AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureVALOR in HFNCT01144182

Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmission in Heart Failure

A study testing Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) in people with Heart Failure, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Heart failure (HF) greatly increases mortality and lowers quality of life (QOL). HF is the most common indication for readmission in older adults and the most frequent reason for 30-day readmission. Medications and restriction of dietary sodium constitute crucial therapy to lower HF recurrence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2010to Sep 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients admitted with either systolic or diastolic HF will be identified through ongoing daily prospective manual search of admission records in VA NYHHS
  • Men and women ( 21 years) being discharged after a HF admission will be eligible
  • They must have an available phone

Who cannot join

  • Patients with poor short-term survival (< 3 months)
  • recent major surgery (< 1 month)
  • planned discharge to a long-term-care facility
  • severe dementia or other serious psychiatric illness
  • temporarily in the area
  • those unable to provide consent, refusal to participate
  • logistic or discretionary reasons (including participation in another study) will be excluded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • VA New York Harbor Health Care System

    New York, New York, 10010

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: VALOR (Veterans Affairs Lowering Readmissions) in Heart Failure Study

Heart failure (HF) greatly increases mortality and lowers quality of life (QOL). HF is the most common indication for readmission in older adults and the most frequent reason for 30-day readmission. Medications and restriction of dietary sodium constitute crucial therapy to lower HF recurrence. However, adherence to medications and dietary recommendations is low in HF patients. Nonadherence is often due to an interaction among the environment, the patient and providers. In the VALOR in Heart Failure Study, we will assess a novel quality improvement program (QIP) to improve HF care using a pretest-posttest design. This interdisciplinary theory-based prospective experimental study will target improving HF treatment using patient-based behavioral and checklist intervention, as well as provider and system-targeted checklists and treatment defaults (posttest or intervention phase); this will be compared to current best practice (CBP) evaluated in the pretest (pretest or pre-intervention) phase. It is hypothesized that the QIP, which intervenes on patient, provider and system levels, will improve QOL and lower HF recurrence compared to CBP.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure (HF) greatly increases mortality and lowers quality of life (QOL). HF is the most common indication for readmission in older adults and the most frequent reason for 30-day readmission. Medications and restriction of dietary sodium constitute crucial therapy to lower HF recurrence. However, adherence to medications and dietary recommendations is low in HF patients. Nonadherence is often due to an interaction among the environment, the patient and providers. In the VALOR in Heart Failure Study, we will assess a novel quality improvement program (QIP) to improve HF care using a pretest-posttest design. This interdisciplinary theory-based prospective experimental study will target improving HF treatment using patient-based behavioral and checklist intervention, as well as provider and system-targeted checklists and treatment defaults (posttest or intervention phase); this will be compared to current best practice (CBP) evaluated in the pretest (pretest or pre-intervention) phase. It is hypothesized that the QIP, which intervenes on patient, provider and system levels, will improve QOL and lower HF recurrence compared to CBP.

The primary specific aims are 1) To test the effect of QIP on HF-specific quality of life compared to the CBP group, and 2) To evaluate the impact of QIP group on general quality of life compared to the CBP group.

Secondary specific aims are to:

  1. assess the effect of QIP on medication adherence at 3 months, 2) examine the effect of QIP on diet adherence at 3 months, and 3) evaluate the effect of QIP on satisfaction, and 4) assess the effect of QIP on intervention acceptability. We will also examine the impact of QIP at 3 months on keeping routine outpatient visits, health-care utilization, exercise capacity, weight, perceived stress, depression, cardiovascular events and deaths.

Exploratory aim is to examine the effect of the QIP on 30 day post-discharge HF readmission rates compared to CBP.

We have enrolled 136 veterans being discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of HF. Patients enrolled in the pretest phase will receive the HF management based on current best practice (CBP). Patients enrolled in the posttest phase receive the comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients. Data, including quality of life (QOL), medication adherence, and dietary adherence, will be collected from patients at baseline (prior to hospital discharge) and 3 months. Hospital readmissions, emergency room visits, and healthcare utilization will be tracked for 6 months. If, as expected, there are no differences in demographic or other confounders (EF, comorbidities, etc), the pretest and posttest groups will be compared by the Fisher's Exact test for discrete outcomes (30-day readmissions or ER visits). We will use the Student's ttest (two-tailed) for normally distributed outcomes and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for categorical variables and continuous variables not normally distributed.

This study will inform and enhance quality improvement efforts in heart failure care in VA New York Harbor and elsewhere. It will also provide data for a rigorous effectiveness trial to test this promising intervention that could reduce HF recurrence and improve QOL in HF. If this promising theory-driven approach can work in a clinical setting where improvements in HF care are so urgent, it will be an important scientific contribution.

Conditions
Heart Failure
Being tested
Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP)
Keywords
heart failure, quality of life, readmissions
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP)Behavioural

    Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) that intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.

Study groups in NCT01144182
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Current Best Practice (CBP)No interventionCBP received no intervention and only current best practices for inpatient HF care.
Quality improvement program (QIP)Active comparatorComprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) intervenes on patient, provider and system levels. The QIP will consist of 3 monthly phone calls to promote diet and medication adherence using the transtheoretical model as a behavioral framework and checklists to facilitate patients' self-monitoring of their diet, physical activity, weight and medication taking. Further, providers during the posttest phase will use checklists for inpatient and outpatient care of HF patients.
Receives: Behavioral: Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. General Quality of Life From the Standardized Physical Component Score

    Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  2. Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life

    Measured by Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Scores range from 0-105, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Standardized Mental Component Score

    Assesses General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  2. Physical Functioning

    Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  3. Role Physical

    Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  4. Pain Index

    Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  5. General Health

    Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  6. Vitality

    Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  7. Social Functioning

    Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  8. Role Emotional

    Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  9. Mental Health

    Subscale of General Quality of Life from VR-36, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher score indicating better quality of life

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  10. Physical Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life

    Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure). Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

  11. Emotional Subscale of Heart Failure Specific Quality of Life

    Subscale of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-specific quality of life measure). Scores range from 0-25, with higher scores indicating poorer QOL.

    Measured: 3 months after discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2010
  3. Primary completionJul 2013
  4. Study completionSep 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01144182
Sponsor's protocol ID
RRP 09-412
Acronym
VALOR in HF
Status last verified
Aug 2015
First submitted
10 Jun 2010
Last updated
16 Oct 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Comprehensive quality improvement program (QIP) in people with Heart Failure, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

General Quality of Life From the Standardized Physical Component Score (time frame: 3 months after discharge). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in