AzTrials
AzTrials

ThrombocytopaeniaPhase 2NCT01147809

Safety and Efficacy Study for Solid Tumor Patients Treated With Eltrombopag

A Phase 2 study testing Eltrombopag olamine in people with Thrombocytopaenia, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 86 sites in 13 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present study is a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, two-Phase, sequential cohort, dose finding study to assess the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in patients with solid tumors receiving gemcitabine monotherapy or the combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin or cisplatin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Thrombocytopaenia
What is being tested?
Eltrombopag olamine
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
130 participants
Where
86 sitesin 13 countries
Study dates
Jun 2010to Mar 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

None listed.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study:
  • Lactating females.
  • Pre-existing cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association [NYHA] Grade III/IV), or arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thromboembolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), unstable angina, or subjects with a QTc >450 msec (QTc >480 msec for subjects with Bundle Branch Block) at study entry, or myocardial infarction within the preceding 6 months. Subjects with a34 pacemaker or defibrillator are not excluded provided that their cardiac function is within normal ranges.
  • Note: For patients with pre-existing NYHA Grade II cardiovascular disease, the investigator should consult with GSK medical monitor before enrolling the subject into the study.
  • Patients with known factor V leiden, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, prothrombin gene mutations, ATIII deficiency, protein C deficiency, protein S deficiency OR recent history of arterial or venous thrombosis (stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) within the preceding 6 months.
  • Note: for patients with known risk factors for thromboembolism e.g., diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, recent major surgery etc., the investigator should consult with GSK medical monitor before enrolling the patient into the study and all risk factors should be documented in the CRF.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Prior surgery within two weeks before study randomization or radiotherapy (RT) within four weeks before study randomization. Subjects with prior surgery or RT are not permitted into the study unless they have completely recovered from surgery and/or acute RT toxicity except for alopecia.
  • Note: Note: patients with minor surgeries or outpatient procedures (e.g. insertion of central venous catheter) are immediately allowed in the study provided that there were no complications from the procedure or surgery.
  • History of prior radiotherapy to more than 20% bone marrow bearing sites.
  • History of platelet agglutination abnormality, platelet disorders or dysfunction or bleeding disorder that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
  • Subjects with a history of CNS metastases or clinical signs or symptoms of brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases confirmed by CT or MRI brain scan unless properly treated. Subjects with CNS metastases treated by neurosurgical resection or brain biopsy performed within 3 months prior to randomization will be excluded.
  • Treated brain metastases are defined
  • Having no evidence of progression or hemorrhage after treatment and no ongoing requirement for dexamethasone, as ascertained by clinical examination and brain imaging (MRI or CT) during the screening period. Anticonvulsants (stable dose) are allowed.
  • Treatment for brain metastases may include whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), radiosurgery (RS; Gamma Knife, LINAC, or equivalent) or a combination as deemed appropriate by the treating physician.
  • Note: if subject has performed a CT scan immediately prior to the screening period and CT could not be repeated, an MRI should be performed in the screening period to exclude the development of brain metastases and/or the progression of the pre-existing brain metastatic lesion(s).
  • Administration of an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, preceding the first dose of investigational product in the study. Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial or administration of any investigational drug during the study is also not permitted.
  • A known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy that, in the opinion of the Investigator or GSK Medical Monitor is due to drugs chemically related to eltrombopag or excipients (e.g. mannitol).
  • Subjects with known Hepatitis B, hepatitis C or Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Subjects with Gilbert's Syndrome are permitted into the study.

Trial locations and contacts

86 sites in 13 countries.

