Type 1 DiabetesNCT01094899
Abnormal Structure and Bone Density in Diabetes
A study testing Radiography, Urine and Blood sampling and Echography in people with Type 1 Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Assumptions and Objectives: The working hypotheses are: 1 - subjects with type 1 diabetes and / or type 2, compared to subjects without diabetes are at risk for osteopenia and / or abnormal bone structure the foot (calcaneus and ankle) can lead to bone deformities, fractures and final stage of Charcot foot. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 70 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Radiography, Urine and Blood sampling and Echography
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 79 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2010to 10 Jul 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 70 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult with type 1 or 2 diabetes with or without neuropathy
Who cannot join
- Pathology affecting bone metabolism:
- abnormalities of phosphate metabolism proved biologically hepatic,
- chronic alcoholism
- renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 60 ml / min)
- hyperthyroidism,
- intoxication active smoking,
Show all 10Show fewer
- occlusive arteritis of lower limbs (IPS > IPS 1.2 or < 0.9)
- Treatment affecting bone metabolism (corticosteroids or glitazones for over 3 months in the year or bisphosphonates within 6 months)
- Known HIV positive serology
- Progressive, inflammatory disease (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, bowel inflammatory)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Study of Abnormal Structure and Bone Density at the Feet of Diabetic Patients
Assumptions and Objectives: The working hypotheses are: 1 - subjects with type 1 diabetes and / or type 2, compared to subjects without diabetes are at risk for osteopenia and / or abnormal bone structure the foot (calcaneus and ankle) can lead to bone deformities, fractures and final stage of Charcot foot. These anomalies are favored by the presence of peripheral neuropathy and plasma levels of advanced glycation end products higher than in diabetic subjects without bone abnormalities.
The objectives of this research are to evaluate these anomalies quantitative and qualitative bone in the foot (calcaneus and ankle) through the use of MicroScanner. In parallel a whole body bone mineral density (BMD) and calcaneal ultrasound will be performed to measure bone mineral density as realized in clinical practice in a defined population of patients with type 1 or type 2. These bone abnormalities will be correlated with the presence of peripheral neuropathy and the rate of advanced glycation end products of proteins and reference to parameters of chronic inflammation and oxidative stress to better understand the pathophysiology and target a population at risk.
The importance of this study is paramount in the management of diabetic foot. Indeed for the moment we are dealing primarily the consequences of diabetes impact bone when bone deformities have appeared with their attendant disability and the risk of recurrent infections in areas of friction in this fragile environment. The ultimate goal is to target people with diabetes have abnormal bone subclinical and take care to avoid changes to bone deformities and find ways to treat them.
Read the detailed description
The population studies on subjects with type 1 and 2 diabetes have revealed a fracture risk multiplied by 4 to 12, especially at the shoulder, hip, ankle and foot, compared to a population of non-diabetic subjects matched for age and sex.
If osteopenia (decreased bone mineral density) is consistently associated with fracture risk in diabetic patients with type 1 diabetes type 2 often have a bone mineral density comparable or superior to non diabetes subjects.
The various causes mentioned in this alteration of the quantity and bone quality in the context of chronic hyperglycemia is a disturbance of the interaction between osteoblasts (cells forming bone) and osteoclasts (cells that resorb bone), partly mediated by the system RANK / RANK-L / osteoprotegerin with decreased bone formation and increased osteolyses. The peripherical neuropathy, the glycation proteins (modifications of proteins by addition of glucose) and the receptor of glycation proteins are directly involved.
