CandidiasisNCT01202253
Early Clinical Experience With Anidulafungin In Patients With Liver Disease In The United Kingdom
An observational study of Candidiasis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to describe the real world effectiveness of anidulafungin in clinical practice in a large Liver Unit in the United Kingdom. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Candidiasis
- What is being tested?
- anidulafungin
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to May 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects admitted with candidiasis infections to the Liver Unit at King's College Hospital (United Kingdom) who are prescribed anidulafungin.
Who may be able to join
- Subjects who have been prescribed anidulafungin between 1st July 2009 and 30th September 2010.
- Patients admitted to specialist liver unit wards and the Liver Intensive Therapy Unit during this period
Who cannot join
- Patients who participated in any interventional clinical trial during this episode of sepsis.
- Patients who received anidulafungin for infection prophylaxis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Study To Describe The Early Clinical Experience With Anidulafungin In Patients With Liver Disease At King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London
The purpose of this study is to describe the real world effectiveness of anidulafungin in clinical practice in a large Liver Unit in the United Kingdom.
Read the detailed description
All subjects that have been treated with Anidulafungin according to its licence during the period of July 2009 and September 2010 will be included.
- Conditions
- Candidiasis
- Being tested
- anidulafungin
- Keywords
- Ecalta, Eraxis, Candida, Candidemia, Systemic Candidiasis, ICU, Intensive Care Unit, Critical Care Unit
- Medical subject headings
- Candidiasis, Torulopsis, Candidemia, Systemic candidiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
anidulafunginDrug
Also called ECALTA, ERAXIS
A single 200 mg loading dose should be administered on Day 1, followed by 100 mg daily thereafter.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Anidulafungin | Not described Receives: Drug: anidulafungin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Outcome
Favorable outcome was defined as favorable clinical response and documented or presumed microbial eradication (two negative follow-up blood cultures for bloodstream infections or a successful clinical response without follow-up cultures for other infections). Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.
Measured: Day 28 post-treatment
Secondary outcomes (40)
Percentage of Participants With Unfavorable Outcome
Unfavorable outcome was defined as the need to change to another antifungal agent because of lack of clinical response or death due to the antifungal infection or microbiologic persistence of the fungus or superinfection with a new Candida, Aspergillus or other fungal strain occurring at least 3 days and up to 14 days of anidulafungin therapy, or a lack of follow up data about clinical and microbiologic responses at the end of anidulafungin therapy.
Measured: Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to All Causes
Death due to all causes included death attributable to fungal infection, death unrelated to fungal infection and death due to multiple causes.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Death Attributable to Fungal Infection
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Death Unrelated to Fungal Infection
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response
Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.
Measured: Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Lack of Clinical Response
Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.
Measured: Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants Requiring Change or Additional Antifungal Therapy
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Oral Antifungal Started to Complete Therapy
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Documented Eradication of Infecting Species
Documented microbial eradication was defined as 2 negative follow-up blood cultures for bloodstream infections.
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Ultrasound Scan Results
An ultrasound scan was performed and the resultant scan was reviewed for the presence of the infection as per investigator's discretion.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Results
A CT scan was performed and the resultant scan was reviewed for the presence of the infection as per investigator's discretion.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at Initiation of Drug Therapy
Percentage of participants with abnormal liver function results were based on 4 liver function variables- bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase. Normal reference ranges of these variables are: plasma bilirubin: 3-17 micromoles/L or 2.5-10 mg/L for adults; aspartate transaminase: 6-34 International Units/Liter (IU/L) for females and 8-40 IU/L for males; alkaline phosphatase: 5-38 IU/L for females and 10-50 IU/L for males; gamma glutamyl transferase: 7-32 IU/L for females and 11-50 IU/L for males. Upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at End of Drug Therapy
Percentage of participants with abnormal liver function results were based on 4 liver function variables- bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase. Normal reference ranges of these variables are: plasma bilirubin: 3-17 micromoles/L or 2.5-10 mg/L for adults; aspartate transaminase: 6-34 IU/L for females and 8-40 IU/L for males; alkaline phosphatase: 5-38 IU/L for females and 10-50 IU/L for males; gamma glutamyl transferase: 7-32 IU/L for females and 11-50 IU/L for males.
Measured: Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Liver Function Test Results at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy
Percentage of participants with liver function test results at least twice the baseline value during period of drug therapy was calculated for the liver function variables, bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyl transferase.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants Admitted to Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)
Measured: Baseline
Duration of Stay at Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Absolute Neutrophil Count Less Than 500 Per Cubic Millimeter (/mm^3) and Greater Than or Equal to 500 /mm^3
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 and upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100, by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Bacterial or Viral Infection
Upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Prescribed With Systemic Antifungal Within 30 Days Before Study Start
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline
Dose Changes for Immunosuppressant Drugs
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Probable or Proven Fungal Infection at the Initiation of Drug Therapy
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Documented Body Temperature Above 38.0 Degree Celsius or Below 36.0 Degree Celsius Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 and upper limit of confidence interval was reported as 100 if the same was calculated as greater than 100, by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure More Than 2 Standard Deviations Below the Mean for Age Recorded Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline
Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Microbiological Analysis
Infection sites included blood, chest, urinary tract, intra-abdominal, bile duct, liver, kidney, mouth and esophagus.
Measured: Baseline
Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Ultrasound Scan and Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan
Measured: Baseline
Infecting Organisms by Species
Measured: Baseline up to Day 14 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Species
Lower limit of confidence interval was reported as 0 if the same was calculated as less than 0 by standard calculations (outside the valid range of 0 to 100).
