Cervical CancerPhase 4NCT01173900
Delivery, Uptake and Acceptability of HPV Vaccination in Tanzanian Girls
A Phase 4 study testing Gardasil® HPV vaccine in people with Cervical Cancer, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Tanzania.
Trial summary
The aims of this study are: 1. To determine feasibility of a school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme in Tanzania. 2. To measure the uptake and acceptability of two different vaccination strategies in rural and urban schools. 3. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 9 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Gardasil® HPV vaccine
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5,532 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTanzania
- Study dates
- Aug 2010to Aug 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 9 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- female pupil
- attends selected school
- born in 1998 if enrolled in school selected for age-based delivery
- attending standard (class) 6 if enrolled in school selected for class-based delivery
Who cannot join
- has not previously received HPV vaccine
- has not participated in previous HPV vaccine trials
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aims of this study are:
- To determine feasibility of a school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme in Tanzania.
- To measure the uptake and acceptability of two different vaccination strategies in rural and urban schools.
- To examine the characteristics of accepters/refusers of vaccination and to identify reasons for acceptance, refusal or non-completion.
- To measure the cost of implementing a school-based HPV vaccination programme in Tanzania.
Read the detailed description
Vaccines against human papillomavirus infection, the primary cause of cervical cancer, are an attractive cervical cancer prevention strategy for resource poor settings which lack the infrastructure for establishing and maintaining complex screening programmes.Feasibility and costs of setting up and sustaining an HPV vaccination programme will depend on whether it can be added onto an existing health programme within schools, if one exists, or whether it has to be established as a separate health intervention. Other factors will also affect vaccine coverage. For example, uptake and overall effectiveness will be critically dependent on parental and community acceptability of a vaccine that prevents a sexually transmitted infection and how the vaccine is promoted and delivered by health-care providers will influence its uptake and acceptability.
This study will determine feasibility, uptake and acceptability of different delivery strategies of school-based HPV vaccination in Tanzania, examine factors related to acceptance or refusal of vaccination and measure the cost of implementing a school-based HPV vaccination programme in Tanzania.
Three doses of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, (Gardasil®; Merck \& Co) given at 0, 2 and 6 months, will be provided to 5000 primary school girls at 134 randomly selected schools in Mwanza Region in Tanzania. Selected schools will be randomly assigned to one of two delivery strategies (age-based or class-based) and coverage and acceptability of these vaccine delivery strategies will be compared. Qualitative research will be conducted before, during and after vaccination to examine barriers to vaccination and reasons for failure to complete vaccination as well as general community perceptions. To determine factors associated with refusal a case control study will be conducted on a 1:1 sample of 350 vaccine refusers and 350 accepters. The costs of introducing and scaling up HPV vaccines in schools will be estimated using established costing methods.
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Being tested
- Gardasil® HPV vaccine
- Keywords
- human papillomavirus, vaccine, school girls, Tanzania, acceptability, vaccine coverage, Cervical cancer prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gardasil® HPV vaccineBiological
0.5 ml given at 0, 2, 6 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Class-based delivery | Other | All girls attending standard 6 in schools selected for class-based vaccine delivery Receives: Biological: Gardasil® HPV vaccine |
| Age-based delivery | Other | All girls born in 1998 attending schools selected for age-based delivery Receives: Biological: Gardasil® HPV vaccine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Vaccine coverage by delivery strategy
Vaccine coverage will be estimated for each dose given and for those completing the full course of vaccination and compared by delivery strategy.
Measured: Month 12
Vaccine coverage (dose 2) by delivery strategy
Measured: Month 5
Vaccine coverage (dose 1) by delivery strategy
Measured: Month 3
Secondary outcomes (3)
Factors associated with refusal to vaccinate or to complete vaccination course
A case control study to determine factors associated with refusal will be conducted on a 1:1 sample of 350 vaccine refusers and 350 accepters.
Measured: Month 12
Identification of barriers to HPV vaccination
Qualitative research will be conducted to examine barriers to vaccination and reasons for failure to complete vaccination.
Measured: Month 14
Estimation of the costs of introducing and scaling up HPV vaccines in schools
Full financial and economic costs from the provider's perspective will be collected for the intervention. Total costs of a district vaccination programme and cost per urban school and rural school reached (if urban/rural differences are identified) and cost per fully-vaccinated girl will be estimated for the two alternative delivery strategies.
Measured: Month 10
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2010
- Primary completionAug 2011
- Study completionAug 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5,532 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania, Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Tanzania, Institut Català d' Oncologia, Spain, Medical Research Council Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, UK, International Union Against Cancer, Switzerland
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Deborah Watson-Jones, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Investigators
- Deborah :L Watson-Jones, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRichard J Hayes, DSC, Principal investigator, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineJohn Changalucha, BSc, Principal investigator, National Institute for Medical Research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01173900
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MITU-001
- Status last verified
- Nov 2011
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2010
- Last updated
- 8 Nov 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Quentin W, Terris-Prestholt F, Changalucha J, Soteli S, Edmunds WJ, Hutubessy R, Ross DA, Kapiga S, Hayes R, Watson-Jones D. Costs of delivering human papillomavirus vaccination to schoolgirls in Mwanza Region, Tanzania. BMC Med. 2012 Nov 13;10:137. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-137.
