Illinois, 61520
Illinois CancerCare-Canton
Canton, Illinois, 61520
Mercy Medical Center
Canton, Ohio, 44708
Saint Francis Medical Center
Cape Girardeau, Missouri, 63703
Illinois CancerCare-Carthage
Carthage, Illinois, 62321
Memorial Hospital
Carthage, Illinois, 62321
Centralia Oncology Clinic
Centralia, Illinois, 62801
Geaugra Hospital
Chardon, Ohio, 44024
West Virginia University Charleston
Charleston, West Virginia, 25304
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Marshfield Clinic-Chippewa Center
Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin, 54729
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Penrose-Saint Francis Healthcare
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907
Mercy Hospital
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, 55433
Parkland Memorial Hospital
Dallas, Texas, 75235
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Carle on Vermilion
Danville, Illinois, 61832
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
Cancer Care Center of Decatur
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
Decatur Memorial Hospital
Decatur, Illinois, 62526
Porter Adventist Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80210
Exempla Saint Joseph Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Presbyterian - Saint Lukes Medical Center - Health One
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Midtown
Denver, Colorado, 80218
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Rose
Denver, Colorado, 80220
Rose Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80220
Colorado Cancer Research Program CCOP
Denver, Colorado, 80224-2522
Colorado Blood Cancer Institute
Denver, Colorado, 80907
Saint John Hospital and Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48236
Essentia Health Cancer Center
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Essentia Health Saint Mary's Medical Center
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Miller-Dwan Hospital
Duluth, Minnesota, 55805
Veterans Adminstration New Jersey Health Care System
East Orange, New Jersey, 07018-1095
Marshfield Clinic Cancer Center at Sacred Heart
Eau Claire, Wisconsin, 54701
Fairview-Southdale Hospital
Edina, Minnesota, 55435
Carle Physician Group-Effingham
Effingham, Illinois, 62401
Crossroads Cancer Center
Effingham, Illinois, 62401
Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Institute of Colorado LLC
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
Swedish Medical Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
Green Bay Oncology - Escanaba
Escanaba, Michigan, 49431
Eureka Hospital
Eureka, Illinois, 61530
Illinois CancerCare-Eureka
Eureka, Illinois, 61530
Essentia Health Cancer Center-South University Clinic
Fargo, North Dakota, 58103
Roger Maris Cancer Center
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Sanford Clinic North-Fargo
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Sanford Medical Center-Fargo
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
Hunterdon Medical Center
Flemington, New Jersey, 08822
Poudre Valley Hospital
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Cool Springs
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067
Unity Hospital
Fridley, Minnesota, 55432
Illinois CancerCare Galesburg
Galesburg, Illinois, 61401
Mountain Blue Cancer Care Center
Golden, Colorado, 80401
North Colorado Medical Center
Greeley, Colorado, 80631
Green Bay Oncology at Saint Vincent Hospital
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54301-3526
Bellin Memorial Hospital
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54301
Saint Vincent Hospital
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54301
Green Bay Oncology Limited at Saint Mary's Hospital
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54303
Saint Mary's Hospital
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54303
Aurora BayCare Medical Center
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54311-6519
Marin Cancer Care Inc
Greenbrae, California, 94904
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Greenwood Village
Greenwood Village, Colorado, 80111
Cancer Institute of New Jersey At Hamilton
Hamilton, New Jersey, 08690
Mason District Hospital
Havana, Illinois, 62644
Geisinger Medical Center-Cancer Center Hazleton
Hazleton, Pennsylvania, 18201
Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850
Hinsdale Hematology Oncology Associates Incorporated
Hinsdale, Illinois, 60521
Hutchinson Area Health Care
Hutchinson, Minnesota, 55350
Green Bay Oncology - Iron Mountain
Iron Mountain, Michigan, 49801
Allegiance Health
Jackson, Michigan, 49201
UW Cancer Center Johnson Creek
Johnson Creek, Wisconsin, 53038
Borgess Medical Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49001
Bronson Methodist Hospital
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
West Michigan Cancer Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007
Illinois CancerCare-Kewanee Clinic
Kewanee, Illinois, 61443
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
