Chronic PancreatitisPhase 2NCT01146561
Safety And Efficacy Of Tanezumab In Patients With Chronic Pancreatitis
A Phase 2 study testing Tanezumab in people with Chronic Pancreatitis, run by Pfizer at 9 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Tanezumab is effective in reducing the pain associated with chronic pancreatitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pancreatitis
- What is being tested?
- Tanezumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 2 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Oct 2010to 22 Mar 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult male or female
- Written informed consent
- Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis based on imaging studies
- Persistent abdominal pain due to chronic pancreatitis
- Qualifying pain score during the pre-treatment period
- Willing to comply with study visit schedule and study requirements including for women of child-bearing potential or male patients with female partners of child-bearing potential, the use of 2 forms of birth control
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women, lactating mothers, women suspected of being pregnant and women who wish to become pregnant during the course of the study
- Chronic pancreatitis as a complication of pancreatic cancer or acute pancreatic duct obstruction
- Pancreatic surgery, lithotripsy or endoscopist decompression within 3 months
- History of alcoholism (within 1 year of screening) or concurrent alcohol abuse
- History of cancer in the past years
- Significant cardiac disease within 6 months
Show all 12Show fewer
- History, diagnosis or signs and symptoms of significant neurologic disease
- Disqualifying laboratory values including Hepatitis B or C, HIV and drug test
- Other medical condition that may interfere with study endpoints or safety of the patient as determined by the Investigator
- Known history of rheumatoid arthritis
- Avascular necrosis of the bone
- History of trauma to a major joint Evidence of osteoarthritis
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
United States9 sites
Carolinas Digestive Health Associates
Harrisburg, North Carolina, 28075
Carolinas Digestive Health Associates
Harrisburg, North Carolina, 28705
Wisconsin Center for Advanced Research
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Gastroenterology Group-of Naples
Naples, Florida, 34102-5449
UMPC Division of Radiology
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Digestive Health Specialists
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
North Mississippi Medical Center
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
Palm Beach Gastroenterology
Wellington, Florida, 33414
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
Tanezumab is effective in reducing the pain associated with chronic pancreatitis.
Read the detailed description
On 23 Dec 2010 the FDA imposed a clinical halt for anti-NGF compounds due to safety reasons, ie, a case of osteonecrosis which occurred in relation to an anti-NGF compound of another company. All indications with the exception of Cancer Pain are affected resulting in termination of all studies in respective indications. Recruitment of Study A4091044 was stopped effective 27 Dec 2010. Two patients recruited so far did not receive further doses and were followed up for safety until LSLV on 22 Mar 2011.
- Conditions
- Chronic Pancreatitis
- Being tested
- Tanezumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatitis, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TanezumabBiological
single administration of tanezumab 20 mg sub-cutaneously
PlaceboOther
single administration of placebo to match tanezumab, sub-cutaneously
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 20 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Tanezumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Average Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score Over the Period From Week 1 to Week 8
Daily average chronic pancreatitis pain is assessed with an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 to 8
Secondary outcomes (16)
Change From Baseline in Average and Worst Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16
Daily average chronic pancreatitis pain and worst chronic pancreatitis pain are assessed with an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Worst Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score Over Week 1 to Week 8 Period
Daily average worst chronic pancreatitis pain is assessed with an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Measured: Baseline, Week 1 to 8
Number of Participants With At Least 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Average and Worst Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score
Daily average chronic pancreatitis pain and worst chronic pancreatitis pain are assessed with an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Measured: Week 8
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Average and Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score
Daily average chronic pancreatitis pain and worst chronic pancreatitis pain are assessed with an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
Measured: Week 8
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-sf) Average and Worst Pain Score at Week 8 and 16
BPI-sf is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions. BPI-sf are 4 questions that assess pain intensity (question 5 consists of 7 items that assess level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was answered on a scale ranging from 0 to 10; '0=No pain and 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine'. Measure were scored by item, with lower scores indicated less pain or pain interference.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8, 16
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Index and Pain Interference Score for General Activity, Walking Ability, Sleep and Normal Work at Week 8 and 16
BPI-sf is an 11-item self-report questionnaire that is designed to assess the severity and impact of pain on daily functions. BPI-sf are 4 questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and question 5 consisted of 7 items that assess level of interference of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was answered on a scale ranging from 0 to 10; '0=No pain and 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine'. Measure was scored by item, with lower score indicated less pain or pain interference. The 7 items in question 5 were averaged to obtain pain interference index, range: 0 to 10; higher score=greater impairment.
Measured: Baseline, Week 8, 16
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Chronic Pancreatitis at Week 4, 8 and 16
Patient's Global Assessment of Chronic Pancreatitis is a global evaluation that utilizes a 5-point Likert scale with a score of 1 being the best (Very Good) and a score of 5 being the worst (Very Poor) for the following question: "Considering all the ways your chronic pancreatitis affects you, how are you doing today?".
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12
Number of Participants With Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to 2 Points From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Chronic Pancreatitis
Patient's Global Assessment of Chronic Pancreatitis is a global evaluation that utilizes a 5-point Likert scale with a score of 1 being the best (Very Good) and a score of 5 being the worst (Very Poor) for the following question: "Considering all the ways your chronic pancreatitis affects you, how are you doing today?".
