AzTrials
AzTrials

CancerNCT01215318

FDG Uptake in Vaginal Tampons is Due to Urine

A study testing modified vaginal tampon in people with Cancer, run by Irene Burger at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The etiology of FDG uptake in vaginal tampons during PET/CT examinations remains unclear and can potentially impair image interpretation. The aim of this study is to determine the etiology of this artefact and identify potential means how to prevent it. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 48 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Cancer
What is being tested?
modified vaginal tampon
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
2 Feb 2010to 30 Sep 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 48 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Inclusion criteria: premenopausal women with known or suspected malignancies who regularly used vaginal tampons during menstruation and thus were familiar with their use

Exclusion criteria: No cervical or genital carcinoma. No vaginal infection.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • University Hospital Zurich

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Source and Prevention of Urinary Contamination of Vaginal Tampons During 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Examinations

The etiology of FDG uptake in vaginal tampons during PET/CT examinations remains unclear and can potentially impair image interpretation.

The aim of this study is to determine the etiology of this artefact and identify potential means how to prevent it.

Read the detailed description

In this prospective, Institutional Review board approved study we included 44 women referred to FDG PET/CT for staging or follow-up in an oncology setting. All women were provided a normal commercial or modified vaginal tampon with a silicon coated base to be used during examination. Images were analyzed to determine the localization and the FDG uptake in the tampons. Between the uptake phase and imaging, all patients were asked to void. After image acquisition, tampons were individually analyzed for creatinine concentration, blood traces, position relative to the pubococcygeal line, and FDG activity. Statistical significance was determined by means of the Mann-Whitney U test.

Conditions
Cancer
Being tested
modified vaginal tampon
Keywords
FDG PET/CT, vaginal tampon, urinary contamination, pitfall
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • modified vaginal tamponDevice

    Also called Ob® Regular; Johnson & Johnson, with silicon seal

    modified vaginal tampons versus unmodified vaginal tampons, comparing the urinary contamination

Study groups in NCT01215318
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Modified vaginal tamponsExperimentalPatients using modified vaginal tampons during FDG PET/CT
Receives: Device: modified vaginal tampon
Unmodified vaginal tamponsPlacebo comparatorPatients using unmodified vaginal tampons during FDG PET/CT
Receives: Device: modified vaginal tampon

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of FDG Positive Tampoons

    Number of FDG positive Tampoons with an SUV > 3

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Tampon Position Relative to the Pubococcygeal Line

    measure tampon position in regard to the pubococcygeal line to identify if positioning is responsible for urinary contamination.

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Oct 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Feb 2010
  3. Primary completion2 Aug 2010
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01215318
Sponsor's protocol ID
KEK-ZH-NR: 2010-0014
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
4 Oct 2010
Last updated
28 Aug 2019
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing modified vaginal tampon in people with Cancer, run by Irene Burger at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of FDG Positive Tampoons (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in