Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 3PALACE2NCT01212757
PALACE 2: Efficacy and Safety Study of Apremilast to Treat Active Psoriatic Arthritis
A Phase 3 study testing Apremilast 20mg and Apremilast 30mg in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Amgen at 98 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether apremilast is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Apremilast is proposed to improve signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis (tender and swollen joints, pain, physical function) in treated patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Apremilast 20mg and Apremilast 30mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 488 participants
- Where
- 98 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Sep 2010to 25 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males or females, aged ≥ 18 years at time of consent.
- Have a diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA, by any criteria) of ≥ 6 months duration.
- Meet the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) PsA at time of screening.
- Must have been inadequately treated by disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
- May not have axial involvement alone
- Concurrent Treatment allowed with methotrexate, leflunomide, or sulfasalazine
Show all 9Show fewer
- Have ≥ 3 swollen AND ≥ 3 tender joints.
- Males \& Females must use contraception
- Stable dose of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), narcotics and low dose oral corticosteroids allowed.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breast feeding.
- History of allergy to any component of the investigational product.
- Hepatitis B surface antigen and/or Hepatitis C antibody positive at screening.
- Therapeutic failure on > 3 agents for PsA or > 1 biologic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker
Trial locations and contacts
98 sites in 16 countries.
98 sites in 16 countries
United States23 sites
Michael Bukhalo MD SC
Arlington Hts, Illinois, 60005
Arthritis and Rheumatology of Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Associated Internal Medical Specialist, PC
Battle Creek, Michigan, 49015
Metroplex Clinical Research Center
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75246-1613
Arthritis Care and Diagnostic Center
Dallas, Texas, 75321
Denver Arthritis Clinic
Denver, Colorado, 80230
Centre For Rheumatology, Immun. And Arthritis
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334
Rheumatology and Immunotherapy Center
Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132
Vital Research
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408
Unifour Medical Research Associatets LLC
Hickory, North Carolina, 28602
Research West Incorporated
Kalispell, Montana, 59901
Advanced Rheumatology
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14623
Luckster Enterprises
San Antonio, Texas, 78232
Seattle Rheumatology Associates
Seattle, Washington, 98104
DMI Research
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33710
Tacoma Center for Arthritis Research, PS
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33612
New England Research Associates, LLC
Trumbull, Connecticut, 6611
Clinical and Translational Research Center of Alabama, PC
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35406
Rheumatic Disease Associates
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090
Czechia9 sites
Revmatologie s.r.o.
Brno, 638 00
MEDIPONT PLUS s.r.o..
České Budějovice, 370 01
L.K.N. Arthrocentrum s.r.o.
Hlučín, 748 01
ARTMEDI UPD s.r.o.
Hostivice, 253 01
Revmatologicky ustav
Prague, 128 50
Revmatologicka Ambulance
Prague, 140 00
Affidea Praha s.r.o
Prague, 148 00
Revmatologicka Ambulance
Sokolov, 356 01
PV - MEDICAL, s.r.o.
Zlín, 760 01
Canada8 sites
Anna Jaroszynska Private Practice
Burlington, Ontario, L7L0B7
Rheumatology Research Associates
Edmonton, Alberta, T5M 0H4
William Bensen's Private Practice
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N1Y2
North Bay Dermatology Center
North Bay, Ontario, P1B 3Z7
Rheumatology Research Associates
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 1A2
Wilderman Medical Clinic
Thornhill, Ontario, L4J1W3
PerCuro Clinical Research
Victoria, British Columbia, V8P5P6
Darryl Toth's Private Practice
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 1E6
Bulgaria6 sites
Diagnostic and Consulting Centre 7
Sofia, 1233
University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment ACIBADEM City Clinic Sofia
Sofia, 1407
17 Diagnostic and Consulting Centre Sofia EOOD
Sofia, 1505
Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment Sv. Ivan Rilski
Sofia, 1612
Diagnostic-Consultative Center Sveta Anna
Sofia, 1709
Diagnostic and Consulting Centre 4
Varna, 9010
Italy6 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
Genova, 16132
Ospedale Luigi Sacco
Milan, 20157
Seconda Universita degli Studi di Napoli
Naples, 80130
IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, 27100
Universita di Pisa
Pisa, 56126
Ospedale Civile Maggiore Borgo Trento
Verona, 37126
Estonia5 sites
Parnu Hospital
Pärnu, EE-80010
East Tallinn Central Hospital
Tallinn, EE-11412
North Estonia Regional Hospital
Tallinn, EE-13419
Clinical Research Centre Ltd
Tartu, 50106
Tartu University Hospital
Tartu, EE-51014
France5 sites
Hopital Universitaire Dupuytren
Limoges, 87042
Hopital Lariboisiere
Paris, 75010
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Paris, 75014
Groupe Hospitalier Pitié- Salpétrière
Paris, 75651
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Poland5 sites
NZOZ Osteo-Medic sc A. Racewicz J. Supronik
Bialystok, 15-351
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej REUMED
Lublin, 20-582
Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny
Warsaw, 00-909
Instytut Reumatologii im. prof. dr hab. med. Eleonory Reicher
Warsaw, 02-637
Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o.
