AzTrials
AzTrials

Persistent Allergic AsthmaPhase 3NCT01202903

Omalizumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Persistent Allergic Asthma Not Adequately Controlled Despite GINA (2009) Step 4 Therapy

A Phase 3 study testing Omalizumab in people with Persistent Allergic Asthma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 39 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of omalizumab, compared to placebo in 18 to 75 year old Chinese patients with moderate to severe persistent allergic asthma who have inadequate asthma control despite treatment according to GINA (2009) Step 4 therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Persistent Allergic Asthma
What is being tested?
Omalizumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
616 participants
Where
39 sitesChina
Study dates
Sep 2010to Oct 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Met study drug-dosing table eligibility criteria (serum baseline total IgE level ≥ 30 to ≤ 700 IU/mL and body weight > 20 kg and ≤ 150 kg)
  • Diagnosed with asthma ≥ 1 year duration at Screening, and a history of asthma that is not adequately controlled with GINA (2009) Step 4 therapy
  • Received medium-to-high dose inhaled corticosteroid > 500 µg Beclomethasone Diproprionate (BDP), or equivalent plus regularly inhaled LABA, either separately or in combination, for at least 8 weeks prior to screening
  • Met specific asthma exacerbations eligibility criteria prior to the screening period
  • Exhibited inadequate symptom control as demonstrated by specific criteria (in keeping with GINA 2009 guidelines)
  • Positive skin prick test to at least one perennial aeroallergen documented by a historical test within 12 months prior to screening, or at Visit 1
  • FEV1 ≥ 40% and < 80% of the predicted normal value for the patient (using local standards), after withholding bronchodilators at Visit 2

Who cannot join

  • Used other investigational drugs at the time of enrollment, or within 30 days or 5 half-lives of enrollment, whichever is longer. For biological agent-based investigational drugs, such as monoclonal antibodies, at least six months will need to have passed between the last administration of the drug and the patient's Screening Visit.
  • History of malignancy
  • History of allergies and diseases that could interfere with the analyses
  • Clinically significant abnormality on a 12-lead ECG recorded at Visit 1
  • Elevated IgE levels for reasons other than allergy
  • Current smokers, or a former smoker with a smoking history of > 10 pack-years. A former smoker must have abstained for a minimum of 12 months before randomization
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Receiving specific medications
  • Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities (not associated with the study indication) at Visit 1
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Trial locations and contacts

39 sites in 1 country.

39 sites in 1 country

China39 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100023

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100029

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100034

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100050

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100088

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100730

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Changchun, Jilin, 130041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Changsha, Hunan, 410003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Changsha, Hunan, 410008

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Changsha, Hunan, 410011

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chongqing, 400037

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chongqing, 400038

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chongqing, 400042

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510030

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guangzhou, 510080

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nanjing, Jiangsu

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nanjing

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nanning, Guangxi, 530021

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shanghai, 200025

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shanghai, 200032

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shanghai, 200233

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shanghai, 200433

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shengyang, Liaoning, 110016

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shenyang, Liaoning

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430022

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430070

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Xi’an, Shanxi, 710032

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Xi’an, Shanxi, 710038

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Xian, Shanxi, 710004

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A 24-week, Phase III Randomized, Double-blind, Placebocontrolled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study of Xolair® (Omalizumab) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Persistent Allergic Asthma Who Remain Not Adequately Controlled Despite GINA (2009) Step 4 Therapy

This study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of omalizumab, compared to placebo in 18 to 75 year old Chinese patients with moderate to severe persistent allergic asthma who have inadequate asthma control despite treatment according to GINA (2009) Step 4 therapy.

Being tested
Omalizumab, Placebo
Keywords
omalizumab, asthma, immunoglobulin E, IgE
Medical subject headings
Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OmalizumabDrug

    The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) omalizumab was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection.

  • PlaceboDrug

    The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) placebo was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection.