86 sites in 13 countries

United States33 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Albany, New York, 12206

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Arlington, Texas, 76014

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bedford, Texas, 76022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bend, Oregon, 97701

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20817

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Columbia, Missouri, 65201

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75246

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Edmonds, Washington, 98026

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29605

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169

  • GSK Investigational Site

    New Port Richey, Florida, 34655

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Norwich, Connecticut, 06360

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19106

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02903

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02906

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rome, Georgia, 30165

  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78217

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Savannah, Georgia, 31405

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sedona, Arizona, 86336

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tyler, Texas, 75702

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Vancouver, Washington, 98684

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wichita, Kansas, 67214

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Yakima, Washington, 98902

Other trials in United States

Germany11 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Augsburg, Bavaria, 86150

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 10367

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 14169

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dresden, Saxony, 01127

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dresden, Saxony, 01307

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45122

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79106

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Goslar, Lower Saxony, 38642

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30171

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 80335

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 81241

Other trials in Germany

Israel6 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Ashkelon, 78306

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Haifa, 34362

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Jerusalem, 91031

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kfar Saba, 44281

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tel Aviv, 64239

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Zrifin, 70300

Other trials in Israel

Hungary5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Budapest, 1529

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Győr, 9022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kaposvár, 7400

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Törökbálint

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Zalaegerszeg, 8900

Other trials in Hungary

Italy5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aviano (PN), Friuli Venezia Giulia, 33081

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Milan, Lombardy, 20133

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Modena, Emilia-Romagna, 41100

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pisa, Tuscany, 56126

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sassari, Sardinia, 07100

Other trials in Italy

Poland5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bialystok, 15-540

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Konin, 62-500

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Olsztyn, 10-357

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Poznan, 60-569

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Poznan, 61-866

Other trials in Poland

Belgium4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Charleroi, 6000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Leuven, 3000

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Libramont, 6800

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Namur, 5000

Other trials in Belgium

Greece4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Athens, 115 27

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Athens, 115 28

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Heraklion, Crete, 71100

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Thessaloniki, 564 29

Other trials in Greece

Czechia3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Olomouc, 775 20

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 100 00

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prague, 150 06

Other trials in Czechia

India3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Madurai, 625107

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pune, 411001

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pune, 411004

Other trials in India

Ireland3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dublin, 4

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dublin, 7

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tallaght, Dublin, 24

Other trials in Ireland

Canada2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

Other trials in Canada

Finland2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Helsinki, 00290

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tampere, 33520

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Blinded, Placebo-controlled, Two-Phase, Sequential Cohort, Dose Finding Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist, Eltrombopag (SB-497115-GR), Administered to Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Gemcitabine Monotherapy or the Combination of Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin or Cisplatin

The present study is a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, two-Phase, sequential cohort, dose finding study to assess the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in patients with solid tumors receiving gemcitabine monotherapy or the combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin or cisplatin. Phase I of the study will examine safety and tolerability of various doses of eltrombopag to identify a dose and schedule of eltrombopag. Phase II will confirm that the chosen dose and schedule of eltrombopag from Phase I can deliver clinically meaningful benefit(s) to thrombocytopenic patients by improving platelet numbers.

Being tested
Eltrombopag olamine, Placebo
Keywords
Solid Tumor, Eltrombopag, chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia, Thrombocytopenia
Medical subject headings
Thrombocytopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Eltrombopag olamineDrug

    thrombopoietin receptor agonist

  • PlaceboOther

    Placebo tablets with no active pharmaceutical ingredient

Study groups in NCT01147809
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EltrombopagActive comparatorDrug: eltrombopag olamine thrombopoietin receptor agonist
Receives: Drug: Eltrombopag olamine
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorOther: Placebo Placebo tablets with no active pharmaceutical ingredient
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Pre-therapy, On-therapy + 30 Days and Post-therapy in Phase I

    AEs are coded using the standard Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and were graded by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE), version 4.0. AE is any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a MP. For marketed MPs, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits, abuse, or misuse. SAE event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: From Cycle 1, Day 1 (C1D1) until at least 30 days post-investigational product discontinuation (longer for AEs considered related to study participation)

  2. Number of Participants With Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grades for the Indicated Hematology Parameters, at Anytime Post-Baseline in Phase I

    Hematology parameters with a related NCI CTCAE (version 4.0) toxicity grading were summarized by toxicity grade at each scheduled assessment, the maximum toxicity grade reached by a participant post-Baseline was summarized. Hematology parameters included hemoglobin (increased), hemoglobin (anemia), lymphocytes (increased), lymphocytes (decreased), total absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelets (PLT) and white blood cells (WBC). The Baseline value is defined as the value reported immediately prior to the administration of the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1. Post-Baseline is defined as any time after the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1 up to and including all follow-up visits. Only those participant available at the indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X,X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: After Baseline (C1D1), on-treatment and 30 day follow-up

