Critical CareNCT01168089
Near Infrared Spectroscopy for Blood Glucose Measurement in Critical Care Settings
An observational study of Critical Care, run by InLight Solutions at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Luminous Medical, the Sponsor is developing a glucose monitor for the critical care setting. The Sponsor's ultimate goal is to provide a near-continuous blood glucose monitor that automatically measures glucose. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Care
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2008to Apr 2008
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: i. Sample size is to include up to 50 subjects ii. Group will include nondiabetics as well as people with Type I and Type II diabetes. iii. Group will nominally be half male, half female. iv. Subjects must be 18 years or older to participate.
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older ii. Bodyweight greater than 100 lbs iii. Hematocrit > 28% iv. Must not be pregnant v. Must have a pre-existing blood access line
Who cannot join
- Rare blood type or antibodies identified ii. Minor status (less than 18 yrs of age) iii. Bodyweight < 100 lbs (45.45 kg) iv. Hematocrit < 28%
- 1. Blood samples will not be collected for study purposes if a patient's hematocrit drops below 28%.
- Limited autonomy vi. Enrollment in other studies requiring large volume blood sampling vii. Pregnancy viii. Jehovah's witness ix. Unavailability of an existing arterial or venous access line was placed for the scheduled procedure in the volunteer. An access line will not be placed for the sole purpose of this study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Luminous Medical, the Sponsor is developing a glucose monitor for the critical care setting. The Sponsor's ultimate goal is to provide a near-continuous blood glucose monitor that automatically measures glucose. In this study, Luminous will evaluate the performance of the near-infrared measurement in blood samples collected from patients in the intensive care unit setting.
Read the detailed description
Maintenance of tight glycemic control in critically ill patients has been demonstrated to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in critical care patients in the OR and ICU settings. Numerous (>20) peer-reviewed publications have demonstrated the benefits of tight glycemic control. For example, tight glycemic control has been shown to reduce surgical site infections by 60% in cardiothoracic surgery patients (Furnary et al., 1999), and has been shown to reduce overall ICU mortality by 40% with significant reductions in ICU morbidity and length of stay (Van den Berghe, 2001).
Historically, caregivers treated hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) only when glucose levels exceeded 220 mg/dL. However, based upon these recent clinical findings, experts now recommend controlling blood glucose to within the normoglycemic range (80-110 mg/dL). Adherence to such strict glucose control regimens requires near-continuous monitoring of blood glucose and frequent adjustment of insulin infusion to achieve normoglycemia while avoiding risk of hypoglycemia (low blood glucose). Surveys indicate that, in response to this demonstrated clinical need, more than 50% of US hospitals have now adopted tight glycemic control protocols for some critical care patients, with an additional 23% expected to adopt such protocols within the next 12 months.
Currently, these TGC protocols require intravenous administration of insulin to achieve and manage glucose control to within the normoglycemic range. The protocols also mandate frequent monitoring of patient blood glucose levels by nursing staff. With existing technology, each test involves removal of a blood sample and testing on handheld meters or blood gas analyzers. This process is cumbersome, labor intensive, and often disruptive to the patient. Although hospitals are responding to the identified clinical need, current technology has limited adoption due to two principal reasons:
- Fear of hypoglycemia: administering insulin to maintain the patient in the target glucose range of 80-110 mg/dL exposes the patient to increased risk clinical hypoglycemia (blood glucose less than 50 mg/dL). Critical care patients are often sedated and do not exhibit typical signs of hypoglycemia, exacerbating the risk of hypoglycemia. The need for frequent monitoring and concern about risk of hypoglycemia increase caregiver stress and can limit adherence to tight glycemic control protocols.
- Glucose monitoring by conventional methods represents a burdensome procedure: most tight glycemic control protocols require frequent glucose monitoring and insulin adjustment at 30 minute to 2 hour intervals (typically hourly) to avoid hypoglycemia while maintaining normoglycemia. Glucose determination with current technology (including instrument preparation, blood sample acquisition and instrument analysis) typically takes 5 minutes per measurement.
The Sponsor is developing an automated patient-attached blood glucose monitor that will automatically make frequent blood glucose measurements. Frequent measurements will allow better tracking of patient glucose status and will provide blood glucose trend information. The system will alert caregivers to impending or actual hypoglycemia conditions. Automation will reduce the labor burden associated with existing technology. The device is intended to help caregivers to better manage tight glycemic control in their patients.
The device measures glucose in whole blood by flowing a patient blood sample through an optical flow cell while transmitting near infrared light through the sample. The blood constituents, including glucose, absorb a portion of the near-infrared energy in characteristic fashion. The instrument measures the resulting transmission spectrum and analyzes the spectrum to determine the concentration of glucose in the blood sample.
