AzTrials
AzTrials

Ventricular TachycardiaNCT01170416

Testing Objective Methods for Template Matching Ventricular Tachycardia and Pacemapping

An observational study of Ventricular Tachycardia, run by John Sapp at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients sometimes suffer from life-threatening abnormal heart racing that originates from the lower chamber of the heart. These patients will often need an implantable defibrillator which has the ability to shock the heart back to a normal heart rhythm, but this does not prevent them from getting frequent recurrences… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Ventricular Tachycardia
What is being tested?
12-lead body surface mapping
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jul 2010to Jul 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients will be recruited from consecutive patients referred for ablation of sustained ventricular tachycardia with or without structural heart disease or Patients referred for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia to the QEII Health Sciences Centre, in Halifax, NS.

Who may be able to join

  • All patients presenting with sustained monomorphic VT who are amenable to VT ablation.
  • Patients referred for ablation of supraventricular tachycardia.

Who cannot join

  • Patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia if no sustained tachycardia can be induced, or if in that particular patient pace-mapping is known to be an inaccurate method of mapping (e.g. in bundle branch reentry VT or fascicular VT).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Capital District Health Authority

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 3A7

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Quantitative Measurements Comparing Body Surface Potentials During Pacemapping and Spontaneous Ventricular Tachycardia

Patients sometimes suffer from life-threatening abnormal heart racing that originates from the lower chamber of the heart. These patients will often need an implantable defibrillator which has the ability to shock the heart back to a normal heart rhythm, but this does not prevent them from getting frequent recurrences of the bad heart rhythm needing shocks from the device. This can be painful and potentially harmful. Medicines to prevent recurrences of shocks are not very effective and have many side effects. An alternative to medicines for this is a procedure called a catheter ablation in which a wire is passed up through the blood vessels of the leg into the heart and used to find the short circuits which cause the dangerous heart rhythm. When the spot causing the trouble is found, the investigators can burn it ("ablate" it). This procedure is challenging and methods are needed to make it more effective and easier to do. One of the main ways for finding the short circuits involves using the electrocardiogram (the "ECG"). The regular ECG is simplistic and only makes use of recordings from 10 sites (6 precordial sites and 4 sites on both upper and lower limbs) on the body surface. The investigators are testing whether making recordings from 120 sites on the chest and back and using special computerized analysis of the recordings can help make catheter ablation for dangerous heart rhythms more effective.

Read the detailed description

Several conventional and advanced mapping techniques are frequently utilized to accomplish a successful catheter ablation. Many of these mapping techniques (activation mapping, entrainment mapping) are hampered by either hemodynamic instability of some tachycardias or non-sustainability of others. Pacemapping is a commonly used tool for mapping non-sustained or hemodynamically unstable VT, which is based upon the principle that activation of the heart from a given site will yield a reproducible body surface electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology and that pacing from a site very close to the site at which VT activates the heart will result in a matching ECG morphology. This technique, however, is limited by imperfect accuracy and spatial resolution, subjectivity of interpretation leading to marked inter-observer variability in the perceived quality of a morphologic match, and by the need for an intuitive interpretation of the ECG to direct catheter manipulation. We hypothesize that one can improve the accuracy with which the origin of VT is localized by applying body surface potential mapping (BSPM), using data derived from 120 simultaneously acquired ECGs.

Objectives:

  1. To quantify the similarity between BSPM waveforms during induced VT and during pacemapping or between two different pacing sites using two waveform comparison metrics, the correlation coefficient (CORR) and the root mean square error (RMSE) and to test the validity of these metrics as markers of proximity of the pacing site to the site of earliest ventricular activation.
  2. To compare the accuracy with which the origin of ventricular tachycardia is localized via pacemapping by applying (BSPM), which uses data derived from 120 simultaneously acquired ECGs, to the accuracy of localization with different ECG subsets e.g. 12-lead ECG and X, Y and Z leads.

Patient and methods:

We anticipate that our patients will fall in one of the flowing 4 groups:

Group A:Patients with focal VT in structurally normal heart. Group B:Patients with scar related VT in which the exit site can be identified. Group C:Patients with scar related VT in which the exit site cannot be identified.Group D:Patients presenting with SVT.

For all groups, data for body-surface potential mapping (BSPM) will be recorded during induced VT (Group A\& B), pacing from virtual VT exit sites which are several points selected around the scar margin to represent the VT exit site (group C) or index pacing site which is a pacing site selected as a reference in the RV of patients presented with SVT (group D) and from different pacemapping sites including successful and unsuccessful ablation sites if applicable. All data will be imported into customized software.

The improvement in the arithmetic value of the two comparison metrics will be tested as the site of pacing approaches the site of earliest ventricular activation (Groups A\&B) or virtual VT exit sites in group C or the index pacing site (in group D). The best CORR and RMSE between the BSPM obtained during VT (in group A and B)/virtual VT exit sites (in group C) or index pacing site (group D) and different pacing sites (including successful and unsuccessful ablation sites) will be recorded. A simple linear regression will be used to compare the CORR and RMSE difference at each pacing site to distance between this pacing site and the successful ablation site as a surrogate of the best pace-match (in group A and B) or the corresponding virtual VT exit site (in group C) or index pacing site (group D). P value <0.05 will be considered significant. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative-predictive accuracies of the arithmetic metrics in determining the VT origin/exit site will be determined. We will repeat the previous protocol using different ECG subsets including 12 lead ECGs and X, Y and Z leads. The predictive accuracies for different subsets of electrodes will be measured and compared to those derived from using the whole BSPM obtained from the 120 ECG leads.