Study groups in NCT01202903
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OmalizumabExperimentalOmalizumab was supplied as lyophilized, sterile powder in a single-use, 5 mL vial that was designed to deliver 150 mg of omalizumab for subcutaneous administration upon reconstitution with 1.4 mL sterile water for injection. The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) omalizumab was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection.
Receives: Drug: Omalizumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorThe placebo was the same mixture of inactive excipients, in quality and quantity, as those used for the drug product. The minimum dose of 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) placebo was administered every 4 weeks by subcutaneous injection.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Following the 24-week Treatment Period

    A Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) meter was distributed to patients at Visit 1, to be used to measure PEF twice-daily as directed. During the Screening and Treatment Periods, PEF was measured in the morning and evening every day. the morning PEF was performed within 15 minutes after waking, and the evening PEF approximately 12 hours later. Patients were encouraged to perform morning and evening PEF measurements before the use of any LABA or rescue medication. The highest of 3 values was recorded as the daily personal best. The personal best was used to calculate the mean morning PEF and mean evening PEF value collected between assessment Visits LS Mean of change from baseline in mean morning PEF is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline mean morning PEF as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Evening PEF (L/Min) Following 24-week Treatment

    A Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) meter was distributed to patients at Visit 1, to be used to measure PEF twice-daily as directed. During the Screening and Treatment Periods, PEF was measured in the morning and evening every day. the morning PEF was performed within 15 minutes after waking, and the evening PEF approximately 12 hours later. Patients were encouraged to perform morning and evening PEF measurements before the use of any LABA or rescue medication. The highest of 3 values was recorded as the daily personal best. The personal best was used to calculate the mean morning PEF and mean evening PEF value collected between assessment Visits. LS Mean of change from baseline in mean morning PEF is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline mean morning PEF as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks

  2. Change From Baseline in % Predicted FEV1 Following 24-week Treatment

    Spirometry was used at defined time points throughout the study to assess the clinical status of patients and to capture the following variables: forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), FEV1 percent predicted, forced vital capacity (FVC) and the FEV1/FVC ratio. During the Screening assessment, spirometry was performed pre- and post-bronchodilator administration to assess reversibility. During the treatment period (including prerandomization assessments on Day 1), spirometry was performed after withholding bronchodilators. The results of spirometry were required to meet the ATS/ERS criteria for acceptability and repeatability. Acceptability criteria were applied before repeatability was determined. LS Mean of change from baseline in % predicted FEV1 is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline % predicted FEV1 as covariates.

    Measured: Baseline, 24 weeks

  3. Change From Baseline in AQLQ Score Following 24-week Treatment

    The standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQs)), was used to assess the patients' asthma-related quality of life. There are 32 questions in the AQLQ and they are in 4 domains (symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function and environmental exposure). Each question was answered on a 7 point scale (1-totally limited/problems all the time, 7-not at all limited/no problems). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses, and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains (a minimum domain / overall score of 1 = Severely impaired whereas a maximum domain / overall score of 7 = not impaired at all). A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement.

    Measured: 24 weeks

  4. Percentage of Patients Achieving at Least a 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 Point Improvement From Baseline in AQLQ Overall Score Following 24-week Treatment

    The standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQs)), was used to assess the patients' asthma-related quality of life. There are 32 questions in the AQLQ and they are in 4 domains (symptoms, activity limitation, emotional function and environmental exposure). Each question was answered on a 7 point scale (1-totally limited/problems all the time, 7-not at all limited/no problems). The overall AQLQ score is the mean of all 32 responses, and the individual domain scores are the means of the items in those domains (a minimum domain / overall score of 1 = Severely impaired whereas a maximum domain / overall score of 7 = not impaired at all). A positive change from baseline score indicates improvement.

