AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerPhase 3NCT01193257

Study Comparing Orteronel Plus Prednisone in Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

A Phase 3 study testing Orteronel and Prednisone in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 78 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed following Docetaxel-based therapy Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer
What is being tested?
Orteronel and Prednisone
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,099 participants
Where
78 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
15 Nov 2010to 29 Feb 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Each participant must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
  • Voluntary written consent
  • Male 18 years or older
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma
  • Radiograph-documented metastatic disease
  • Progressive disease
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Prior surgical castration or concurrent use of an agent for medical castration
  • Progressive disease during or following 1 or 2 regimens of cytotoxic chemotherapy, 1 of which must have included docetaxel. Must have received greater than or equal to (>=) 360 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) of docetaxel within a 6-month period. Participants who were clearly intolerant to docetaxel or develop progressive disease before receiving >= 360 mg/m^2 are also eligible if they have received at least 225 mg/m^2 of docetaxel within a 6-month period and meet the other study entry criteria.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 2
  • Even if surgically sterilized, participants must practice effective barrier contraception during the entire study treatment period and for 4 months after the last dose of study drug, OR Abstain from heterosexual intercourse
  • Screening laboratory values as specified in protocol
  • Stable medical condition
  • Life expectancy of 6 months or more
  • Participants who have had up to 2 prior chemotherapy treatments are eligible to participate

Who cannot join

  • Participants meeting any of the following exclusion criteria are not to be enrolled in the study:
  • Known hypersensitivity to orteronel, prednisone or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue
  • Received prior therapy with orteronel, aminoglutethimide, ketoconazole or abiraterone
  • Any other therapies for prostate cancer, except for GnRH analogue therapy, must be discontinued 2 weeks before the first dose of study drug
  • Radioisotope therapy or external beam radiation therapy within 4 weeks of first dose of study drug
  • Documented central nervous system metastases
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Treatment with any investigational compound within 30 days prior to first dose of study drug (Participants who are in long-term follow-up following active treatment in other trials are eligible)
  • Diagnosis or treatment of another malignancy within 2 years preceding first dose of study drug except nonmelanoma skin cancer or in situ malignancy completely resected
  • Uncontrolled cardiovascular condition as specified in study protocol
  • Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, hepatitis B, or hepatitis C
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with protocol
  • Known gastrointestinal disease or procedure that could interfere with oral absorption or tolerance of orteronel
  • Uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea despite appropriate medical therapy
  • Prostate cancer confined to just the prostrate bed or immediate adjacent tissue

Trial locations and contacts

78 sites in 14 countries.

78 sites in 14 countries

United States37 sites
  • Study site

    Albany, New York, 12208

  • Study site

    Amarillo, Texas, 79106

  • Study site

    Anchorage, Alaska, 99508

  • Study site

    Bedford, Texas, 76022

  • Study site

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45230

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • Study site

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Study site

    East Syracuse, New York, 13057

  • Study site

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33916

  • Study site

    Fort Smith, Arkansas, 72903

  • Study site

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Study site

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29605

  • Study site

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • Study site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46219