Being tested
12-lead body surface mapping
Keywords
Ventricular Tachycardia, Body Surface Mapping
Medical subject headings
Tachycardia, Ventricular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 12-lead body surface mappingOther

    An average of 20 distinct left ventricular sites will be mapped using 12-lead body surface mapping electrodes and recorded for 15 seconds, then sent to a computer for further analysis.

Study groups in NCT01170416
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
12-Lead Body Surface Mapping - Focal VT .Body surface mapping (BSM) will be completed in patients with a defined focal VT site during the EP study.
Receives: Other: 12-lead body surface mapping
12-Lead BSPM - Scar related VT, exit not identifiedBody surface mapping will be competed on patients with scar related VT where the exit cannot be identified
Receives: Other: 12-lead body surface mapping
12-Lead BSPM - Scar related VT exit identifiedBody surface mapping will be competed on patients with scar related VT where the exit is identified
Receives: Other: 12-lead body surface mapping
12-Lead BSPM - Supraventricular tachycardiaBody surface mapping will be completed on patients requiring an EP study for the treatment of symptoms related to supraventricular tachycardia
Receives: Other: 12-lead body surface mapping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Correlating the arithmetic markers (CORR and MAD) to the distance between the pacing site and origin of the ventricular tachycardia or the index pacing site.

    Measured: One year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jul 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2010
  3. Primary completionJul 2011
  4. Study completionJul 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01170416
Sponsor's protocol ID
SP12
Status last verified
May 2016
First submitted
25 Jul 2010
Last updated
17 May 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH, Reddy RK, Marchlinski FE, Yee R, Guarnieri T, Talajic M, Wilber DJ, Fishbein DP, Packer DL, Mark DB, Lee KL, Bardy GH. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):1009-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071098.

    PubMed 18768944
  • Aliot EM, Stevenson WG, Almendral-Garrote JM, Bogun F, Calkins CH, Delacretaz E, Della Bella P, Hindricks G, Jais P, Josephson ME, Kautzner J, Kay GN, Kuck KH, Lerman BB, Marchlinski F, Reddy V, Schalij MJ, Schilling R, Soejima K, Wilber D; European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); American College of Cardiology (ACC); American Heart Association (AHA). EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Heart Rhythm. 2009 Jun;6(6):886-933. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.04.030. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19467519
  • Stevenson WG, Soejima K. Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2007 May 29;115(21):2750-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.655720. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17533195
  • Stevenson WG. In: Wilber D, Packer DL, Stevenson WG, eds. Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias: Basic Concepts and clinical Application. 3rd Edition: Blackwell Publishing; 2008:315-324.

  • Gerstenfeld EP, Dixit S, Callans DJ, Rajawat Y, Rho R, Marchlinski FE. Quantitative comparison of spontaneous and paced 12-lead electrocardiogram during right ventricular outflow tract ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Jun 4;41(11):2046-53. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00427-3.

    PubMed 12798580
  • American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (ACC/AHA/HRS Writing Committee to Develop Data Standards on Electrophysiology); Buxton AE, Calkins H, Callans DJ, DiMarco JP, Fisher JD, Greene HL, Haines DE, Hayes DL, Heidenreich PA, Miller JM, Poppas A, Prystowsky EN, Schoenfeld MH, Zimetbaum PJ, Goff DC, Grover FL, Malenka DJ, Peterson ED, Radford MJ, Redberg RF. ACC/AHA/HRS 2006 key data elements and definitions for electrophysiological studies and procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (ACC/AHA/HRS Writing Committee to Develop Data Standards on Electrophysiology). Circulation. 2006 Dec 5;114(23):2534-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180199. Epub 2006 Nov 27. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17130345
  • Zipes DP, Camm AJ, Borggrefe M, Buxton AE, Chaitman B, Fromer M, Gregoratos G, Klein G, Moss AJ, Myerburg RJ, Priori SG, Quinones MA, Roden DM, Silka MJ, Tracy C, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Antman EM, Anderson JL, Hunt SA, Halperin JL, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Dean V, Deckers JW, Despres C, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo JL, Zamorano JL; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; European Heart Rhythm Association; Heart Rhythm Society. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (writing committee to develop Guidelines for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death): developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2006 Sep 5;114(10):e385-484. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.178233. Epub 2006 Aug 25. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16935995
  • de Bakker JM, van Capelle FJ, Janse MJ, Tasseron S, Vermeulen JT, de Jonge N, Lahpor JR. Slow conduction in the infarcted human heart. 'Zigzag' course of activation. Circulation. 1993 Sep;88(3):915-26. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.3.915.

    PubMed 8353918

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ventricular Tachycardia, run by John Sapp at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Correlating the arithmetic markers (CORR and MAD) to the distance between the pacing site and origin of the ventricular tachycardia or the index pacing site. (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01170416, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in