Prostate CancerPhase 3NCT01193257
Study Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone in Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
A Phase 3 study testing Orteronel and Prednisone in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 78 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed following Docetaxel-based therapy Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Orteronel and Prednisone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,099 participants
- Where
- 78 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2010to 29 Feb 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Each participant must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
- Voluntary written consent
- Male 18 years or older
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma
- Radiograph-documented metastatic disease
- Progressive disease
Show all 14Show fewer
- Prior surgical castration or concurrent use of an agent for medical castration
- Progressive disease during or following 1 or 2 regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy, 1 of which must have included docetaxel. Must have received greater than or equal to (>=) 360 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) of docetaxel within a 6-month period. Participants who were clearly intolerant to docetaxel or develop progressive disease before receiving >= 360 mg/m^2 are also eligible if they have received at least 225 mg/m^2 of docetaxel within a 6-month period and meet the other study entry criteria.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 2
- Even if surgically sterilized, participants must practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment period and for 4 months after the last dose of study drug, OR Abstain from heterosexual intercourse
- Screening laboratory values as specified in protocol
- Stable medical condition
- Life expectancy of 6 months or more
- Participants who have had up to 2 prior chemotherapy treatments are eligible to participate
Who cannot join
- Participants meeting any of the following exclusion criteria are not to be enrolled in the study:
- Known hypersensitivity to orteronel, prednisone or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue
- Received prior therapy with orteronel, aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole or abiraterone
- Any other therapies for prostate cancer, except for GnRH analogue therapy, must be discontinued 2 weeks before the first dose of study drug
- Radioisotope therapy or external beam radiation therapy within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
- Documented central nervous system metastases
Show all 14Show fewer
- Treatment with any investigational compound within 30 days prior to first dose of study drug (Participants who are in long-term follow-up following active treatment in other trials are eligible)
- Diagnosis or treatment of another malignancy within 2 years preceding first dose of study drug except nonmelanoma skin cancer or in situ malignancy completely resected
- Uncontrolled cardiovascular condition as specified in study protocol
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
- Unwilling or unable to comply with protocol
- Known gastrointestinal disease or procedure that could interfere with oral absorption or tolerance of orteronel
- Uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea despite appropriate medical therapy
- Prostate cancer confined to just the prostrate bed or immediate adjacent tissue
Trial locations and contacts
78 sites in 14 countries.
78 sites in 14 countries
United States37 sites
Study site
Albany, New York, 12208
Study site
Amarillo, Texas, 79106
Study site
Anchorage, Alaska, 99508
Study site
Bedford, Texas, 76022
Study site
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45230
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Study site
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Study site
East Syracuse, New York, 13057
Study site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33916
Study site
Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72903
Study site
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
Study site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
Study site
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46219
Study site
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109
Study site
Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130
Study site
Kennewick, Washington, 99336
Study site
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90025
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Study site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Study site
Newport News, Virginia, 23606
Study site
Odessa, Texas, 79761
Study site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Study site
Port Saint Lucie, Florida, 34952
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Study site
Riverside, California, 92501
Study site
Rochester, New York, 14623
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Study site
San Diego, California, 92120
Study site
Tualatin, Oregon, 97062
Study site
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Study site
Webster, Texas, 77598
Study site
Westminster, Maryland, 21157
Canada8 sites
Study site
Brampton, Ontario, L6T4S5
Study site
Edmonton, Alberta
Study site
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V2H3
Study site
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y2H4
Study site
Moncton, New Brunswick
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Newmarket, Ontario
Study site
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R4S3
France6 sites
Study site
La Roche-sur-Yon
Study site
Le Mans
Study site
Lyon
Study site
Marseille
Study site
Paris
Study site
Villejuif, 94805
Australia5 sites
Study site
Hobart, Tasmania
Study site
Malvere, Victoria
Study site
Redcliffe, Queensland
Study site
Wodonga, Victoria
Study site
Woodville South, South Australia, 5011
Czechia5 sites
Study site
Hradec Dralove
Study site
Kromertz
Study site
Modřice
Study site
Prague
Study site
Zlín
Belgium4 sites
Study site
Brussels
Study site
Kortijk
Study site
Liège
Study site
Namur
Poland3 sites
Study site
Bielsko-Biala
Study site
Goczałkowice Zdrój
Study site
Wroclaw
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel (TAK-700) Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer That Has Progressed During or Following Docetaxel-based Therapy.
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed following Docetaxel-based therapy
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Orteronel, Prednisone, Orteronel Placebo
- Keywords
- Drug therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OrteronelDrug
Also called TAK-700
Orteronel tablets
PrednisoneDrug
Prednisone tablets
Orteronel PlaceboDrug
Orteronel placebo-matching tablets
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Orteronel + prednisone | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Orteronel; Drug: Prednisone |
| Placebo + prednisone | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Orteronel Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.
Measured: Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Secondary outcomes (21)
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)
rPFS was defined as the time from randomization until radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: The appearance of 2 or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scan as defined by prostate cancer working group (PCWG)2; Should 2 or more new bone lesions be evident at the first assessment (8-week assessment) on treatment, 2 or more additional new lesions must have been evident on a confirmatory assessment at least 6 weeks later; One or more new soft tissue/visceral organ lesions identified by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Progression as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12
Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A greater than or equal to (>=) 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use; or a 25 percent (%) or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Measured: Week 12
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours [hrs]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.
Measured: Baseline up to End-of-treatment (EOT) (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Measured: Cycle 59 Day 58
Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline.