  • Study site

    Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109

  • Study site

    Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130

  • Study site

    Kennewick, Washington, 99336

  • Study site

    Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California, 90025

  • Study site

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • Study site

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112

  • Study site

    Newport News, Virginia, 23606

  • Study site

    Odessa, Texas, 79761

  • Study site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212

  • Study site

    Port Saint Lucie, Florida, 34952

  • Study site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607

  • Study site

    Riverside, California, 92501

  • Study site

    Rochester, New York, 14623

  • Study site

    Salt Lake City, Utah

  • Study site

    San Diego, California, 92120

  • Study site

    Tualatin, Oregon, 97062

  • Study site

    Tyler, Texas, 75702

  • Study site

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Study site

    Westminster, Maryland, 21157

Other trials in United States

Canada8 sites
  • Study site

    Brampton, Ontario, L6T4S5

  • Study site

    Edmonton, Alberta

  • Study site

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V2H3

  • Study site

    Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y2H4

  • Study site

    Moncton, New Brunswick

  • Study site

    Montreal, Quebec

  • Study site

    Newmarket, Ontario

  • Study site

    Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R4S3

Other trials in Canada

France6 sites
  • Study site

    La Roche-sur-Yon

  • Study site

    Le Mans

  • Study site

    Lyon

  • Study site

    Marseille

  • Study site

    Paris

  • Study site

    Villejuif, 94805

Other trials in France

Australia5 sites
  • Study site

    Hobart, Tasmania

  • Study site

    Malvere, Victoria

  • Study site

    Redcliffe, Queensland

  • Study site

    Wodonga, Victoria

  • Study site

    Woodville South, South Australia, 5011

Other trials in Australia

Czechia5 sites
  • Study site

    Hradec Dralove

  • Study site

    Kromertz

  • Study site

    Modřice

  • Study site

    Prague

  • Study site

    Zlín

Other trials in Czechia

Belgium4 sites
  • Study site

    Brussels

  • Study site

    Kortijk

  • Study site

    Liège

  • Study site

    Namur

Other trials in Belgium

Poland3 sites
  • Study site

    Bielsko-Biala

  • Study site

    Goczałkowice Zdrój

  • Study site

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Finland2 sites
  • Study site

    Oulu

  • Study site

    Tampere

Other trials in Finland

Hungary2 sites
  • Study site

    Miskolc

  • Study site

    Osztaly

Other trials in Hungary

Italy2 sites
  • Study site

    Novara

  • Study site

    Rome

Other trials in Italy

Estonia1 site
  • Study site

    Tallinn

Other trials in Estonia

Greece1 site
  • Study site

    Pátrai

Other trials in Greece

Netherlands1 site
  • Study site

    Eindhoven

Other trials in Netherlands

Spain1 site
  • Study site

    Seville

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Orteronel (TAK-700) Plus Prednisone With Placebo Plus Prednisone in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer That Has Progressed During or Following Docetaxel-based Therapy.

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study evaluating orteronel plus prednisone compared with placebo plus prednisone in men with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) that has progressed following Docetaxel-based therapy

Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Being tested
Orteronel, Prednisone, Orteronel Placebo
Keywords
Drug therapy
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OrteronelDrug

    Also called TAK-700

    Orteronel tablets

  • PrednisoneDrug

    Prednisone tablets

  • Orteronel PlaceboDrug

    Orteronel placebo-matching tablets

Study groups in NCT01193257
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Orteronel + prednisoneExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Orteronel; Drug: Prednisone
Placebo + prednisonePlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Prednisone; Drug: Orteronel Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was calculated from the date of participant randomization to the date of participant death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at time of the analysis were censored as of the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the data cutoff date, whichever was earlier.

    Measured: Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS)

    rPFS was defined as the time from randomization until radiographic disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 or more of the following: The appearance of 2 or more new lesions on radionuclide bone scan as defined by prostate cancer working group (PCWG)2; Should 2 or more new bone lesions be evident at the first assessment (8-week assessment) on treatment, 2 or more additional new lesions must have been evident on a confirmatory assessment at least 6 weeks later; One or more new soft tissue/visceral organ lesions identified by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Progression as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA50 Response) at Week 12

    The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50 percent (%) from baseline.

    Measured: Week 12

  3. Percentage of Participants With Pain Response at Week 12

    Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A greater than or equal to (>=) 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use; or a 25 percent (%) or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.

    Measured: Week 12

  4. Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

  5. Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

  6. Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Vital Signs

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

  7. Number of Participants With TEAEs Related to Weight

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

  8. Number of Participants With Worst Change From Baseline in Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

    ECOG assessed participant's performance status on 5 point scale: 0=Fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours [hrs]), capable of all self care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hrs; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Worst change was defined as the worst overall change that occurred in ECOG status at any measured time point during the treatment period.

    Measured: Baseline up to End-of-treatment (EOT) (Cycle 59 Day 58)

  9. Number of Participants With Abnormal Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    Measured: Cycle 59 Day 58

  10. Number of Participants With TEAEs Categorized Into Investigations Related to Chemistry, Hematology or Steroid Hormone Panel

    Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Cycle 59 Day 58)

  11. Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA50 Response at Any Time During the Study

    The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline.

    Measured: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25

  12. Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA90 Response) at Week 12

    The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.

    Measured: Week 12

  13. Percentage of Participants Achieving PSA90 Response at Any Time During the Study

    The PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.

    Measured: Cycle: 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25

  14. Best PSA Response at Any Time During the Study

    The PSA50 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 50% from baseline. PSA90 was defined as the percentage of participants who had a PSA decline of at least 90% from baseline.

