AzTrials
AzTrials

Major Depressive DisorderPhase 3NCT01152554

A Study to Assess the Long- Term Safety of TC-5214 as an Adjunct Therapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

A Phase 3 study testing TC-5214 in people with Major Depressive Disorder and MDD, run by AstraZeneca at 94 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if TC-5214 or placebo (a tablet that looks like medicine tablet or capsule, but contains no active medicine) is safe and effective when taken for 52 weeks with another antidepressant medicine. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, Depression
What is being tested?
TC-5214
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
813 participants
Where
94 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Jun 2010to Feb 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent before initiation of any study-related procedures.
  • The patient must have a clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) with inadequate response to no more than one antidepressant.
  • Outpatient status at enrollment and randomization.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a lifetime history of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  • Patients with a history of suicide attempts in the past year and/or seen by the investigator as having a significant history of risk of suicide or homicide.
  • Patients with significant liver, kidney, lung, heart, neurological, or any other medical conditions that might confound the study or put the patient at greater risk during study participation.

Trial locations and contacts

94 sites in 2 countries.

94 sites in 2 countries

United States93 sites
  • Research Site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Research Site

    Arcadia, California

  • Research Site

    Austin, Texas

  • Research Site

    Baltimore, Maryland

  • Research Site

    Beechwood, Ohio

  • Research Site

    Beverly Hills, California

  • Research Site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Research Site

    Bradenton, Florida

  • Research Site

    Canton, Ohio

  • Research Site

    Carson, California

  • Research Site

    Cerritos, California

  • Research Site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Research Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • Research Site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Research Site

    Chino, California

  • Research Site

    Coral Springs, Florida

  • Research Site

    Costa Mesa, California

  • Research Site

    Creve Coeur, Missouri

  • Research Site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Research Site

    Dayton, Ohio

  • Research Site

    Denver, Colorado

  • Research Site

    Dublin, Ohio

  • Research Site

    Encino, California

  • Research Site

    Escondido, California

  • Research Site

    Florence, Kentucky

  • Research Site

    Flowood, Mississippi

  • Research Site

    Fort Myers, Florida

  • Research Site

    Fresh Meadows, New York

  • Research Site

    Friendswood, Texas

  • Research Site

    Gainsville, Florida

  • Research Site

    Gaithersburg, Maryland

  • Research Site

    Garden Grove, California

  • Research Site

    Glen Burnie, Maryland

  • Research Site

    Hoffman Estates, Illinois

  • Research Site

    Irvine, California

  • Research Site

    Irving, Texas

  • Research Site

    Jacksonville, Florida

  • Research Site

    Jenkintown, Pennsylvania

  • Research Site

    Joliet, Illinois

  • Research Site

    Lafayette, Indiana

  • Research Site

    Lake Jackson, Texas

  • Research Site

    Lincoln, Nebraska

  • Research Site

    Little Rock, Arkansas

  • Research Site

    Los Alamitos, California

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Research Site

    Maitland, Florida

  • Research Site

    Mason, Ohio

  • Research Site

    Middleburg Heights, Ohio

  • Research Site

    Middleton, Wisconsin

  • Research Site

    Mount Kisco, New York

  • Research Site

    New York, New York

  • Research Site

    Newport Beach, California

  • Research Site

    Norristown, Pennsylvania

  • Research Site

    North Miami, Florida

  • Research Site

    Norwalk, Connecticut

  • Research Site

    Norwich, Connecticut

  • Research Site

    Orange City, Florida

  • Research Site

    Orlando, Florida

  • Research Site

    Pico Rivera, California

  • Research Site

    Pinecrest, Florida

  • Research Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

  • Research Site

    Plantation, Florida

  • Research Site

    Portland, Oregon

  • Research Site

    Prairie Village, Kansas

  • Research Site

    Riverside, California

  • Research Site

    Rochester, New York

  • Research Site

    Rockville, Maryland

  • Research Site

    Roswell, Georgia

  • Research Site

    Salem, Oregon

  • Research Site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • Research Site

    Schaumburg, Illinois

  • Research Site

    Seattle, Washington

  • Research Site

    Sherman Oaks, California

  • Research Site

    Shreveport, Louisiana

  • Research Site

    Skokie, Illinois

  • Research Site

    South Kirkland, Washington

  • Research Site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • Research Site

    St. Petersburg, Florida

  • Research Site

    Staten Island, New York

  • Research Site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Research Site

    Toledo, Ohio

  • Research Site

    Toms River, New Jersey

  • Research Site

    Torrance, California

  • Research Site

    Tucson, Arizona

  • Research Site

    Tuscaloosa, Alabama

  • Research Site

    Upland, California

  • Research Site

    Valparaiso, Indiana

  • Research Site

    West Palm Beach, Florida

  • Research Site

    Weymouth, Massachusetts

  • Research Site

    Wichita, Kansas

  • Research Site

    Willingboro, New Jersey

  • Research Site

    Wilmington, North Carolina

  • Research Site

    Woodstock, Vermont

Other trials in United States

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Research Site

    San Juan

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-controlled, Phase III, Long-Term Safety and Tolerability Study of TC-5214 (S-mecamylamine) as an Adjunct to an Antidepressant in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder Who Exhibit an Inadequate Response to Antidepressant Therapy

The purpose of this study is to determine if TC-5214 or placebo (a tablet that looks like medicine tablet or capsule, but contains no active medicine) is safe and effective when taken for 52 weeks with another antidepressant medicine.