Wroclaw, 50-088
Taiwan5 sites
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Taichung, 402
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
Taichung, 40705
Cathay General Hospital
Taipei, 106
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Taipei, 112
National Taiwan University Hospital
Tapei, 10002
United Kingdom5 sites
Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital
Basingstoke, RG24 9NA
Cannock Chase Hospital
Cannock, WS11 5XY
Chapel Allerton Hospital
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Poole Hospital
Poole, BH 1 5JB
Great Western Hospital
Swindon, SN3 6BB
Belgium4 sites
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, 1020
UZ Gent
Ghent, 9000
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000
University Hospital of Liege CHU Liege
Liège, 4000
Germany4 sites
Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Klinikum der Johann-Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt, 60590
Praxis Karin Rockwitz
Goslar, 38642
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Leipzig, 4103
Russia4 sites
City Clinical Hospital #1 n.a. N.I.Pirogov
Moscow, 119049
City Clinical Hospital #5
Nizhny Novgorod, 603005
St.Petersburg State Medical Academy n. a. I.I.Mechnikov
Saint Petersburg, 195067
Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital
Yaroslavl, 150062
Hungary3 sites
Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum
Debrecen, 4032
Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz
Kistarcsa, 2143
Principal SMO Kft.
Makó, 6900
South Africa3 sites
Nelson Mandela School Of Medicine
Durban, 4091
Greenacres Hospital
Port Elizabeth, 6057
Jacaranda Hospital
Pretoria, 2
Spain3 sites
Hospital General Carlos Haya
Málaga, 29009
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, 38320
Hospital Sierrallana
Torrelavega, 39300
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Doses of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
The purpose of this study is to determine whether apremilast is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis.
Apremilast is proposed to improve signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis (tender and swollen joints, pain, physical function) in treated patients.
Read the detailed description
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis that occurs in 6-39% of psoriasis patients. The immunopathogenesis of PsA, which mirrors but is not identical to that seen in psoriatic plaques, reflects a complex interaction among resident dendritic, fibroblastic and endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells attracted to the synovium by cytokines and chemokines. Apremilast (CC-10004) is a novel oral agent that modulates multiple inflammatory pathways through targeted phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE4) enzyme inhibition. Therefore, apremilast has the potential to be effective in the treatment of PsA.
