AzTrials
AzTrials

EpilepsyPhase 4NCT01118455

Trial to Assess Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy vs. Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) Treatment in Children With Refractory Seizures

A Phase 4 study testing Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy and Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) in people with Epilepsy, run by Cyberonics, Inc. at 19 sites in 5 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized study designed to compare long-term treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with refractory seizures treated with VNS (Vagus Nerve Stimulation) Therapy versus anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Seizure reduction, quality of life measures, and side effect profiles will be evaluated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Epilepsy
What is being tested?
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy and Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
134 participants
Where
19 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
Oct 2004to Jan 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Refractory seizures
  • Having tried at least two appropriate anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 have been tolerated at normal dose;
  • Having at least 3 appropriate AEDs left to try
  • Having his/her current AED medication at an optimal dose at baseline
  • At least three seizures per month (average over 2 months prior to admission), excluding absences.
  • No more than four (4) weeks between seizures (over 2 months prior to admission)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Age 17 years or less
  • Having been evaluated for epilepsy surgery and resective surgery not felt indicated or patient/parents/legal guardian declined.
  • Patient is a male or patient is a nonpregnant female adequately protected from conception. Females of childbearing potential must use an acceptable method of birth control. Abstinence is an acceptable means of birth control
  • Patient or legal guardian understands study procedures and has voluntarily signed an informed consent in accordance with institutional policies.

Who cannot join

  • Having tried less then 2 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 have been tolerated at normal doses in the patient's lifetime
  • A progressive neurological condition (e.g. brain tumor etc.)
  • Inability of the parents or reluctance of the child to comply with the frequency of clinic visits during the treatment phase
  • Patient has a history of noncompliance for seizure diary completion.
  • Patient has taken an investigational drug within a period of five times the mean elimination half-life of the investigational drug plus two weeks.
  • Patient is currently using another investigational device or drug.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Patient is likely to require a whole body Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after VNS Therapy device implantation. (Refer to the Physician's Manual for the NCP Generator for additional information on the use of MRI.)
  • Patient is currently receiving or likely to receive short-wave diathermy, microwave diathermy, or therapeutic ultrasound diathermy after implantation (Refer to Physician's Manual for the VNS (Vagus Nerve Stimulation) Therapy device for additional information on the contraindicated use of diathermy).
  • Patient was previously enrolled in this or any other VNS Therapy device Study.
  • Patient has an active peptic ulcer
  • Patient has another unstable medical condition likely to precipitate seizures and make it difficult to evaluate to evaluate efficacy (e.g. diabetes)
  • Patient has had a unilateral or bilateral cervical vagotomy.
  • Patient is pregnant at the time of enrolment.

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 5 countries.

19 sites in 5 countries

United Kingdom12 sites
  • Birmingham Children's Hospital

    Birmingham

  • Royal Hospital for Sick Children

    Bristol

  • Addenbrookes Hospital

    Cambridge

  • Ninewells Hospital & Medical School

    Dundee

  • Leeds General Infirmary

    Leeds

  • Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children

    London

  • King's College Hospital

    London

  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital

    Manchester

  • Sir James Spence Institute - Royal Victoria Infirmary

    Newcastle

  • Queens's Medical Centre Nottingham

    Nottingham

  • Sheffield Children's Hospital

    Sheffield

  • Southampton Hospital

    Southampton

Other trials in United Kingdom

Sweden3 sites
  • University Hospital Lund

    Lund

  • Astrid Lindgrens Barnsjukhus Karolinska

    Stockholm

  • Uppsala University Hospital

    Uppsala

Other trials in Sweden

Germany2 sites
  • Kinderklinik der Justus-Liebig Universität

    Giessen

  • University Children's Hospital

    Lübeck

Other trials in Germany

Austria1 site
  • Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital (AKH)

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Belgium1 site
  • ULB- Hospital Erasme

    Brussels

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: An Open Randomized Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Versus New Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) Treatment in Children With Refractory Seizures

This is a randomized study designed to compare long-term treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with refractory seizures treated with VNS (Vagus Nerve Stimulation) Therapy versus anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Seizure reduction, quality of life measures, and side effect profiles will be evaluated. The results of this study will provide controlled comparative data to better guide physicians in determining the best overall treatment strategy for patients with seizures who have failed initial AED therapy.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized, parallel group, multi-center study. Screening Visit (visit 1) Subjects, parents, and the investigator signed and dated the informed consent after which subject eligibility was checked. Eligible subjects were entered in the baseline period.