  3. Number of Participants With Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grades for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Parameters, at Anytime Post-Baseline in Phase I

    Clinical chemistry laboratory parameters with a related NCI CTCAE (version 4.0) toxicity grading were summarized by toxicity grade at each scheduled assessment. Clinical chemistry laboratory parameters included albumin (Alb), urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DB) and international normalized ratio/Prothrombin time (PT). The Baseline value is defined as the value reported immediately prior to the administration of the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1. Post-Baseline is defined as any time after the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1 up to and including all follow-up visits. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X,X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: After Baseline (C1D1), on-treatment and 30 day follow-up

  4. Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Creatinine of >=26.5 Micromoles/Liter (UMOL/L) in Phase I

    The number of participants with at least 1 change from Baseline in creatinine, with an increase >=26.5 UMOL/L are reported. Creatinine clearance is estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula which is a method to approximate kidney function. The Baseline value is defined as the value reported immediately prior to the administration of the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1.

    Measured: After Baseline (C1D1), on-treatment and 30 day follow-up

  5. Number of the Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scores at the Indicated Time Points in Phase I

    ECOG-Zubrod scores for the performance status are defined as follows: Score 0: Fully active, 1: restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, 2: ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, 3: capable of only limited self-care, 4: completely disabled, 5: dead. The data is presented for the participants with the ECOG performance score at the indicated time points during the study.

    Measured: Screening, C1D1, C2D1, C2D8, C2D15, C3D1, C4D1, C4D22, C5D1, C5D8, C6D1, C6D15

  6. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Anytime Post-Baseline in Phase I

    A single safety 12-lead ECG was performed using a standard 12-lead ECG machine at screening and post-dose on C2D4. Three further ECGs were carried out at C2D8, C5D8 and C6D15. Change in ECG findings were categorized as 'Clinically significant change: favorable', 'No change or insignificant change' or 'Clinically significant change (CSC): unfavorable' as determined by the investigator. The Baseline value is defined as the value reported immediately prior to the administration of the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1. Any time post-Baseline is defined by counting the participants under the worst result experienced post-Baseline. The best to worst order is 'Clinically significant change: favorable', 'No change or insignificant change', and then 'Clinically significant change (CSC): unfavorable. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X,X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: C2D4, C2D8, C5D8, C6D15

  7. Mean Day 1 Scheduled Pre-chemotherapy Platelet Count Evaluated Across Cycles 1 to 6 in Phase II

    Scheduled pre-chemotherapy platelet count is defined within each cycle as the platelet count assessment on which the decision to give or delay chemotherapy was made. This was averaged for each participant across Cycles 1 to 6 and a natural log transformation was applied to the average. The log-transformed values were compared between eltrombopag and placebo groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for cycle duration (21-day vs. 28-day), Baseline loge(platelet count) and part of study (part 1 or 2 of phase II). Only those participants available at indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X).

    Measured: Day 1 (averaged across cycles 1 to 6)

Secondary outcomes (30)
  1. Average Pre-chemotherapy Platelet Count at the Indicated Time Points in Phase I

    Pre-chemotherapy platelet count is defined for Cycle 1 as the platelet count (from central laboratory data) immediately preceding the first dose of chemotherapy within Cycle 1. For all subsequent cycles it is defined as the platelet count (from central laboratory data) immediately preceding, but limited to within 2 days prior to the first dose of chemotherapy at Day 1. For Group A, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 21 days and for Group B, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 28 days. Blood samples were collected to estimate platelet count at the following time points: Group A; Days 1 and 8 of Cycles 1 to 6. Group B; Days 1, 8 and 15 of Cycles 1 to 6. Only those participants available at indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X, X, X).