Being tested
TC-5214, Placebo
Keywords
Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, Depression, Safety, add-on therapy
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TC-5214Drug

    Tablet, oral, twice daily for 52 weeks

  • PlaceboDrug

    Tablet, oral, twice daily for 52 weeks

Study groups in NCT01152554
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SSRI/Serotonin/SNRI + TC-5214 1-4 mgExperimentalSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/Serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + TC-5214 1-4 mg BID
Receives: Drug: TC-5214
SSRI/Serotonin/SNRI + placeboPlacebo comparatorSelective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/Serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + placebo BID
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Frequency of Patients Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

    The frequency of patients experiencing at least one AE during the randomized treatment or follow-up periods was calculated.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 54)

  2. Frequency of Patients Experiencing AEs That Resulted in Discontinuation of Investigational Product (IP)

    The frequency of patients experiencing AEs that resulted in discontinuation of IP during the randomized treatment or follow-up periods was calculated.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 54)

  3. Frequency of Patients Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    The frequency of patients experiencing serious adverse events (SAEs) during the randomized treatment or follow-up periods was calculated.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 54)

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Sustained Efficacy at 3 Months, Defined as a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score of ≤12 at Week 12 and All Visits up to and Including Week 24

    The percentage of patients with a a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 12 and all visits up to and including Week 24 was calculated. One intermediate occurrence of a MADRS total score >12 but ≤16 or missing was allowed from Week 16 to Week 20.

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Week 12 to Week 24

  2. Sustained Efficacy at 9 Months, Defined as a MADRS Total Score of ≤12 at Week 12 and at All Visits up to and Including Week 52

    The percentage of patients with a MADRS total score of ≤12 at Week 12 and at all visits up to and including Week 52 was calculated. Two intermediate occurrences (not consecutive) of a MADRS >12 but ≤16 or missing were allowed from Week 16 to Week 48.

    A 10-item scale for the evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each MADRS item is rated on a 0 to 6 scale. The MADRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores; the total score can range from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Week 12 to Week 52

  3. Change in the Clinician-rated Global Outcome of Severity as Measured by the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score From Randomization (Week 0) to End of Treatment (Week 52)

    A 3-part, clinician-administered scale that rates the improvement or worsening of the patient's illness from randomization (baseline). Each item is scored on a 1 to 7 scale. Higher CGI-S scores indicate greater illness severity.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) to end of treatment (Week 52)

  4. Change in Functional Impairment From Randomization (Week 0) to End of Treatment (Week 52) as Measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score

    Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is 5-item, self-administered scale that measures the extent a patient is impaired by their disease. Higher scores indicate more severe impairment. The SDS total score is calculated as the sum of the score for the 3 inter-correlated domains (school/work, social life, and family life/home responsibilities) and ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) to end of treatment (Week 52)

  5. Change in Overall Quality of Life and Satisfaction From Randomization (Week 0) to End of Treatment (Week 52) by Assessing the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) % Maximum Total Score

    The Q-LES-Q-SF total score is derived by summing item scores 1 to 14. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain. The Q-LES-Q-SF % maximum total score is calculated as 100% × (Q-LES-Q-SF total score - 14) / 56, and can range from 0% to 100%.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) to end of treatment (Week 52)

  6. Change in EuroQol - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) From Randomization (Week 0) to End of Treatment (Week 52)

    A self-assessment questionnaire that provides 2 measures of health status. The EQ-5D index score is a weighted linear combination over 5 dimensions of health status. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3, and an equation is used to calculate the EQ-5D index score. The EQ-5D index score can range from possible negative values to a maximum of 1.0. The EQ-VAS is a visual analog scale with a range of 0 to 100. For both variables, a higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Randomization (Week 0) to end of treatment (Week 52)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionFeb 2012
  4. Study completionFeb 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
813 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01152554
Sponsor's protocol ID
D4130C00007
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
28 Jun 2010
Last updated
11 Apr 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Tummala R, Desai D, Szamosi J, Wilson E, Hosford D, Dunbar G, Eriksson H. Safety and tolerability of dexmecamylamine (TC-5214) adjunct to ongoing antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder and an inadequate response to antidepressant therapy: results of a long-term study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Feb;35(1):77-81. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000269.

    PubMed 25514064

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing TC-5214 in people with Major Depressive Disorder and MDD, run by AstraZeneca at 94 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 94 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Frequency of Patients Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE) (time frame: Randomization (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 54)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01152554, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in