Baseline Period (between visits 1 and 2) Eligible subjects entered an 8-week baseline period during which a seizure count was done. During this period, subjects and caregivers were contacted on a regular basis to ensure up to date information collection.

At the end of the baseline period, subjects who continued to be eligible were stratified based on previous therapy history (Early: previously treated with 2 to 5 AEDs versus Non-early: previously treated with >5 AEDs). Within each stratification, the investigator randomized each subject to receive one of the 2 treatments (VNS Therapy treatment or AED treatment) at the end of visit 2 using a randomization schedule provided by an independent third party (Synergos).

Implantation/AED Treatment Initiation (visit 3) For subjects randomized to the AED arm, a new AED treatment was initiated and gradually increased to an effective dose in accordance with the investigator's discretion and the manufacturer's suggested guidelines.

Subjects randomized to the VNS treatment arm were implanted with the VNS Therapy System and allowed adequate surgical recovery according to usual clinical practice before initiation of treatment. A delay of 2 weeks between the end of the baseline period and surgery was authorized to allow practical organization of the implantation. Extension of this period was approved in advance by the Study Director or his delegate.

Treatment Ramp-up (between visits 3 and 4) This ramp-up period for both AEDs and VNS may have taken up to 9 weeks, ending at visit 4. Additional visits were scheduled outside of the study protocol to adequately accommodate Treatment Ramp-up as needed. Initiation of treatments as well as the ramp-up schedule was documented in the Case Report Forms.

Study Treatment Period The Study Treatment Period was 12 months (52 weeks) following visit 3 and including Treatment Ramp-up. Because this study was designed to compare the natural course of treatment, changes in the study AED dose (for the AED group) or VNS stimulation parameters (for the VNS Therapy group) were allowed as clinically indicated during the Study Treatment Period. The protocol allowed approximately a 10% increase in baseline AED to allow for an increase in growth of the patient in the VNS arm.

Study End At the end of the study, subjects in the AED group who had not had significant improvement after all study assessments were completed were offered a VNS device implantation. Subjects in the VNS arm who had not had adequate improvement were evaluated for AED treatment.

Number of Subjects: Approximately 400 subjects were to be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either AED or VNS treatment strata. Strata were to be according the AED treatment history (Early subjects were previously treated and failed treatment with 2 to 5 AEDs, Non-early subjects were treated and failed treatment with >5 AEDs). At least 15 study sites were to enroll subjects. Initially, only United Kingdom (UK) sites were to be selected. During the course of the trial, an extension was used to add non-UK centers.

A total of 151 subjects underwent screening prior to enrollment. Eight failed screening, and 143 went on to be randomized. Of those randomized, 8 subjects (4 in each of the treatment groups) were not treated. One patient in the VNS arm was explanted prior to initiation of device stimulation, so they were excluded. Therefore, 134 subjects were treated (ITT population): 65 were implanted with the VNS system and 69 were treated with AED. Nineteen investigational sites in the UK, Austria, Belgium, Germany, and Sweden participated in this study and enrolled subjects.

Study Duration: The maximum study follow-up was approximately 14 months from enrollment to study exit. The study was terminated due to insufficient enrollment prior to reaching the 400 subjects as specified in the protocol. After 4.5 years of enrollment, the Sponsor terminated enrollment and followed the remaining subjects out to the 52 week follow-up visit.

Conditions
Epilepsy
Being tested
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy, Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)
Medical subject headings
Epilepsy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) TherapyDevice

    Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control.

  • Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)Drug

    Subject has tried at least 2 appropriate AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 had been tolerated at normal doses.

Study groups in NCT01118455
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) TherapyExperimentalVagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control.
Receives: Device: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy
Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)ExperimentalThis arm will supply a comparison between VNS and new AEDs which is necessary to determine an overall treatment regimen for the 30% to 40% of patients who fail to respond to 2 AEDs.
Receives: Drug: Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Responders After 1 Year of Follow-up (ITT-population)

    Responders are subjects who had no new AEDs added or significant dose changes in baseline AEDs within 1 year of follow-up, along with a reduction in the percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline to the 2-month period prior to the 1-year follow-up of at least 50%.

    Measured: 52 weeks post baseline

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Mean Percent Change in Hague Seizure Severity Scale Score (ITT Population)

    The Hague Seizure Severity Assessment (Carpay et al. 1996) is a scale completed by the patient and/or caregiver to assess the severity and post-ictal recovery of seizures. A reduction in the HSSA score reflects less seizure severity experienced.

    Measured: 52 weeks post baseline

  2. Wellcome Quality of Life Assessment (Questionnaire A) in Epilepsy (ITT Population)

    Calculate changes in the Wellcome Quality of Life Assessment (Parker et al. 1999) (Questionnaire A) for patients in both treatment arms (AED and VNS) at 52 weeks after randomization compared to baseline. The higher the quality of life score the better the quality of life experienced.

    An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model will be used to adjust for baseline variables (including QoL score) when comparing the two treatment groups. A two-sample t-test will be used for simple comparison QoL change from baseline.

    Total range for this scale is a minimum score of 81 to a maximum score of 336. There are no applicable subscales.

    Measured: 52 weeks post baseline

  3. Hague Restriction in Childhood Epilepsy Scale (Questionnaire B) (ITT Population)

    Calculate changes in the Hague Restriction in Childhood Epilepsy scale (Carpay et al. 1997) (Questionnaire B) for patients in both treatment arms (AED and VNS) at 52 weeks after randomization compared to baseline. The higher the quality of life score the better the quality of life experienced.

    An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model will be used to adjust for baseline variables (including QoL score) when comparing the two treatment groups. A two-sample t-test will be used for simple comparison QoL change from baseline.

    Total range for this scale is a minimum score of 10 to a maximum score of 40. There are no applicable subscales.

    Measured: 52 weeks post baseline

  4. Mean Percent Change in Seizure Frequency (ITT Population)

    The mean percent change in seizure frequency for the VNS and AED treatment groups at 52 weeks post baseline.

    Both AED and VNS treatment groups were stratified according to the patients' number of previous AED treatments ("early group" had 2 to 5 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of target range; "non-early group" had more than 5 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of target range). Seizure frequency was calculated based on number of patient/caregiver reported seizures at 52-week post baseline (percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline to the 2-month period prior to the 1-year follow-up of at least 50%). All seizures were counted.

    The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm.

    Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population.

    Measured: 52 weeks post baseline

  5. Number of Subjects With Any Non-Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Population)

    To compare the safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) treatment using the VNS Therapy device to anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy in treating patients with seizures.

    The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm.

    Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population.

    Measured: 0-52 weeks

  6. Number of Subjects With Any Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class & Preferred Term (Safety Population)

    To compare the safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) treatment using the VNS Therapy device to anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy in treating patients with seizures.

    The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm.

    Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population.

    Measured: 0-52 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2004
  3. Primary completionDec 2009
  4. Study completionJan 2010

Why it stopped: Insufficient enrollment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
134 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01118455
Sponsor's protocol ID
Epilepsy (E)-06
Status last verified
Jun 2014
First submitted
5 May 2010
Last updated
26 Jun 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy and Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) in people with Epilepsy, run by Cyberonics, Inc. at 19 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jun 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Austria, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jun 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Responders After 1 Year of Follow-up (ITT-population) (time frame: 52 weeks post baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jun 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in