    Measured: C1D1, C1D8, C1D15, C2D1, C2D8, C2D15, C3D1, C3D8, C3D15, C4D1,C4D8, C4D15, C5D1,C5D8, C5D15, C6D1,C6D8 and C6D15

  2. Average Within-subject Central Laboratory Platelet Count Prior to Scheduled Chemotherapy Across Cycles 2 to 6 in Phase I

    Within-subject platelet count for each participant was calculated by summing up the visit platelet counts from each of Cycles 1 to 6 and dividing it by the number of cycles in which the participant had data. The average within a treatment group was calculated by summing up the values from each participant within the treatment group and dividing it by the number of participants. These platelet counts are different from the pre-chemotherapy platelet counts for cycles where the chemotherapy dose was delayed. Average within-subject central laboratory platelet count prior to scheduled chemotherapy across Cycles 2 to 6 are summarized. Blood samples were collected on Days 1 and 8 of Cycles 2 to 6 for Group A and on Days 1, 8 and 15 from Cycles 2 to 6 for Group B to estimate the average within subject platelet count prior to scheduled chemotherapy. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X,X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: Day 1 (averaged across Cycles 2 to 6), Day 8 (averaged across Cycles 2 to 6)

  3. Platelet Count Nadir for Each Chemotherapy Cycle in Phase I

    Platelet nadir is defined as the lowest platelet count (from central laboratory data) reported after the first dose of chemotherapy within each cycle. Platelet count nadir is defined for each cycle. For Group A, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 21 days and for Group B, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 28 days. Blood samples were collected to estimate platelet nadir count at the following time points: Group A; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 1 and 2, at Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycle 3 to 6. Group B; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6. Only those participants available at indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X, X, X).

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  4. Central Laboratory Average Daily Area Under the Curve Platelet-time Course Across Cycles 2 to 6 in Phase I

    The average daily area under the platelet-time course was normalized by dividing the area under curve by total duration. This gives an estimated average platelet value over the time period from cycles 2 to 6. For 21-Day Cycle, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 21 days and for 28-Day Cycle, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 28 days. Blood samples were collected to estimate thrombocytes at the following time points: 21-Day Cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 1 to 6. 28-Day Cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6.

    Measured: All assessments from Cycle 2 Day 1 to last assessment in Cycle 6

  5. Number of Participants With Thrombocytopenia of Grade 1, 2, 3 or 4 Across All the Chemotherapy Cycles in Phase I, Using Central Laboratory Platelet Count

    As per the CTCAE version 4.0, par. with a platelet count <LLN but >=75 x 10^9/L (Gi/L) were considered to have Grade 1 thrombocytopenia; par. with a platelet count <75Gi/L, but >=50Gi/L were considered to have Grade 2 thrombocytopenia; par. with a platelet count <50Gi/L, but >=25Gi/L were considered to have Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and par. with a platelet count <25Gi/L were considered to have Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Blood samples were collected to estimate thrombocytes at the following time points: For Group A, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 21 days and for Group B, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 28 days. Blood samples were collected to estimate thrombocytes at the following time points: Group A; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 1 to 6. Group B; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6. Par. experiencing thrombocytopenia (Platelets <150Gi/L) at least once within a cycle are presented in the category title as n=X,X,X,X.

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  6. Maximum Duration of Thrombocytopenia Across Cycles 2 to 6 in Phase I, Estimated Using Central Laboratory Platelet Counts

    Duration of thrombocytopenia is defined as a period of time in days from the first report of a platelet count with NCI CTCAE Grade 1-4 until the first subsequent report of a platelet count no longer meeting those criteria, regardless of rescue medication usage. It was assessed between Day 1 of Cycle 2 and up to and including any Conclusion/Early Withdrawal visit assigned to the same cycle for participants completing up to 6 cycles, and between Day 1 of Cycle 2 and up to and including the end of Cycle 6 for participants continuing beyond 6 cycles. The chemotherapy cycle for Group A was 21 days and for Group B was 28 days. Blood samples were collected to estimate thrombocytes at the following time points: Group A; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 2 to 6. Group B; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and 24 of Cycles 2 to 6.

    Measured: Cycle 2 to Cycle 6

  7. Central Laboratory Platelet Count for Time Taken to Reach Platelet Nadir for Each Chemotherapy Cycle in Phase I

    Platelet nadir is defined within each cycle as the lowest platelet count reported after the Day 1 chemotherapy dose. The time taken to reach platelet nadir is defined within each cycle. For Group A, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 21 days and for Group B, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 28 days. Blood samples were collected to estimate platelet nadir count at the following time points: Group A; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 1 to 6. Group B; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6. Only those participants available at indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X, X, X).