IU Health Arnett Cancer Care
Lafayette, Indiana, 47904
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Lakewood
Lakewood, Colorado, 80228
Saint Anthony Hospital
Lakewood, Colorado, 80228
Lawrence Memorial Hospital
Lawrence, Kansas, 66044
Geisinger Medical Oncology at Evangelical Community Hospital
Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, 17837
Lewistown Hospital
Lewistown, Pennsylvania, 17044
North Shore Hematology Oncology
Libertyville, Illinois, 60048
Littleton Adventist Hospital
Littleton, Colorado, 80122
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Sky Ridge
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124
Sky Ridge Medical Center
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124
Longmont United Hospital
Longmont, Colorado, 80501
McKee Medical Center
Loveland, Colorado, 80539
Illinois CancerCare-Macomb
Macomb, Illinois, 61455
Mcdonough District Hospital
Macomb, Illinois, 61455
Dean Hematology and Oncology Clinic
Madison, Wisconsin, 53717
University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792
Minnesota Oncology Hematology PA-Maplewood
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109
Saint John's Hospital - Healtheast
Maplewood, Minnesota, 55109
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic-Marinette
Marinette, Wisconsin, 54143
Marshfield Clinic
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Saint Joseph's Hospital
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449
Carle Physician Group-Mattoon/Charleston
Mattoon, Illinois, 61938
Ireland Cancer Center Landerbrook Health Center
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124
Lake University Ireland Cancer Center
Mentor, Ohio, 44060
Franciscan Saint Anthony Health-Michigan City
Michigan City, Indiana, 46360
Southwest General Health Center Ireland Cancer Center
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130
Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Abbott-Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415
Marshfield Clinic-Minocqua Center
Minocqua, Wisconsin, 54548
Illinois CancerCare-Monmouth
Monmouth, Illinois, 61462
West Virginia University Healthcare
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903
Ochsner Baptist Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Ochsner Medical Center Jefferson
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
New York University Langone Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016
Christiana Care Health System-Christiana Hospital
Newark, Delaware, 19718
UMDNJ - New Jersey Medical School
Newark, New Jersey, 07103
Illinois Cancer Specialists-Niles
Niles, Illinois, 60714
Bromenn Regional Medical Center
Normal, Illinois, 61761
Community Cancer Center Foundation
Normal, Illinois, 61761
Oconomowoc Memorial Hospital-ProHealth Care Inc
Oconomowoc, Wisconsin, 53066-3896
Green Bay Oncology - Oconto Falls
Oconto Falls, Wisconsin, 54154
UHHS-Chagrin Highlands Medical Center
Orange, Ohio, 44122
Toledo Clinic Cancer Centers-Oregon
Oregon, Ohio, 43616
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic - Oshkosh
Oshkosh, Wisconsin, 54904
Illinois CancerCare-Ottawa Clinic
Ottawa, Illinois, 61350
Ottawa Regional Hospital and Healthcare Center
Ottawa, Illinois, 61350
Ottumwa Regional Health Center
Ottumwa, Iowa, 52501
Parker Adventist Hospital
Parker, Colorado, 80138
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers-Parker
Parker, Colorado, 80138
Illinois CancerCare-Pekin
Pekin, Illinois, 61554
Pekin Cancer Treatment Center
Pekin, Illinois, 61554
Methodist Medical Center of Illinois
Peoria, Illinois, 61603
Proctor Hospital
Peoria, Illinois, 61614
Illinois CancerCare-Peoria
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Illinois Oncology Research Association CCOP
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
OSF Saint Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, 61637
Illinois CancerCare-Peru
Peru, Illinois, 61354
Illinois Valley Hospital
Peru, Illinois, 61354
Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Aria Health-Torresdale Campus
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
Saint Joseph Mercy Oakland
Pontiac, Michigan, 48341
Geisinger Medical Oncology-Pottsville
Pottsville, Pennsylvania, 17901
Illinois CancerCare-Princeton
Princeton, Illinois, 61356
Perry Memorial Hospital
Princeton, Illinois, 61356
Saint Mary Corwin Medical Center
Pueblo, Colorado, 81004
Marshfield Clinic at James Beck Cancer Center
Rhinelander, Wisconsin, 54501
Saint Mary's Hospital
Rhinelander, Wisconsin, 54501
Marshfield Clinic-Rice Lake Center
Rice Lake, Wisconsin, 54868
North Memorial Medical Health Center
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, 55422
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
SwedishAmerican Regional Cancer Center/ACT
Rockford, Illinois, 61107
Saint Mary's of Michigan
Saginaw, Michigan, 48601
Metro-Minnesota CCOP
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Park Nicollet Clinic - Saint Louis Park
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, 55416