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Being tested
- Apremilast 20mg, Apremilast 30mg, Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast, Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast
- Keywords
- Psoriasis, Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, inflammation, skin condition, inflammatory cells, apremilast, CC-10004, phosphodiesterase type 4
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Psoriatic, Psoriasis, Arthritis, Inflammation, Skin Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Apremilast 20mgDrug
Also called CC-10004
Apremilast 20 mg twice daily, orally
Apremilast 30mgDrug
Also called CC-10004
Apremilast 30 mg twice daily, orally
Placebo + 20 mg ApremilastDrug
Also called Placebo, CC-10004
Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast
Placebo + 30 mg ApremilastDrug
Also called Placebo, CC-10004
Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast 20mg | Experimental | 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase Receives: Drug: Apremilast 20mg |
| Apremilast 30mg | Experimental | 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice a day for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice a day for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase orally twice daily Receives: Drug: Apremilast 30mg |
| Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast | Placebo comparator | Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase. Subjects who do not have at least 20% improvement in their swollen and tender joint counts at Week 16 will escape to 20 mg Apremilast twice daily at Week 16 Receives: Drug: Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast |
| Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast | Placebo comparator | Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase. Subjects who do not have at least 20% improvement in their swollen and tender joint counts at Week 16 will escape to 30 mg Apremilast twice daily at Week 16. Receives: Drug: Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants with an ACR20 response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦C-Reactive Protein.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Secondary outcomes (52)
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 20 Response at Week 24
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦C-Reactive Protein.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 16
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 16
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: - 78 tender joint count, - 76 swollen joint count, - Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest; - Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 16
The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 16
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 16
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 16
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: - 28 tender joint count (TJC), - 28 swollen joint count (SJC), - Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; - Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: - 28 tender joint count - 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; - C-reactive protein (CRP) - Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 16
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 24
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 24
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 24
The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 24
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 24
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: • 28 tender joint count (TJC), • 28 swollen joint count (SJC), • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8; Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10; Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22; High Disease Activity: > 22.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 24
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 16
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 16
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 16 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16
A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 24
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 24
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 24 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24
EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 50 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: o Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); o Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); o Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); o Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); o C-Reactive Protein.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 16
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: o Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); o Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); o Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); o Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); o C-Reactive Protein.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 24
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: o Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); o Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); o Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); o Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); o C-Reactive Protein.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70 Response at Week 24
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦C-Reactive Protein.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 16
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 16 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 16
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 16 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Measured: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 24
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks of treatment. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 24
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 24 weeks of treatment. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 20 Response at Week 52
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
The Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index is a patient-reported questionnaire consisting of 20 questions referring to eight domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task are summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 to 3, where zero represents no disability and three very severe, high-dependency disability. Negative mean changes from Baseline in the overall score indicate improvement in functional ability.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale Score at Week 52
The Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-36) is a self-administered instrument that measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life and consists of 36 questions in eight domains (physical function, pain, general and mental health, vitality, social function, physical and emotional health). Norm-based scores were used in analyses, calibrated so that 50 is the average score and the standard deviation equals 10. Higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. The physical functioning domain assesses limitations in physical activities because of health problems. A positive change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Percentage of Participants With a Modified PsARC Response at Week 52
Modified PsARC response is defined as improvement in at least 2 of the 4 measures, at least one of which must be tender joint count or swollen joint count, and no worsening in any of the 4 measures: • 78 tender joint count, • 76 swollen joint count, • Patient global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm visual Analog scale (VAS), where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest; • Physician global assessment of disease activity, measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = lowest disease activity and 100 mm = highest. Improvement or worsening in joint counts is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 30%, and improvement or worsening in global assessments is defined as decrease or increase, respectively, from baseline by ≥ 20 mm VAS. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Patient Assessment of Pain at Week 52
The participant was asked to place a vertical line on a 100-mm visual analog scale on which the left-hand boundary (score = 0 mm) represents "no pain," and the right-hand boundary (score = 100 mm) represents "pain as severe as can be imagined." The distance from the mark to the left-hand boundary was recorded in millimeters.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 52
The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 52
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet will be rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the CDAI Score at Week 52
