LeukemiaPhase 4Ara-CNCT01191541
Cytarabine (Ara-C) in Children With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL)
A Phase 4 study testing DNR: and Ara-c in people with Leukemia, run by Xiaofan Zhu at 2 sites in China.
Trial summary
Several groups, especially the PETHEMA group (in their LPA96 and 99 trials), obtained low relapse rates in newly diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) patients by combining ll-transretinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracyclines without Ara-C, suggesting that avoiding Ara-C in the chemotherapy of APL reduced treatment… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 14 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- DNR: and Ara-c
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesChina
- Study dates
- May 2010to Feb 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 14 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL)
Who cannot join
- > 14
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
China2 sites
Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300020
Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, PR China
Tianjin, 300020
About this study
Official title: Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in Children: Remission Induction With All-transretinoic Acid (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (As2O3). Consolidation With Daunorubicin(DNR)+Ara-c or DNR Alone.
Several groups, especially the PETHEMA group (in their LPA96 and 99 trials), obtained low relapse rates in newly diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) patients by combining ll-transretinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracyclines without Ara-C, suggesting that avoiding Ara-C in the chemotherapy of APL reduced treatment toxicity without increasing relapses. While the relapse rate for the children with white blood cell(WBC) counts greater than 10×109/L at presentation were higher than those WBC counts less than 10×109/L (31% and 3.5%,respectively) in the LPA96 and 99 trials. A recent adult randomized trial show that avoiding Ara-C leads to an increased risk of relapse in the APL patients with WBC counts less than 10×109/L. The role of the Ara-C remains controversial. And there are very limited data reported on children with APL so far.
Read the detailed description
Some studies suggest patients with high-risk disease should be treated with intensified doses of anthracycline, or intermediate/ high-dose Ara-C or As2O3 as an early consolidation, so as to decrease the risk of relapse.However, a higher cumulative dose of anthracycline may lead to cardiac toxicity, especially for children. In addition, containing Ara-C will led to more therapy-related toxicity. The benefit to add Ara-C to the schedules is questionable and remains a matter of investigation in children.
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Being tested
- DNR:, Ara-c
- Keywords
- ara-c, As2O3, pediatric, acute
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DNR:Drug
DNR:45mg/m2 d1-3
Ara-cDrug
DNR+ARA-C:DNR:45mg/m2 d1-3;Ara-C :1g/m2 d1-3
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DNR+Ara-c(Ara-C group) | Active comparator | patients in this group were treated with DNR+Ara-C in consolidation Receives: Drug: DNR:; Drug: Ara-c |
| DNR(No Ara-C group) | Experimental | patients in this group were treated with DNR alone in consolidation Receives: Drug: DNR: |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the Overall Survival of APL Patients Treated With Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) Based Trial
We assessed the OS of APL patients when ATRA and ATO were used. The overall survival (OS) durations was calculated from the date of diagnosis to last follow-up or death.
Measured: two years
the Event-free Survival (EFS) of APL Patients Treated With Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) Based Trial
We assessed the EFS of APL patients treated with retinoic acid receptor alpha (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) based trial. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to last follow-up or an event (relapse or death).
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Side Effects
Also, we compared the side effect and outcome between the two groups.To assessed whether Ara-C could be omitted when ATO and ATRA were used.
Measured: three years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2010
- Primary completionFeb 2017
- Study completionFeb 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Xiaofan Zhu
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Xiaofan Zhu, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- Investigators
- Xiaofan Zhu, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Pediatrics, CAMS&PUMC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01191541
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCAPL2010
- Acronym
- Ara-C
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2010
- Last updated
- 10 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ortega JJ, Madero L, Martin G, Verdeguer A, Garcia P, Parody R, Fuster J, Molines A, Novo A, Deben G, Rodriguez A, Conde E, de la Serna J, Allegue MJ, Capote FJ, Gonzalez JD, Bolufer P, Gonzalez M, Sanz MA; PETHEMA Group. Treatment with all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline monochemotherapy for children with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a multicenter study by the PETHEMA Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23(30):7632-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.3359.