Regions Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55101
United Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102
Salinas Valley Memorial
Salinas, California, 93901
Ireland Cancer Center at Firelands Regional Medical Center
Sandusky, Ohio, 44870
Hematology and Oncology Associates of North East Pennsylvania
Scranton, Pennsylvania, 18508
Saint Francis Regional Medical Center
Shakopee, Minnesota, 55379
Saint Nicholas Hospital
Sheboygan, Wisconsin, 53081
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic-Sheboygan
Sheboygan, Wisconsin, 53081
Siouxland Hematology Oncology Associates
Sioux City, Iowa, 51101
Mercy Medical Center-Sioux City
Sioux City, Iowa, 51104
Saint Luke's Regional Medical Center
Sioux City, Iowa, 51104
Sanford Cancer Center-Oncology Clinic
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104
Sanford USD Medical Center - Sioux Falls
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57117-5134
Memorial Medical Center
Springfield, Illinois, 62781-0001
Stanford University Hospitals and Clinics
Stanford, California, 94305
Geisinger Medical Group
State College, Pennsylvania, 16801
Mount Nittany Medical Center
State College, Pennsylvania, 16803
Marshfield Clinic Cancer Care at Saint Michael's Hospital
Stevens Point, Wisconsin, 54481
Saint Michael's Hospital
Stevens Point, Wisconsin, 54481
Lakeview Hospital
Stillwater, Minnesota, 55082
Green Bay Oncology - Sturgeon Bay
Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, 54235
Aurora Medical Center in Summit
Summit, Wisconsin, 53066
Flower Hospital
Sylvania, Ohio, 43560
North Suburban Medical Center
Thornton, Colorado, 80229
Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program CCOP
Toledo, Ohio, 43617
Toledo Clinic Cancer Centers-Toledo
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
Vince Lombardi Cancer Clinic
Two Rivers, Wisconsin, 54241
Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
The Carle Foundation Hospital
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Ridgeview Medical Center
Waconia, Minnesota, 55387
University Hospitals Sharon Health Center
Wadsworth, Ohio, 44281
Saint John Macomb-Oakland Hospital
Warren, Michigan, 48093
Waukesha Memorial Hospital - ProHealth Care
Waukesha, Wisconsin, 53188
Aspirus Regional Cancer Center
Wausau, Wisconsin, 54401
Aurora Cancer Care-Milwaukee West
Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226
Reading Hospital
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611
UH-Seidman Cancer Center at Saint John Medical Center
Westlake, Ohio, 44145
UHHS-Westlake Medical Center
Westlake, Ohio, 44145
Diagnostic and Treatment Center
Weston, Wisconsin, 54476
Marshfield Clinic - Weston Center
Weston, Wisconsin, 54476
Exempla Lutheran Medical Center
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Wesley Medical Center
Wichita, Kansas, 67214
Geisinger Wyoming Valley
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, 18711
Rice Memorial Hospital
Willmar, Minnesota, 56201
Marshfield Clinic - Wisconsin Rapids Center
Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, 54494
Riverview Hospital
Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin, 54494
Minnesota Oncology and Hematology PA-Woodbury
Woodbury, Minnesota, 55125
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: A 3-Arm Randomized Phase II Trial of Bendamustine-Rituximab (BR) Followed by Rituximab vs Bortezomib-BR (BVR) Followed by Rituximab vs BR Followed by Lenalidomide/Rituximab in High Risk Follicular Lymphoma
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as bendamustine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Biological therapies, such as lenalidomide, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. It is not yet known whether giving bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab together alone is more effective than giving bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab together with bortezomib or lenalidomide in treating follicular lymphoma.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying giving bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab together with or without bortezomib followed by rituximab with or without lenalidomide to see how well they work in treating patients with high-risk stage II, stage III, or stage IV follicular lymphoma.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare the complete remission rate in patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma receiving induction therapy comprising bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab with vs without bortezomib.
- To compare the 1-year post-induction disease-free survival rate in patients receiving continuation therapy comprising rituximab with vs without lenalidomide.
Secondary
- To determine the 3-year progression-free survival and the 5-year overall survival of these patients.
- To evaluate patient-reported outcomes at baseline and during treatment to determine differences in symptom palliation, treatment-related symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life.
