Patency, Hepatic Venous CongestionPhase 2/3MHVLDLTNCT01205802
Usability of Ringed Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft for Venous Vascular Reconstruction of Living Donor Liver Transplantation
A Phase 2/3 study testing MHV reconstruction in people with Patency, Hepatic Venous Congestion, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction with an interposition vessel graft has been settled as a standard procedure for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a right lobe graft. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Patency, Hepatic Venous Congestion
- What is being tested?
- MHV reconstruction
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Aug 2010to Jul 2012
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Living donor liver transplantation requiring MHV reconstruction
Who cannot join
- Living donor liver transplantation not requiring MHV reconstruction
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prospective Study on Usability of Ringed Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft for Venous Vascular Reconstruction of Living Donor Liver Transplantation
Middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction with an interposition vessel graft has been settled as a standard procedure for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a right lobe graft. Increasing demand of vessel graft in the situation of limited resources of allograft led the investigators to search for new vessel substitutes. Since the use of thin-walled expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft showed poor long-term patency, a prospective study is going to be performed to enhance the clinical usability of expanded PTFE graft. A clinical study intends to know how to maintain its luminal flow effectively by using ringed PTFE graft. During 12 months of study period, ringed PTFE graft will be used for reconstruction of MHV reconstruction. The investigators expect that ringed PTFE graft seems to be a more useful alternative than usual PTFE graft when adequate autologous or allogenic vessel graft is not available.
Read the detailed description
Since late 2009, the relative supply of vessel allograft over the increasing demand on LDLT became seriously shortened in the investigators' institution. Thus the investigators decide to use prosthetic vascular grafts more frequently than before. After a preliminary study from January 2010 to July 2010, a prospective case-controlled study will be performed for 12 months from August 2010 to July 2011.
The case number of patients requiring MHV reconstruction is expected as being 200 during the study period. Of them, currently using homologous or autologous vessel grafts will be used for 150. Due to expected shortage of such human vessels, other 50 will undergo MHV reconstruction using ringed PTFE graft in addition to available autologous or homologous vessel segments.
According to the implications from precedent animal and preliminary studies, the investigators set up the institutional guidelines for use of prosthetic vascular graft during MHV reconstruction of LDLT as follows: use only ringed PTFE graft; choose graft of a larger-caliber (≥1 cm); apply an intervening patch when making an end-to-side anastomosis for MHV branch of the segment 8 (V8); provide a slight redundancy in length; make the IVC-side orifice much larger than the usual; perform flow surveillance more frequently with dynamic CT scan and Doppler ultrasonography; place a stent as soon as any significant luminal narrowing is detected; and keep hypocoagulable state for at least 2 weeks and anti-platelet therapy for 6 months.
Technical knacks for secure suture include minimal removal of the rings attached at the surface of the ringed PTFE, use of PTFE suture material (GORE-TEX SUTURE; GORE-TEX, W.L. Gore \& Associated, Inc., USA) - a non-absorbable monofilament made of expanded PTFE enabling 1:1 needle to thread ratio to minimize needle hole bleeding at anastomoses, making a redundant patch plasty for end-to-side branch anastomosis especially for V8, and spray application of fibrin glues for suture-point minute bleedings and for stable fixation of PTFE graft at the liver cut surface.
The primary goal for this clinical study is set to keep up the rate of luminal patency as 100% for at least 1 month after MHV reconstruction for LDLT. Any occurrence of flow disturbance at luminal narrowing greater than 50% of the original cross-sectional area at 1 month should make the guidelines revise extensively. This protocol is designed as being a prospective case-controlled study for 1 year.
The use of PTFE graft for various hepatobiliary surgical procedures including LDLT has been permissible in the investigators' institution. Only after parenchymal transection of the donor liver, the size and shape of suitable vessel allograft for MHV reconstruction is determined. Thus the use of PTFE graft will be decided at this time after checking the list of all available allograft stored at the institutional tissue bank. The indication of PTFE use will be confined to the occasions that adequate allograft was not available. Permission for potential use of PTFE graft will be obtained from all cases of LDLT using a right lobe graft. This study protocol is approved by the institutional review board for clinical study.
- Conditions
- Patency, Hepatic Venous Congestion
- Being tested
- MHV reconstruction
- Keywords
- patency, hepatic venous congestion, liver transplantation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MHV reconstructionProcedure or surgery
MHV reconstruction with PTFE or homograft
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PTFE group | Active comparator | MHV reconstruction with ringed Goretex Receives: Procedure: MHV reconstruction |
| Homograft group | Placebo comparator | MHV reconstruction with homograft Receives: Procedure: MHV reconstruction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patency of the reconstructed MHV
Patency rate up to 1 year
Measured: Follow-up for 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2010
- Primary completionJul 2011 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2012 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Patency, Hepatic Venous CongestionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Asan Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Asan Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01205802
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MHV_Goretex_LDLT
- Acronym
- MHVLDLT
- Status last verified
- Sep 2010
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Hwang S, Jung DH, Ha TY, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Kim KH, Song GW, Park GC, Jung SW, Yoon SY, Namgoong JM, Park CS, Park YH, Park HW, Lee HJ, Lee SG. Usability of ringed polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for middle hepatic vein reconstruction during living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2012 Aug;18(8):955-65. doi: 10.1002/lt.23456.