At the foot, these changes in the bones (osteopenia and decreased bone quality) are responsible for deformations observed in some diabetic subjects, resulting in the formation of "Charcot foot" and the risk of sores and amputation as a major disability cause. Few studies have examined the abnormalities that we could find at the foot of the diabetic patients before the development of deformities observed in the Charcot foot. One study looked at bone mineral density measured by ultrasound at the Charcot foot and the contralateral foot in subjects with type 1 or type 2 compared to subjects with no diabetic Charcot foot. The authors found a decrease in bone density measured by ultrasound at the Charcot foot compared with the contralateral foot in subjects with type 1 and type 2. Bone density at the contralateral foot was reduced compared with control subjects with diabetes only in subjects with type 1 diabetes but not in patients with type 2 diabetes. The link with the peripheral neuropathy is not clear. A second study in women with type 1 diabetes in premenopausal also found a decrease in bone density at the calcaneus measured by ultrasound compared with women without diabetes. None of these studies focused on the local structure of the bone. Yet we may suspect that hyperglycemia, including glycation of proteins may cause structural changes in the bone of diabetic subjects. Previously, it was difficult to understand the structure of bone by non-invasive, the MicroScanner developed by the Scanco company can measure bone density and trabecular architecture of the wrist and ankle with a discrimination of 42 microns . He does a minimal radiation (3 microsV) and allows a resolution of 80 microns. It has already been used in osteopenic women and showed significant differences in terms of bone architecture between women with fracture and those who do not.
Assumptions and Objectives: The working hypotheses are: 1 - subjects with type 1 diabetes and / or type 2, compared to subjects without diabetes are at risk for osteopenia and / or abnormal bone structure the foot (calcaneus and ankle) can lead to bone deformities, fractures and final stage of Charcot foot. These anomalies are favored by the presence of peripheral neuropathy and plasma levels of advanced glycation end products higher than in diabetic subjects without bone abnormalities.
The objectives of this research are to evaluate these anomalies quantitative and qualitative bone in the foot (calcaneus and ankle) through the use of MicroScanner. In parallel a whole body BMD and calcaneal ultrasound will be performed to measure bone mineral density as realized in clinical practice in a defined population of patients with type 1 or type 2. These bone abnormalities will be correlated with the presence of peripheral neuropathy and the rate of advanced glycation end products of proteins and reference to parameters of chronic inflammation and oxidative stress to better understand the pathophysiology and target a population at risk.
The importance of this study is paramount in the management of diabetic foot. Indeed for the moment we are dealing primarily the consequences of diabetes impact bone when bone deformities have appeared with their attendant disability and the risk of recurrent infections in areas of friction in this fragile environment. The ultimate goal is to target people with diabetes have abnormal bone subclinical and take care to avoid changes to bone deformities and find ways to treat them.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes
- Being tested
- Radiography, Urine and Blood sampling, Echography
- Keywords
- diabetes, osteopenia, neuropathy, foot, AGE
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetes Mellitus, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RadiographyRadiation
Radiography, microscanner, osteodensitometry
Urine and Blood samplingOther
mainly dosage of bones metabolism
EchographyOther
body bones echography
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Type 1 Diabetics without Neuropathy | Experimental | Adult male with type 1 diabetes and without peripherical neuropathy Receives: Radiation: Radiography; Other: Urine and Blood sampling; Other: Echography |
| Type 2 Diabetics without Neuropathy | Experimental | Adult male with type 2 diabetes and without peripherical neuropathy Receives: Radiation: Radiography; Other: Urine and Blood sampling; Other: Echography |
| Type 1 Diabetics with Neuropathy | Experimental | Adult male with type 1 diabetes and with peripherical neuropathy Receives: Radiation: Radiography; Other: Urine and Blood sampling; Other: Echography |
| Type 2 Diabetics with Neuropathy | Experimental | Adult male with type 1 diabetes and with peripherical neuropathy Receives: Radiation: Radiography; Other: Urine and Blood sampling; Other: Echography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
evaluate the MicroScanner, alterations quantitative and qualitative bone in the foot in patients with type 1 diabetes 2 with or without neuropathy
Measured: 18 month
Secondary outcomes (1)
correlation involving bone and extension of neuropathy Assessment criteria associated with biological abnormalities qualitative and quantitative bone in diabetic subjects
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Study start10 Mar 2010
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completion10 Jul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Type 1 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Christian Boitard, MD, Study director, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01094899
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C08-25
- Other IDs
- 2008-A00937-48
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2010
- Last updated
- 1 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of Abnormal Structure and Bone Density at the Feet of Diabetic Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01094899
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C08-25
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes, Type 2 Diabetes
- Keywords
- diabetes, osteopenia, neuropathy, foot, AGE
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 79 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceOther government
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Assumptions and Objectives: The working hypotheses are: 1 - subjects with type 1 diabetes and / or type 2, compared to subjects without diabetes are at risk for osteopenia and / or abnormal bone structure the foot (calcaneus and ankle) can lead to bone deformities, fractures and final stage of Charcot foot. These anomalies are favored by the presence of peripheral neuropathy and plasma levels of advanced glycation end products higher than in diabetic subjects without bone abnormalities.