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  8. Time to Recovery From Platelet Nadir for Each Chemotherapy Cycle in Phase I, Estimated Using Central Laboratory Platelet Counts

    Platelet nadir is defined within each cycle as the lowest platelet count reported after the Day 1 chemotherapy dose. Time to recovery (TR) (>100Gi/L or >150Gi/L) from platelet nadir is defined within each cycle as the time in days from the platelet nadir to the time at which platelet count returns to >=100Gi/L or >=150Gi/L within the same cycle or up to and including Day 1 of the next cycle. For the last cycle in the study, time to recovery was calculated in the same manner but up to and including any Conclusion/Early Withdrawal visit which has been assigned to the same cycle. For Group A, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 21 days and for Group B, the chemotherapy cycle consisted of 28 days. Blood samples were collected to estimate platelet count at: Group A; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 1 to 6. Group B; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22, and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6. Only those participants available at indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X, X, X).

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  9. Dose Intensity of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin (G+Cis)/Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin (G+Cb) and Gemcitabine Across Chemotherapy Cycles 1 to 6 in Phase I

    Dose intensity of chemotherapy is defined as the actual dose of chemotherapy given as a percentage of the scheduled C1D1/C1D8 dose, as applicable, within this study: Cycle Dose Intensity (%) = Total Actual dose (mg/m^2) within Cycle *100/ Total Scheduled dose (mg/m^2) in Cycle 1; wherein Actual Dose (mg/m^2) = Actual dose (mg)/Body Surface Area reported on electronic case report form (eCRF).

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  10. Number of Participants With at Least One Delay in Their Scheduled Dose of Chemotherapy in Any Cycle in Phase I

    Any delay in a scheduled dose of gemcitabine monotherapy or the combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin or cisplatin was evaluated for eltrombopag and placebo treated participants.

    Measured: All time on chemotherapy treatment

  11. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Pre-therapy, On-therapy + 30 Days and Post-therapy in Phase II

    AE is any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a MP. For marketed MPs, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits, abuse, or misuse. SAE event is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

    Measured: From first dose of investigational product (IP) until 30 days after discontinuation of IP (Longer for AEs related to study participation)

  12. Number of Participants With Any Bleeding and Significant Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale, Across Cycles 1-6 in Phase II

    The WHO Bleeding Scale is a measure of bleeding severity with the following grades: Grade 0=no bleeding; Grade 1=petechiae; Grade 2=mild blood loss; Grade 3=gross bleeding; Grade 4=debilitating blood loss. The WHO grades were further classified into the following categories: no bleeding=Grade 0; any bleeding=Grades 1 to 4; no clinically significant bleeding=Grades 0 to 1; clinically significant bleeding=Grades 2 to 4. Baseline is defined as the Day 1 assessment or the latest possible screening assessment. Across Cycles 1-6 included all assessments after first dose of chemotherapy up to the end of Cycle 6. Data exclused for participants taking drugs that affect platelet function or anticoagulants, from the time that the medication was started.

    Measured: Screening, Day -5, Day 1 and 8 of Cycles 1 to 6 of 21-day cycle schedule, Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycles 1 to 6 of 28-day schedule, treatment withdrawal and 30-day follow-up

  13. Number of Participants Requiring a Platelet Transfusion in Phase II

    Platelet transfusion was used as a rescue medication for the treatment of thrombocytopenia. Number of participants requiring a platelet transfusion during Cycles 1-6 was summarized and compared between treatment groups using a logistic regression model adjusted for cycle duration. Each cycle included assessments starting at Day 1 of the cycle.