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 16
Number of Participants With Anti Drug Antibody
Measured: Baseline, Week 8, 16
Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS)
NIS: 74-item questionnaire assesses muscle weakness, reflexes and sensation; scored separately for left, right limbs (37 items for each side). Components of muscle weakness (hip and knee flexion, hip and knee extension, ankle dorsiflexors, ankle plantar flexors, toe extensors, toe flexors) scored on scale 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score=greater weakness. Components of reflexes (quadriceps femoris, triceps surae) and sensation (touch pressure, pin-prick, vibration, joint position) scored 0 = normal, 1= decreased, or 2 = absent. Total possible NIS score range 0-244, higher score=greater impairment.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reaction
Assessment of the injection site reactions were based on presence of erythema (redness), induration (swelling), ecchymosis (bruising), pruritus (itching) and pain that occurred after the injection had been administered (not related to pain of needle insertion).
Measured: Day 1 up to Week 16
Plasma Tanezumab Levels
Measured: Baseline (pre-dose), Week 2, 4, 8, 16
Serum Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Levels
Measured: Baseline (pre-dose), Week 8, 16
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Measured: Baseline up to 112 days after the dose of study medication (up to 113 days)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
Laboratory analysis included blood chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, pregnancy test, glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c levels) test and blood alcohol test.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula [QTcF], QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula [QTcB], RR intervals and heart rate) were analyzed for ECG abnormalities.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Study start13 Oct 2010
- Primary completion22 Mar 2011
- Study completion22 Mar 2011
Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic PancreatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01146561
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A4091044
- Other IDs
- 2010-019012-21, CHRONIC PANCREATITIS POC STUDY
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 24 May 2010
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC PANCREATITIS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01146561
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A4091044
- Conditions
- Chronic Pancreatitis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.
- Enrolment
- 2 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 13 Oct 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Mar 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Mar 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Mar 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Tanezumab is effective in reducing the pain associated with chronic pancreatitis.
Detailed description
On 23 Dec 2010 the FDA imposed a clinical halt for anti-NGF compounds due to safety reasons, ie, a case of osteonecrosis which occurred in relation to an anti-NGF compound of another company. All indications with the exception of Cancer Pain are affected resulting in termination of all studies in respective indications. Recruitment of Study A4091044 was stopped effective 27 Dec 2010. Two patients recruited so far did not receive further doses and were followed up for safety until LSLV on 22 Mar 2011.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumab 20 mg | Experimental | Biological: Tanezumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult male or female
- Written informed consent
- Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis based on imaging studies
- Persistent abdominal pain due to chronic pancreatitis
- Qualifying pain score during the pre-treatment period
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Pregnant women, lactating mothers, women suspected of being pregnant and women who wish to become pregnant during the course of the study
- Chronic pancreatitis as a complication of pancreatic cancer or acute pancreatic duct obstruction
- Pancreatic surgery, lithotripsy or endoscopist decompression within 3 months
- History of alcoholism (within 1 year of screening) or concurrent alcohol abuse
- History of cancer in the past years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tanezumabsingle administration of tanezumab 20 mg sub-cutaneously | Biological | Tanezumab 20 mg |
| Placebosingle administration of placebo to match tanezumab, sub-cutaneously | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Average Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score Over the Period From Week 1 to Week 8
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to 8
Daily average chronic pancreatitis pain is assessed with an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
16 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Average and Worst Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Worst Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score Over Week 1 to Week 8 Period
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to 8
Number of Participants With At Least 30 Percent (%), 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Average and Worst Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score
Time frame: Week 8
Number of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Average and Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score
Time frame: Week 8
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-sf) Average and Worst Pain Score at Week 8 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, 16
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (BPI-sf) Pain Interference Index and Pain Interference Score for General Activity, Walking Ability, Sleep and Normal Work at Week 8 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, 16
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Chronic Pancreatitis at Week 4, 8 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12
Number of Participants With Improvement of Greater Than or Equal to 2 Points From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Chronic Pancreatitis
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 16
Number of Participants With Anti Drug Antibody
Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, 16
Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS)
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 16
Number of Participants With Injection Site Reaction
Time frame: Day 1 up to Week 16
Plasma Tanezumab Levels
Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose), Week 2, 4, 8, 16
Serum Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) Levels
Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose), Week 8, 16
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 112 days after the dose of study medication (up to 113 days)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Chronic Pancreatitis
RecruitingPhase 1
Metabolic Impact of Pancreatic Duct Decompression
Chronic Pancreatitis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Food Effect of CBT-248 in Healthy Adult Participants
Chronic Pancreatitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
AI-Assisted Differentiation of Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer Using EUS: A Multicenter Ambispective Study
Autoimmune Pancreatitis, Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Comparative Study to Evaluate Microbial Versus Porcine Pancreatic Enzyme Therapy in Chronic Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis, Chronic, Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Of Effect Of Secretin For In Injection (Chirostim) On Pancreatic Fluid Composition In Healthy Subjects
Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency, Chronic Pancreatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tanezumab in people with Chronic Pancreatitis, run by Pfizer at 9 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Mar 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Average Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Intensity Score Over the Period From Week 1 to Week 8 (time frame: Baseline, Week 1 to 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.