The objectives of this research are to evaluate these anomalies quantitative and qualitative bone in the foot (calcaneus and ankle) through the use of MicroScanner. In parallel a whole body bone mineral density (BMD) and calcaneal ultrasound will be performed to measure bone mineral density as realized in clinical practice in a defined population of patients with type 1 or type 2. These bone abnormalities will be correlated with the presence of peripheral neuropathy and the rate of advanced glycation end products of proteins and reference to parameters of chronic inflammation and oxidative stress to better understand the pathophysiology and target a population at risk.
The importance of this study is paramount in the management of diabetic foot. Indeed for the moment we are dealing primarily the consequences of diabetes impact bone when bone deformities have appeared with their attendant disability and the risk of recurrent infections in areas of friction in this fragile environment. The ultimate goal is to target people with diabetes have abnormal bone subclinical and take care to avoid changes to bone deformities and find ways to treat them.
Detailed description
The population studies on subjects with type 1 and 2 diabetes have revealed a fracture risk multiplied by 4 to 12, especially at the shoulder, hip, ankle and foot, compared to a population of non-diabetic subjects matched for age and sex.
If osteopenia (decreased bone mineral density) is consistently associated with fracture risk in diabetic patients with type 1 diabetes type 2 often have a bone mineral density comparable or superior to non diabetes subjects.
The various causes mentioned in this alteration of the quantity and bone quality in the context of chronic hyperglycemia is a disturbance of the interaction between osteoblasts (cells forming bone) and osteoclasts (cells that resorb bone), partly mediated by the system RANK / RANK-L / osteoprotegerin with decreased bone formation and increased osteolyses. The peripherical neuropathy, the glycation proteins (modifications of proteins by addition of glucose) and the receptor of glycation proteins are directly involved.
At the foot, these changes in the bones (osteopenia and decreased bone quality) are responsible for deformations observed in some diabetic subjects, resulting in the formation of "Charcot foot" and the risk of sores and amputation as a major disability cause. Few studies have examined the abnormalities that we could find at the foot of the diabetic patients before the development of deformities observed in the Charcot foot. One study looked at bone mineral density measured by ultrasound at the Charcot foot and the contralateral foot in subjects with type 1 or type 2 compared to subjects with no diabetic Charcot foot. The authors found a decrease in bone density measured by ultrasound at the Charcot foot compared with the contralateral foot in subjects with type 1 and type 2. Bone density at the contralateral foot was reduced compared with control subjects with diabetes only in subjects with type 1 diabetes but not in patients with type 2 diabetes. The link with the peripheral neuropathy is not clear. A second study in women with type 1 diabetes in premenopausal also found a decrease in bone density at the calcaneus measured by ultrasound compared with women without diabetes. None of these studies focused on the local structure of the bone. Yet we may suspect that hyperglycemia, including glycation of proteins may cause structural changes in the bone of diabetic subjects. Previously, it was difficult to understand the structure of bone by non-invasive, the MicroScanner developed by the Scanco company can measure bone density and trabecular architecture of the wrist and ankle with a discrimination of 42 microns . He does a minimal radiation (3 microsV) and allows a resolution of 80 microns. It has already been used in osteopenic women and showed significant differences in terms of bone architecture between women with fracture and those who do not.
Assumptions and Objectives: The working hypotheses are: 1 - subjects with type 1 diabetes and / or type 2, compared to subjects without diabetes are at risk for osteopenia and / or abnormal bone structure the foot (calcaneus and ankle) can lead to bone deformities, fractures and final stage of Charcot foot. These anomalies are favored by the presence of peripheral neuropathy and plasma levels of advanced glycation end products higher than in diabetic subjects without bone abnormalities.
