MelanomaPhase 1NCT01149343
Evaluation of a New Vaccine Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Skin Cancer
A Phase 1 study testing Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations in people with Melanoma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 37 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to examine the safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of the immunotherapeutic product GSK2302025A (also referred to as recPRAME + AS15 Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic [ASCI]) administered as a first line treatment in patients with unresectable and progressive… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma
- What is being tested?
- Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 107 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Jul 2010to 19 Dec 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patient with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma. Phase I segment: All melanoma patients with stage IV M1b and stage IV M1c including completely resected stage IV patients but with the exception of stage IV M1c disease with serum lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 x Upper Limit of Normal or with involvement of the Central Nervous System.
- Phase II segment: All melanoma patients with measurable, unresectable stage III melanoma including in-transit metastasis (with (N3) or without (N2c) nodal metastasis) and stage IV M1a melanoma. The patient should have documented progressive disease within 12 weeks of registration into the trial. Patients with resected stage IV and with stage IV M1b or M1c disease cannot be included.
- Written informed consent for PRAME expression screening and gene profiling on resected tumor tissue and for the complete study has been obtained from the patient prior to shipment of the sample for expression testing and prior to the performance of any other protocol-specific procedure.
- The patient is >= 18 years old at the time of signing the first informed consent form.
- The patient's tumor shows expression of the PRAME antigen as determined by RT-PCR analysis or any updated technique on fresh tissue sample.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1.
Show all 13Show fewer
- The patient has adequate bone marrow reserve, renal, adrenal and hepatic function as assessed by standard laboratory criteria.
- Female patients of non-childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study. Non-childbearing potential is defined as current tubal ligation, hysterectomy, ovariectomy or post-menopause.
- Female patients of childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study, if the patient:
- has practiced adequate contraception for 30 days prior to the study product administration, and
- has a negative pregnancy test on the day of administration, and
- has agreed to continue adequate contraception during the entire treatment period and for 2 months after the completion of the study product administration series.
- In the view of the investigator, the patient can and will comply with all the requirements of the protocol.
Who cannot join
- The patient has at any time received systemic chemotherapy, (bio)-chemotherapy or CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies for metastatic disease.
- The patient is scheduled to receive any other anticancer treatment, including but not limited to (bio)-chemotherapeutic or immunomodulating agents and radiotherapy.
- The patient has received any cancer immunotherapy containing the PRAME antigen or any cancer immunotherapy for his/her metastatic disease.
- The patient requires concomitant treatment (more than 7 consecutive days) with systemic corticosteroids or any other immunosuppressive agents.
- Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine) other than the study product within the 30 days preceding the first ASCI dose injection or planned use during the study period
- The patient has (had) previous or concomitant malignancies at other sites (including carcinoma in situ), except effectively treated non-melanoma skin cancers or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or effectively treated malignancy that has been in remission for over 5 years and is highly likely to have been cured.
Show all 15Show fewer
- The patient has an allergy to any component of the study investigational product or has a history of previous allergic reactions to vaccinations.
- The patient has a history of confirmed adrenal dysfunction.
- The patient has an autoimmune disease such as, but not limited to, multiple sclerosis, lupus, and inflammatory bowel disease.
- The patient is known to be positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- The patient has an uncontrolled bleeding disorder.
- The patient has a family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency.
- The patient has psychiatric or addictive disorders that may compromise his/her ability to give informed consent or to comply with the trial procedures.
- The patient has other concurrent severe medical problems, unrelated to the malignancy, that would significantly limit full compliance with the study or expose the patient to unacceptable risk.
- For female patients: the patient is pregnant or lactating.
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 6 countries.
