AzTrials
AzTrials

MelanomaPhase 1NCT01149343

Evaluation of a New Vaccine Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Skin Cancer

A Phase 1 study testing Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations in people with Melanoma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 37 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to examine the safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of the immunotherapeutic product GSK2302025A (also referred to as recPRAME + AS15 Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic [ASCI]) administered as a first line treatment in patients with unresectable and progressive… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Melanoma
What is being tested?
Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
107 participants
Where
37 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
2 Jul 2010to 19 Dec 2016
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patient with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma. Phase I segment: All melanoma patients with stage IV M1b and stage IV M1c including completely resected stage IV patients but with the exception of stage IV M1c disease with serum lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 x Upper Limit of Normal or with involvement of the Central Nervous System.
  • Phase II segment: All melanoma patients with measurable, unresectable stage III melanoma including in-transit metastasis (with (N3) or without (N2c) nodal metastasis) and stage IV M1a melanoma. The patient should have documented progressive disease within 12 weeks of registration into the trial. Patients with resected stage IV and with stage IV M1b or M1c disease cannot be included.
  • Written informed consent for PRAME expression screening and gene profiling on resected tumor tissue and for the complete study has been obtained from the patient prior to shipment of the sample for expression testing and prior to the performance of any other protocol-specific procedure.
  • The patient is >= 18 years old at the time of signing the first informed consent form.
  • The patient's tumor shows expression of the PRAME antigen as determined by RT-PCR analysis or any updated technique on fresh tissue sample.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • The patient has adequate bone marrow reserve, renal, adrenal and hepatic function as assessed by standard laboratory criteria.
  • Female patients of non-childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study. Non-childbearing potential is defined as current tubal ligation, hysterectomy, ovariectomy or post-menopause.
  • Female patients of childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study, if the patient:
  • has practiced adequate contraception for 30 days prior to the study product administration, and
  • has a negative pregnancy test on the day of administration, and
  • has agreed to continue adequate contraception during the entire treatment period and for 2 months after the completion of the study product administration series.
  • In the view of the investigator, the patient can and will comply with all the requirements of the protocol.

Who cannot join

  • The patient has at any time received systemic chemotherapy, (bio)-chemotherapy or CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies for metastatic disease.
  • The patient is scheduled to receive any other anticancer treatment, including but not limited to (bio)-chemotherapeutic or immunomodulating agents and radiotherapy.
  • The patient has received any cancer immunotherapy containing the PRAME antigen or any cancer immunotherapy for his/her metastatic disease.
  • The patient requires concomitant treatment (more than 7 consecutive days) with systemic corticosteroids or any other immunosuppressive agents.
  • Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine) other than the study product within the 30 days preceding the first ASCI dose injection or planned use during the study period
  • The patient has (had) previous or concomitant malignancies at other sites (including carcinoma in situ), except effectively treated non-melanoma skin cancers or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or effectively treated malignancy that has been in remission for over 5 years and is highly likely to have been cured.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • The patient has an allergy to any component of the study investigational product or has a history of previous allergic reactions to vaccinations.
  • The patient has a history of confirmed adrenal dysfunction.
  • The patient has an autoimmune disease such as, but not limited to, multiple sclerosis, lupus, and inflammatory bowel disease.
  • The patient is known to be positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
  • The patient has an uncontrolled bleeding disorder.
  • The patient has a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency.
  • The patient has psychiatric or addictive disorders that may compromise his/her ability to give informed consent or to comply with the trial procedures.
  • The patient has other concurrent severe medical problems, unrelated to the malignancy, that would significantly limit full compliance with the study or expose the patient to unacceptable risk.
  • For female patients: the patient is pregnant or lactating.

Trial locations and contacts

37 sites in 6 countries.

37 sites in 6 countries

Germany11 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Berlin, 13585

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Homburg, Saarland, 66421

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jena, Thuringia, 07740

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23538

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68167

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nuremberg, Bavaria, 90419

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076

Other trials in Germany

Italy8 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Genoa, Liguria, 16132

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Meldola (FC), Emilia-Romagna, 47014

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Milan, Lombardy, 20133

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Milan, Lombardy, 20141

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Naples, Campania, 80131

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ravenna, Emilia-Romagna, 48100

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rimini, Emilia-Romagna, 47900

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rozzano (MI), Lombardy, 20089

