AzTrials
AzTrials

MalariaPhase 4MalaRiaNCT01150344

Evaluation of the Riamet® Versus Malarone® in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria

A Phase 4 study testing Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination) and RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination) in people with Malaria, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Riamet® or Malarone® are both recommended as the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in France, according to the French consensus Conference revised in 2007 on the treatment of imported malaria. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Malaria
What is being tested?
Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination) and RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
317 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Jul 2010to Nov 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • subjects aged more than 18,
  • back from an endemic area with a positive diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum by microscopic blood (thin and thick film) examination,
  • absence of any severe manifestation according to the WHO definition of severe falciparum malaria

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy,
  • ECG abnormality,
  • contraindication to treatment,
  • previous anti-malaric treatment within 30 days,
  • unable to come back at J3, J7 and J28,
  • unwilling to consent to participate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hôpital Avicenne

    Bobigny, Seine St Denis, 93000

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of the Riamet® Versus Malarone® in the Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria : a Multicentric Study

Riamet® or Malarone® are both recommended as the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in France, according to the French consensus Conference revised in 2007 on the treatment of imported malaria.

The aim of the study is to compare both tolerance and efficacy of Malarone® and Riamet® in the treatment of uncomplicated imported malaria and to determine clinical and parasitological predictive factors associated with a less effectiveness. It's a multicentric, randomised study in adults with uncomplicated malaria. Treatment will be administered for 3 days, and patients will be followed for 28 days, to evaluate the therapeutic evolution. 640 patients will be included among 15 centres.

Read the detailed description

Background : RIAMET® or Malarone® are both recommended as the first line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in France, according to the French consensus Conference revised in 2007 on the treatment of imported malaria. Today no randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing both treatments are available for either tolerance or efficacy especially in the field of imported malaria.

Malarone®, an atovaquone+proguanil combination, has become these last years the most prescribed treatment in adult in this indication in France. With Malarone®, therapeutic failures are rare, but digestive side effects are observed, such as vomiting, possibly leading to the use of a second line treatment.

Riamet®, an artemether+lumefantrine combination, is available in France since only July 2007, but is largely used in endemic areas (as CO-ARTEM). A good tolerance and efficacy are reported by studies performed in endemic areas.

Both antimalarials are to be taken for a 3-days treatment period, once a day for Malarone®, but twice a day for Riamet®, which is supposed to affect the observance, on the one hand. On the other hand, parasitological cure rate and apyrexia occur faster with RIAMETt® than with Malarone®.

Primary objective: to compare both tolerance et efficacy of Malarone® and RIAMET® in the treatment of uncomplicated imported malaria.

Secondary objective: to determine clinical and parasitological predictive factors associated with a less effectiveness.

Primary outcome: Number of cases where a second line treatment is used for either intolerance or lack of effectiveness within the 28 days after diagnosis of malaria.

Secondary outcome: parasitological cure rate at J3, fever clearance, digestive tolerance, number of relapses.

Design: Multicentric, open-label, randomized, controlled trial of superiority in adults with uncomplicated malaria and no contraindications to the oral treatment. Treatment will be administered for 3 days, and patients will be followed for 28 days, according to the national recommendations, to evaluate the therapeutic evolution. 640 patients will be included within 36 months. Recruitment will take place among 15 of the corresponding centres of the Malaria National Reference Centre.

Inclusion criteria : subjects aged more than 18, back from an endemic area with a positive diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum by microscopic blood (thin and thick film) examination, able to come back at J3, J7 and J28, consent to participate.

Non inclusion criteria: pregnancy, ECG abnormality, contraindication to treatment, previous anti-malaric treatment within 30 days (HALOFANTRIN) or 48 hours (other antimalarial treatments).

Sample size justification: considering that 13% of patients on Malarone® will be treated by a second line of treatment, 300 patients per group would be necessary to achieve a relative reduction of 50% of patients treated by a second line of treatment (i.e. 6,5%) in the RIAMET® group, with a 80% of statistical power and a type I error rate taken to be 0,05. Considering 5% of patients lost of follow up, 640 patients have to be included.

Perspectives : these data should help to define the best 1st line of treatment in the uncomplicated malaria.

Conditions
Malaria
Being tested
Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination), RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination)
Keywords
Multicentric study, Antimalarial, P. falciparum, Efficacy, Failures, Malarone, RIAMET
Medical subject headings
Malaria

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination)Drug

    Also called atovaquone+proguanil combination

    4 X (250mg atovaquone + 100 mg proguanil) per os, once a day on 3 days as H0, H24 and H48.

  • RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination)Drug

    Also called artemether+LUMEFANTRIN combination

    4 X (20mg artemether + 120 mg lumefantrine) per os twice a day on 3 days as H0, H8, H24, H36, H48 and H60

Study groups in NCT01150344
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MalaroneActive comparatorMalarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination): patients treated with Malarone®
Receives: Drug: Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination)
RiametActive comparatorRIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination): patients treated with Riamet®
Receives: Drug: RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of cases where a second line treatment is used for either intolerance or lack of effectiveness

    Measured: within the 28 days after diagnosis of malaria

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Parasitological cure rate

    Measured: At day 3

  2. Fever clearance

    Measured: At day 3

  3. Digestive tolerance

    Measured: At day 3

  4. Number of relapses

    Measured: At day 3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2010
  3. Primary completionApr 2014
  4. Study completionNov 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
317 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01150344
Sponsor's protocol ID
P081222
Other IDs
2010-019950-42
Acronym
MalaRia
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
18 Jun 2010
Last updated
9 Dec 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Malarone (atovaquone + proguanil combination) and RIAMET (artemether + LUMEFANTRIN combination) in people with Malaria, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of cases where a second line treatment is used for either intolerance or lack of effectiveness (time frame: within the 28 days after diagnosis of malaria). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in