AttitudeP4PNCT01116960
How do Attitude About Pay for Performance Differ Among Different Anesthesia Care Provider and Over Time
An observational study of Attitude, run by University of Oklahoma at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators hypothesize that common objections to P4P relate to potential loss of autonomy or concerns about adverse effects on patient care. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 24 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Attitude
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2007to Mar 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 24 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: anesthesia care providers
Who may be able to join
- All anesthesia care providers in the department
Who cannot join
- locum faculty members and CRNAs
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Univeristy of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Dept. Anesthesiology
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Univeristy of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
About this study
Official title: How do Attitute About Pay for Performance Differ Among Different Anesthesia Care Provider and Over Time
The investigators hypothesize that common objections to P4P relate to potential loss of autonomy or concerns about adverse effects on patient care.
Read the detailed description
We seek to establish baseline attitudes about Pay for Performance (P4P) in the OUHSC Dept of Anesthesiology and determine what differences exist between faculty, CRNAs and residents. We plan to resurvey annually to determine if attitudes change as the department implements a P4P program. We hope that by understanding the attitudes of anesthesia care providers, we can alleviate their concerns. We hope to account for their concerns as we develop and modify our P4P program. We believe that acceptance of the general idea of P4P is important if individuals are to maintain job satisfaction.
- Conditions
- Attitude
- Keywords
- P4P
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Faculty; MD | Full time Faculty members working with the Department | |
| CRNAs | Full time CRNAs working within the department | |
| Residents | Residents working within the department |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2007
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMar 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AttitudeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oklahoma
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pamela Roberts, MD, Principal investigator, University of Oklahoma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01116960
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13878
- Acronym
- P4P
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 3 May 2010
- Last updated
- 4 May 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- How do Attitute About Pay for Performance Differ Among Different Anesthesia Care Provider and Over Time
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01116960
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P4P / 13878
- Conditions
- Attitude
- Keywords
- P4P
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OklahomaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2007
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators hypothesize that common objections to P4P relate to potential loss of autonomy or concerns about adverse effects on patient care.
Detailed description
We seek to establish baseline attitudes about Pay for Performance (P4P) in the OUHSC Dept of Anesthesiology and determine what differences exist between faculty, CRNAs and residents. We plan to resurvey annually to determine if attitudes change as the department implements a P4P program. We hope that by understanding the attitudes of anesthesia care providers, we can alleviate their concerns. We hope to account for their concerns as we develop and modify our P4P program. We believe that acceptance of the general idea of P4P is important if individuals are to maintain job satisfaction.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Faculty; MD | – | –Full time Faculty members working with the Department |
| CRNAs | – | –Full time CRNAs working within the department |
| Residents | – | –Residents working within the department |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 24 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- anesthesia care providers
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All anesthesia care providers in the department
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- locum faculty members and CRNAs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Attitude
Active, not recruiting
A Multilevel Intervention to Improve Adherence to Childhood Cancer Survivorship
Childhood Cancer, Survivorship
Active, not recruiting
Engaging Adolescents in Decisions About Return of Genomic Research Results
Genetic Screening, Adolescent
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
What Should we Measure? A Qualitative Interview Study on Outcomes for Evaluating AI-assisted Medical Image Interpretation.
Artificial Intelligence Perception and Attitude
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Immersive VR, Non-Immersive VR, and 3D-Printed Models on Anatomy Learning and Cognitive Load
Healthy, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Enrolling by invitation
Attitudes, Experience and Adaptation to Family Presence in the ICU
ICU Staff Attitudes Toward Family Presence, ICU Staff Experience of Family Presence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pamela Roberts, MD principal investigator
University of Oklahoma
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Attitude, run by University of Oklahoma at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.