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Colonization Index
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Other Prior Fungal Infection by Species and Colonization Index
Measured: Baseline
Number of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation
Measured: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Loading Dose
Measured: Day 1
Percentage of Participants Who Received 100 mg Dose on Day 2
Measured: Day 2
Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Dose on Day 1 and 100 mg for All Subsequent Doses
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Number of Participants With Other Dosing Patterns
The other dosing patterns for anidulafungin included any dosing pattern different from 200 mg loading dose on Day 1 followed by 100 mg doses subsequently starting from Day 2.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Duration of Anidulafungin Therapy
Measured: Baseline
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment was considered an adverse event (AE) without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An AE resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be a SAE: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With One or More Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Number of Participants With Different Types of Drug-related Serious Adverse Events
Measured: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionMay 2011
- Study completionMay 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for CandidiasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01202253
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A8851028
- Status last verified
- Mar 2014
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study To Describe The Early Clinical Experience With Anidulafungin In Patients With Liver Disease At King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01202253
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A8851028
- Conditions
- Candidiasis
- Keywords
- Ecalta, Eraxis, Candida, Candidemia, Systemic Candidiasis, ICU, Intensive Care Unit, Critical Care Unit
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Oct 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to describe the real world effectiveness of anidulafungin in clinical practice in a large Liver Unit in the United Kingdom.
Detailed description
All subjects that have been treated with Anidulafungin according to its licence during the period of July 2009 and September 2010 will be included.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Anidulafungin | – | Drug: anidulafungin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects admitted with candidiasis infections to the Liver Unit at King's College Hospital (United Kingdom) who are prescribed anidulafungin.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subjects who have been prescribed anidulafungin between 1st July 2009 and 30th September 2010.
- Patients admitted to specialist liver unit wards and the Liver Intensive Therapy Unit during this period
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients who participated in any interventional clinical trial during this episode of sepsis.
- Patients who received anidulafungin for infection prophylaxis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| anidulafunginAlso: ECALTA, ERAXISA single 200 mg loading dose should be administered on Day 1, followed by 100 mg daily thereafter. | Drug | Anidulafungin |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Outcome
Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment
Favorable outcome was defined as favorable clinical response and documented or presumed microbial eradication (two negative follow-up blood cultures for bloodstream infections or a successful clinical response without follow-up cultures for other infections). Favorable clinical response was defined as clinical resolution of signs and symptoms of infection and no need to change or add to antifungal therapy, or transition to oral antifungal to complete therapy.
40 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Unfavorable Outcome
Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to All Causes
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Death Attributable to Fungal Infection
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Death Unrelated to Fungal Infection
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Clinical Response
Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Lack of Clinical Response
Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants Requiring Change or Additional Antifungal Therapy
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Oral Antifungal Started to Complete Therapy
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Documented Eradication of Infecting Species
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Ultrasound Scan Results
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Resolution of Signs of Infection According to Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Results
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at Initiation of Drug Therapy
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Results for Liver Function at End of Drug Therapy
Time frame: Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Liver Function Test Results at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Creatinine Clearance at Least Twice the Baseline Value During Period of Drug Therapy
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants Admitted to Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)
Time frame: Baseline
Duration of Stay at Liver Intensive Therapy Unit (LITU)
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Absolute Neutrophil Count Less Than 500 Per Cubic Millimeter (/mm^3) and Greater Than or Equal to 500 /mm^3
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Bacterial or Viral Infection
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Prescribed With Systemic Antifungal Within 30 Days Before Study Start
Time frame: Baseline
Dose Changes for Immunosuppressant Drugs
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Probable or Proven Fungal Infection at the Initiation of Drug Therapy
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Documented Body Temperature Above 38.0 Degree Celsius or Below 36.0 Degree Celsius Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Systolic Blood Pressure More Than 2 Standard Deviations Below the Mean for Age Recorded Within 24 Hour Period Prior to Initiation of Drug Therapy
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Microbiological Analysis
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Participants With Infection Sites as Per Ultrasound Scan and Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan
Time frame: Baseline
Infecting Organisms by Species
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 14 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Species
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Prior Colonization With Candida by Colonization Index
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Other Prior Fungal Infection by Species and Colonization Index
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Who Received Water-based and Ethanol-based Formulation
Time frame: Baseline
Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Loading Dose
Time frame: Day 1
Percentage of Participants Who Received 100 mg Dose on Day 2
Time frame: Day 2
Percentage of Participants Who Received 200 mg Dose on Day 1 and 100 mg for All Subsequent Doses
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Number of Participants With Other Dosing Patterns
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Duration of Anidulafungin Therapy
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Percentage of Participants With One or More Drug-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Number of Participants With Different Types of Drug-related Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 28 post-treatment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Candidiasis
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ruxolitinib on Hair Regrowth in Patients With Autoimmune Polyendocrinopathy Candidiasis Ectodermal Dystrophy (APECED)-Associated Alopecia Areata
Autoimmune Polyendocrinopathy Candidiasis Ectodermal Dystrophy (Apeced), Alopecia Areata
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Individuals With Immune System Problems That Lead to Fungal Infections
Chronic Mucocutaneous Candidiasis, Invasive Aspergillosis
RecruitingObservational study
Middle East Study of Infections in Patients With Hematological Malignancies
Hematological Malignancy, Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation
Recruiting
Comparison of Uncomplicated Candidemia Therapy Duration in Children and Adults
Invasive Candidiasis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of Fosmanogepix for the Treatment of Adult Participants With Candidemia and/or Invasive Candidiasis.
Candidemia, Candidiasis, Invasive
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Candidiasis, run by Pfizer at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Favorable Outcome (time frame: Day 28 post-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2014.