37 sites in 6 countries
Germany11 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 13585
GSK Investigational Site
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
GSK Investigational Site
Homburg, Saarland, 66421
GSK Investigational Site
Jena, Thuringia, 07740
GSK Investigational Site
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105
GSK Investigational Site
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23538
GSK Investigational Site
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131
GSK Investigational Site
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68167
GSK Investigational Site
Nuremberg, Bavaria, 90419
GSK Investigational Site
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076
Italy8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Genoa, Liguria, 16132
GSK Investigational Site
Meldola (FC), Emilia-Romagna, 47014
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20133
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20141
GSK Investigational Site
Naples, Campania, 80131
GSK Investigational Site
Ravenna, Emilia-Romagna, 48100
GSK Investigational Site
Rimini, Emilia-Romagna, 47900
GSK Investigational Site
Rozzano (MI), Lombardy, 20089
France7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bordeaux, 33075
GSK Investigational Site
Lille, 59037
GSK Investigational Site
Marseille, 13385
GSK Investigational Site
Nantes, 44093
GSK Investigational Site
Reims, 51092
GSK Investigational Site
Rennes, 35042
GSK Investigational Site
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Russia5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Chelyabinsk, 454087
GSK Investigational Site
Moscow, 115478
GSK Investigational Site
Pyatigorsk, 357502
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg, 197758
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
Czechia3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brno, 656 53
GSK Investigational Site
Hradec Králové, 500 05
GSK Investigational Site
Prague, 128 08
Poland3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80-215
GSK Investigational Site
Poznan, 60-693
GSK Investigational Site
Słupsk, 76-200
About this study
Official title: Study of GSK2302025A Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
The purpose of this clinical study is to examine the safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of the immunotherapeutic product GSK2302025A (also referred to as recPRAME + AS15 Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic [ASCI]) administered as a first line treatment in patients with unresectable and progressive metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Read the detailed description
In this study, patients were to receive a maximum of 24 doses of recMAGE-A3 + AS15 according to four cycles over a period of four years. An active follow-phase (up to five years after registration into the study) was planned for all patients.
This protocol summary has been impacted by protocol amendment 3, so there will no longer be an active follow-up of patients after discontinuation or completion of the study treatment. The study will end approximately 30 days after the last dose will be administered.
In addition, no more biological samples will be collected for protocol research purposes. For each biological sample already collected in the scope of this study and not tested yet, testing will not be performed by default, except if a scientific rationale remains relevant.
Sampling for safety monitoring as per protocol will continue.
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Being tested
- Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations
- Keywords
- PRAME, Cancer immunotherapeutic, Malignant melanoma, ASCI (Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic)
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma, Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulationsBiological
Also called PRAME ASCI
Intramuscular administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| GSK2302025A Cohort 1 | Experimental | Male or female patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma received the investigational Low-Dose (LD) adjuvanted GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic vaccine, intramuscularly into the deltoid or lateral region of the thigh, with alternation on right or left side at each succeeding injection. Subjects received a total of 24 administrations in 4 cycles: 6 administrations given at 2 weeks intervals in cycle 1, 6 administrations given at 3 weeks intervals in cycle 2, 4 administrations given at 6 weeks intervals in cycle 3 and 4 administrations given at 3 months interval in cycle 4. Receives: Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations |
| GSK2302025A Cohort 2 | Experimental | Male or female patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma received the investigational Middle-Dose (MD) adjuvanted GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic vaccine, intramuscularly into the deltoid or lateral region of the thigh, with alternation on right or left side at each succeeding injection. Subjects received a total of 24 administrations in 4 cycles: 6 administrations given at 2 weeks intervals in cycle 1, 6 administrations given at 3 weeks intervals in cycle 2, 4 administrations given at 6 weeks intervals in cycle 3 and 4 administrations given at 3 months interval in cycle 4. Receives: Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations |
| GSK2302025A Cohort 3 | Experimental | Male or female patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma received the investigational High-Dose (HD) adjuvanted GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic vaccine, intramuscularly into the deltoid or lateral region of the thigh, with alternation on right or left side at each succeeding injection. Subjects received a total of 24 administrations in 4 cycles: 6 administrations given at 2 weeks intervals in cycle 1, 6 administrations given at 3 weeks intervals in cycle 2, 4 administrations given at 6 weeks intervals in cycle 3 and 4 administrations given at 3 months interval in cycle 4. Receives: Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations |
| GSK2302025A Cohort 4 | Experimental | In Phase 2 of the study subjects received the optimal investigational dose-level identified in Phase 1. Patients received a treatment consisting of 24 injections of the experimental GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic. Receives: Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Patients With Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I)
The dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as follows: •An Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic (ASCI) related or possibly ASCI related grade 3 or higher toxicity. Grade 3 myalgia, arthralgia, headache, fever, rigors/chills and fatigue (including lethargy, malaise and asthenia) persisting for 48 hours despite therapy. •An ASCI related or possibly ASCI related grade 2 or higher allergic reaction occurring within 24 hours following the ASCI administration. •An ASCI related or possibly ASCI related decrease in renal function, with a creatinine clearance lower than (<) 40 milliliters per minute (mL/min). •An ASCI-related or possibly ASCI-related symptomatic and confirmed adrenal insufficiency. The grading used was defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0: Grade 3 DLT = severe DLT. Related = DLT considered by investigator as possibly related to product administration.