Other trials in Italy

France7 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bordeaux, 33075

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lille, 59037

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Marseille, 13385

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nantes, 44093

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Reims, 51092

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rennes, 35042

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

Other trials in France

Russia5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chelyabinsk, 454087

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 115478

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pyatigorsk, 357502

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197758

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg

Other trials in Russia

Czechia3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Brno, 656 53

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hradec Králové, 500 05

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 128 08

Other trials in Czechia

Poland3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gdansk, 80-215

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Poznan, 60-693

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Słupsk, 76-200

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Study of GSK2302025A Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

The purpose of this clinical study is to examine the safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of the immunotherapeutic product GSK2302025A (also referred to as recPRAME + AS15 Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic [ASCI]) administered as a first line treatment in patients with unresectable and progressive metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Read the detailed description

In this study, patients were to receive a maximum of 24 doses of recMAGE-A3 + AS15 according to four cycles over a period of four years. An active follow-phase (up to five years after registration into the study) was planned for all patients.

This protocol summary has been impacted by protocol amendment 3, so there will no longer be an active follow-up of patients after discontinuation or completion of the study treatment. The study will end approximately 30 days after the last dose will be administered.

In addition, no more biological samples will be collected for protocol research purposes. For each biological sample already collected in the scope of this study and not tested yet, testing will not be performed by default, except if a scientific rationale remains relevant.

Sampling for safety monitoring as per protocol will continue.

Conditions
Melanoma
Being tested
Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations
Keywords
PRAME, Cancer immunotherapeutic, Malignant melanoma, ASCI (Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic)
Medical subject headings
Melanoma, Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulationsBiological

    Also called PRAME ASCI

    Intramuscular administration

Study groups in NCT01149343
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GSK2302025A Cohort 1ExperimentalMale or female patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma received the investigational Low-Dose (LD) adjuvanted GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic vaccine, intramuscularly into the deltoid or lateral region of the thigh, with alternation on right or left side at each succeeding injection. Subjects received a total of 24 administrations in 4 cycles: 6 administrations given at 2 weeks intervals in cycle 1, 6 administrations given at 3 weeks intervals in cycle 2, 4 administrations given at 6 weeks intervals in cycle 3 and 4 administrations given at 3 months interval in cycle 4.
Receives: Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations
GSK2302025A Cohort 2ExperimentalMale or female patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma received the investigational Middle-Dose (MD) adjuvanted GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic vaccine, intramuscularly into the deltoid or lateral region of the thigh, with alternation on right or left side at each succeeding injection. Subjects received a total of 24 administrations in 4 cycles: 6 administrations given at 2 weeks intervals in cycle 1, 6 administrations given at 3 weeks intervals in cycle 2, 4 administrations given at 6 weeks intervals in cycle 3 and 4 administrations given at 3 months interval in cycle 4.
Receives: Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations
GSK2302025A Cohort 3ExperimentalMale or female patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma received the investigational High-Dose (HD) adjuvanted GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic vaccine, intramuscularly into the deltoid or lateral region of the thigh, with alternation on right or left side at each succeeding injection. Subjects received a total of 24 administrations in 4 cycles: 6 administrations given at 2 weeks intervals in cycle 1, 6 administrations given at 3 weeks intervals in cycle 2, 4 administrations given at 6 weeks intervals in cycle 3 and 4 administrations given at 3 months interval in cycle 4.
Receives: Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations
GSK2302025A Cohort 4ExperimentalIn Phase 2 of the study subjects received the optimal investigational dose-level identified in Phase 1. Patients received a treatment consisting of 24 injections of the experimental GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic.
Receives: Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Patients With Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I)

    The dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as follows: •An Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic (ASCI) related or possibly ASCI related grade 3 or higher toxicity. Grade 3 myalgia, arthralgia, headache, fever, rigors/chills and fatigue (including lethargy, malaise and asthenia) persisting for 48 hours despite therapy. •An ASCI related or possibly ASCI related grade 2 or higher allergic reaction occurring within 24 hours following the ASCI administration. •An ASCI related or possibly ASCI related decrease in renal function, with a creatinine clearance lower than (<) 40 milliliters per minute (mL/min). •An ASCI-related or possibly ASCI-related symptomatic and confirmed adrenal insufficiency. The grading used was defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0: Grade 3 DLT = severe DLT. Related = DLT considered by investigator as possibly related to product administration.

    Measured: During the study treatment (up to Year 4), for all patients

  2. Percentage of Patients With Anti-PReferentially Expressed Antigen of MElanoma (Anti-PRAME) Humoral Immune Response (Phase I)

    A seronegative/seropositive patient for anti-PRAME antibodies was a patient with antibody concentration lower (<)/ higher than or equal to (≥) cut-off level. Humoral immune response was defined as a) if baseline concentration < cut-off level: post treatment concentration ≥ cut-off level, or b) if baseline concentration ≥ cut-off level: post treatment concentration at least twice the baseline value. Cut-off values for seropositivity (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) were 12 ELISA Units per milliliter (EL.U/mL).