Measured: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12
The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Measured: Cycle: 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Best PSA Response at Any Time During the Study
The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.
Measured: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Time to PSA Progression
Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25% and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, above the baseline PSA.
Measured: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)
A favorable CTC count was defined as less than (<) 5 counts per (/) 7.5 mililiter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as >=5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.
Measured: Baseline and EOT (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. The overall objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to <10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter(s) or short axis of lymph nodes.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Time to Pain Progression
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was >= 4 with a >= 2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was >= 4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was <= 3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use.
Measured: Baseline until EOT visit or until end of short term follow-up, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Time to Pain Response
Time to pain response was defined as the time from randomization until first pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A >= 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Number of Participants With Best Pain Response
Best pain response was evaluated in participants who had a pain response across the entire study were summarized by treatment group. The pain response was defined as a >=2-point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.
Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12
The global health status or quality of life (QOL) was measured as the HRQOL response rate at 12 weeks using the 2-item global health status index of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) instrument. HRQOL response was defined as a 17-point increase from the baseline assessment on the QOL index, after the score had been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 1 global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and 6 single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score representing better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
Measured: Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study start15 Nov 2010
- Primary completion16 May 2013
- Study completion29 Feb 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,099 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Monitor, Study director, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01193257
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C21005
- Other IDs
- 2010-018662-23, CTR20131423, 0991413212, C21005, U1111-1181-8040
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 31 Aug 2010
- Last updated
- 19 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Heller G, McCormack R, Kheoh T, Molina A, Smith MR, Dreicer R, Saad F, de Wit R, Aftab DT, Hirmand M, Limon A, Fizazi K, Fleisher M, de Bono JS, Scher HI. Circulating Tumor Cell Number as a Response Measure of Prolonged Survival for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comparison With Prostate-Specific Antigen Across Five Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 20;36(6):572-580. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2998. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
PubMed 29272162Suri A, Chapel S, Lu C, Venkatakrishnan K. Physiologically based and population PK modeling in optimizing drug development: A predict-learn-confirm analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;98(3):336-44. doi: 10.1002/cpt.155. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
PubMed 26031410Fizazi K, Jones R, Oudard S, Efstathiou E, Saad F, de Wit R, De Bono J, Cruz FM, Fountzilas G, Ulys A, Carcano F, Agarwal N, Agus D, Bellmunt J, Petrylak DP, Lee SY, Webb IJ, Tejura B, Borgstein N, Dreicer R. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone with placebo plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy: ELM-PC 5. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):723-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5119. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
PubMed 25624429
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel (TAK-700) Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer That Has Progressed During or Following Docetaxel-based Therapy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01193257
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C21005
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Drug therapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,099 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Feb 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Dec 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed following Docetaxel-based therapy
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Orteronel + prednisone | Experimental | Drug: Orteronel, Drug: Prednisone |
| Placebo + prednisone | Placebo comparator | Drug: Prednisone, Drug: Orteronel Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Voluntary written consent
- Male 18 years or older
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma
- Radiograph-documented metastatic disease
- Progressive disease
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Participants meeting any of the following exclusion criteria are not to be enrolled in the study:
- Known hypersensitivity to orteronel, prednisone or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue
- Received prior therapy with orteronel, aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole or abiraterone
- Any other therapies for prostate cancer, except for GnRH analogue therapy, must be discontinued 2 weeks before the first dose of study drug
- Radioisotope therapy or external beam radiation therapy within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OrteronelAlso: TAK-700Orteronel tablets | Drug | Orteronel + prednisone |
| PrednisonePrednisone tablets | Drug | Orteronel + prednisone, Placebo + prednisone |
| Orteronel PlaceboOrteronel placebo-matching tablets | Drug | Placebo + prednisone |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.
21 secondary outcomes
Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Time frame: Baseline up to End-of-treatment (EOT) (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time frame: Cycle 59 Day 58
Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study
Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study
Time frame: Cycle: 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Best PSA Response at Any Time During the Study
Time frame: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25
Time to PSA Progression
Time frame: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)
Time frame: Baseline and EOT (Cycle 59 Day 58)
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Time to Pain Progression
Time frame: Baseline until EOT visit or until end of short term follow-up, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Time to Pain Response
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Number of Participants With Best Pain Response
Time frame: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)
Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Dec 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29272162Heller G, McCormack R, Kheoh T, Molina A, Smith MR, Dreicer R, Saad F, de Wit R, Aftab DT, Hirmand M, Limon A, Fizazi K, Fleisher M, de Bono JS, Scher HI. Circulating Tumor Cell Number as a Response Measure of Prolonged Survival for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comparison With Prostate-Specific Antigen Across Five Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 20;36(6):572-580. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2998. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26031410Suri A, Chapel S, Lu C, Venkatakrishnan K. Physiologically based and population PK modeling in optimizing drug development: A predict-learn-confirm analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;98(3):336-44. doi: 10.1002/cpt.155. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25624429Fizazi K, Jones R, Oudard S, Efstathiou E, Saad F, de Wit R, De Bono J, Cruz FM, Fountzilas G, Ulys A, Carcano F, Agarwal N, Agus D, Bellmunt J, Petrylak DP, Lee SY, Webb IJ, Tejura B, Borgstein N, Dreicer R. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone with placebo plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy: ELM-PC 5. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):723-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5119. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Monitor study director
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
78 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Orteronel and Prednisone in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 78 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 78 sites in United States, Canada, France, Australia, Czechia and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Dec 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01193257, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2018.