The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is a composite index that is calculated as the sum of the: • 28 tender joint count (TJC), • 28 swollen joint count (SJC), • Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS), where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest; • Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity -measured on a 10 cm VAS, where 0 cm = lowest disease activity and 10 cm = highest. The CDAI score ranges from 0-76 where lower scores indicate less disease activity. The following thresholds of disease activity have been defined for the CDAI: Remission: ≤ 2.8 Low Disease Activity: > 2.8 and ≤ 10 Moderate Disease Activity: > 10 and ≤ 22 High Disease Activity: > 22.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the DAS28 at Week 52
The DAS28 measures the severity of disease at a specific time and is derived from the following variables: • 28 tender joint count • 28 swollen joint count, which do not include the DIP joints, the hip joint, or the joints below the knee; • C-reactive protein (CRP) • Patient's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28(CRP) scores range from 0 to approximately 10, with the upper bound dependent on the highest possible level of CRP. A DAS28 score higher than 5.1 indicates high disease activity, a DAS28 score less than 3.2 indicates low disease activity, and a DAS28 score less than 2.6 indicates clinical remission.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the FACIT-Fatigue Scale Score at Week 52
The FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item self-administered questionnaire that assesses both the physical and functional consequences of fatigue. Each question is answered on a 5-point scale, where 0 means "not at all," and 4 means "very much." The FACIT-Fatigue scale score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores denoting lower levels of fatigue. A positive change from baseline score indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 52
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improved by ≥ 20% from Baseline after 52 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 52
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improved by ≥ 1 after 52 weeks. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 52
A EULAR response reflects an improvement in disease activity and an attainment of a lower degree of disease activity based on the DAS-28 score. A Good Response is defined as an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 compared with Baseline and attainment of a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2. A Moderate Response is defined as either: • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of greater than 0.6 and less than or equal to 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of less than or equal to 5.1 or, • an improvement (decrease) in the DAS28 of more than 1.2 and attainment of a DAS28 score of greater than 3.2.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 52
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 50% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 50% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 52
Percentage of participants with an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 70% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 70% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦ Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦ Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦ Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦ C-Reactive Protein. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 52
Percentage of participants with pre-existing enthesopathy whose MASES improves to 0 after 24 weeks. The Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score quantitates inflammation of the entheses (enthesitis) by assessing pain at the following entheses (sites where tendons or ligaments insert into the bone): 1st costochondral joints left/right; 7th costochondral joints left/right; posterior superior iliac spine left/right; anterior superior iliac spine left/right; iliac crest left/right; 5th lumbar spinous process; and the proximal insertion of the Archilles tendon left/right. The MASES, ranging from 0 to 13, is the number of painful entheses out of 13 entheses. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 52
Percentage of participants with pre-existing dactylitis whose dactylitis severity score improves to zero after 52 weeks. Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. Each digit on the hands and feet was rated as zero for no dactylitis or 1 for dactylitis present. The dactylitis score is the sum of the individual scores for each digit. The dactylitis severity score, ranging from 0 to 20, is the number of digits on the hands and feet with dactylitis present. Two-sided 95% confidence interval is based on the Clopper-Pearson method.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events During the Placebo-Controlled Phase
A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of Investigational Product (IP). The severity of each adverse event (AE) and serious AE (SAE) was assessed by the investigator and graded based on a scale from Mild - mild symptoms to Severe AEs (non-serious or serious). A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE which:
- Resulted in death
- Was life-threatening
- Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
- Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
- Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
- Constituted an important medical event
Measured: Week 0 to Week 16 for placebo participants who entered EE at Week 16 and up to Week 24 for all other participants (placebo participants who remained on placebo through week 24 and participants randomized to the APR 20 mg BID or APR 30 mg BID)
Number of Participants With TEAEs During the Apremilast-Exposure Period
A treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of Investigational Product (IP). The severity of each adverse event (AE) and serious AE (SAE) was assessed by the investigator and graded based on a scale from Mild - mild symptoms to Severe AEs (non-serious or serious). A serious adverse event (SAE) is any AE which:
- Resulted in death
- Was life-threatening
- Required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization
- Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity
- Was a congenital anomaly/birth defect
- Constituted an important medical event
Measured: Week 0 to week 260; overall median duration of exposure to apremilast 20 mg and 30 mg BID was 198 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Study start27 Sep 2010
- Primary completion26 Jul 2012
- Study completion25 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psoriatic ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AmgenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 488 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amgen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- MD, Study director, Amgen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01212757
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CC-10004-PSA-003
- Other IDs
- 2010-018386-32
- Acronym
- PALACE2
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 6 May 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Publications
Cutolo M, Myerson GE, Fleischmann RM, Liote F, Diaz-Gonzalez F, Van den Bosch F, Marzo-Ortega H, Feist E, Shah K, Hu C, Stevens RM, Poder A. A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results of the PALACE 2 Trial. J Rheumatol. 2016 Sep;43(9):1724-34. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.151376. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
PubMed 27422893Mease PJ, Hatemi G, Paris M, Cheng S, Maes P, Zhang W, Shi R, Flower A, Picard H, Stein Gold L. Apremilast Long-Term Safety Up to 5 Years from 15 Pooled Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Behcet's Syndrome. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Sep;24(5):809-820. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00783-7. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
PubMed 37316690Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Kavanaugh A, McGonagle D, Nash P, Guerette B, Nakasato P, Brunori M, Teng L, McInnes IB. Articular and Extra-Articular Benefits in ACR20 Non-responders at Week 104 Treated With Apremilast: Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Dec;8(4):1677-1691. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00369-x. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
PubMed 34536218Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Ogdie A, Coates LC, Behrens F, Kavanaugh A, McInnes I, Queiro R, Guerette B, Brunori M, Teng L, Smolen JS. Treatment-to-Target With Apremilast in Psoriatic Arthritis: The Probability of Achieving Targets and Comprehensive Control of Disease Manifestations. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jun;72(6):814-821. doi: 10.1002/acr.24134. Epub 2020 May 8.