Measured: During the study treatment (up to Year 4), for all patients
Percentage of Patients With Anti-PReferentially Expressed Antigen of MElanoma (Anti-PRAME) Humoral Immune Response (Phase I)
A seronegative/seropositive patient for anti-PRAME antibodies was a patient with antibody concentration lower (<)/ higher than or equal to (≥) cut-off level. Humoral immune response was defined as a) if baseline concentration < cut-off level: post treatment concentration ≥ cut-off level, or b) if baseline concentration ≥ cut-off level: post treatment concentration at least twice the baseline value. Cut-off values for seropositivity (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) were 12 ELISA Units per milliliter (EL.U/mL).
Measured: After the administration of dose 4, at Week 8
Number of Patients With Best Overall Response to Study Treatment (Phase II)
The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). In general the patient's best response assignment depended on the achievement of both measurement and confirmation criteria. The best overall response includes the complete response (CR) defined as disappearance of all targeted/non-targeted lesions and partial response (PR) defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD and persistence of one or more non-targeted lesion(s).
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Secondary outcomes (17)
Number of Patients With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs), by Maximum Grading
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination. The grading to be used by the investigators for the assessment of the severity of adverse events (AEs) was defined as the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 (Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe or medically significant; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = death related to AE). Adverse Events were coded to the preferred term (PT) level by means of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), by Maximum Grading
Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity. The grading to be used by the investigators for the assessment of the severity of adverse events (AEs) was defined as the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 (Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe or medically significant; Grade 4 = life-threatening; Grade 5 = death related to AE). SAEs were coded to the preferred term (PT) level by means of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA).
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Laboratory Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Unknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grade (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [APTTP] grading versus baseline parameter grading.
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Laboratory Abnormal Results Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grade (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [ALT/I] and [APH/I] grading versus baseline parameter grading.
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Hematological and Biochemical Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to baseline parameter grades (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [AN], [AST/I] and [CRE/I] grading versus baseline parameter grading.
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Laboratory Hematological and Biochemical Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to baseline parameter grades (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [CRE/I] and [GGT/I] grading versus baseline parameter grading.
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Lab Hematological and Biochemical Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grade (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [Hgb/I] and [HYP] grading versus baseline parameter grading.
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Results Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [ NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grade (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [LYMC/D] and [LYMC/I] grading versus baseline parameter grading.
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Results Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Laboratory abnormalities belong to hematological and biochemical parameters such as: activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged [APTTP], alanine aminotransferase increased [ALT/I], alkaline phoshatase increased [APH/I], anemia [AN], asparatate aminostransferase increased [AST/I], blood bilirubin increased [BB/I], creatinine increased [CRE/I], gamma glumatymtransferase increased [GGT/I], hemoglobin increased [Hgb/I], hypoalbuminemia [HYP], lymphocyte count decreased [LYMC/D], lymphocyte count increased [LYMC/I], neutrophil count decreased [NEUC/D], platelet count decreased [PLA/D], white blood cell decreased [WBC/D]. Parameter grades (G0,1,2,3,4,Uknown) were compared to each baseline parameter grades (GUnknown,0,1,2,3), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0 of May 28, 2009 [http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE]. This endpoint presents values for [NEUC/D], [PLA/D] and [WBC/D] grading versus baseline parameter grading.