    Measured: 24 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline in ACQ Score Following 24-week Treatment

    The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a questionnaire consisting of 7 questions assessing symptoms, airway caliber and rescue β2-agonist use. One value representing overall asthma control on that occasion was calculated. Decrease in scores of 0.5 or higher between ACQ assessments are considered clinically meaningful. The ACQ was completed by the patient at the Investigator's site at Visit 2 (Week 1, pre-dose), Visit 6 (after completion of 16 weeks of treatment) and at the End of Study/Early Termination visit. LS Mean of change from baseline in ACQ score is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, center grouping, smoking status, and baseline ACQ score as covariates. Score 0= totally controlled, 6= extremely poorly controlled

    Measured: 24 weeks

  6. Percentage of Patients With at Least a 0.5 or 0.75 Point Improvement in the ACQ Score at Week 24

    The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a questionnaire consisting of 7 questions assessing symptoms, airway caliber and rescue β2-agonist use. One value representing overall asthma control on that occasion was calculated. Decrease in scores of 0.5 or higher between ACQ assessments are considered clinically meaningful. The ACQ was completed by the patient at the Investigator's site at Visit 2 (Week 1, pre-dose), Visit 6 (after completion of 16 weeks of treatment) and at the End of Study/Early Termination visit. Only patients with no more than 1 item missing are included, and the missing item was imputed by interpolation

    Measured: 24 weeks

  7. Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Scores Following 24-week Treatment

    Total asthma symptom score was derived for each day as the total of the morning (scale 0-1), daytime (scale 0-4) and nocturnal (scale 0-4) scores with a max score of 9. The mean score across the 28 days prior to the week 24 assessment visit was used to calculate a change from baseline. Analysis of total asthma symptom score was performed using ANCOVA model and Van-Elteren test. LS Mean of change from baseline in mean asthma symptom score is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, smoking status, center grouping, and baseline mean asthma symptom scores as covariates. Decrease of score on change from baseline means improvement of asthma symptom control.

    Measured: 24 weeks

  8. Percentage of Participants With Investigator and Patient Global Evaluation of Treatment Effectiveness (GETE) at Weeks 16 and 24

    The global evaluation of treatment effectiveness (GETE) is an assessment of asthma symptom control and overall response to asthma treatment. The evaluation was performed by both investigator and patient, each using the same 5 point scale. The GETE scale ranges were as follows: excellent, good, moderate, poor and worsening. A good or excellent response on the 5 point scale indicated that a patient had responded to treatment. 1=excellent 2=good 3=moderate 4=poor 5= worsening. Responder is defined as the patient who achieved an excellent or good response. Non-responder isdefined as the patient who achieved a moderate or poor or worsening response.

    Measured: 16 and 24 weeks

  9. Change From Baseline in Number of Puffs of Asthma Rescue Medication Following 24-week Treatment

    Analysis of rescue medication use followed a similar method to that employed for total asthma symptom score. The mean number of puffs across the 28 days prior to the Week 24 assessment visit was used to calculate a change from baseline. LS Mean of change from baseline in mean number of puffs of asthma rescue medication is calculated with the ANCOVA model using treatment, stratification group, dosing schedule, gender, smoking status, center grouping, and baseline mean number of puffs of asthma rescue medication as covariates.

    Measured: 24 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionOct 2013
  4. Study completionOct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
616 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01202903
Sponsor's protocol ID
CIGE025A2313
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
14 Sep 2010
Last updated
23 Mar 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Li J, Wang C, Liu C, Kang J, Kong L, Huang Y, Liu S, Huang M, Wang L, Fogel R, Jaumont X, Yang J, Zhong N. Efficacy predictors of omalizumab in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma: Findings from a post-hoc analysis of a randomised phase III study. World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Nov 24;13(12):100469. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100469. eCollection 2020 Dec.

    PubMed 34611470

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Omalizumab in people with Persistent Allergic Asthma, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 39 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 39 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Mar 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Mean Morning Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Following the 24-week Treatment Period (time frame: Baseline, 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01202903, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in