Though the proposed study will represent the initial measurements made by the device in ICU patients, the Sponsor has collected data in volunteer studies conducted at InLight's facility. In one study, we collected blood from volunteer donors and created individual blood samples with variable glucose (glucose range 50-550 mg/dL) by spiking the samples with concentrated glucose solution. We also induced hematocrit variation between 30-50% in these samples by controlling the red cell to plasma ratio. Spectral measurements collected with the prototype device were mathematically correlated with simultaneous blood glucose measurements of the same samples obtained with a Yellow Springs Instruments YSI 2700 Select glucose analyzer (an industry-standard laboratory glucose analyzer) to generate a spectral glucose model and to provide baseline near-infrared glucose measurement results. This evaluation demonstrated that the device's glucose measurements tracked the YSI 2700 glucose measurements with an accuracy of 8.9 mg/dL (1 s.d.). See Figure 1.
In another study, we collected serial blood samples from 5 volunteer subjects with diabetes undergoing dynamic glucose changes induced by carbohydrate ingestion and insulin administration. We obtained spectral glucose measurements of the blood samples using the prototype near-infrared device and compared them with simultaneous blood glucose measurements of the same samples obtained with the YSI 2700 Select glucose analyzer. The Sponsor's results compared favorably with the YSI 2700 results, demonstrating a root-mean-squared error (1 standard deviation) of 5.9 mg/dL (Figure 2). This accuracy level is comparable to current handheld meter technology.
We anticipate that the OR and ICU environments will present new physiological and pharmacological challenges for our instrument. The proposed study is essentially a screening study that will give the Sponsor insight into these challenges. Access to the de-identified ICU charts will allow the Sponsor to correlate the glucose measurements and measurement errors with specific pharmacologic therapies and physiological events. In this manner, the proposed study is in effect a screening study.
- Conditions
- Critical Care
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2008
- Primary completionApr 2008
- Study completionApr 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Critical CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- InLight Solutions
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Luminous Medical
- Investigators
- Mark Rohrscheib, M.D., Principal investigator, UNMHSC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01168089
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ILS-06-078
- Status last verified
- Feb 2008
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2010
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Near Infrared Spectroscopy for Blood Glucose Measurement in Critical Care Settings
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01168089
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ILS-06-078
- Conditions
- Critical Care
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- InLight SolutionsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Luminous Medical
- Study start
- Apr 2008
- Primary completion
- Apr 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Luminous Medical, the Sponsor is developing a glucose monitor for the critical care setting. The Sponsor's ultimate goal is to provide a near-continuous blood glucose monitor that automatically measures glucose. In this study, Luminous will evaluate the performance of the near-infrared measurement in blood samples collected from patients in the intensive care unit setting.
Detailed description
Maintenance of tight glycemic control in critically ill patients has been demonstrated to significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in critical care patients in the OR and ICU settings. Numerous (>20) peer-reviewed publications have demonstrated the benefits of tight glycemic control. For example, tight glycemic control has been shown to reduce surgical site infections by 60% in cardiothoracic surgery patients (Furnary et al., 1999), and has been shown to reduce overall ICU mortality by 40% with significant reductions in ICU morbidity and length of stay (Van den Berghe, 2001).
Historically, caregivers treated hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) only when glucose levels exceeded 220 mg/dL. However, based upon these recent clinical findings, experts now recommend controlling blood glucose to within the normoglycemic range (80-110 mg/dL). Adherence to such strict glucose control regimens requires near-continuous monitoring of blood glucose and frequent adjustment of insulin infusion to achieve normoglycemia while avoiding risk of hypoglycemia (low blood glucose). Surveys indicate that, in response to this demonstrated clinical need, more than 50% of US hospitals have now adopted tight glycemic control protocols for some critical care patients, with an additional 23% expected to adopt such protocols within the next 12 months.
Currently, these TGC protocols require intravenous administration of insulin to achieve and manage glucose control to within the normoglycemic range. The protocols also mandate frequent monitoring of patient blood glucose levels by nursing staff. With existing technology, each test involves removal of a blood sample and testing on handheld meters or blood gas analyzers. This process is cumbersome, labor intensive, and often disruptive to the patient. Although hospitals are responding to the identified clinical need, current technology has limited adoption due to two principal reasons:
- Fear of hypoglycemia: administering insulin to maintain the patient in the target glucose range of 80-110 mg/dL exposes the patient to increased risk clinical hypoglycemia (blood glucose less than 50 mg/dL). Critical care patients are often sedated and do not exhibit typical signs of hypoglycemia, exacerbating the risk of hypoglycemia. The need for frequent monitoring and concern about risk of hypoglycemia increase caregiver stress and can limit adherence to tight glycemic control protocols.
