AzTrials
AzTrials

High CholesterolRISAPNCT01187056

The RISAP-study: a Complex Intervention in Risk Communication and Shared Decision-making in General Practice

A study testing Training programme in people with High Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Disease, run by University of Aarhus.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

General practitioners (GPs) and patients find it difficult to talk about risk of future disease, especially when patients have asymptomatic conditions, and treatment options are unlikely to cause immediate perceptible improvements in well-being. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
High Cholesterol, Cardiovascular Disease
What is being tested?
Training programme
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
179 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2007to Jul 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • GPs in Region Central and Region North, Denmark, are invited to the study.
  • Patients are at least 18 years old, and have high cholesterol corresponding to a recommendation for cholesterol-reducing medication according to Danish clinical guideline for general practice. The patients are recruited after their high cholesterol has been detected and when treatment options are to be discussed.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with CVD or DM are excluded from the study, as are patients already receiving cholesterol-reducing medication and patients unable to speak and read Danish.

About this study

General practitioners (GPs) and patients find it difficult to talk about risk of future disease, especially when patients have asymptomatic conditions, and treatment options are unlikely to cause immediate perceptible improvements in well-being. Further studies in risk communication for disease prevention are needed, as are studies about risk communication training for GPs. Aim: 1) to systematically develop, describe and evaluate a complex intervention comprising a training programme for GPs in risk communication and shared decision-making, 2) to evaluate the effect of the training programme on real-life consultations between GPs and patients with high cholesterol levels, and 3) to evaluate patients' reactions during and after the consultations. Hypothesis: 1) patients have better adherence to chosen treatment.

The effect of the complex intervention, based around a training programme, will be evaluated in a cluster-randomised controlled trial with an intervention group and an active control group with 40 GPs and 280 patients in each group.

Read more

The GPs receive a questionnaire at baseline and after 6 months about their attitudes towards risk communication and cholesterol-reducing medication. After each consultation with a participating high cholesterol-patient, the GPs will complete a questionnaire about decision satisfaction.

The patients will receive a questionnaire at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. It includes questions about adherence to chosen treatment, self-rated health, patient enablement, and risk communication and decision-making effectiveness. Prescriptions, contacts to the health services, and cholesterol level will be drawn from the register of the National Health Service of Denmark at baseline and at 6 months.

In both intervention group and active control group, 12 consultations will be observed and tape-recorded. The consultations will be divided between 4 GPs with each 3 patients. The patients from these 24 consultations will be interviewed immediately after the consultation and re-interviewed after 6 months.Eight purposefully selected GPs from the intervention group will be interviewed in a focus group 6 months after participation in the training programme. The process and context of the RISAP-study will be investigated in detail using an action research approach, in order to describe and analyse research choices, adaptation of intervention model to the specific context, and GPs' and patients' reactions to trial participation.

Being tested
Training programme
Keywords
Shared decision-making, Risk information, Decision aids
Medical subject headings
Hypercholesterolemia, Cardiovascular Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Training programmeBehavioural

    Also called decision making, decision aids

    2 x 2 hours of training (workshops)

Study groups in NCT01187056
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Training, decision makingExperimentalGeneral practitioners receive training in shared decision-making and risk communication, and use their newly acquired skills in real-life consultations with 7 patients with high cholesterol.
Receives: Behavioral: Training programme
Training, usual practiceActive comparatorThe control group GPs will receive 2 hours of training in the primary care guideline for prevention of cardiovascular disease
Receives: Behavioral: Training programme

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary patient outcome is adherence to treatment choice.

    Measured: 2010-08-01 - 2011-04-01

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. satisfaction with decision.

    Measured: 2010-08-01 - 2011-04-01

  2. self-rated health

    Measured: 2010-08-01 - 2011-04-01

  3. anxiety

    Measured: 2010-08-01 - 2011-04-01

  4. enablement

    Measured: 2010-08-01 - 2011-04-01

  5. satisfaction with communication,

    Measured: 2010-08-01 - 2011-04-01

  6. satisfaction and confidence in decision

    Measured: 2010-08-01 - 2011-04-01

  7. number of contacts to health services

    Measured: 2010-08-01 - 2011-04-01

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2007
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionJul 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
179 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01187056
Sponsor's protocol ID
2007-41-1446
Acronym
RISAP
Status last verified
Oct 2012
First submitted
20 Aug 2010
Last updated
9 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Kirkegaard P, Edwards A, Risor MB, Thomsen JL. Risk of cardiovascular disease? A qualitative study of risk interpretation among patients with high cholesterol. BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Sep 16;14:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-137.

    PubMed 24040920
  • Kirkegaard P, Risor MB, Edwards A, Junge AG, Thomsen JL. Speaking of risk, managing uncertainty: decision-making about cholesterol-reducing treatment in general practice. Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(4):245-52.

    PubMed 23113909
  • Kirkegaard P, Edwards AG, Hansen B, Hansen MD, Jensen MS, Lauritzen T, Risoer MB, Thomsen JL. The RISAP-study: a complex intervention in risk communication and shared decision-making in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Sep 22;11:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-70.

    PubMed 20860820

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Training programme in people with High Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Disease, run by University of Aarhus.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary patient outcome is adherence to treatment choice. (time frame: 2010-08-01 - 2011-04-01). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01187056, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in