AzTrials
AzTrials

Major Depressive DisorderPhase 3NCT01180400

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of TC-5214 as an Adjunct Therapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

A Phase 3 study testing TC-5214 in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Depression, run by AstraZeneca at 66 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if TC-5214 or placebo (a tablet that looks like medicine tablet or capsule, but contains no active medicine) is safe and effective when taken together with another antidepressant. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Major Depressive Disorder, Depression
What is being tested?
TC-5214
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
295 participants
Where
66 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
Sep 2010to Sep 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent before initiation of any study-related procedures.
  • The patient must have a clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) with inadequate response to no more than one antidepressant.
  • Out-patient status at enrollment and randomization.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a lifetime history of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  • Patients with a history of suicide attempts in the past year and/or seen by the investigator as having a significant history of risk of suicide or homicide.
  • History of renal insufficiency or impairment or conditions that could affect absorption or metabolism of the investigational product in this patient population

Trial locations and contacts

66 sites in 10 countries.

66 sites in 10 countries

Poland12 sites
  • Research Site

    Bełchatów

  • Research Site

    Bialystok

  • Research Site

    Bydgoszczy

  • Research Site

    Dublin

  • Research Site

    Gdansk

  • Research Site

    Gdynia, Poland

  • Research Site

    Leszno, Poland

  • Research Site

    Lublin

  • Research Site

    Sosnowiec

  • Research Site

    Toru

  • Research Site

    Torun

  • Research Site

    Żuromin

Other trials in Poland

France10 sites
  • Research Site

    Douai

  • Research Site

    Dublin

  • Research Site

    Élancourt

  • Research Site

    Jarnac

  • Research Site

    La Seyne-sur-Mer

  • Research Site

    Nîmes

  • Research Site

    Rennes

  • Research Site

    Toulon, La Seyne Sur Mer

  • Research Site

    Toulon

  • Research Site

    Villejuif

Other trials in France

Finland7 sites
  • Research Site

    Dublin

  • Research Site

    Espoo

  • Research Site

    Helsinki

  • Research Site

    Kuopio

  • Research Site

    Mikkeli

  • Research Site

    Oulu

  • Research Site

    Tampere

Other trials in Finland

Lithuania7 sites
  • Research Site

    Dublin

  • Research Site

    Kaunas, Lithuania

  • Research Site

    Palanga

  • Research Site

    Šilutė

  • Research Site

    Vilnius, Lithuania

  • Research Site

    Vilnius

  • Research Site

    Ziegzdrai, Kaunas County

Other trials in Lithuania

Sweden7 sites
  • Research Site

    Dublin

  • Research Site

    Gothenburg

  • Research Site

    Halmstad

  • Research Site

    Lund

  • Research Site

    Malmö

  • Research Site

    Solna

  • Research Site

    Stockholm

Other trials in Sweden

Czechia6 sites
  • Research Site

    Brno

  • Research Site

    Kutná Hora

  • Research Site

    Litoměřice

  • Research Site

    Pilsen

  • Research Site

    Prague

  • Research Site

    Praha 10 - Strasnice

Other trials in Czechia

Latvia6 sites
  • Research Site

    Dublin

  • Research Site

    Jelgava

  • Research Site

    Liepāja

  • Research Site

    Riga

  • Research Site

    Sigulda

  • Research Site

    Strenči

Other trials in Latvia

Estonia5 sites
  • Research Site

    Dublin

  • Research Site

    Tallinn

  • Research Site

    Tartu, Estonia

  • Research Site

    Tartu

  • Research Site

    Võru

Other trials in Estonia

Germany5 sites
  • Research Site

    Berlin

  • Research Site

    Bochum

  • Research Site

    Dublin

  • Research Site

    Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate

  • Research Site

    Siegen

Other trials in Germany

Hungary1 site
  • Research Site

    Dublin

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of TC-5214 (S-mecamylamine) in Flexible Doses as an Adjunct to an Antidepressant in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Exhibit an Inadequate Response to Antidepressant Therapy

The purpose of this study is to determine if TC-5214 or placebo (a tablet that looks like medicine tablet or capsule, but contains no active medicine) is safe and effective when taken together with another antidepressant.

Read the detailed description

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of TC-5214 (S-mecamylamine) in Flexible Doses as an Adjunct to an Antidepressant in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Who Exhibit an Inadequate Response to Antidepressant Therapy

Being tested
TC-5214, Placebo
Keywords
Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, Depression, Safety, add-on therapy
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TC-5214Drug

    Tablet, oral, twice daily for 8 weeks

  • PlaceboDrug

    Tablet, oral, twice daily for 8 weeks

Study groups in NCT01180400
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TC-5214ExperimentalSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/Serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + TC-5214, 1-4 mg BID
Receives: Drug: TC-5214
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/Serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + Placebo BID
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Randomization to End of Treatment.