    Measured: Screening, Day -5, throughout cycles 1 to 6 and up to 30 days after IP discontinuation

  14. Number of Participants With at Least One Delay in Their Scheduled Dose of Chemotherapy in Any Cycle in Phase II

    Any delay in scheduled dose of gemcitabine monotherapy or the combination of gemcitabine plus carboplatin or cisplatin was evaluated for eltrombopag and placebo treated participants. Number of participants with any delay in dose during 21-day cycle or 28-day cycle, in part 1 or part 2 of the study is summarized and presented. Only those participants who actually received chemotherapy are included for the cisplatin and carboplatin components and all participants are included for the gemcitabine components (represented by n=X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  15. Number of Participants With Any Dose Reduction in Their Scheduled Dose of Chemotherapy in Any Cycle in Phase II

    Dose reductions are required following potential drug-related toxicities. Number of participants with any dose reduction during 21-day cycle or 28-day cycle, in part 1 or part 2 of the study is summarized and presented. Only participants who actually received chemotherapy were included for the cisplatin and carboplatin components. All participants were included for the gemcitabine components.

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  16. Dose Intensity of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin(G+Cis)/Gemcitabine Plus Carboplatin (G+Cb) and Gemcitabine Across Chemotherapy Cycles 1-6 in Phase II

    Dose intensity of chemotherapy is defined as the actual dose of chemotherapy given as a percentage of the scheduled C1D1/C1D8 dose, as applicable, within this study: cycle Dose Intensity (%) = Total Actual dose (mg/m^2) within cycle *100/ Total Scheduled dose (mg/m^2) in Cycle 1; wherein Actual Dose (mg/m^2) = Actual dose (mg)/Body Surface Area reported on eCRF. The average chemotherapy dose intensity at Day 1 across Cycles 1 to 6, Day 8 across Cycles 1 to 6 and Day 15 across Cycles 1 to 6 was summarized and compared between treatment groups using an ANCOVA model adjusted for cycle duration and part of the study.

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  17. Number of Participants With Indicated Maximum Toxicity Grades for the Indicated Hematology Parameters, at Anytime Post-Baseline in Phase II

    Hematology parameters with a related NCI CTCAE (version 4.0) toxicity grading were summarized by toxicity grade at each scheduled assessment, the maximum toxicity grade reached by a participant post-Baseline was summarized. Hematology parameters included Hemoglobin (Hb) increased, Anemia, Lymphocyte count (Lym), platelet count, White Blood Cell count (WBC) and Total Absolute Neutrophil Count (Total ANC). The Baseline value is defined as the value reported immediately prior to the administration of the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1. Post-Baseline is defined as any time after the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1 up to and including all follow-up visits. participants with missing Baseline value were assumed to have normal Baseline value. Only those Participant available at the indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: After baseline (C1D1), on-treatment and 30 day follow-up

  18. Number of Participants With Indicated Worst-case Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Parameters Using CTCAE Toxicity Grading, at Anytime Post-Baseline in Phase II

    Clinical chemistry laboratory parameters with a related CTCAE (version 4.0) toxicity grading were summarized by toxicity grade at each scheduled assessment. Worst-case grade change of the laboratory parameters at anytime post-Baseline is presented as "Any grade increase", "Increase to Grade 3 or Grade 4". Clinical chemistry laboratory parameters included Albumin (Al), creatinine, AST, ALT, ALP, TB, Calcium hypercalcemia (CaHy)/hypocalcemia (CaHo), Glucose hyperglycemia (GluHy)/hypoglycemia (GluHo), Potassium hypernatremia (KHy)/hyponatremia (KHo) and Sodium hypernatremia (NaHy)/hyponatremia (NaHo). The Baseline value is defined as the value reported immediately prior to the administration of the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1. Post-Baseline is defined as any time after the first dose of chemotherapy in Cycle 1 up to and including all follow-up visits. Only those Participant available at the indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: After baseline (C1D1), on-treatment (collected on days 1 and 8 for subjects on 21-day cycle and on days 1, 8 and 15 for subjects on 28-day cycle) and 30 day follow-up

  19. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Creatinine of >=26.5 UMOL/L in Phase II

    Number of participants with at least 1 assessment of change from Baseline in creatinine, with increase >=26.5 UMOL/L are presented. The Baseline value is defined as the value reported immediately prior to the administration of the first dose of IP.