PubMed 31909868Kavanaugh A, Gladman DD, Edwards CJ, Schett G, Guerette B, Delev N, Teng L, Paris M, Mease PJ. Long-term experience with apremilast in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 5-year results from a PALACE 1-3 pooled analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 10;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1901-3.
PubMed 31077258Gladman DD, Kavanaugh A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Wollenhaupt J, Cutolo M, Schett G, Lespessailles E, Guerette B, Delev N, Teng L, Edwards CJ, Birbara CA, Mease PJ. Therapeutic benefit of apremilast on enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a pooled analysis of the PALACE 1-3 studies. RMD Open. 2018 Jun 27;4(1):e000669. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000669. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30018799
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Doses of Apremilast (CC-10004) in Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01212757
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PALACE2 / CC-10004-PSA-003
- Conditions
- Psoriatic Arthritis
- Keywords
- Psoriasis, Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, inflammation, skin condition, inflammatory cells, apremilast, CC-10004
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 488 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AmgenIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Sep 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 May 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether apremilast is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis.
Apremilast is proposed to improve signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis (tender and swollen joints, pain, physical function) in treated patients.
Detailed description
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory arthritis that occurs in 6-39% of psoriasis patients. The immunopathogenesis of PsA, which mirrors but is not identical to that seen in psoriatic plaques, reflects a complex interaction among resident dendritic, fibroblastic and endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells attracted to the synovium by cytokines and chemokines. Apremilast (CC-10004) is a novel oral agent that modulates multiple inflammatory pathways through targeted phosphodiesterase type 4 (PDE4) enzyme inhibition. Therefore, apremilast has the potential to be effective in the treatment of PsA.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast 20mg | Experimental | Drug: Apremilast 20mg20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase |
| Apremilast 30mg | Experimental | Drug: Apremilast 30mg30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice a day for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice a day for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase orally twice daily |
| Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo + 20 mg ApremilastPlacebo + 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 20 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase. Subjects who do not have at least 20% improvement in their swollen and tender joint counts at Week 16 will escape to 20 mg Apremilast twice daily at Week 16 |
| Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo + 30 mg ApremilastPlacebo + 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for 24 weeks during the placebo-controlled phase followed by 30 mg Apremilast tablets administered twice daily for up to 4.5 years in the active treatment / long-term safety phase. Subjects who do not have at least 20% improvement in their swollen and tender joint counts at Week 16 will escape to 30 mg Apremilast twice daily at Week 16. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Males or females, aged ≥ 18 years at time of consent.
- Have a diagnosis of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA, by any criteria) of ≥ 6 months duration.
- Meet the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) PsA at time of screening.
- Must have been inadequately treated by disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)
- May not have axial involvement alone
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnant or breast feeding.
- History of allergy to any component of the investigational product.
- Hepatitis B surface antigen and/or Hepatitis C antibody positive at screening.