The objectives of this research are to evaluate these anomalies quantitative and qualitative bone in the foot (calcaneus and ankle) through the use of MicroScanner. In parallel a whole body BMD and calcaneal ultrasound will be performed to measure bone mineral density as realized in clinical practice in a defined population of patients with type 1 or type 2. These bone abnormalities will be correlated with the presence of peripheral neuropathy and the rate of advanced glycation end products of proteins and reference to parameters of chronic inflammation and oxidative stress to better understand the pathophysiology and target a population at risk.
The importance of this study is paramount in the management of diabetic foot. Indeed for the moment we are dealing primarily the consequences of diabetes impact bone when bone deformities have appeared with their attendant disability and the risk of recurrent infections in areas of friction in this fragile environment. The ultimate goal is to target people with diabetes have abnormal bone subclinical and take care to avoid changes to bone deformities and find ways to treat them.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Type 1 Diabetics without Neuropathy | Experimental | Radiation: Radiography, Other: Urine and Blood sampling, Other: EchographyAdult male with type 1 diabetes and without peripherical neuropathy |
| Type 2 Diabetics without Neuropathy | Experimental | Radiation: Radiography, Other: Urine and Blood sampling, Other: EchographyAdult male with type 2 diabetes and without peripherical neuropathy |
| Type 1 Diabetics with Neuropathy | Experimental | Radiation: Radiography, Other: Urine and Blood sampling, Other: EchographyAdult male with type 1 diabetes and with peripherical neuropathy |
| Type 2 Diabetics with Neuropathy | Experimental | Radiation: Radiography, Other: Urine and Blood sampling, Other: EchographyAdult male with type 1 diabetes and with peripherical neuropathy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 70 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult with type 1 or 2 diabetes with or without neuropathy
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Pathology affecting bone metabolism:
- Treatment affecting bone metabolism (corticosteroids or glitazones for over 3 months in the year or bisphosphonates within 6 months)
- Known HIV positive serology
- Progressive, inflammatory disease (rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, bowel inflammatory)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RadiographyRadiography, microscanner, osteodensitometry | Radiation | Type 1 Diabetics with Neuropathy, Type 1 Diabetics without Neuropathy, Type 2 Diabetics with Neuropathy, Type 2 Diabetics without Neuropathy |
| Urine and Blood samplingmainly dosage of bones metabolism | Other | Type 1 Diabetics with Neuropathy, Type 1 Diabetics without Neuropathy, Type 2 Diabetics with Neuropathy, Type 2 Diabetics without Neuropathy |
| Echographybody bones echography | Other | Type 1 Diabetics with Neuropathy, Type 1 Diabetics without Neuropathy, Type 2 Diabetics with Neuropathy, Type 2 Diabetics without Neuropathy |
Primary outcome
evaluate the MicroScanner, alterations quantitative and qualitative bone in the foot in patients with type 1 diabetes 2 with or without neuropathy
Time frame: 18 month
1 secondary outcome
correlation involving bone and extension of neuropathy Assessment criteria associated with biological abnormalities qualitative and quantitative bone in diabetic subjects
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Sep 2021.
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingObservational study
EFFECT OF HYBRID CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEMS ON CARDIOVASCULAR MARKERS IN TYPE 1 DIABETES.
Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Crosstalk Between Mucosal-Associated Invariant T (MAIT) Cells and the Gut Microbiota and Mucosa in the Development of Type 1 Diabetes in Children
Type1diabetes
RecruitingPhase 2
Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and Porustobart in Resectable pMMR/MSS Colon Cancer
Colon Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC)
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Islet Cell Transplant for Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christian Boitard, MD study director
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Radiography, Urine and Blood sampling and Echography in people with Type 1 Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes, run by Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
evaluate the MicroScanner, alterations quantitative and qualitative bone in the foot in patients with type 1 diabetes 2 with or without neuropathy (time frame: 18 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2021.