AzTrials
AzTrials

Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseNCT01110811

Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Versus Sham for Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

A study testing Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hiatal Hernia, run by EndoGastric Solutions at 4 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study objective is to evaluate the relative merits, safety and effectiveness of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dependent GERD patients compared with sham procedure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
4 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Apr 2010to Dec 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-80 years
  • On daily PPIs for > 6 months
  • Documented PPI dependency
  • Persistent GERD symptoms without PPI therapy during the titration phase of the study
  • Evidence of two or more of the following while off PPI therapy (> 10 days):
  • Erosive esophagitis (Los Angeles grade A-C)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Abnormal ambulatory pH study
  • Moderate to severe GERD symptoms
  • Normal or near normal esophageal motility (by manometry)
  • Patient willing to cooperate with post-operative dietary recommendations and assessment tests
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • BMI > 35
  • Hiatal hernia > 3 cm
  • Esophagitis LA grade D
  • Esophageal ulcer
  • Esophageal stricture
  • Barretts esophagus (Prague: C>1, M>2)
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Esophageal motility disorder
  • Severe gastric paralysis
  • Pregnancy or plans for pregnancy in the next 12 months
  • Immunosuppression
  • ASA > 2
  • Portal hypertension and/or varices
  • History of previous resective gastric or esophageal surgery, cervical spine fusion, Zenker's diverticulum, esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum, achalasia, scleroderma or dermatomyositis, eosinophilic esophagitis, or cirrhosis
  • Active gastro-duodenal ulcer disease
  • Gastric outlet obstruction or stenosis
  • Severe gastroparesis or delayed gastric emptying confirmed by solid-phase gastric emptying study if patient complains of postprandial satiety during assessment
  • Coagulation disorders

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 3 countries.

4 sites in 3 countries

Sweden2 sites
  • Karolinska University, Ersta Hospital

    Stockholm

  • Karolinska University, Huddinge Hospital

    Stockholm

Other trials in Sweden

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospitals Leuven

    Leuven

Other trials in Belgium

France1 site
  • University of Nantes Hospital

    Nantes

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Using EsophyX With Sham Procedure for the Treatment of PPI Dependent GERD: the TIF vs. Sham Study

The study objective is to evaluate the relative merits, safety and effectiveness of transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dependent GERD patients compared with sham procedure.

Read the detailed description

Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: The proportion of patients in clinical remission after 6 months (without being classified as treatment failure).

Secondary Effectiveness: PPI consumption, esophageal acid exposure, reduction in QOLRAD and GSRS scores and healing of reflux esophagitis.

Being tested
Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF)
Keywords
GERD, Esophagitis, Fundoplication, Anti-reflux surgery, PPI dependent
Medical subject headings
Gastroesophageal Reflux, Hernia, Hiatal, Esophagitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF)Procedure or surgery

    The TIF procedure results in the creation of an esophago-gastric fundoplication extending up to 4 cm above the Z-line and 270 degress around the esophagus.

Study groups in NCT01110811
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TIF procedureActive comparatorTransoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF)
Receives: Procedure: Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF)
Sham procedureSham comparatorThe intervention on the Sham procedure consisted of an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, or EGD.(esophagogastricduodenoscopy).
Receives: Procedure: Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients in clinical remission

    Fifty nine per cent of patients remained in clinical remission

    Measured: at 6 month follow-up

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Reduction in symptoms

    GSRS score improved from 14 (range 10-21) to 10 (range 6-19) with P = 0.004.

    Measured: at 6 moths follow-up

  2. Normalized esophageal acid exposure

    Sixty nine per cent of patients (69%) in TIF surgical arm normalized esophageal acid exposure.

    Measured: at 6 months follow-up

  3. Healed reflux esophagitis

    In 80% of patients healing of esophagitis was observed

    Measured: at 6 months follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Apr 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01110811
Sponsor's protocol ID
D2009-10
Status last verified
Mar 2019
First submitted
23 Apr 2010
Last updated
6 Mar 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Hakansson B, Montgomery M, Cadiere GB, Rajan A, Bruley des Varannes S, Lerhun M, Coron E, Tack J, Bischops R, Thorell A, Arnelo U, Lundell L. Randomised clinical trial: transoral incisionless fundoplication vs. sham intervention to control chronic GERD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Dec;42(11-12):1261-70. doi: 10.1111/apt.13427. Epub 2015 Oct 13.

    PubMed 26463242

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Hiatal Hernia, run by EndoGastric Solutions at 4 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Sweden, Belgium, France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients in clinical remission (time frame: at 6 month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01110811, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in