- Glucose monitoring by conventional methods represents a burdensome procedure: most tight glycemic control protocols require frequent glucose monitoring and insulin adjustment at 30 minute to 2 hour intervals (typically hourly) to avoid hypoglycemia while maintaining normoglycemia. Glucose determination with current technology (including instrument preparation, blood sample acquisition and instrument analysis) typically takes 5 minutes per measurement.
The Sponsor is developing an automated patient-attached blood glucose monitor that will automatically make frequent blood glucose measurements. Frequent measurements will allow better tracking of patient glucose status and will provide blood glucose trend information. The system will alert caregivers to impending or actual hypoglycemia conditions. Automation will reduce the labor burden associated with existing technology. The device is intended to help caregivers to better manage tight glycemic control in their patients.
The device measures glucose in whole blood by flowing a patient blood sample through an optical flow cell while transmitting near infrared light through the sample. The blood constituents, including glucose, absorb a portion of the near-infrared energy in characteristic fashion. The instrument measures the resulting transmission spectrum and analyzes the spectrum to determine the concentration of glucose in the blood sample.
Though the proposed study will represent the initial measurements made by the device in ICU patients, the Sponsor has collected data in volunteer studies conducted at InLight's facility. In one study, we collected blood from volunteer donors and created individual blood samples with variable glucose (glucose range 50-550 mg/dL) by spiking the samples with concentrated glucose solution. We also induced hematocrit variation between 30-50% in these samples by controlling the red cell to plasma ratio. Spectral measurements collected with the prototype device were mathematically correlated with simultaneous blood glucose measurements of the same samples obtained with a Yellow Springs Instruments YSI 2700 Select glucose analyzer (an industry-standard laboratory glucose analyzer) to generate a spectral glucose model and to provide baseline near-infrared glucose measurement results. This evaluation demonstrated that the device's glucose measurements tracked the YSI 2700 glucose measurements with an accuracy of 8.9 mg/dL (1 s.d.). See Figure 1.
In another study, we collected serial blood samples from 5 volunteer subjects with diabetes undergoing dynamic glucose changes induced by carbohydrate ingestion and insulin administration. We obtained spectral glucose measurements of the blood samples using the prototype near-infrared device and compared them with simultaneous blood glucose measurements of the same samples obtained with the YSI 2700 Select glucose analyzer. The Sponsor's results compared favorably with the YSI 2700 results, demonstrating a root-mean-squared error (1 standard deviation) of 5.9 mg/dL (Figure 2). This accuracy level is comparable to current handheld meter technology.
We anticipate that the OR and ICU environments will present new physiological and pharmacological challenges for our instrument. The proposed study is essentially a screening study that will give the Sponsor insight into these challenges. Access to the de-identified ICU charts will allow the Sponsor to correlate the glucose measurements and measurement errors with specific pharmacologic therapies and physiological events. In this manner, the proposed study is in effect a screening study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- i. Sample size is to include up to 50 subjects ii. Group will include nondiabetics as well as people with Type I and Type II diabetes. iii. Group will nominally be half male, half female. iv. Subjects must be 18 years or older to participate.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 18 years of age or older ii. Bodyweight greater than 100 lbs iii. Hematocrit > 28% iv. Must not be pregnant v. Must have a pre-existing blood access line
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Rare blood type or antibodies identified ii. Minor status (less than 18 yrs of age) iii. Bodyweight < 100 lbs (45.45 kg) iv. Hematocrit < 28%
- 1. Blood samples will not be collected for study purposes if a patient's hematocrit drops below 28%.
- Limited autonomy vi. Enrollment in other studies requiring large volume blood sampling vii. Pregnancy viii. Jehovah's witness ix. Unavailability of an existing arterial or venous access line was placed for the scheduled procedure in the volunteer. An access line will not be placed for the sole purpose of this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2010.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Critical Care
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
WSACS 2026 Delphi Consensus on the Practical Management of Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Intra-Abdominal Hypertension, Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Ceftriaxone Dosage for Non-Critical Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)
RecruitingPhase 3
Canadian Critical Care Comparative Effectiveness Platform
Intensive Care Unit ICU, Vasopressor
Active, not recruiting
Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit
Psychomotor Agitation, Critical Illness
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Core Competencies in General Intensive Care Ultrasound (GenIUS): a Delphi Study
Critical Illness, Ultrasound
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark Rohrscheib, M.D. principal investigator
UNMHSC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Critical Care, run by InLight Solutions at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2010.