- Therapeutic failure on > 3 agents for PsA or > 1 biologic tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blocker
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Apremilast 20mgAlso: CC-10004Apremilast 20 mg twice daily, orally | Drug | Apremilast 20mg |
| Apremilast 30mgAlso: CC-10004Apremilast 30 mg twice daily, orally | Drug | Apremilast 30mg |
| Placebo + 20 mg ApremilastAlso: Placebo, CC-10004Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast | Drug | Placebo + 20 mg Apremilast |
| Placebo + 30 mg ApremilastAlso: Placebo, CC-10004Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast | Drug | Placebo + 30 mg Apremilast |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of participants with an ACR20 response. A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from Baseline were met: • ≥ 20% improvement in 78 tender joint count; • ≥ 20% improvement in 76 swollen joint count; and • ≥ 20% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: ◦Patient's assessment of pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale [VAS]); ◦Patient's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦Physician's global assessment of disease activity (measured on a 100 mm VAS); ◦Patient's self-assessment of physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)); ◦C-Reactive Protein.
52 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 20 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Change From Baseline in 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC) Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With MASES Improvement ≥ 20% at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Dactylitis Improvement ≥ 1 Point at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 50 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 70 Response at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
Percentage of Participants With an ACR 50 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 70 Response at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 16
Time frame: Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a MASES Score of Zero at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Dactylitis Score of Zero at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With a ACR 20 Response at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale Score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Percentage of Participants With a Modified PsARC Response at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Patient Assessment of Pain at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Entheses Score (MASES) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Dactylitis Severity Score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 27422893Cutolo M, Myerson GE, Fleischmann RM, Liote F, Diaz-Gonzalez F, Van den Bosch F, Marzo-Ortega H, Feist E, Shah K, Hu C, Stevens RM, Poder A. A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results of the PALACE 2 Trial. J Rheumatol. 2016 Sep;43(9):1724-34. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.151376. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37316690Mease PJ, Hatemi G, Paris M, Cheng S, Maes P, Zhang W, Shi R, Flower A, Picard H, Stein Gold L. Apremilast Long-Term Safety Up to 5 Years from 15 Pooled Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies of Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Behcet's Syndrome. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023 Sep;24(5):809-820. doi: 10.1007/s40257-023-00783-7. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34536218Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Kavanaugh A, McGonagle D, Nash P, Guerette B, Nakasato P, Brunori M, Teng L, McInnes IB. Articular and Extra-Articular Benefits in ACR20 Non-responders at Week 104 Treated With Apremilast: Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized Controlled Trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2021 Dec;8(4):1677-1691. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00369-x. Epub 2021 Sep 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31909868Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Ogdie A, Coates LC, Behrens F, Kavanaugh A, McInnes I, Queiro R, Guerette B, Brunori M, Teng L, Smolen JS. Treatment-to-Target With Apremilast in Psoriatic Arthritis: The Probability of Achieving Targets and Comprehensive Control of Disease Manifestations. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jun;72(6):814-821. doi: 10.1002/acr.24134. Epub 2020 May 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31077258Kavanaugh A, Gladman DD, Edwards CJ, Schett G, Guerette B, Delev N, Teng L, Paris M, Mease PJ. Long-term experience with apremilast in patients with psoriatic arthritis: 5-year results from a PALACE 1-3 pooled analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 May 10;21(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1901-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30018799Gladman DD, Kavanaugh A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Wollenhaupt J, Cutolo M, Schett G, Lespessailles E, Guerette B, Delev N, Teng L, Edwards CJ, Birbara CA, Mease PJ. Therapeutic benefit of apremilast on enthesitis and dactylitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a pooled analysis of the PALACE 1-3 studies. RMD Open. 2018 Jun 27;4(1):e000669. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000669. eCollection 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request
Related trials for Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn if Bimekizumab Given in Different Ways is Safe and Moves Similarly Throughout the Body Over Time in Adults
Psoriatic Arthritis, Axial Spondyloarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Analogs on Disease Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Guselkumab vs Golimumab in PsA TNF Inadequate Responder Patients
Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
MD study director
Amgen
98 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Apremilast 20mg and Apremilast 30mg in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by Amgen at 98 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 98 sites in United States, Czechia, Canada, Bulgaria, Italy and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline and Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01212757, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2020.