AzTrials
AzTrials

Adverse EventsNCT01128127

Strategies for Improving Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) Prescription Associated to Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

A study testing Group education, audit-feedback and computer support and Audit-feedback and computer support in people with Adverse Events, run by Servicio Canario de Salud at 1 site in Spain.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background Despite the low prevalence of serious complications associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use, there is a widespread use of gastroprotective proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in order to prevent adverse effects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Adverse Events
What is being tested?
Group education, audit-feedback and computer support and Audit-feedback and computer support
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Jan 2013to Jun 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Primary care physicians

Who cannot join

  • Participating as a subject in any other clinical research study
  • Have received any other intervention on the subject within the last 6 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Servicio de Evaluación. Servicio Canario de Salud

    Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38004

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Strategies for Improving Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) Prescription for Gastropathy Prevention Due to Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in Primary Health Care

Background

Despite the low prevalence of serious complications associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use, there is a widespread use of gastroprotective proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in order to prevent adverse effects. Inappropriate prescribing of PPIs includes overprescribing for inappropriate indications and the misuse of first choice in their class in terms of efficacy, safety and cost. A series of recommendations, based on the best available scientific evidence, has been established to justify prophylaxis with PPIs associated to NSAIDs. Therefore, there is the need to encourage the incorporation of this knowledge to guide decisions of physicians with the objective of improving patient health and sustainability of the Public Health Service. Although since long ago there is a great concern regarding rational use of drugs, the available evidence for the most appropriate strategies to improve prescribing is scarce. Passive dissemination of research findings are generally ineffective and at best result in small changes in practice. Multifaceted intervention targeting different barriers to change are more likely to be effective than single intervention.

Read more

Objectives

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two educational multifaceted strategies aimed at improving PPIs prescription associated to NSAIDs use in primary care. We will also compare the cost-effectiveness of such strategies.

Hypothesis

It is hypothesized that a quality improvement intervention directed to primary care physicians will decrease inappropriate PPIs prescriptions associated to NSAIDs prescription.

Methodology

A three-arm prospective quasi-randomized controlled trial will test the effectiveness of two strategies for improving PPI prescription associated to NSAID in primary care context. Three of the Canary Islands will be selected and randomized to either a experimental multifaceted intervention (group education+audit-feedback+CCDSS) group, a experimental multifaceted intervention (audit-feedback+CCDSS) group, or a control group (usual intervention). From each of these islands, 6-8 primary care centers will be randomly selected to received the intervention practices. All family physicians working at each randomly selected primary care center were mandatorily included. Primary outcome measure is reduction of inappropriate PPI prescription. The efficacy of the intervention will be examined within a 3, 6 and a 12 month follow up.

Conditions
Adverse Events
Being tested
Group education, audit-feedback and computer support, Audit-feedback and computer support, Control
Keywords
knowledge translation, prescription, primary care, NSAID, PPI, Gastrointestinal damage, Inappropriate prescription

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Group education, audit-feedback and computer supportBehavioural

    Psycho-educational group workshop: two theory-practice sessions on both evidence-based guidelines on PPI-NSAID prescription and communication and negotiation skills to deal with patients. All participants will fill out an initial questionnaire concerning prescribing patterns and barriers to appropriate prescription. All attendees will be given a reminder printed material designed to give the necessary information in a brief fashion and for maximal visual impact.

    Audit-Feedback: participants will receive, monthly and by e-mail, an individualized report with data of their own appropriate/inappropriate PPI prescriptions and avoidable costs.

    CCDSS: interactive computer program designed to assist physicians with decision making when prescribing PPI associated to NSAID. It consists in pop-up alert screens that aim to influence prescription choice according to each patient characteristics and evidence-based clinical guidelines.

  • Audit-feedback and computer supportBehavioural

    Audit-Feedback: participants will receive, monthly and by e-mail, an individualized report with data of their own appropriate/inappropriate PPI prescriptions and avoidable costs

    CCDSS: interactive computer program designed to assist physicians with decision making when prescribing PPI associated to NSAID. It consists in pop-up alert screens that aim to influence prescription choice according to each patient characteristics and evidence-based clinical guidelines.

  • ControlBehavioural

    Usual intervention includes:

    Compulsory attendance both to courses (10-12 hours) and to short sessions (around 30 min.) on the rational use of drugs held in groups and during working hours. Each primary care physician attends to 1-2 courses and 3-4 short sessions per year.

    Every three months, physicians receive a feedback paper with information on his/her own prescribing overall costs comparing to his/her primary care center average cost.

    Distribution of a printed booklet of recommendations, delivered personally or through mass mailings, on the prescribing of PPI-NSAID.

Study groups in NCT01128127
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Multifaceted intervention 1Experimentalpsycho-educational workshop + audit-feedback + computer-based clinical decision support system (CCDSS) + usual intervention
Receives: Behavioral: Group education, audit-feedback and computer support
Multifaceted intervention 2Experimentalaudit-feedback + computer-based clinical decision support system (CCDSS) + usual intervention
Receives: Behavioral: Audit-feedback and computer support
ControlActive comparatorusual intervention
Receives: Behavioral: Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of inappropriate PPI prescriptions

    Change in the proportion of inappropriate PPI prescription associated with NSAID prescription

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionNov 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01128127
Sponsor's protocol ID
PI 43 08
Status last verified
Sep 2012
First submitted
20 May 2010
Last updated
14 Sep 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Group education, audit-feedback and computer support and Audit-feedback and computer support in people with Adverse Events, run by Servicio Canario de Salud at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of inappropriate PPI prescriptions (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in