    Measured: After baseline (C1D1), on-treatment (collected on days 1 and 8 for subjects on 21-day cycle and on days 1, 8 and 15 for subjects on 28-day cycle) and 30 day follow-up

  20. Number of the Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scores at the Indicated Time Points in Phase II

    ECOG-Zubrod scores for the Performance Status were defined as follows: 0: Fully active, 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, 2: Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, 3: Capable of only limited self-care, 4: Completely disabled, 5 and Unknown: Dead. The data is presented for the participants with the ECOG performance score at different time points during the study. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: Screening, C1D1, C2D1, C3D1, C4D1, C5D1, C6D1, C7D1, C8D1, C9D1, C10D1, C11D1, C12D1, C13D1, C14D1, C15D1, C16D1 and C17D1

  21. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Cycle 1 Day 4 (2 to 6 Hours Post-dose) in Phase II

    A single safety 12-lead ECG was performed using a standard 12-lead ECG machine at screening and 2 to 6 hours post-dose on C1D4. Change in ECG findings were categorized as 'Clinically significant change (CSC): favorable', 'No change or insignificant change' or 'Clinically significant change (CSC): unfavorable' as determined by the investigator. The Baseline value is defined as the value reported immediately prior to the administration of the first dose of investigational product. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: C1D4

  22. Mean Day 8 Scheduled Pre-chemotherapy Platelet Counts Evaluated Across Cycles 1 to 6 in Phase II

    Scheduled pre-chemotherapy platelet count is defined within each cycle as the platelet count assessment on which the decision to give or delay chemotherapy was made. This was averaged for each subject across cycles 1 to 6 and a natural log transformation was applied to the average. The log-transformed values were compared between eltrombopag and placebo groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for cycle duration (21-day vs. 28-day), baseline loge(platelet count) and part of study (part 1 or 2 of phase II). The number of participants analyzed is the number with a Day 8 scheduled platelet count.

    Measured: Day 8 (averaged across cycles 1 to 6)

  23. Mean Day 15 Scheduled Pre-chemotherapy Platelet Counts Evaluated Across Cycles 1 to 6 in Phase II

    Scheduled pre-chemotherapy platelet count is defined within each cycle as the platelet count assessment on which the decision to give or delay chemotherapy was made. This was averaged for each subject across cycles 1 to 6 and a natural log transformation was applied to the average. The log-transformed values were compared between eltrombopag and placebo groups using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for cycle duration (21-day vs. 28-day), baseline loge(platelet count) and part of study (part 1 or 2 of phase II). The number of participants analyzed is the number with a Day 15 scheduled platelet count.

    Measured: Day 15 (averaged across cycles 1 to 6)

  24. Mean Within-subject Platelet Count Prior to Scheduled Chemotherapy Across Cycles 1 to 6 in Phase II

    Within-subject platelet count for each par. was calculated by summing up the visit platelet counts from each of Cycles 1 to 6 and dividing it by the number of cycles in which the par. had data. The average within a treatment group was calculated by summing up the values from each par. within the treatment 21-day cycle dividing it by the number of par. These platelet counts are different from the pre-chemotherapy platelet counts for cycles where the chemotherapy dose was delayed. Average within-subject central laboratory platelet count prior to scheduled chemotherapy across Cycles 1 to 6 are summarized. Blood samples were collected on Day 1 and 8 of Cycles 1 to 6 for 21-day cycle and on Day 1, 8 and 15 from Cycles 1 to 6 for 28-day cycle to estimate the average within subject platelet count prior to scheduled chemotherapy. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X,X in the category titles).

    Measured: Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 (all averaged across cycles 1 to 6)

  25. Platelet Count Nadir for Each Chemotherapy Cycle in Phase II

    Platelet nadir is defined as the lowest platelet count reported after the first dose of chemotherapy within each cycle. Platelet count nadir is defined for each cycle. Blood samples were collected to estimate platelet nadir count at the following time points: 21-day cycle; Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 17 of Cycles 1 to 6. 28-day cycle; Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 24 of Cycles 1 to 6. Only those participants available at indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X).

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  26. Average Daily Area Under the Platelet-time Course Across Cycles 1 to 6 in Phase II

    The average daily area under the platelet-time course was normalized by dividing the area under curve by total duration. This gives an estimated average platelet value over the time period from cycles 1 to 6. Blood samples were collected to estimate platelet count at the following time points: 21-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 1 to 6. 28-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6.