    Measured: Cycle: 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25

  15. Time to PSA Progression

    Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to a PSA increase of 25% and PSA rise of at least 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the lowest value observed post baseline or, if no PSA decline occurred post baseline, above the baseline PSA.

    Measured: Baseline until the final on treatment assessment or until end of short term follow-up following discontinuation of treatment, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)

  16. Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline Between Favorable and Unfavorable Categories in Circulating Tumor Cell Count (CTC)

    A favorable CTC count was defined as less than (<) 5 counts per (/) 7.5 mililiter (mL) in whole blood. An unfavorable CTC count was defined as >=5 counts/7.5 mL in whole blood.

    Measured: Baseline and EOT (Cycle 59 Day 58)

  17. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

    Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. The overall objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). A complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions determined by computerized tomography (CT) or MRI. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have had reduction in short axis to <10 millimetre (mm). A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest diameters of non-lymph node lesions and of the short diameter(s) or short axis of lymph nodes.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

  18. Time to Pain Progression

    Time to pain progression was defined as the time from participant randomization to the first assessment date of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: The brief pain inventory-short form (BPI-SF) worst pain score was >= 4 with a >= 2 point increase over baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score with stable or increased analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was >= 4 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step II or Step III analgesic use; The BPI-SF worst pain score was <= 3 but not less than baseline with new or increased (relative to baseline) Step III analgesic use.

    Measured: Baseline until EOT visit or until end of short term follow-up, whichever occurred later (approximately up to 4.5 years)

  19. Time to Pain Response

    Time to pain response was defined as the time from randomization until first pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by an additional assessment, at least 3 weeks but not more than 5 weeks later: A >= 2 point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline. The analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

  20. Number of Participants With Best Pain Response

    Best pain response was evaluated in participants who had a pain response across the entire study were summarized by treatment group. The pain response was defined as a >=2-point reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or a 25% or more reduction in analgesic use from baseline without an increase in worst pain score from baseline.

    Measured: Baseline until disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (approximately up to 4.5 years)

  21. Percentage of Participants With Health-related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Response at Week 12

    The global health status or quality of life (QOL) was measured as the HRQOL response rate at 12 weeks using the 2-item global health status index of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer-quality of life questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) instrument. HRQOL response was defined as a 17-point increase from the baseline assessment on the QOL index, after the score had been linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. EORTC QLQ-C30: included 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 1 global health status, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting) and 6 single items (dyspnoea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation/diarrhea and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score representing better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.

    Measured: Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start15 Nov 2010
  3. Primary completion16 May 2013
  4. Study completion29 Feb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
1,099 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01193257
Sponsor's protocol ID
C21005
Other IDs
2010-018662-23, CTR20131423, 0991413212, C21005, U1111-1181-8040
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
31 Aug 2010
Last updated
19 Dec 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Heller G, McCormack R, Kheoh T, Molina A, Smith MR, Dreicer R, Saad F, de Wit R, Aftab DT, Hirmand M, Limon A, Fizazi K, Fleisher M, de Bono JS, Scher HI. Circulating Tumor Cell Number as a Response Measure of Prolonged Survival for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Comparison With Prostate-Specific Antigen Across Five Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 20;36(6):572-580. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2998. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

    PubMed 29272162
  • Suri A, Chapel S, Lu C, Venkatakrishnan K. Physiologically based and population PK modeling in optimizing drug development: A predict-learn-confirm analysis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Sep;98(3):336-44. doi: 10.1002/cpt.155. Epub 2015 Jul 14.

    PubMed 26031410
  • Fizazi K, Jones R, Oudard S, Efstathiou E, Saad F, de Wit R, De Bono J, Cruz FM, Fountzilas G, Ulys A, Carcano F, Agarwal N, Agus D, Bellmunt J, Petrylak DP, Lee SY, Webb IJ, Tejura B, Borgstein N, Dreicer R. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing orteronel (TAK-700) plus prednisone with placebo plus prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that has progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy: ELM-PC 5. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 1;33(7):723-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5119. Epub 2015 Jan 26.

    PubMed 25624429

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Orteronel and Prednisone in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 78 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 78 sites in United States, Canada, France, Australia, Czechia and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Dec 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival (time frame: Baseline until death (approximately up to 4.5 years)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01193257, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in