- To examine the association between baseline Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) information and outcome of these patients.
- To examine the association between baseline and end-of-treatment patient comorbidities assessed by the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) and outcome.
- To create an image and tissue bank including serial PET/CT scans, diagnostic paraffin-embedded tissue, germline DNA, and serial blood and bone marrow samples sufficient to support proposed and future studies of tumor and host characteristics that may predict for clinical outcome, including treatment arm effects, and enhance existing prognostic indices. (exploratory)
- To evaluate the rate of peripheral neuropathy associated with subcutaneous and intravenous bortezomib.
OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to FLIPI-1score (0-2 vs 3 vs 4-5) and Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) tumor burden (low vs high). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm A then Arm D
- Arm A (induction): Patients receive rituximab intravenously (IV) on day 1 and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm D (continuation): Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive rituximab IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm B then Arm E
- Arm B (induction): Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1; bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 4. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm E (continuation): Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive rituximab as in arm D.
- Arm C then Arm F
- Arm C (induction): Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1 and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm F (continuation): Immediately after completing induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive oral lenalidomide on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 13 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, these patients receive rituximab IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life (including fatigue, neurotoxicity, anxiety, and depression) is assessed by questionnaire at baseline and periodically during study therapy.
Blood, bone marrow, and tissue samples may be collected periodically for correlative studies and for a repository.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up periodically for 15 years.
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Being tested
- rituximab, Bendamustin, bortezomib, lenalidomide
- Keywords
- contiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 2 follicular lymphoma, stage IV grade 3 follicular lymphoma
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Lymphoma, Follicular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rituximabBiological
Also called IDEC-C2B8, Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, Rituxan
Given IV
BendamustinDrug
Also called Bendamustine hydrochloride, CEP-18083, TREANDA
Given IV
bortezomibDrug
Also called MLN341, LDP-341, Velcade®, PS-341
Given IV
lenalidomideDrug
Also called IMiD compound CC-5013, Revlimid®
Given orally
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A then Arm D (Induction with Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation with Rituximab) | Experimental | Arm A (induction): Patients receive rituximab intravenously (IV) on day 1 and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Arm D (continuation): Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive rituximab IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Biological: rituximab; Drug: Bendamustin |
| Arm B then Arm E (Induction with Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation with Rituximab) | Experimental | Arm B (induction): Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1; bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 4. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Arm E (continuation): Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive rituximab as in arm D. Receives: Biological: rituximab; Drug: Bendamustin; Drug: bortezomib |
| Arm C then Arm F (Induction with Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation with Lenalidomide + Rituximab) | Experimental | Arm C (induction): Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1 and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Arm F (continuation): Immediately after completing induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive oral lenalidomide on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 13 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, these patients receive rituximab IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Biological: rituximab; Drug: Bendamustin; Drug: lenalidomide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete Remission (CR) Rate
Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.
This analysis was conducted among 222 evaluable patients for the primary analysis. The purpose of this analysis is to compare the complete remission rate of rituximab + bendamustine vs. bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine as induction therapy, therefore, the proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between Arm B (bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine) and Arms A and C combined (rituximab + bendamustine).
Measured: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years
1-year Post-induction Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.
The purpose of this analysis is to compare the 1-year post-induction disease-free survival (DFS) rate with rituximab plus lenalidomide to rituximab alone as continuation therapy following induction treatment of bendamustine+rituximab, therefore, patients with induction treatment of bendamustine + rituximab + bortezomib were not included in this analysis.
Measured: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years
Secondary outcomes (23)
3-year Progression-free Survival Rate
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. 3-year progression-free survival rate is the proportion of patients who were progression-free and alive at 3 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.
Measured: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
5-year Overall Survival Rate
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Measured: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Complete Remission (CR) Rate
Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.
This analysis was conducted among 222 evaluable patients. The proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between patients with Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) of 3-5 and patients with FLIPI of 0-2/unknown.
The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis.
Measured: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years
1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.
This analysis was conducted among 203 evaluable patients in the continuation treatment portion of the study. The 1-year post induction disease-free survival rate was compared between patients with FLIPI of 3-5 and patients with FLIPI of 0-2/unknown.
The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis.
Measured: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years
Progression-free Survival
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.
The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis.