    Measured: After the administration of dose 4, at Week 8

  3. Number of Patients With Best Overall Response to Study Treatment (Phase II)

    The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). In general the patient's best response assignment depended on the achievement of both measurement and confirmation criteria. The best overall response includes the complete response (CR) defined as disappearance of all targeted/non-targeted lesions and partial response (PR) defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD and persistence of one or more non-targeted lesion(s).

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Number of Patients With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs), by Maximum Grading

    An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. The grading to be used by the investigators for the assessment of the severity of adverse events (AEs) was defined as the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 (Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe or medically significant; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = death related to AE). Adverse Events were coded to the preferred term (PT) level by means of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

  2. Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), by Maximum Grading

    Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity. The grading to be used by the investigators for the assessment of the severity of adverse events (AEs) was defined as the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 (Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe or medically significant; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = death related to AE). SAEs were coded to the preferred term (PT) level by means of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

  3. Number of Patients With Laboratory Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading

    Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Unknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grade (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [APTTP] grading versus baseline parameter grading.

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

  4. Number of Patients With Laboratory Abnormal Results Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading

    Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grade (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [ALT/I] and [APH/I] grading versus baseline parameter grading.

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

  5. Number of Patients With Hematological and Biochemical Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading

    Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to baseline parameter grades (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [AN], [AST/I] and [CRE/I] grading versus baseline parameter grading.

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

  6. Number of Patients With Laboratory Hematological and Biochemical Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading

    Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to baseline parameter grades (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [CRE/I] and [GGT/I] grading versus baseline parameter grading.

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

  7. Number of Patients With Lab Hematological and Biochemical Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading

    Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grade (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [Hgb/I] and [HYP] grading versus baseline parameter grading.

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

  8. Number of Patients With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Results Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading

    Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grade (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [LYMC/D] and [LYMC/I] grading versus baseline parameter grading.

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

  9. Number of Patients With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Results Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading

    Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grades (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [NEUC/D], [PLA/D] and [WBC/D] grading versus baseline parameter grading.

    Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration

  10. Percentage of Patients With Anti-PRAME Cellular (T-cell) Response (Phase I)

    Cellular response was defined as: Geometric Mean Response (GMR) above the 2.68 cut-off value and at least a four-fold increase of PRAME- specific Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 4/8 T-cells. Considering that 2 studies failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy of recombinant protein based cancer vaccines, GSK decided in 2014 to stop the development and to stop recruitment in all the ongoing clinical studies. The decision was made to end the study (i.e., stopping patient enrollment, follow-ups, sample collection and analysis of samples for research purposes). Patients still on treatment at the time of the protocol amendment were offered to continue the administration of the study treatment until the last dose or until recurrence, whichever came first, or until the patient or the investigator decided to stop the study treatment. No further active protocol visit/contact was performed except for the concluding visit at Week 199, 30 days after the last treatment administration.

    Measured: Up to Data Lock Point at Week 8

  11. Number of Patients With Anti-PRAME Humoral Immune Response (Phase I & II)

    A seropositive patient was a patient whose anti-PRAME antibody concentration was greater than or equal to (≥) the assay cut-off value of 12 ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). A seronegative patient was defined as a patient whose pre-treatment antibody concentration was below (<) the cut-off value. An anti-PRAME antibody responder was defined as: For a seronegative patient: a post-treatment antibody concentration ≥ the cut-off value; For a seropositive patient: a post-treatment antibody concentration ≥ twice the pre-treatment antibody concentration.

    Measured: At Weeks 0, 4, 8, 10, 12, 29, 51, 75, 99, 123, 147 and conclusion visit at 30 days post last treatment administration (Week 199) for each patient

  12. Number of Patients With Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD), Mixed Response (MR) (Phase I & II)

    Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), where stable disease for target lesions refers to neither enough shrinkage to qualify for complete response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) since the treatment started. For non-targeted lesions it refers to persistence of one or more non-target lesions. Progressive disease is related to a clear increase of diameters of lesions taking as references the smallest diameters recorded since the treatment started OR the appearance of one or more new lesions OR both of these.

