Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 3NCT01098539
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes With Renal Impairment.
A Phase 3 study testing albiglutide and sitagliptin in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 218 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a weekly dose of albiglutide as compared with sitagliptin. Subjects who are renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and whose glycemia is inadequately controlled on their current regimen of diet… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- albiglutide and sitagliptin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 507 participants
- Where
- 218 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- May 2010to Nov 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is experiencing inadequate glycemic control on their current regime of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, TZD, SU, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications
- BMI >/=20 kg/m2 and </=45 kg/m2
- Fasting C-peptide >/=0.8 ng/mL (>/=0.26 nmol/L)
- HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.0%, inclusive.
Who cannot join
- History of cancer
- History of treated diabetic gastroparesis
- Current biliary disease or history of pancreatitis
- History of significant gastrointestinal surgery
- Recent clinically significant cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease
- History of human immunodeficiency virus infection
Show all 10Show fewer
- Abnormal liver function or acute symptomatic infection with hepatitis B or hepatitis C
- Female subject is pregnant (confirmed by laboratory testing), lactating, or <6 weeks postpartum
- Known allergy to any GLP 1 analogue, sitagliptin, other study medications' excipients, excipients of albiglutide, or Baker's yeast
- Receipt of any investigational drug or sitagliptin within the 30 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, before Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months before randomization or receipt of albiglutide in previous studies
Trial locations and contacts
218 sites in 15 countries.
218 sites in 15 countries
United States121 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alexandria, Louisiana, 71301
GSK Investigational Site
Altoona, Pennsylvania, 16602
GSK Investigational Site
Arlington, Texas, 76011
GSK Investigational Site
Arlington, Texas, 76014
GSK Investigational Site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28801
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30312
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
GSK Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30909
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78751
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78758
GSK Investigational Site
Bangor, Maine, 04401
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
GSK Investigational Site
Blue Ridge, Georgia, 30513
GSK Investigational Site
Bountiful, Utah, 84010
GSK Investigational Site
Bristol, Tennessee, 37620
GSK Investigational Site
Burke, Virginia, 22015
GSK Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29412
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75224
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75231
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75251
GSK Investigational Site
Dearborn, Michigan, 48124
GSK Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30032
GSK Investigational Site
Deer Park, Texas, 77536
GSK Investigational Site
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
GSK Investigational Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48235
GSK Investigational Site
Doral, Florida, 33172
GSK Investigational Site
Downington, Pennsylvania, 19335
GSK Investigational Site
Flint, Michigan, 48504
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
GSK Investigational Site
Franklin, Tennessee, 37067
GSK Investigational Site
Fresno, California, 93720
GSK Investigational Site
Gallipolis, Ohio, 45631
GSK Investigational Site
Grapevine, Texas, 76051
GSK Investigational Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
GSK Investigational Site
Gulf Shores, Alabama, 36542
GSK Investigational Site
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77027
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77036
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77070
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77074
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77081
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77088
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77099
GSK Investigational Site
Humble, Texas, 77338
GSK Investigational Site
Huntington Beach, California, 92648
GSK Investigational Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
GSK Investigational Site
Hurst, North Carolina, 76054
GSK Investigational Site
Hurst, Texas, 76054
GSK Investigational Site
Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782
GSK Investigational Site
Irving, Texas, 75039
GSK Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32205
GSK Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
GSK Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64128
GSK Investigational Site
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37923
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89103
GSK Investigational Site
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90017
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90022
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90073
GSK Investigational Site
Los Gatos, California, 95032
GSK Investigational Site
Manassas, Virginia, 20110
GSK Investigational Site
Medford, Oregon, 97501
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
GSK Investigational Site
Miami Beach, Florida, 33141
GSK Investigational Site
Midland, Texas, 79707
GSK Investigational Site
Mission, Kansas, 66202
GSK Investigational Site
New Port Richey, Florida, 34653
GSK Investigational Site
Norfolk, Virginia, 23510
GSK Investigational Site
North Massapequa, New York, 11758
GSK Investigational Site
North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29582
GSK Investigational Site
North Richland Hills, Texas, 76180
GSK Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73103
GSK Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
GSK Investigational Site
Orange, California, 92868
GSK Investigational Site
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003
GSK Investigational Site
Pearland, Texas, 77584
GSK Investigational Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33028
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19146
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85028
GSK Investigational Site
Plano, Texas, 75075
GSK Investigational Site
Plantation, Florida, 33322
GSK Investigational Site
Richardson, Texas, 75080
GSK Investigational Site
Roswell, Georgia, 30076
GSK Investigational Site
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, 48081
GSK Investigational Site
Salem, Virginia, 24153
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78217
GSK Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92120
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92161
GSK Investigational Site
San Dimas, California, 91773