PubMed 23148516Watson-Jones D, Baisley K, Ponsiano R, Lemme F, Remes P, Ross D, Kapiga S, Mayaud P, de Sanjose S, Wight D, Changalucha J, Hayes R. Human papillomavirus vaccination in Tanzanian schoolgirls: cluster-randomized trial comparing 2 vaccine-delivery strategies. J Infect Dis. 2012 Sep 1;206(5):678-86. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis407. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
PubMed 22711908
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Nov 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Delivery, Uptake and Acceptability of HPV Vaccination in Tanzanian Girls
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01173900
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MITU-001
- Conditions
- Cervical Cancer
- Keywords
- human papillomavirus, vaccine, school girls, Tanzania, acceptability, vaccine coverage, Cervical cancer prevention
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5,532 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania, Ocean Road Cancer Institute, Tanzania, Institut Català d' Oncologia, Spain, Medical Research Council Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, UK, International Union Against Cancer, Switzerland
- Study start
- Aug 2010
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aims of this study are:
- To determine feasibility of a school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination programme in Tanzania.
- To measure the uptake and acceptability of two different vaccination strategies in rural and urban schools.
- To examine the characteristics of accepters/refusers of vaccination and to identify reasons for acceptance, refusal or non-completion.
- To measure the cost of implementing a school-based HPV vaccination programme in Tanzania.
Detailed description
Vaccines against human papillomavirus infection, the primary cause of cervical cancer, are an attractive cervical cancer prevention strategy for resource poor settings which lack the infrastructure for establishing and maintaining complex screening programmes.Feasibility and costs of setting up and sustaining an HPV vaccination programme will depend on whether it can be added onto an existing health programme within schools, if one exists, or whether it has to be established as a separate health intervention. Other factors will also affect vaccine coverage. For example, uptake and overall effectiveness will be critically dependent on parental and community acceptability of a vaccine that prevents a sexually transmitted infection and how the vaccine is promoted and delivered by health-care providers will influence its uptake and acceptability.
This study will determine feasibility, uptake and acceptability of different delivery strategies of school-based HPV vaccination in Tanzania, examine factors related to acceptance or refusal of vaccination and measure the cost of implementing a school-based HPV vaccination programme in Tanzania.
Three doses of quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, (Gardasil®; Merck \& Co) given at 0, 2 and 6 months, will be provided to 5000 primary school girls at 134 randomly selected schools in Mwanza Region in Tanzania. Selected schools will be randomly assigned to one of two delivery strategies (age-based or class-based) and coverage and acceptability of these vaccine delivery strategies will be compared. Qualitative research will be conducted before, during and after vaccination to examine barriers to vaccination and reasons for failure to complete vaccination as well as general community perceptions. To determine factors associated with refusal a case control study will be conducted on a 1:1 sample of 350 vaccine refusers and 350 accepters. The costs of introducing and scaling up HPV vaccines in schools will be estimated using established costing methods.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Class-based delivery | Other | Biological: Gardasil® HPV vaccineAll girls attending standard 6 in schools selected for class-based vaccine delivery |
| Age-based delivery | Other | Biological: Gardasil® HPV vaccineAll girls born in 1998 attending schools selected for age-based delivery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 9 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- female pupil
- attends selected school
- born in 1998 if enrolled in school selected for age-based delivery
- attending standard (class) 6 if enrolled in school selected for class-based delivery
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- has not previously received HPV vaccine
- has not participated in previous HPV vaccine trials
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gardasil® HPV vaccine0.5 ml given at 0, 2, 6 months | Biological | Age-based delivery, Class-based delivery |
Primary outcome
Vaccine coverage by delivery strategy
Time frame: Month 12
Vaccine coverage will be estimated for each dose given and for those completing the full course of vaccination and compared by delivery strategy.
Vaccine coverage (dose 2) by delivery strategy
Time frame: Month 5
Vaccine coverage (dose 1) by delivery strategy
Time frame: Month 3
3 secondary outcomes
Factors associated with refusal to vaccinate or to complete vaccination course
Time frame: Month 12
Identification of barriers to HPV vaccination
Time frame: Month 14
Estimation of the costs of introducing and scaling up HPV vaccines in schools
Time frame: Month 10
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Nov 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23148516Quentin W, Terris-Prestholt F, Changalucha J, Soteli S, Edmunds WJ, Hutubessy R, Ross DA, Kapiga S, Hayes R, Watson-Jones D. Costs of delivering human papillomavirus vaccination to schoolgirls in Mwanza Region, Tanzania. BMC Med. 2012 Nov 13;10:137. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-137.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22711908Watson-Jones D, Baisley K, Ponsiano R, Lemme F, Remes P, Ross D, Kapiga S, Mayaud P, de Sanjose S, Wight D, Changalucha J, Hayes R. Human papillomavirus vaccination in Tanzanian schoolgirls: cluster-randomized trial comparing 2 vaccine-delivery strategies. J Infect Dis. 2012 Sep 1;206(5):678-86. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis407. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
Related trials for Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Proton Re-irradiation in Patients With Recurrent or Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer , a Multicentre Phase II Single Arm Trial
Head & Neck Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Proton Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy or Photon Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Combination With Pembrolizumab Before Surgery for the Treatment of Locally Advanced and Radiation-Naive Locoregionally Recurrent Oral Cavity Cancer, OSPRI Trial
Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Locally Recurrent Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 4
Lidocaine Infiltration and Neuroimmunomodulation in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer (H&N)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deborah :L Watson-Jones, MD, PhD principal investigator
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Richard J Hayes, DSC principal investigator
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
John Changalucha, BSc principal investigator
National Institute for Medical Research
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Gardasil® HPV vaccine in people with Cervical Cancer, run by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine at 1 site in Tanzania.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Tanzania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Vaccine coverage by delivery strategy (time frame: Month 12). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01173900, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2011.