Measured: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Percentage of Patients With Anti-PRAME Cellular (T-cell) Response (Phase I)
Cellular response was defined as: Geometric Mean Response (GMR) above the 2.68 cut-off value and at least a four-fold increase of PRAME- specific Cluster of Differentiation (CD) 4/8 T-cells. Considering that 2 studies failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy of recombinant protein based cancer vaccines, GSK decided in 2014 to stop the development and to stop recruitment in all the ongoing clinical studies. The decision was made to end the study (i.e., stopping patient enrollment, follow-ups, sample collection and analysis of samples for research purposes). Patients still on treatment at the time of the protocol amendment were offered to continue the administration of the study treatment until the last dose or until recurrence, whichever came first, or until the patient or the investigator decided to stop the study treatment. No further active protocol visit/contact was performed except for the concluding visit at Week 199, 30 days after the last treatment administration.
Measured: Up to Data Lock Point at Week 8
Number of Patients With Anti-PRAME Humoral Immune Response (Phase I & II)
A seropositive patient was a patient whose anti-PRAME antibody concentration was greater than or equal to (≥) the assay cut-off value of 12 ELISA units per milliliter (EL.U/mL). A seronegative patient was defined as a patient whose pre-treatment antibody concentration was below (<) the cut-off value. An anti-PRAME antibody responder was defined as: For a seronegative patient: a post-treatment antibody concentration ≥ the cut-off value; For a seropositive patient: a post-treatment antibody concentration ≥ twice the pre-treatment antibody concentration.
Measured: At Weeks 0, 4, 8, 10, 12, 29, 51, 75, 99, 123, 147 and conclusion visit at 30 days post last treatment administration (Week 199) for each patient
Number of Patients With Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD), Mixed Response (MR) (Phase I & II)
Tumor response was assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), where stable disease for target lesions refers to neither enough shrinkage to qualify for complete response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) since the treatment started. For non-targeted lesions it refers to persistence of one or more non-target lesions. Progressive disease is related to a clear increase of diameters of lesions taking as references the smallest diameters recorded since the treatment started OR the appearance of one or more new lesions OR both of these.
Measured: At 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199)
Number of Patients With Best Overall Response, Including Mixed Response (MxR) and Slow Progressive Disease (SPD) Criteria (Phase I & II)
Tumor response was assessed by the RECIST criteria, where SD for target lesions refers to neither enough shrinkage to qualify for CR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD taking as references the smallest sum longest diameter (LD) since the treatment started. For non-targeted lesions it refers to persistence of one or more nom-target lesions. Progressive disease is related to a clear increase of diameters of lesions taking as references the smallest diameters recorded since the treatment started OR the appearance of one or more new lesions OR both of these. Mixed response is defined as at least 30% decrease in the LD occurring in at least one target lesion recorded and measured at baseline. Such response occurring in otherwise SD or PD status of the LD of target lesions were classified as "SD with target lesion regression" or "PD with target lesion regression", respectively. New lesion(s) in otherwise PR status of the LD of target lesions were "PR with new lesion".
Measured: At 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199)
Anti-Protein D Humoral Response (Phase I & II)
Analysis of immunogenicity for anti-PD antibodies was not performed, following negative results to the NCT00480025 study which assessed another study product from same technology platform. For this study, the main analysis of the dose-escalation Phase I segment was performed according to protocol when all patients enrolled in the Phase I segment had received the first 4 treatment doses and had completed Week 8. The main analysis of the Phase II segment was performed according to protocol when all patients had either completed the treatment until the end of Cycle 3 or had been withdrawn from the study treatment, with the exception of anti-PD antibody responses and PRAME-specific cellular responses which were not yet performed. All samples that had been collected but not yet tested were not tested by default, except if a scientific rationale remained relevant.