GSK Investigational Site
Schertz, Texas, 78154
GSK Investigational Site
Shelby, North Carolina, 28150
GSK Investigational Site
South Burlington, Vermont, 05403
GSK Investigational Site
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01107
GSK Investigational Site
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
GSK Investigational Site
Staten Island, New York, 10301
GSK Investigational Site
Stone Mountain, Georgia, 30088
GSK Investigational Site
Sugarland, Texas, 77479
GSK Investigational Site
Tabor City, North Carolina, 28463
GSK Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33613
GSK Investigational Site
Tarzana, California, 91356
GSK Investigational Site
Taylor, Michigan, 48180
GSK Investigational Site
Taylors, South Carolina, 29687
GSK Investigational Site
Tomball, Texas, 77375
GSK Investigational Site
Toney, Alabama, 35773
GSK Investigational Site
Tullahoma, Tennessee, 37398
GSK Investigational Site
Valparaiso, Indiana, 46383
GSK Investigational Site
West Hills, California, 91307
GSK Investigational Site
Whittier, California, 90602
GSK Investigational Site
Whittier, California, 90603
GSK Investigational Site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
GSK Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
GSK Investigational Site
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
GSK Investigational Site
Winter Park, Florida, 32792
India13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Ahmedabad, 380015
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560 010
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560 054
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560043
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560052
GSK Investigational Site
Bangalore, 560078
GSK Investigational Site
Belagavi, 590001
GSK Investigational Site
Belagavi, 590010
GSK Investigational Site
Chennai, 600013
GSK Investigational Site
Lucknow, 226005
GSK Investigational Site
Manipal, 576104
GSK Investigational Site
Mumbai, 400 008
GSK Investigational Site
Nashik, 422013
Australia12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Auchenflower, Queensland, 4066
GSK Investigational Site
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
GSK Investigational Site
Caboolture, Queensland, 4510
GSK Investigational Site
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050
GSK Investigational Site
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
GSK Investigational Site
Fremantle, Western Australia, 6160
GSK Investigational Site
Garran, Australian Capital Territory, 2606
GSK Investigational Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3081
GSK Investigational Site
Herston, Queensland, 4029
GSK Investigational Site
Kippa-Ring, Queensland, 4021
GSK Investigational Site
Melbourne, Victoria, 3135
GSK Investigational Site
Parkville, Victoria, 3050
South Africa11 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4092
GSK Investigational Site
Houghton Estate, 2198
GSK Investigational Site
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2013
GSK Investigational Site
Johannesburg, Gauteng, 2193
GSK Investigational Site
Lenasia, Gauteng, 1827
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, KwaZulu-Natal, 4068
GSK Investigational Site
Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, 6014
GSK Investigational Site
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0084
GSK Investigational Site
Pretoria, 0002
GSK Investigational Site
Somerset West, 07129
GSK Investigational Site
Tygerberg, 7505
United Kingdom9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, B9 5SS
GSK Investigational Site
Coventry, West Midlands, CV2 2DX
GSK Investigational Site
Hertfordshire
GSK Investigational Site
Hull, HU3 2RW
GSK Investigational Site
Liverpool, L9 7AL
GSK Investigational Site
Livingston, EH54 6PP
GSK Investigational Site
London, SE1 9NH
GSK Investigational Site
Plymouth, PL6 8BX
GSK Investigational Site
Swansea, SA6 6NL
Peru8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Arequipa, Arequipa, 54
GSK Investigational Site
Callao, Lima, Callao 2
GSK Investigational Site
Ica, Ica, 11
GSK Investigational Site
Lima, Lima Province, 01
GSK Investigational Site
Lima, Lima Province, 17
GSK Investigational Site
Lima, Lima 1
GSK Investigational Site
Piura, Piura
GSK Investigational Site
Trujillo
Israel7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Ashkelon, 78278
GSK Investigational Site
Beersheba, 84101
GSK Investigational Site
Haifa, 31096
GSK Investigational Site
Haifa, 35251
GSK Investigational Site
Holon, 58100
GSK Investigational Site
Kfar Saba, 44281
GSK Investigational Site
Safed, 13110
Spain7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
A Coruña, 15006
GSK Investigational Site
Alicante, 03114
GSK Investigational Site
Málaga, 29010
GSK Investigational Site
Palma de Mallorca, 07014
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
GSK Investigational Site
Seville, 41003
GSK Investigational Site
Torrevieja (Alicante), 03186
South Korea6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Seongnam-si, 463712
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 135-720
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 136-705
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 137-701
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 139-872
GSK Investigational Site
Suwon, Kyonggi-do, 443-721
Germany5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bad Lauterberg im Harz, Lower Saxony, 37431
GSK Investigational Site
Bad Nauheim, Hesse, 61231
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, State of Berlin, 10115
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
GSK Investigational Site
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55116
Philippines5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Cebu City, 6000
GSK Investigational Site
Iloilo City, 5000
GSK Investigational Site
Makati City, 1218
GSK Investigational Site
Pasay, 1300
GSK Investigational Site
Tagbilaran City, 6300
Brazil4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Brasília, 71625-009
GSK Investigational Site
Mogi das Cruzes, 08780 - 090
GSK Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-170
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05302-001
Russia4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Nizhny Novgorod, 603126
GSK Investigational Site
Saratov, 410030
GSK Investigational Site
St'Petersburg, 194156
GSK Investigational Site
Yaroslavl, 150062
Colombia3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Barrangquilla
GSK Investigational Site
Bogotá, 110221
GSK Investigational Site
Floridablanca-Santander
Taiwan3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City, 833
GSK Investigational Site
Taichung, 404
GSK Investigational Site
Tainan, 71044
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide as Compared With Sitagliptin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Renal Impairment
This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a weekly dose of albiglutide as compared with sitagliptin. Subjects who are renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and whose glycemia is inadequately controlled on their current regimen of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications will be recruited into the study.