    Measured: All assessments from Cycle 1 Day 1 to last assessment in Cycle 6

  27. Number of Participants With Thrombocytopenia of Grade 1, 2, 3 or 4 Across Cycles 1 to 6 in Phase II

    As per the CTCAE version 4.0, participants with a platelet count <LLN but >=75 x 10^9/L (Gi/L) were considered to have Grade 1 thrombocytopenia; participants with a platelet count <75Gi/L, but >=50Gi/L were considered to have Grade 2 thrombocytopenia; participants with a platelet count <50Gi/L, but >=25Gi/L were considered to have Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and participants with a platelet count <25Gi/L were considered to have Grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Blood samples were collected to estimate thrombocytes at the following time points: 21-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 1 to 6. 28-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6. Participants experiencing thrombocytopenia(Platelets <150Gi/L) at least once within cycle are presented in the category title as n=X,X.

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  28. Maximum Duration of Thrombocytopenia Across Cycles 1 to 6 in Phase II

    Duration of thrombocytopenia is defined as a period of time in days from the first report of a platelet count with NCI CTCAE Grade 1-4 until the first subsequent report of a platelet count no longer meeting those criteria, regardless of rescue medication usage. It was assessed between Day 1 of Cycle 2 and up to and including any Conclusion/Early Withdrawal visit assigned to the same cycle for participants completing up to 6 cycles, and between Day 1 of Cycle 2 and up to and including the end of Cycle 6 for participants continuing beyond 6 cycles. The chemotherapy cycle for 21-day cycle was 21 days and for 28-day cycle was 28 days. Blood samples were collected to estimate thrombocytes at the following time points: 21-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 2 to 6. 28-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and 24 of Cycles 2 to 6.

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  29. Time Taken to Reach Platelet Nadir for Each Chemotherapy Cycle in Phase II

    Platelet nadir is defined within each cycle as the lowest platelet count reported after the Day 1 chemotherapy dose. The time taken to reach platelet nadir is defined within each cycle. Blood samples were collected to estimate platelet nadir count at the following time points: 21-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 1 to 6. 28-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6. Only those participants available at indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X).

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

  30. Time to Recovery From Platelet Nadir for Each Chemotherapy Cycle in Phase II

    Platelet nadir is defined within each cycle as the lowest platelet count reported after the Day 1 chemotherapy dose. TR (>100Gi/L or >150Gi/L) from platelet nadir is defined within each cycle as the time in days from the platelet nadir to the time at which platelet count returns to >=100Gi/L or >=150Gi/L within the same cycle or up to and including Day 1 of the next cycle. For the last cycle in the study, time to recovery was calculated in the same manner but up to and including any Conclusion/Early Withdrawal visit which has been assigned to the same cycle. Blood samples were collected to estimate platelet count at: 21-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15 and 17 of Cycles 1 to 6. 28-day cycle; Days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22, and 24of Cycles 1 to 6. Time to recover censored if platelet count did not return to >=100/150 Gi/L. Censored results are excluded from calculation of summary statistics. Only those participants available at indicated time points were analyzed (represented by n=X, X).

    Measured: Cycle 1 to Cycle 6

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2015
  4. Study completionMar 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
130 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01147809
Sponsor's protocol ID
112765
Status last verified
Mar 2016
First submitted
20 May 2010
Last updated
18 Apr 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Winer ES, Safran H, Karaszewska B, Richards DA, Hartner L, Forget F, Ramlau R, Kumar K, Mayer B, Johnson BM, Messam CA, Mostafa Kamel Y. Eltrombopag with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors: a randomized phase I study. Cancer Med. 2015 Jan;4(1):16-26. doi: 10.1002/cam4.326. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

    PubMed 25165041

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Eltrombopag olamine in people with Thrombocytopaenia, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 86 sites in 13 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 86 sites in United States, Germany, Israel, Hungary, Italy and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Apr 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE): Pre-therapy, On-therapy + 30 Days and Post-therapy in Phase I (time frame: From Cycle 1, Day 1 (C1D1) until at least 30 days post-investigational product discontinuation (longer for AEs considered related to study participation)). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01147809, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Apr 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in