Measured: At Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 29, 51, 75, 99, 123, 147, 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199), with follow-up, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after concluding visit
Anti-Cytosine Phosphate Guanosine Oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG) Humoral Response (Phase I & II)
Analysis of immunogenicity for anti-CpG antibodies was not performed, following negative results to the NCT00480025 study which assessed another study product from same technology platform. For this study, the main analysis of the dose-escalation Phase I segment was performed according to protocol when all patients enrolled in the Phase I segment had received the first 4 treatment doses and had completed Week 8. The main analysis of the Phase II segment was performed according to protocol when all patients had either completed the treatment until the end of Cycle 3 or had been withdrawn from the study treatment, with the exception of anti-CpG antibody responses and PRAME-specific cellular responses which were not yet performed. All samples that had been collected but not yet tested were not tested by default, except if a scientific rationale remained relevant.
Measured: At Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 29, 51, 75, 99, 123, 147, 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199), with follow-up, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after concluding visit
Time to Treatment Failure, Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival (Phase I & II)
Time to treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the time from first administration of study product until the date of the last administration of the product, irrespective of the reason for study treatment discontinuation. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from first adminsitration of study product until the date of either disease progression or death (for whatever reason), whichever comes first. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from first administration of study product until death.
Measured: Up to concluding visit, at Week 199
Duration of Response for Patients With CR, PR and SD or SD/PR Status (Phase II)
This analysis was not performed following negative results to the NCT00480025 study which assessed another study product from same technology platform. For this study, the main analysis of the dose-escalation Phase I segment was performed according to protocol when all patients enrolled in the Phase I segment had received the first 4 treatment doses and had completed Week 8. The main analysis of the Phase II segment was performed according to protocol when all patients had either completed the treatment until the end of Cycle 3 or had been withdrawn from the study treatment, with the exception of anti-CpG/anti-PD antibody responses and PRAME-specific cellular responses which were not yet performed. All samples that had been collected but not yet tested were not tested by default, except if a scientific rationale remained relevant.
Measured: Up to concluding visit, at Week 199
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study start2 Jul 2010
- Primary completion11 Feb 2014
- Study completion19 Dec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01149343
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 113173
- Other IDs
- 2009-016636-13, 2009
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 22 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 20 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Publications
Gutzmer R, Rivoltini L, Levchenko E, Testori A, Utikal J, Ascierto PA, Demidov L, Grob JJ, Ridolfi R, Schadendorf D, Queirolo P, Santoro A, Loquai C, Dreno B, Hauschild A, Schultz E, Lesimple TP, Vanhoutte N, Salaun B, Gillet M, Jarnjak S, De Sousa Alves PM, Louahed J, Brichard VG, Lehmann FF. Safety and immunogenicity of the PRAME cancer immunotherapeutic in metastatic melanoma: results of a phase I dose escalation study. ESMO Open. 2016 Aug 8;1(4):e000068. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000068. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27843625
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of GSK2302025A Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01149343
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 113173
- Conditions
- Melanoma
- Keywords
- PRAME, Cancer immunotherapeutic, Malignant melanoma, ASCI (Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic)
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 2 Jul 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Aug 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical study is to examine the safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of the immunotherapeutic product GSK2302025A (also referred to as recPRAME + AS15 Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic [ASCI]) administered as a first line treatment in patients with unresectable and progressive metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Detailed description
In this study, patients were to receive a maximum of 24 doses of recMAGE-A3 + AS15 according to four cycles over a period of four years. An active follow-phase (up to five years after registration into the study) was planned for all patients.
This protocol summary has been impacted by protocol amendment 3, so there will no longer be an active follow-up of patients after discontinuation or completion of the study treatment. The study will end approximately 30 days after the last dose will be administered.
In addition, no more biological samples will be collected for protocol research purposes. For each biological sample already collected in the scope of this study and not tested yet, testing will not be performed by default, except if a scientific rationale remains relevant.
