AzTrials
AzTrials

HealthyPhase 1NCT01161472

A Study to Assess the Cognitive Effects of Fesoterodine in Elderly Subjects

A Phase 1 study testing 4mg fesoterodine, 8mg fesoterodine and alprazolam 1mg in people with Healthy, run by Pfizer at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is designed to evaluate elements of cognitive function in subjects receiving either fesoterodine or alprazolam. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Healthy
What is being tested?
4mg fesoterodine, 8mg fesoterodine and alprazolam 1mg
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
20 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jul 2010to Sep 2010
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult healthy volunteers 65 years and over with minimum MMSE of 26

Who cannot join

  • Prohibited concomitant medications
  • Confounding medical conditions
  • Clinically significant comorbid diseases
  • Hypersensitivity or contraindications to fesoterodine or active control

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66211

  • Pfizer Investigational Site

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66212

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A 4 Way Placebo And Active Controlled Study To Evaluate The Effects Of Fesoterodine On Cognitive Function In Healthy Elderly Subjects

The study is designed to evaluate elements of cognitive function in subjects receiving either fesoterodine or alprazolam.

Read the detailed description

Evaluation of cognitive function

Conditions
Healthy
Being tested
4mg fesoterodine, 8mg fesoterodine, alprazolam 1mg, Placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 4mg fesoterodineDrug

    4mg tablet once daily for 6 days

  • 8mg fesoterodineDrug

    4mg tablet once daily for 3 days followed by 8mg tablet once daily for 3 days

  • alprazolam 1mgDrug

    1mg tablet once on last day of treatment period at clinic

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo tablet for fesoterodine once daily for 6 days and placebo tablet for alprazolam once on last day of treatment period at clinic

Study groups in NCT01161472
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
4mg fesoterodineExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: 4mg fesoterodine
fesoterodine 8mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: 8mg fesoterodine
1mg alprazolamActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: alprazolam 1mg
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Detection Speed

    Detection speed: a cognitive test which assessed psychomotor function. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant was to press the 'Yes' key. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses [measured in log10 milliseconds (MS)]. Lower scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Change From Baseline in Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Detection Speed on Day 6

    Detection speed: a cognitive test which assessed psychomotor function. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant was to press the 'Yes' key. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses [measured in log10 milliseconds (MS)]. Lower scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 6

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. CogState Identification Speed

    Identification speed: a cognitive test which assessed visual attention. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant had to decide whether the card was red or not. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses (measured in log10 MS). Lower scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Change From Baseline in CogState Identification Speed on Day 6

    Identification speed: a cognitive test which assessed visual attention. A playing card was presented face up in the center of the screen. As soon as this happened, the participant had to decide whether the card was red or not. The outcome measure was speed of performance; mean of the log10 transformed reaction time for correct responses (measured in log10 MS). Lower scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 6

  3. CogState One Card Learning

    One card learning: a cognitive test which assessed visual learning. Participants were to remember which cards were previously shown in a task. The outcome measure was accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of the square root (sqrt) of the proportion of correct responses. Higher scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Change From Baseline in CogState One Card Learning on Day 6

    One card learning: a cognitive test which assessed visual learning. Participants were to remember which cards were previously shown in a task. The outcome measure was accuracy of performance; arcsine transformation of the square root (sqrt) of the proportion of correct responses. Higher scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 6

  5. CogState Continuous Paired Associate Learning (CPAL)

    CPAL: a cognitive test which assessed visual episodic learning. Participant was to learn and remember picture locations on the screen and was to tap the target on the central location to begin. As each picture was revealed, the participant was to remember where the picture was located and tap that location. The outcome measure was the number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location 4 times. Lower scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Change From Baseline in CogState CPAL on Day 6

    CPAL: a cognitive test which assessed visual episodic learning. Participant was to learn and remember picture locations on the screen and was to tap the target on the central location to begin. As each picture was revealed, the participant was to remember where the picture was located and tap that location. The outcome measure was the number of errors made in correctly placing each of the 4 patterns in their location 4 times. Lower scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 6

  7. CogState Groton Maze Learning Task (GMLT)

    GMLT: a cognitive test which assessed executive function. Participant was shown a 10 x 10 grid of tiles on a computer touch screen. A 28-step pathway was hidden among 100 possible locations. The participant was instructed to move 1 step from the start location and then continue 1 tile at a time, toward the end to find the pathway. The outcome measure was total number of errors made in attempting to learn the same hidden pathway on 5 consecutive trials at a single session. Lower scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Change From Baseline in CogState Groton Maze Learning Task on Day 6

    GMLT: a cognitive test which assessed executive function. Participant was shown a 10 x 10 grid of tiles on a computer touch screen. A 28-step pathway was hidden among 100 possible locations. The participant was instructed to move 1 step from the start location and then continue 1 tile at a time, toward the end to find the pathway. The outcome measure was total number of errors made in attempting to learn the same hidden pathway on 5 consecutive trials at a single session. Lower scores meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 6

  9. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

    RAVLT evaluates a wide diversity of functions: short-term auditory-verbal memory, rate of learning, learning strategies, retroactive, and proactive interference, presence of confabulation of confusion in memory processes, retention of information, and differences between learning and retrieval. Assessment of RAVLT is between 10 to 15 minutes; Performance variable: the sum of the number of words recalled successfully on the delayed recall trial. Higher score meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) on Day 6

    RAVLT evaluates a wide diversity of functions: short-term auditory-verbal memory, rate of learning, learning strategies, retroactive, and proactive interference, presence of confabulation of confusion in memory processes, retention of information, and differences between learning and retrieval. Assessment of RAVLT is between 10 to 15 minutes; Performance variable: the sum of the number of words recalled successfully on the delayed recall trial. Higher score meant a better performance.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01161472
Sponsor's protocol ID
A0221086
Status last verified
May 2012
First submitted
12 Jul 2010
Last updated
28 Jun 2012
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing 4mg fesoterodine, 8mg fesoterodine and alprazolam 1mg in people with Healthy, run by Pfizer at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Jun 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Computer Based Objective Cognition Testing (CogState) Detection Speed (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in