Measured: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
5-year Overall Survival Rate
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
The FLIPI was developed in order to predict prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed follicular lymphoma (FL). The five FLIPI risk factors were: age > 60 years, Ann Arbor stage III-IV, hemoglobin level < 12 gm/dL, >4 nodal areas, and serum LDH level above normal. The FLIPI score was calculated by summing the number of risk factors. The higher the FLIPI score, the worse the prognosis.
Measured: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Complete Remission (CR) Rate
Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy.
This analysis was conducted among 250 evaluable patients with Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) data available. The proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between patients with CIRS <10 and patients with CIRS >=10. Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points.
Measured: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years
1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion.
This analysis was conducted among 250 evaluable patients with Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) data available. The proportion of patients disease-free and alive at 1 year post induction treatment was compared between patients with CIRS <10 and patients with CIRS >=10. Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points.
Measured: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years
3-year Progression-free Survival Rate
Progression-free survival is defined as the time from registration of induction treatment to progression, relapse or death, whichever occurs first. Patients alive without documented progression are censored at last disease assessment. 3-year progression-free survival rate is the proportion of patients who were progression-free and alive at 3 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
Progression/relapse is defined as appearance of any new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis during or at the end of therapy, >=50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved nodes or extranodal masses or the size of other lesions, or >=50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node or extranodal mass more than 1 cm in its short axis.
The 3-year progression-free survival rate is reported by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score (<10 vs. >=10). Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points.
Measured: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
5-year Overall Survival Rate
Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to death or date last known alive. 5-year overall survival rate is the proportion of patients who were alive at 5 years estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier.
The 5-year overall survival rate is reported by Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score (<10 vs. >=10). Higher CIRS scores indicate higher severity with max score of 56 points.
Measured: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Peripheral Neuropathy
Peripheral neuropathy was assessed using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. Proportion of patients with grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was compared between patients with subcutaneous bortezomib and patients with intravenous bortezomib.
Measured: Assessed every cycle during treatment and for 30 days after discontinuation of treatment, up to 15 years
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Baseline
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Assessed at baseline
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Mid-treatment
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
FACT-G total score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACT-G total score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score.
Measured: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at End of Induction Treatment
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire that has four areas of measurements (physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being and functional well-being) with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-G total score ranges between 0 and 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Baseline
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Assessed at baseline
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
FACT-Lym subscale score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACT-Lym subscale score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score.
Measured: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) is a 15-item questionnaire that evaluates disease-related symptoms and concerns specific to lymphoma with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-Lym subscale score ranges between 0 and 60. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Baseline
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Assessed at baseline
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
FACIT-Fatigue subscale score at cycle 3 is considered as mid-treatment score. If FACIT-Fatigue subscale score at cycle 3 is not available, the score at cycle 4 will be used as the mid-treatment score.
Measured: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) is comprised of 13 items that assess fatigue and its impact with a scale of 0-4. The FACIT-Fatigue subscale score ranges between 0 and 52. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Baseline
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Assessed at baseline
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Assessed at cycle 3, approximately 3 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at the End of Induction Treatment
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) subscale is comprised of 11 items that assess neurotoxicity with a scale of 0-4. The FACT-GOG-NTX subscale score ranges between 0 and 44. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Measured: Assessed at end of induction treatment (cycle 6), approximately 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Study start9 Feb 2011
- Primary completion2 Dec 2019
- Study completion2 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research GroupThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrew M. Evens, DO, MS, Principal investigator, Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01216683
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E2408
- Other IDs
- E2408, NCI-2011-02644, CDR0000683312
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 6 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 29 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data may be made available upon request as per the ECOG-ACRIN Data Sharing Policy.
Publications
Evens AM, Hong F, Habermann TM, Advani RH, Gascoyne RD, Witzig TE, Quon A, Ranheim EA, Ansell SM, Cheema PS, Dy PA, O'Brien TE, Winter JN, Cescon TP, Chang JE, Kahl BS. A Three-Arm Randomized Phase II Study of Bendamustine/Rituximab with Bortezomib Induction or Lenalidomide Continuation in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma: ECOG-ACRIN E2408. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;26(17):4468-4477. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1345. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
PubMed 32532790
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 3-Arm Randomized Phase II Trial of Bendamustine-Rituximab (BR) Followed by Rituximab vs Bortezomib-BR (BVR) Followed by Rituximab vs BR Followed by Lenalidomide/Rituximab in High Risk Follicular Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01216683
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E2408
- Conditions
- Lymphoma
- Keywords
- contiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, contiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 1 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 2 follicular lymphoma, noncontiguous stage II grade 3 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 1 follicular lymphoma, stage III grade 2 follicular lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 9 Feb 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Feb 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as bendamustine hydrochloride, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some block the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Others find cancer cells and help kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Biological therapies, such as lenalidomide, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop cancer cells from growing. It is not yet known whether giving bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab together alone is more effective than giving bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab together with bortezomib or lenalidomide in treating follicular lymphoma.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying giving bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab together with or without bortezomib followed by rituximab with or without lenalidomide to see how well they work in treating patients with high-risk stage II, stage III, or stage IV follicular lymphoma.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- To compare the complete remission rate in patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma receiving induction therapy comprising bendamustine hydrochloride and rituximab with vs without bortezomib.