Sampling for safety monitoring as per protocol will continue.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| GSK2302025A Cohort 1 | Experimental | Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulationsMale or female patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma received the investigational Low-Dose (LD) adjuvanted GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic vaccine, intramuscularly into the deltoid or lateral region of the thigh, with alternation on right or left side at each succeeding injection. Subjects received a total of 24 administrations in 4 cycles: 6 administrations given at 2 weeks intervals in cycle 1, 6 administrations given at 3 weeks intervals in cycle 2, 4 administrations given at 6 weeks intervals in cycle 3 and 4 administrations given at 3 months interval in cycle 4. |
| GSK2302025A Cohort 2 | Experimental | Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulationsMale or female patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma received the investigational Middle-Dose (MD) adjuvanted GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic vaccine, intramuscularly into the deltoid or lateral region of the thigh, with alternation on right or left side at each succeeding injection. Subjects received a total of 24 administrations in 4 cycles: 6 administrations given at 2 weeks intervals in cycle 1, 6 administrations given at 3 weeks intervals in cycle 2, 4 administrations given at 6 weeks intervals in cycle 3 and 4 administrations given at 3 months interval in cycle 4. |
| GSK2302025A Cohort 3 | Experimental | Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulationsMale or female patients with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma received the investigational High-Dose (HD) adjuvanted GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic vaccine, intramuscularly into the deltoid or lateral region of the thigh, with alternation on right or left side at each succeeding injection. Subjects received a total of 24 administrations in 4 cycles: 6 administrations given at 2 weeks intervals in cycle 1, 6 administrations given at 3 weeks intervals in cycle 2, 4 administrations given at 6 weeks intervals in cycle 3 and 4 administrations given at 3 months interval in cycle 4. |
| GSK2302025A Cohort 4 | Experimental | Biological: Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulationsIn Phase 2 of the study subjects received the optimal investigational dose-level identified in Phase 1. Patients received a treatment consisting of 24 injections of the experimental GSK2302025A immunotherapeutic. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Male or female patient with histologically proven cutaneous melanoma. Phase I segment: All melanoma patients with stage IV M1b and stage IV M1c including completely resected stage IV patients but with the exception of stage IV M1c disease with serum lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5 x Upper Limit of Normal or with involvement of the Central Nervous System.
- Phase II segment: All melanoma patients with measurable, unresectable stage III melanoma including in-transit metastasis (with (N3) or without (N2c) nodal metastasis) and stage IV M1a melanoma. The patient should have documented progressive disease within 12 weeks of registration into the trial. Patients with resected stage IV and with stage IV M1b or M1c disease cannot be included.
- Written informed consent for PRAME expression screening and gene profiling on resected tumor tissue and for the complete study has been obtained from the patient prior to shipment of the sample for expression testing and prior to the performance of any other protocol-specific procedure.
- The patient is >= 18 years old at the time of signing the first informed consent form.
- The patient's tumor shows expression of the PRAME antigen as determined by RT-PCR analysis or any updated technique on fresh tissue sample.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- The patient has at any time received systemic chemotherapy, (bio)-chemotherapy or CTLA-4 monoclonal antibodies for metastatic disease.
- The patient is scheduled to receive any other anticancer treatment, including but not limited to (bio)-chemotherapeutic or immunomodulating agents and radiotherapy.
- The patient has received any cancer immunotherapy containing the PRAME antigen or any cancer immunotherapy for his/her metastatic disease.
- The patient requires concomitant treatment (more than 7 consecutive days) with systemic corticosteroids or any other immunosuppressive agents.
- Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine) other than the study product within the 30 days preceding the first ASCI dose injection or planned use during the study period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulationsAlso: PRAME ASCIIntramuscular administration | Biological | GSK2302025A Cohort 1, GSK2302025A Cohort 2, GSK2302025A Cohort 3, GSK2302025A Cohort 4 |
Primary outcome
Number of Patients With Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I)
Time frame: During the study treatment (up to Year 4), for all patients
The dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as follows: •An Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic (ASCI) related or possibly ASCI related grade 3 or higher toxicity. Grade 3 myalgia, arthralgia, headache, fever, rigors/chills and fatigue (including lethargy, malaise and asthenia) persisting for 48 hours despite therapy. •An ASCI related or possibly ASCI related grade 2 or higher allergic reaction occurring within 24 hours following the ASCI administration. •An ASCI related or possibly ASCI related decrease in renal function, with a creatinine clearance lower than (<) 40 milliliters per minute (mL/min). •An ASCI-related or possibly ASCI-related symptomatic and confirmed adrenal insufficiency. The grading used was defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0: Grade 3 DLT = severe DLT. Related = DLT considered by investigator as possibly related to product administration.