PubMed 22511404
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Study on Usability of Ringed Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft for Venous Vascular Reconstruction of Living Donor Liver Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01205802
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MHVLDLT / MHV_Goretex_LDLT
- Conditions
- Patency, Hepatic Venous Congestion
- Keywords
- patency, hepatic venous congestion, liver transplantation
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Asan Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2010
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2012 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction with an interposition vessel graft has been settled as a standard procedure for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a right lobe graft. Increasing demand of vessel graft in the situation of limited resources of allograft led the investigators to search for new vessel substitutes. Since the use of thin-walled expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft showed poor long-term patency, a prospective study is going to be performed to enhance the clinical usability of expanded PTFE graft. A clinical study intends to know how to maintain its luminal flow effectively by using ringed PTFE graft. During 12 months of study period, ringed PTFE graft will be used for reconstruction of MHV reconstruction. The investigators expect that ringed PTFE graft seems to be a more useful alternative than usual PTFE graft when adequate autologous or allogenic vessel graft is not available.
Detailed description
Since late 2009, the relative supply of vessel allograft over the increasing demand on LDLT became seriously shortened in the investigators' institution. Thus the investigators decide to use prosthetic vascular grafts more frequently than before. After a preliminary study from January 2010 to July 2010, a prospective case-controlled study will be performed for 12 months from August 2010 to July 2011.
The case number of patients requiring MHV reconstruction is expected as being 200 during the study period. Of them, currently using homologous or autologous vessel grafts will be used for 150. Due to expected shortage of such human vessels, other 50 will undergo MHV reconstruction using ringed PTFE graft in addition to available autologous or homologous vessel segments.
According to the implications from precedent animal and preliminary studies, the investigators set up the institutional guidelines for use of prosthetic vascular graft during MHV reconstruction of LDLT as follows: use only ringed PTFE graft; choose graft of a larger-caliber (≥1 cm); apply an intervening patch when making an end-to-side anastomosis for MHV branch of the segment 8 (V8); provide a slight redundancy in length; make the IVC-side orifice much larger than the usual; perform flow surveillance more frequently with dynamic CT scan and Doppler ultrasonography; place a stent as soon as any significant luminal narrowing is detected; and keep hypocoagulable state for at least 2 weeks and anti-platelet therapy for 6 months.
Technical knacks for secure suture include minimal removal of the rings attached at the surface of the ringed PTFE, use of PTFE suture material (GORE-TEX SUTURE; GORE-TEX, W.L. Gore \& Associated, Inc., USA) - a non-absorbable monofilament made of expanded PTFE enabling 1:1 needle to thread ratio to minimize needle hole bleeding at anastomoses, making a redundant patch plasty for end-to-side branch anastomosis especially for V8, and spray application of fibrin glues for suture-point minute bleedings and for stable fixation of PTFE graft at the liver cut surface.
The primary goal for this clinical study is set to keep up the rate of luminal patency as 100% for at least 1 month after MHV reconstruction for LDLT. Any occurrence of flow disturbance at luminal narrowing greater than 50% of the original cross-sectional area at 1 month should make the guidelines revise extensively. This protocol is designed as being a prospective case-controlled study for 1 year.
The use of PTFE graft for various hepatobiliary surgical procedures including LDLT has been permissible in the investigators' institution. Only after parenchymal transection of the donor liver, the size and shape of suitable vessel allograft for MHV reconstruction is determined. Thus the use of PTFE graft will be decided at this time after checking the list of all available allograft stored at the institutional tissue bank. The indication of PTFE use will be confined to the occasions that adequate allograft was not available. Permission for potential use of PTFE graft will be obtained from all cases of LDLT using a right lobe graft. This study protocol is approved by the institutional review board for clinical study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PTFE group | Active comparator | Procedure: MHV reconstructionMHV reconstruction with ringed Goretex |
| Homograft group | Placebo comparator | Procedure: MHV reconstructionMHV reconstruction with homograft |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Living donor liver transplantation requiring MHV reconstruction
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Living donor liver transplantation not requiring MHV reconstruction
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MHV reconstructionMHV reconstruction with PTFE or homograft | Procedure or surgery | Homograft group, PTFE group |
Primary outcome
Patency of the reconstructed MHV
Time frame: Follow-up for 1 year
Patency rate up to 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2010.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22511404Hwang S, Jung DH, Ha TY, Ahn CS, Moon DB, Kim KH, Song GW, Park GC, Jung SW, Yoon SY, Namgoong JM, Park CS, Park YH, Park HW, Lee HJ, Lee SG. Usability of ringed polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for middle hepatic vein reconstruction during living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2012 Aug;18(8):955-65. doi: 10.1002/lt.23456.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing MHV reconstruction in people with Patency, Hepatic Venous Congestion, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patency of the reconstructed MHV (time frame: Follow-up for 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01205802, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2010.