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Response in Depressive Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Defined as a ≥50% Reduction From Randomization (Week 8) in MADRS Total Score at End of Treatment (Week 16)

    The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score at end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  2. Remission in Depressive Symptoms of MDD, Defined as MADRS Total Score of ≤8 at End of Treatment (Week 16)

    The percentage of patients with a MADRS total score of ≤8 at end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Week 16

  3. Early and Sustained Response, Defined as a ≥50% Reduction From Randomization (Week 8) in MADRS Total Score and a MADRS Total Score of ≤12 at Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and End of Treatment (Week 16)

    The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score and a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16); Week 10, Week 12, Week 14, and Week 16

  4. Sustained Response, Defined as a ≥50% Reduction From Randomization (Week 8) in MADRS Total Score and a MADRS Total Score of ≤12 at Week 12, Week 14, and End of Treatment (Week 16)

    The percentage of patients with a ≥50% reduction from randomization (Week 8) in MADRS total score and a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16) was calculated.

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16); Week 12, Week 14, and Week 16

  5. Sustained Remission, Defined as a MADRS Total Score of ≤8 at Week 12, Week 14, and End of Treatment (Week 16)

    The percentage of patients with a MADRS total score of ≤8 at Week 12, Week 14, and end of treatment (Week 16)was calculated.

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Week 12, Week 14, Week 16

  6. Change in Depressive Symptoms From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression-17 Items (HAMD-17) Total Score

    A 17-item, clinician-rated scale that assesses depressive symptoms. The HAMD-17 consists of 17 symptoms, each of which is rated from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, where 0 is none/absent. The HAMD-17 total score is calculated as the sum of the 17 individual symptom scores; the total score can range from 0 to 52. Higher HAMD-17 scores indicate more severe depression.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  7. Change in the Clinician-rated Global Outcome of Severity as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16)

    A 3-part, clinician-administered scale that rates the improvement or worsening of the patient's illness from randomization (baseline). Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale. Higher CGI-S scores indicate greater illness severity.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  8. Response in the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Defined as CGI-I Rating of "Very Much Improved" or "Much Improved" From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16)

    A 3-part, clinician-administered scale that rates the improvement or worsening of the patient's illness from randomization (baseline). Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale. CGI-I scores >4 indicate worsening, while scores <4 indicate improvement.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  9. Change in MADRS Total Score From Randomization (Week 8) to Week 9

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 9

  10. Change in MADRS Total Score From Randomization (Week 8) to Week 10

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 10

  11. Change in MADRS Total Score From Randomization (Week 8) to Week 12

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 12

  12. Change in MADRS Total Score From Randomization (Week 8) to Week 14

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to Week 14

  13. Change in Functional Impairment From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score

    Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the score for the 3 inter-correlated domains (school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities) and ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  14. Change in Functional Impairment From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by SDS Work/School Domain Score

    A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the work/school domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  15. Change in Functional Impairment From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by SDS Social Life Domain Score

    A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the SDS social life domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  16. Change in Functional Impairment From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) as Measured by SDS Family Life/Home Responsibilities Domain Score

    A 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The 3 inter-correlated domains are school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities. The numerical rating for the SDS family life/home responsibilities domain score is 0- 10, where 10 is considered to be 'highly impaired'.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  17. Change in Overall Quality of Life and Satisfaction From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) by Assessing the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) % Maximum Total Score

    The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form)total score is derived by summing item scores 1 to 14. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain. The Q-LES-Q-SF % maximum total score is calculated as 100% × (Q-LES-Q-SF total score - 14) / 56, and can range from 0% to 100%.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  18. Change From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q LES-Q-SF) Item 15

    The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) measures the patient's satisfaction with medication and overall quality of life. The 15th item queries respondents' satisfaction with the medication they are taking, rated on a 1 to 4 scale, score 0 indicates that no medication was taken. Higher scores are indicative of greater satisfaction.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  19. Change From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16) in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q LES-Q-SF) Item 16

    The Q-LES-Q-SF (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form) measures the patient's satisfaction with medication and overall quality of life. The 16th item is a global rating of overall life satisfaction and contentment, rated on a 1 to 5 scale. Higher scores are indicative of greater satisfaction.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

  20. Change in EuroQol - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) From Randomization (Week 8) to End of Treatment (Week 16)

    A self-assessment questionnaire that provides 2 measures of health status. The EQ-5D index score is a weighted linear combination over 5 dimensions of health status. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3, and an equation is used to calculate the EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D index score can range from possible negative values (minimum -0.415) to a maximum of 1.0. The EQ-VAS is a visual analog scale with a range of 0 to 100. For both variables, a higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2011
  4. Study completionSep 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
295 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01180400
Sponsor's protocol ID
D4130C00003
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
5 Aug 2010
Last updated
11 Apr 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Vieta E, Thase ME, Naber D, D'Souza B, Rancans E, Lepola U, Olausson B, Szamosi J, Wilson E, Hosford D, Dunbar G, Tummala R, Eriksson H. Efficacy and tolerability of flexibly-dosed adjunct TC-5214 (dexmecamylamine) in patients with major depressive disorder and inadequate response to prior antidepressant. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;24(4):564-74. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

    PubMed 24507016

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing TC-5214 in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Depression, run by AstraZeneca at 66 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 66 sites in Poland, France, Finland, Lithuania, Sweden and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Nov 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Randomization to End of Treatment. (time frame: Randomization (Week 8) to end of treatment (Week 16)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01180400, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in