Percentage of Patients With Anti-PReferentially Expressed Antigen of MElanoma (Anti-PRAME) Humoral Immune Response (Phase I)
Time frame: After the administration of dose 4, at Week 8
A seronegative/seropositive patient for anti-PRAME antibodies was a patient with antibody concentration lower (<)/ higher than or equal to (≥) cut-off level. Humoral immune response was defined as a) if baseline concentration < cut-off level: post treatment concentration ≥ cut-off level, or b) if baseline concentration ≥ cut-off level: post treatment concentration at least twice the baseline value. Cut-off values for seropositivity (by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) were 12 ELISA Units per milliliter (EL.U/mL).
Number of Patients With Best Overall Response to Study Treatment (Phase II)
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
The best overall response is the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression (taking as reference for progressive disease the smallest measurements recorded since the treatment started). In general the patient's best response assignment depended on the achievement of both measurement and confirmation criteria. The best overall response includes the complete response (CR) defined as disappearance of all targeted/non-targeted lesions and partial response (PR) defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as reference the baseline sum LD and persistence of one or more non-targeted lesion(s).
17 secondary outcomes
Number of Patients With Any Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs), by Maximum Grading
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), by Maximum Grading
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Laboratory Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Laboratory Abnormal Results Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Hematological and Biochemical Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Laboratory Hematological and Biochemical Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Lab Hematological and Biochemical Abnormalities Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Results Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Number of Patients With Abnormal Hematological and Biochemical Laboratory Results Versus Baseline, by Maximum Grading
Time frame: During the entire study period - up to Year 4 + 1 month post last study treatment administration
Percentage of Patients With Anti-PRAME Cellular (T-cell) Response (Phase I)
Time frame: Up to Data Lock Point at Week 8
Number of Patients With Anti-PRAME Humoral Immune Response (Phase I & II)
Time frame: At Weeks 0, 4, 8, 10, 12, 29, 51, 75, 99, 123, 147 and conclusion visit at 30 days post last treatment administration (Week 199) for each patient
Number of Patients With Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD), Mixed Response (MR) (Phase I & II)
Time frame: At 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199)
Number of Patients With Best Overall Response, Including Mixed Response (MxR) and Slow Progressive Disease (SPD) Criteria (Phase I & II)
Time frame: At 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199)
Anti-Protein D Humoral Response (Phase I & II)
Time frame: At Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 29, 51, 75, 99, 123, 147, 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199), with follow-up, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after concluding visit
Anti-Cytosine Phosphate Guanosine Oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG) Humoral Response (Phase I & II)
Time frame: At Week 0, 4, 8, 12, 29, 51, 75, 99, 123, 147, 30 days after the last treatment administration for each patient (Week 199), with follow-up, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after concluding visit
Time to Treatment Failure, Progression Free Survival and Overall Survival (Phase I & II)
Time frame: Up to concluding visit, at Week 199
Duration of Response for Patients With CR, PR and SD or SD/PR Status (Phase II)
Time frame: Up to concluding visit, at Week 199
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27843625Gutzmer R, Rivoltini L, Levchenko E, Testori A, Utikal J, Ascierto PA, Demidov L, Grob JJ, Ridolfi R, Schadendorf D, Queirolo P, Santoro A, Loquai C, Dreno B, Hauschild A, Schultz E, Lesimple TP, Vanhoutte N, Salaun B, Gillet M, Jarnjak S, De Sousa Alves PM, Louahed J, Brichard VG, Lehmann FF. Safety and immunogenicity of the PRAME cancer immunotherapeutic in metastatic melanoma: results of a phase I dose escalation study. ESMO Open. 2016 Aug 8;1(4):e000068. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000068. eCollection 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
37 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Immunotherapeutic GSK2302025A, different formulations in people with Melanoma, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 37 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in Germany, Italy, France, Russia, Czechia and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Aug 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Patients With Dose-limiting Toxicity (Phase I) (time frame: During the study treatment (up to Year 4), for all patients). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01149343, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Nov 2020.