- To compare the 1-year post-induction disease-free survival rate in patients receiving continuation therapy comprising rituximab with vs without lenalidomide.
Secondary
- To determine the 3-year progression-free survival and the 5-year overall survival of these patients.
- To evaluate patient-reported outcomes at baseline and during treatment to determine differences in symptom palliation, treatment-related symptoms, and overall health-related quality of life.
- To examine the association between baseline Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) information and outcome of these patients.
- To examine the association between baseline and end-of-treatment patient comorbidities assessed by the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) and outcome.
- To create an image and tissue bank including serial PET/CT scans, diagnostic paraffin-embedded tissue, germline DNA, and serial blood and bone marrow samples sufficient to support proposed and future studies of tumor and host characteristics that may predict for clinical outcome, including treatment arm effects, and enhance existing prognostic indices. (exploratory)
- To evaluate the rate of peripheral neuropathy associated with subcutaneous and intravenous bortezomib.
OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to FLIPI-1score (0-2 vs 3 vs 4-5) and Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) tumor burden (low vs high). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm A then Arm D
- Arm A (induction): Patients receive rituximab intravenously (IV) on day 1 and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm D (continuation): Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive rituximab IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm B then Arm E
- Arm B (induction): Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1; bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 4. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm E (continuation): Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive rituximab as in arm D.
- Arm C then Arm F
- Arm C (induction): Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1 and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
- Arm F (continuation): Immediately after completing induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive oral lenalidomide on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 13 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, these patients receive rituximab IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Quality of life (including fatigue, neurotoxicity, anxiety, and depression) is assessed by questionnaire at baseline and periodically during study therapy.
Blood, bone marrow, and tissue samples may be collected periodically for correlative studies and for a repository.
After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up periodically for 15 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A then Arm D (Induction with Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation with Rituximab) | Experimental | Biological: rituximab, Drug: BendamustinArm A (induction): Patients receive rituximab intravenously (IV) on day 1 and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Arm D (continuation): Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive rituximab IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
| Arm B then Arm E (Induction with Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation with Rituximab) | Experimental | Biological: rituximab, Drug: Bendamustin, Drug: bortezomibArm B (induction): Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1; bortezomib IV on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 4. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Arm E (continuation): Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive rituximab as in arm D. |
| Arm C then Arm F (Induction with Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation with Lenalidomide + Rituximab) | Experimental | Biological: rituximab, Drug: Bendamustin, Drug: lenalidomideArm C (induction): Patients receive rituximab IV on day 1 and bendamustine hydrochloride IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 2. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Arm F (continuation): Immediately after completing induction therapy, patients who have stable disease or better at time of post-induction restaging receive oral lenalidomide on days 1-21. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 13 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Beginning 4 weeks after the completion of induction therapy, these patients receive rituximab IV on day 1. Treatment repeats every 8 weeks for 2 years in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (50 listed)
- Histologically confirmed (biopsy-proven) diagnosis of follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma with no evidence of transformation to large cell histology
- Stage II, III, or IV AND grade 1, 2, or 3a disease
- Must meet criteria for High Tumor Burden (higher risk) as defined by either the Groupe D'Etude des Lymphomes Follicularies (GELF) criteria OR the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) as defined below:
- At least 1 objective measurable disease parameter
- HIV-positive patients must meet all of the following criteria:
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Prior chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy for lymphoma
- Recent history of malignancy except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, in situ cervical cancer, or other cancer for which the patient has been disease-free for ≥ 2 years
- Pregnant or nursing
- Active, uncontrolled infections (afebrile for > 48 hours off antibiotics)
- ≥ grade 2 neuropathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rituximabAlso: IDEC-C2B8, Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, RituxanGiven IV | Biological | Arm A then Arm D (Induction with Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation with Rituximab), Arm B then Arm E (Induction with Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation with Rituximab), Arm C then Arm F (Induction with Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation with Lenalidomide + Rituximab) |