PubMed 16234524Zhang L, Zou Y, Chen Y, Guo Y, Yang W, Chen X, Wang S, Liu X, Ruan M, Zhang J, Liu T, Liu F, Qi B, An W, Ren Y, Chang L, Zhu X. Role of cytarabine in paediatric acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with the combination of all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4280-2.
PubMed 29615003
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Patients With Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in Children: Remission Induction With All-transretinoic Acid (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (As2O3). Consolidation With Daunorubicin(DNR)+Ara-c or DNR Alone.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01191541
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Ara-C / CCAPL2010
- Conditions
- Leukemia
- Keywords
- ara-c, As2O3, pediatric, acute
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Xiaofan Zhu
- Study start
- May 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Feb 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Several groups, especially the PETHEMA group (in their LPA96 and 99 trials), obtained low relapse rates in newly diagnosed Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) patients by combining ll-transretinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracyclines without Ara-C, suggesting that avoiding Ara-C in the chemotherapy of APL reduced treatment toxicity without increasing relapses. While the relapse rate for the children with white blood cell(WBC) counts greater than 10×109/L at presentation were higher than those WBC counts less than 10×109/L (31% and 3.5%,respectively) in the LPA96 and 99 trials. A recent adult randomized trial show that avoiding Ara-C leads to an increased risk of relapse in the APL patients with WBC counts less than 10×109/L. The role of the Ara-C remains controversial. And there are very limited data reported on children with APL so far.
Detailed description
Some studies suggest patients with high-risk disease should be treated with intensified doses of anthracycline, or intermediate/ high-dose Ara-C or As2O3 as an early consolidation, so as to decrease the risk of relapse.However, a higher cumulative dose of anthracycline may lead to cardiac toxicity, especially for children. In addition, containing Ara-C will led to more therapy-related toxicity. The benefit to add Ara-C to the schedules is questionable and remains a matter of investigation in children.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DNR+Ara-c(Ara-C group) | Active comparator | Drug: DNR:, Drug: Ara-cpatients in this group were treated with DNR+Ara-C in consolidation |
| DNR(No Ara-C group) | Experimental | Drug: DNR:patients in this group were treated with DNR alone in consolidation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 14 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- > 14
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DNR:DNR:45mg/m2 d1-3 | Drug | DNR(No Ara-C group), DNR+Ara-c(Ara-C group) |
| Ara-cDNR+ARA-C:DNR:45mg/m2 d1-3;Ara-C :1g/m2 d1-3 | Drug | DNR+Ara-c(Ara-C group) |
Primary outcome
the Overall Survival of APL Patients Treated With Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) Based Trial
Time frame: two years
We assessed the OS of APL patients when ATRA and ATO were used. The overall survival (OS) durations was calculated from the date of diagnosis to last follow-up or death.
the Event-free Survival (EFS) of APL Patients Treated With Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) Based Trial
Time frame: 2 years
We assessed the EFS of APL patients treated with retinoic acid receptor alpha (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) based trial. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as time from diagnosis to last follow-up or an event (relapse or death).
1 secondary outcome
Number of Participants With Side Effects
Time frame: three years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Aug 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16234524Ortega JJ, Madero L, Martin G, Verdeguer A, Garcia P, Parody R, Fuster J, Molines A, Novo A, Deben G, Rodriguez A, Conde E, de la Serna J, Allegue MJ, Capote FJ, Gonzalez JD, Bolufer P, Gonzalez M, Sanz MA; PETHEMA Group. Treatment with all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline monochemotherapy for children with acute promyelocytic leukemia: a multicenter study by the PETHEMA Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 20;23(30):7632-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.3359.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29615003Zhang L, Zou Y, Chen Y, Guo Y, Yang W, Chen X, Wang S, Liu X, Ruan M, Zhang J, Liu T, Liu F, Qi B, An W, Ren Y, Chang L, Zhu X. Role of cytarabine in paediatric acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with the combination of all-trans retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4280-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 1
Vididencel in CML-CP Patients With MRD
CML (Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xiaofan Zhu, MD principal investigator
Department of Pediatrics, CAMS&PUMC
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing DNR: and Ara-c in people with Leukemia, run by Xiaofan Zhu at 2 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the Overall Survival of APL Patients Treated With Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha (ATRA) and Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) Based Trial (time frame: two years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01191541, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Aug 2021.