MalariaPhase 4MalaRiaNCT01150344
Evaluation of the Riamet® Versus Malarone® in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria
A Phase 4 study testing Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination) and RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination) in people with Malaria, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Riamet® or Malarone® are both recommended as the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in France, according to the French consensus Conference revised in 2007 on the treatment of imported malaria. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria
- What is being tested?
- Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination) and RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 317 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Jul 2010to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- subjects aged more than 18,
- back from an endemic area with a positive diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum by microscopic blood (thin and thick film) examination,
- absence of any severe manifestation according to the WHO definition of severe falciparum malaria
Who cannot join
- pregnancy,
- ECG abnormality,
- contraindication to treatment,
- previous anti-malaric treatment within 30 days,
- unable to come back at J3, J7 and J28,
- unwilling to consent to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of the Riamet® Versus Malarone® in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria : a Multicentric Study
Riamet® or Malarone® are both recommended as the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in France, according to the French consensus Conference revised in 2007 on the treatment of imported malaria.
The aim of the study is to compare both tolerance and efficacy of Malarone® and Riamet® in the treatment of uncomplicated imported malaria and to determine clinical and parasitological predictive factors associated with a less effectiveness. It's a multicentric, randomised study in adults with uncomplicated malaria. Treatment will be administered for 3 days, and patients will be followed for 28 days, to evaluate the therapeutic evolution. 640 patients will be included among 15 centres.
Read the detailed description
Background : RIAMET® or Malarone® are both recommended as the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in France, according to the French consensus Conference revised in 2007 on the treatment of imported malaria. Today no randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing both treatments are available for either tolerance or efficacy especially in the field of imported malaria.
Malarone®, an atovaquone+proguanil combination, has become these last years the most prescribed treatment in adult in this indication in France. With Malarone®, therapeutic failures are rare, but digestive side effects are observed, such as vomiting, possibly leading to the use of a second line treatment.
Riamet®, an artemether+lumefantrine combination, is available in France since only July 2007, but is largely used in endemic areas (as CO-ARTEM). A good tolerance and efficacy are reported by studies performed in endemic areas.
Both antimalarials are to be taken for a 3-days treatment period, once a day for Malarone®, but twice a day for Riamet®, which is supposed to affect the observance, on the one hand. On the other hand, parasitological cure rate and apyrexia occur faster with RIAMETt® than with Malarone®.
Primary objective: to compare both tolerance et efficacy of Malarone® and RIAMET® in the treatment of uncomplicated imported malaria.
Secondary objective: to determine clinical and parasitological predictive factors associated with a less effectiveness.
Primary outcome: Number of cases where a second line treatment is used for either intolerance or lack of effectiveness within the 28 days after diagnosis of malaria.
Secondary outcome: parasitological cure rate at J3, fever clearance, digestive tolerance, number of relapses.
Design: Multicentric, open-label, randomized, controlled trial of superiority in adults with uncomplicated malaria and no contraindications to the oral treatment. Treatment will be administered for 3 days, and patients will be followed for 28 days, according to the national recommendations, to evaluate the therapeutic evolution. 640 patients will be included within 36 months. Recruitment will take place among 15 of the corresponding centres of the Malaria National Reference Centre.
Inclusion criteria : subjects aged more than 18, back from an endemic area with a positive diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum by microscopic blood (thin and thick film) examination, able to come back at J3, J7 and J28, consent to participate.
Non inclusion criteria: pregnancy, ECG abnormality, contraindication to treatment, previous anti-malaric treatment within 30 days (HALOFANTRIN) or 48 hours (other antimalarial treatments).
Sample size justification: considering that 13% of patients on Malarone® will be treated by a second line of treatment, 300 patients per group would be necessary to achieve a relative reduction of 50% of patients treated by a second line of treatment (i.e. 6,5%) in the RIAMET® group, with a 80% of statistical power and a type I error rate taken to be 0,05. Considering 5% of patients lost of follow up, 640 patients have to be included.
Perspectives : these data should help to define the best 1st line of treatment in the uncomplicated malaria.
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Being tested
- Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination), RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination)
- Keywords
- Multicentric study, Antimalarial, P. falciparum, Efficacy, Failures, Malarone, RIAMET
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination)Drug
Also called atovaquone+proguanil combination
4 X (250mg atovaquone + 100 mg proguanil) per os, once a day on 3 days as H0, H24 and H48.
RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination)Drug
Also called artemether+LUMEFANTRIN combination
4 X (20mg artemether + 120 mg lumefantrine) per os twice a day on 3 days as H0, H8, H24, H36, H48 and H60
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Malarone | Active comparator | Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination):
patients treated with Malarone® Receives: Drug: Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination) |
| Riamet | Active comparator | RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination):
patients treated with Riamet® Receives: Drug: RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of cases where a second line treatment is used for either intolerance or lack of effectiveness
Measured: within the 28 days after diagnosis of malaria
Secondary outcomes (4)
Parasitological cure rate
Measured: At day 3
Fever clearance
Measured: At day 3
Digestive tolerance
Measured: At day 3
Number of relapses
Measured: At day 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2010
- Primary completionApr 2014
- Study completionNov 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 317 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Olivier Bouchaud, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01150344
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P081222
- Other IDs
- 2010-019950-42
- Acronym
- MalaRia
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 18 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of the Riamet® Versus Malarone® in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria : a Multicentric Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01150344
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MalaRia / P081222
- Conditions
- Malaria
- Keywords
- Multicentric study, Antimalarial, P. falciparum, Efficacy, Failures, Malarone, RIAMET
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 317 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2010
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Riamet® or Malarone® are both recommended as the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in France, according to the French consensus Conference revised in 2007 on the treatment of imported malaria.