Read the detailed description
This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 2 parallel-group, multicenter study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a weekly subcutaneously injected dose of albiglutide as compared with sitagliptin. Subjects who are renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and whose glycemia is inadequately controlled on their current regimen of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications will be recruited into the study.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- albiglutide, sitagliptin
- Keywords
- sitagliptin, albiglutide, renal impairment
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Renal Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
albiglutideBiological
albiglutide weekly subcutaneous injection + sitagliptin matching placebo
sitagliptinDrug
albiglutide matching placebo + sitagliptin (25mg, 50mg or 100mg depending on level of renal impairment)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| albiglutide | Active comparator | albiglutide weekly subcutaneous injection + sitagliptin matching placebo Receives: Biological: albiglutide |
| sitagliptin | Active comparator | albiglutide matching placebo + sitagliptin Receives: Drug: sitagliptin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 26 minus the value at Baseline. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (<65 years versus >=65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Measured: Baseline; Week 26
Secondary outcomes (15)
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The Observed Cases (OC) method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is define as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline FPG + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region.
Measured: Baseline; Week 26
Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were analyzed in a particular treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCF
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., the number of participants who achieved HbA1c <7% and <6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Measured: Week 26
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF
The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26 were assessed. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Measured: Week 26
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OC
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., number of participants who achieved HbA1c <7% and <6.5% at Week 26) was assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC
The number of participants who a clinically meaningful improvement from Baseline in the HbA1c response level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52 assessed. The OC method (no imputation of missing data) was used. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Measured: Week 52
Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52
Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value >=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the >Week 4 and <Week 12 visits, a single FPG value >=250 mg/dL and previous titration for >=4 weeks; for the >=Week 12 and <Week 26 visits, HbA1c >=8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for >=4 weeks; for the >=Week 26 and <Week 48 visits, HbA1c >=8.5% and previous titration for >=4 weeks; for the >=Week 48 and <Week 52 visits, HbA1c >=8.0% and previous titration for >=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue.
Measured: Week 2 to Week 52
Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52
Hyperglycemic rescue was defined as meeting one of the following criteria, confirmed by a second sample drawn within 7 days and analyzed by the central laboratory: for the Week 2 to Week 4 visit, a single FPG value >=280 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL); for the >Week 4 and <Week 12 visits, a single FPG value >=250 mg/dL and previous titration for >=4 weeks; for the >=Week 12 and <Week 26 visits, HbA1c >=8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline and previous titration for >=4 weeks; for the >=Week 26 and <Week 48 visits, HbA1c >=8.5% and previous titration for >=4 weeks; for the >=Week 48 and <Week 52 visits, HbA1c >=8.0% and previous titration for >=4 weeks. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is the time between the date of first dose and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of first dose and the date of last visit during active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time is divided by 7 to express the result in weeks.
Measured: Week 2 to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCF
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. Based on ANCOVA: Change = treatment + Baseline weight + renal impairment + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region.
Measured: Baseline; Week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used the LOCF method for missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue werre treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values.
Measured: Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The Baseline weight value is defined as the last non-missing value prior to treatment. This analysis used observed weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.
Measured: Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 26, Week 36, Week 48, and Week 52
Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16
Sparse population pharmacokinetic (PK) data were collected for population PK and PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses. Participants (par.) who received albiglutide were initiated on a 30 mg weekly dosing regimen. Beginning at Week 4, uptitration of albiglutide was allowed based on glycemic parameters. As such, albiglutide plasma conc. achieved at each sampling time represent a mixed population of par. who received either 30 mg or 50 mg weekly for various durations. The PK and PK/PD of albiglutide were characterized using a population modeling approach. Mean albiglutide plasma conc. observed at Weeks 8 and 16 are presented. Par. came to the clinic at Weeks 8 and 16 without taking albiglutide/matching placebo. The pre-dose PK sample was taken immediately prior to dosing. The Week 8 post-dose sample was taken between Weeks 8 and 10, >=2 days after a dose of medication. The Week 16 post-dose PK sample was taken any time between Weeks 16 and 20, >=2 days after the previous dose of albiglutide.