    Measured: At 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199)

  13. Number of Patients With Best Overall Response, Including Mixed Response (MxR) and Slow Progressive Disease (SPD) Criteria (Phase I & II)

    Tumor response was assessed by the RECIST criteria, where SD for target lesions refers to neither enough shrinkage to qualify for CR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) since the treatment started. For non-targeted lesions it refers to persistence of one or more nom-target lesions. Progressive disease is related to a clear increase of diameters of lesions taking as references the smallest diameters recorded since the treatment started OR the appearance of one or more new lesions OR both of these. Mixed response is defined as at least 30% decrease in the LD occurring in at least one target lesion recorded and measured at baseline. Such response occurring in otherwise SD or PD status of the LD of target lesions were classified as "SD with target lesion regression" or "PD with target lesion regression", respectively. New lesion(s) in otherwise PR status of the LD of target lesions were "PR with new lesion".

    Measured: At 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199)

  14. Anti-Protein D Humoral Response (Phase I & II)

    Analysis of immunogenicity for anti-PD antibodies was not performed, following negative results to the NCT00480025 study which assessed another study product from same technology platform. For this study, the main analysis of the dose-escalation Phase I segment was performed according to protocol when all patients enrolled in the Phase I segment had received the first 4 treatment doses and had completed Week 8. The main analysis of the Phase II segment was performed according to protocol when all patients had either completed the treatment until the end of Cycle 3 or had been withdrawn from the study treatment, with the exception of anti-PD antibody responses and PRAME-specific cellular responses which were not yet performed. All samples that had been collected but not yet tested were not tested by default, except if a scientific rationale remained relevant.

    Measured: At Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 29, 51, 75, 99, 123, 147, 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199), with follow-up, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after concluding visit

  15. Anti-Cytosine Phosphate Guanosine Oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG) Humoral Response (Phase I & II)

    Analysis of immunogenicity for anti-CpG antibodies was not performed, following negative results to the NCT00480025 study which assessed another study product from same technology platform. For this study, the main analysis of the dose-escalation Phase I segment was performed according to protocol when all patients enrolled in the Phase I segment had received the first 4 treatment doses and had completed Week 8. The main analysis of the Phase II segment was performed according to protocol when all patients had either completed the treatment until the end of Cycle 3 or had been withdrawn from the study treatment, with the exception of anti-CpG antibody responses and PRAME-specific cellular responses which were not yet performed. All samples that had been collected but not yet tested were not tested by default, except if a scientific rationale remained relevant.

    Measured: At Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 29, 51, 75, 99, 123, 147, 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199), with follow-up, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after concluding visit

  16. Time to Treatment Failure, Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival (Phase I & II)

    Time to treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the time from first administration of study product until the date of the last administration of the product, irrespective of the reason for study treatment discontinuation. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from first adminsitration of study product until the date of either disease progression or death (for whatever reason), whichever comes first. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from first administration of study product until death.

    Measured: Up to concluding visit, at Week 199

  17. Duration of Response for Patients With CR, PR and SD or SD/PR Status (Phase II)

    This analysis was not performed following negative results to the NCT00480025 study which assessed another study product from same technology platform. For this study, the main analysis of the dose-escalation Phase I segment was performed according to protocol when all patients enrolled in the Phase I segment had received the first 4 treatment doses and had completed Week 8. The main analysis of the Phase II segment was performed according to protocol when all patients had either completed the treatment until the end of Cycle 3 or had been withdrawn from the study treatment, with the exception of anti-CpG/anti-PD antibody responses and PRAME-specific cellular responses which were not yet performed. All samples that had been collected but not yet tested were not tested by default, except if a scientific rationale remained relevant.

    Measured: Up to concluding visit, at Week 199

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start2 Jul 2010
  3. Primary completion11 Feb 2014
  4. Study completion19 Dec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
107 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01149343
Sponsor's protocol ID
113173
Other IDs
2009-016636-13, 2009
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
22 Jun 2010
Last updated
20 Nov 2020
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Publications

  • Gutzmer R, Rivoltini L, Levchenko E, Testori A, Utikal J, Ascierto PA, Demidov L, Grob JJ, Ridolfi R, Schadendorf D, Queirolo P, Santoro A, Loquai C, Dreno B, Hauschild A, Schultz E, Lesimple TP, Vanhoutte N, Salaun B, Gillet M, Jarnjak S, De Sousa Alves PM, Louahed J, Brichard VG, Lehmann FF. Safety and immunogenicity of the PRAME cancer immunotherapeutic in metastatic melanoma: results of a phase I dose escalation study. ESMO Open. 2016 Aug 8;1(4):e000068. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000068. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27843625

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations in people with Melanoma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 37 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 37 sites in Germany, Italy, France, Russia, Czechia and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Patients With Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I) (time frame: During the study treatment (up to Year 4), for all patients). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01149343, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in