| BendamustinAlso: Bendamustine hydrochloride, CEP-18083, TREANDAGiven IV | Drug | Arm A then Arm D (Induction with Bendamustine + Rituximab; Continuation with Rituximab), Arm B then Arm E (Induction with Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation with Rituximab), Arm C then Arm F (Induction with Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation with Lenalidomide + Rituximab) |
| bortezomibAlso: MLN341, LDP-341, Velcade®, PS-341Given IV | Drug | Arm B then Arm E (Induction with Bendamustine + Rituximab + Bortezomib; Continuation with Rituximab) |
| lenalidomideAlso: IMiD compound CC-5013, Revlimid®Given orally | Drug | Arm C then Arm F (Induction with Bendamustine+Rituximab; Continuation with Lenalidomide + Rituximab) |
Primary outcome
Complete Remission (CR) Rate
Time frame: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years
Complete remission is defined as complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present prior to therapy. This analysis was conducted among 222 evaluable patients for the primary analysis. The purpose of this analysis is to compare the complete remission rate of rituximab + bendamustine vs. bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine as induction therapy, therefore, the proportion of patients with complete remission was compared between Arm B (bortezomib + rituximab + bendamustine) and Arms A and C combined (rituximab + bendamustine).
1-year Post-induction Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
Time frame: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years
1-year post induction disease-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during induction treatment and are alive and maintaining complete remission at 1 year after induction completion. The purpose of this analysis is to compare the 1-year post-induction disease-free survival (DFS) rate with rituximab plus lenalidomide to rituximab alone as continuation therapy following induction treatment of bendamustine+rituximab, therefore, patients with induction treatment of bendamustine + rituximab + bortezomib were not included in this analysis.
23 secondary outcomes
3-year Progression-free Survival Rate
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
5-year Overall Survival Rate
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Complete Remission (CR) Rate
Time frame: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years
1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
Time frame: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years
Progression-free Survival
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
5-year Overall Survival Rate
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Complete Remission (CR) Rate
Time frame: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years
1-year Disease-free Survival (DFS) Rate
Time frame: Assessed at 1 year post-induction, approximately 1.5 years
3-year Progression-free Survival Rate
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
5-year Overall Survival Rate
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and every 6 months between 2 and 5 years from study entry
Proportion of Patients With Grade 3 or Higher Peripheral Neuropathy
Time frame: Assessed every cycle during treatment and for 30 days after discontinuation of treatment, up to 15 years
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Baseline
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at Mid-treatment
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at End of Induction Treatment
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Baseline
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Baseline
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 3 or cycle 4, approximately 3 or 4 months
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Subscale Score at End of Induction Treatment
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 6, approximately 6 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Baseline
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at Mid-induction Treatment
Time frame: Assessed at cycle 3, approximately 3 months
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity (FACT-GOG-NTX) Subscale Score at the End of Induction Treatment
Time frame: Assessed at end of induction treatment (cycle 6), approximately 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 32532790Evens AM, Hong F, Habermann TM, Advani RH, Gascoyne RD, Witzig TE, Quon A, Ranheim EA, Ansell SM, Cheema PS, Dy PA, O'Brien TE, Winter JN, Cescon TP, Chang JE, Kahl BS. A Three-Arm Randomized Phase II Study of Bendamustine/Rituximab with Bortezomib Induction or Lenalidomide Continuation in Untreated Follicular Lymphoma: ECOG-ACRIN E2408. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Sep 1;26(17):4468-4477. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1345. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data may be made available upon request as per the ECOG-ACRIN Data Sharing Policy.
Related trials for Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Glofitamab, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP) for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage II Mantle Cell Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage III Mantle Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew M. Evens, DO, MS principal investigator
Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center
227 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing rituximab, Bendamustin and bortezomib in people with Lymphoma, run by ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group at 227 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 50 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 227 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete Remission (CR) Rate (time frame: Assessed every 4 weeks during induction treatment and every 8 weeks during continuation treatment, up to 2 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01216683, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jun 2023.