Measured: Week 8 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), Week 8 Post-dose (at least 2 days after a dose of medication), Week 16 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), and Week 16 Post-dose (at least 2 days after previous dose of albiglutide)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2010
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionNov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 507 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01098539
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 114130
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2010
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Publications
Natale P, Green SC, Tunnicliffe DJ, Pellegrino G, Toyama T, Strippoli GF. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 18;2(2):CD015849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015849.pub2.
PubMed 39963952Young MA, Wald JA, Matthews JE, Scott R, Hodge RJ, Zhi H, Reinhardt RR. Clinical pharmacology of albiglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Postgrad Med. 2014 Nov;126(7):84-97. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.11.2836.
PubMed 25387217
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide as Compared With Sitagliptin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Renal Impairment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01098539
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 114130
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- sitagliptin, albiglutide, renal impairment
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 507 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2010
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 May 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a weekly dose of albiglutide as compared with sitagliptin. Subjects who are renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and whose glycemia is inadequately controlled on their current regimen of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications will be recruited into the study.
Detailed description
This randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 2 parallel-group, multicenter study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a weekly subcutaneously injected dose of albiglutide as compared with sitagliptin. Subjects who are renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and whose glycemia is inadequately controlled on their current regimen of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, thiazolidinedione, sulfonylurea, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications will be recruited into the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| albiglutide | Active comparator | Biological: albiglutidealbiglutide weekly subcutaneous injection + sitagliptin matching placebo |
| sitagliptin | Active comparator | Drug: sitagliptinalbiglutide matching placebo + sitagliptin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Renally impaired with a historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and is experiencing inadequate glycemic control on their current regime of diet and exercise or their antidiabetic therapy of metformin, TZD, SU, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications
- BMI >/=20 kg/m2 and </=45 kg/m2
- Fasting C-peptide >/=0.8 ng/mL (>/=0.26 nmol/L)
- HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.0%, inclusive.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- History of cancer
- History of treated diabetic gastroparesis
- Current biliary disease or history of pancreatitis
- History of significant gastrointestinal surgery
- Recent clinically significant cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| albiglutidealbiglutide weekly subcutaneous injection + sitagliptin matching placebo | Biological | albiglutide |
| sitagliptinalbiglutide matching placebo + sitagliptin (25mg, 50mg or 100mg depending on level of renal impairment) | Drug | sitagliptin |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26
Time frame: Baseline; Week 26
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 26 minus the value at Baseline. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (<65 years versus >=65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
15 secondary outcomes
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20: LOCF
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: Observed Cases
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and 52
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26
Time frame: Baseline; Week 26
Mean Change From Baseline in FPG at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26: LOCF
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 26
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, and Week 52: OC
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 26, 36, 48, Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 26: LOCF
Time frame: Week 26
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 26: LOCF
Time frame: Week 26
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 52: OC
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants Who Achieved a Clinically Meaningful Improvement in the HbA1c Response Level of >=1.0%, >=1.5%, and >=2.0% at Week 52: OC
Time frame: Week 52
Number of Participants With the Indicated Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52
Time frame: Week 2 to Week 52
Time to Hyperglycemic Rescue Through Week 52
Time frame: Week 2 to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26: LOCF
Time frame: Baseline; Week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 26: LOCF
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, and Week 26
Change From Baseline in Body Weight Through Week 52: OC
Time frame: Baseline; Week 1, Week 2 , Week 3, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20, Week 26, Week 36, Week 48, and Week 52
Plasma Concentrations (Conc.) of Albiglutide at Week 8 and Week 16
Time frame: Week 8 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), Week 8 Post-dose (at least 2 days after a dose of medication), Week 16 Pre-dose (immediately prior to dose), and Week 16 Post-dose (at least 2 days after previous dose of albiglutide)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Feb 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39963952Natale P, Green SC, Tunnicliffe DJ, Pellegrino G, Toyama T, Strippoli GF. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Feb 18;2(2):CD015849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015849.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25387217Young MA, Wald JA, Matthews JE, Scott R, Hodge RJ, Zhi H, Reinhardt RR. Clinical pharmacology of albiglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Postgrad Med. 2014 Nov;126(7):84-97. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2014.11.2836.
- Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
218 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing albiglutide and sitagliptin in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 218 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 218 sites in United States, India, Australia, South Africa, United Kingdom and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 26 (time frame: Baseline; Week 26). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01098539, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2017.