The aim of the study is to compare both tolerance and efficacy of Malarone® and Riamet® in the treatment of uncomplicated imported malaria and to determine clinical and parasitological predictive factors associated with a less effectiveness. It's a multicentric, randomised study in adults with uncomplicated malaria. Treatment will be administered for 3 days, and patients will be followed for 28 days, to evaluate the therapeutic evolution. 640 patients will be included among 15 centres.
Detailed description
Background : RIAMET® or Malarone® are both recommended as the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in France, according to the French consensus Conference revised in 2007 on the treatment of imported malaria. Today no randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing both treatments are available for either tolerance or efficacy especially in the field of imported malaria.
Malarone®, an atovaquone+proguanil combination, has become these last years the most prescribed treatment in adult in this indication in France. With Malarone®, therapeutic failures are rare, but digestive side effects are observed, such as vomiting, possibly leading to the use of a second line treatment.
Riamet®, an artemether+lumefantrine combination, is available in France since only July 2007, but is largely used in endemic areas (as CO-ARTEM). A good tolerance and efficacy are reported by studies performed in endemic areas.
Both antimalarials are to be taken for a 3-days treatment period, once a day for Malarone®, but twice a day for Riamet®, which is supposed to affect the observance, on the one hand. On the other hand, parasitological cure rate and apyrexia occur faster with RIAMETt® than with Malarone®.
Primary objective: to compare both tolerance et efficacy of Malarone® and RIAMET® in the treatment of uncomplicated imported malaria.
Secondary objective: to determine clinical and parasitological predictive factors associated with a less effectiveness.
Primary outcome: Number of cases where a second line treatment is used for either intolerance or lack of effectiveness within the 28 days after diagnosis of malaria.
Secondary outcome: parasitological cure rate at J3, fever clearance, digestive tolerance, number of relapses.
Design: Multicentric, open-label, randomized, controlled trial of superiority in adults with uncomplicated malaria and no contraindications to the oral treatment. Treatment will be administered for 3 days, and patients will be followed for 28 days, according to the national recommendations, to evaluate the therapeutic evolution. 640 patients will be included within 36 months. Recruitment will take place among 15 of the corresponding centres of the Malaria National Reference Centre.
Inclusion criteria : subjects aged more than 18, back from an endemic area with a positive diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum by microscopic blood (thin and thick film) examination, able to come back at J3, J7 and J28, consent to participate.
Non inclusion criteria: pregnancy, ECG abnormality, contraindication to treatment, previous anti-malaric treatment within 30 days (HALOFANTRIN) or 48 hours (other antimalarial treatments).
Sample size justification: considering that 13% of patients on Malarone® will be treated by a second line of treatment, 300 patients per group would be necessary to achieve a relative reduction of 50% of patients treated by a second line of treatment (i.e. 6,5%) in the RIAMET® group, with a 80% of statistical power and a type I error rate taken to be 0,05. Considering 5% of patients lost of follow up, 640 patients have to be included.
Perspectives : these data should help to define the best 1st line of treatment in the uncomplicated malaria.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Malarone | Active comparator | Drug: Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination)Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination): patients treated with Malarone® |
| Riamet | Active comparator | Drug: RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination)RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination): patients treated with Riamet® |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- subjects aged more than 18,
- back from an endemic area with a positive diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum by microscopic blood (thin and thick film) examination,
- absence of any severe manifestation according to the WHO definition of severe falciparum malaria
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- pregnancy,
- ECG abnormality,
- contraindication to treatment,
- previous anti-malaric treatment within 30 days,
- unable to come back at J3, J7 and J28,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination)Also: atovaquone+proguanil combination4 X (250mg atovaquone + 100 mg proguanil) per os, once a day on 3 days as H0, H24 and H48. | Drug | Malarone |
| RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination)Also: artemether+LUMEFANTRIN combination4 X (20mg artemether + 120 mg lumefantrine) per os twice a day on 3 days as H0, H8, H24, H36, H48 and H60 | Drug | Riamet |
Primary outcome
Number of cases where a second line treatment is used for either intolerance or lack of effectiveness
Time frame: within the 28 days after diagnosis of malaria
4 secondary outcomes
Parasitological cure rate
Time frame: At day 3
Fever clearance
Time frame: At day 3
Digestive tolerance
Time frame: At day 3
Number of relapses
Time frame: At day 3
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2015.
Related trials for Malaria
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olivier Bouchaud, MD, PhD principal investigator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination) and RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination) in people with Malaria, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of cases where a second line treatment is used for either intolerance or lack of effectiveness (time frame: within the 28 days after diagnosis of malaria). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2015.