ArrhythmiaNCT01076374
MEDTRONIC ADAPTA, VERSA AND SENSIA nEw3 POST APPROVAL STUDY
An observational study of Arrhythmia and Bradycardia, run by Medtronic at 129 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the long term reliability of the Medtronic Adapta®/Sensia™/Versa™ platform of devices. This study is required by FDA as a condition of approval of nEw3 devices. Patients will be followed for 5 years after implant. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Arrhythmia, Bradycardia
- How many people
- 2,927 participants
- Where
- 129 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2008to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects implanted with a Medtronic Adapta®, Sensia™, or Versa™ IPG.
Who may be able to join
- Subjects or appropriate legal guardians provide written informed consent and/or authorization for access to and use of health information, as required by an institution's IRB/MEC/REB.
- AND one of the following must also apply:
- Subjects indicated for implant or within six months post-implant of a Medtronic market-released lead connected to a Medtronic Adapta®, Sensia™, or Versa™ IPG. The Medtronic lead must be used for pacing, sensing or defibrillation application.
- Subjects who participated in a qualifying study (IDE) of a Medtronic cardiac therapy product and: 1) have a Medtronic Adapta®, Sensia™, or Versa™ IPG 2)product is market-released 3) complete implant and follow-up data, including product-related adverse events are available and 4) subject of appropriate legal guardian authorizes release of subject study data to SLS
- Subjects implanted with a Medtronic Adapta®, Sensia™, or Versa™ IPG and Medtronic CapSure Epi Leads (model 4965 and 4968) at a minimum of three pre-selected sites to retrospectively collect data for post approval requirements.
Who cannot join
- Subjects who are, or will be inaccessible for follow-up at a SLS center
- Subjects with exclusion criteria required by local law (EMEA only)
- Subjects receiving an implant of a Medtronic device at a non-participating center and the implant data and current status cannot be confirmed within 30 days after implant
- Subjects implanted with a Medtronic device whose predetermined enrollment limit for that specific product has been exceeded
Trial locations and contacts
129 sites in 12 countries.
129 sites in 12 countries
United States110 sites
Study site
Akron, Ohio
Study site
Albany, Georgia
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Study site
Alexandria, Louisiana
Study site
Anchorage, Alaska
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Bakersfield, California
Study site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Study site
Birmingham, Alabama
Study site
Bradenton, Florida
Study site
Browns Mills, New Jersey
Study site
Burlington, Vermont
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Study site
Chesapeake, Virginia
Study site
Chula Vista, California
Study site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Study site
Clearwater, Florida
Study site
Cleveland, Ohio
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Study site
Columbia, Missouri
Study site
Columbia, South Carolina
Study site
Columbus, Georgia
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Coon Rapids, Minnesota
Study site
Covington, Louisiana
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Denver, Colorado
Study site
Des Moines, Iowa
Study site
Downey, California
Study site
Durham, North Carolina
Study site
East Palo Alto, California
Study site
Edgewood, Kentucky
Study site
Erie, Pennsylvania
Study site
Evansville, Indiana
Study site
Fairfax, Virginia
Study site
Fargo, North Dakota
Study site
Florence, South Carolina
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas
Study site
Garden City, New York
Study site
Germantown, Tennessee
Study site
Gilbert, Arizona
Study site
Greensboro, North Carolina
Study site
Henderson, New York
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Huntington, New York
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Study site
Jacksonville, Florida
Study site
Jonesboro, Arkansas
Study site
Kansas City, Kansas
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Study site
Kingsport, Tennessee
Study site
La Jolla, California
Study site
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Study site
Lansing, Michigan
Study site
Lebanon, New Hampshire
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky
Study site
Little Rock, Arkansas
Study site
Long Beach, California
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Madison, Wisconsin
Study site
Marietta, Georgia
Study site
Marquette, Michigan
Study site
Melbourne, Florida
Study site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Study site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
Newark, Delaware
Study site
Oak Lawn, Illinois
Study site
Ocean City, New Jersey
Study site
Olympia, Washington
Study site
Parlin, New Jersey
Study site
Plano, Texas
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Poughkeepsie, New York
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina
Study site
Redding, California
Study site
Robbinsdale, Minnesota
Study site
Rochester, Minnesota
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
Saginaw, Michigan
Study site
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota
Study site
Saint Paul, Minnesota
Study site
Salinas, California
Study site
Salisbury, Maryland
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
Santa Rosa, California
Study site
Sayre, Pennsylvania
Study site
Scottsdale, Arizona
Study site
Silver Spring, Maryland
Study site
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Study site
Spokane, Washington
Study site
Tacoma, Washington
Study site
Takoma Park, Maryland
Study site
Tampa, Florida
Study site
The Woodlands, Texas
Study site
Toledo, Ohio
Study site
Torrance, California
Study site
Towson, Maryland
Study site
Utica, New York
Study site
Van Nuys, California
Study site
Washington, Missouri
Study site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia
Study site
West Orange, New Jersey
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Study site
Worcester, Massachusetts
Study site
Ypsilanti, Michigan
Canada6 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta
Study site
Kingston, Ontario
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Ottawa, Ontario
Study site
Regina, Saskatchewan
Study site
Toronto, Ontario
About this study
Official title: Medtronic Adapta/Versa/Sensia Long Term Reliability Study
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the long term reliability of the Medtronic Adapta®/Sensia™/Versa™ platform of devices. This study is required by FDA as a condition of approval of nEw3 devices. Patients will be followed for 5 years after implant. This study utilizes data collected from the System Longevity Study (SLS).
Read the detailed description
The rate of device malfunctions will be determined and a comparison to historical controls will be done.
- Conditions
- Arrhythmia, Bradycardia
- Keywords
- pacemaker
- Medical subject headings
- Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bradycardia
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of device malfunctions
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2008
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ArrhythmiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by MedtronicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,927 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- nEw3 PAS Clinical Trial Leader, Study chair, Medtronic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01076374
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- nEw3 PAS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 26 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Medtronic Adapta/Versa/Sensia Long Term Reliability Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01076374
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- nEw3 PAS
- Conditions
- Arrhythmia, Bradycardia
- Keywords
- pacemaker
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,927 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- MedtronicIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2008
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the long term reliability of the Medtronic Adapta®/Sensia™/Versa™ platform of devices. This study is required by FDA as a condition of approval of nEw3 devices. Patients will be followed for 5 years after implant. This study utilizes data collected from the System Longevity Study (SLS).
Detailed description
The rate of device malfunctions will be determined and a comparison to historical controls will be done.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects implanted with a Medtronic Adapta®, Sensia™, or Versa™ IPG.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subjects or appropriate legal guardians provide written informed consent and/or authorization for access to and use of health information, as required by an institution's IRB/MEC/REB.
- Subjects indicated for implant or within six months post-implant of a Medtronic market-released lead connected to a Medtronic Adapta®, Sensia™, or Versa™ IPG. The Medtronic lead must be used for pacing, sensing or defibrillation application.
- Subjects who participated in a qualifying study (IDE) of a Medtronic cardiac therapy product and: 1) have a Medtronic Adapta®, Sensia™, or Versa™ IPG 2)product is market-released 3) complete implant and follow-up data, including product-related adverse events are available and 4) subject of appropriate legal guardian authorizes release of subject study data to SLS
- Subjects implanted with a Medtronic Adapta®, Sensia™, or Versa™ IPG and Medtronic CapSure Epi Leads (model 4965 and 4968) at a minimum of three pre-selected sites to retrospectively collect data for post approval requirements.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects who are, or will be inaccessible for follow-up at a SLS center
- Subjects with exclusion criteria required by local law (EMEA only)
- Subjects receiving an implant of a Medtronic device at a non-participating center and the implant data and current status cannot be confirmed within 30 days after implant
- Subjects implanted with a Medtronic device whose predetermined enrollment limit for that specific product has been exceeded
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Rate of device malfunctions
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Apr 2018.
Related trials for Arrhythmia
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks
Apnea of Prematurity
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Enrolling by invitation
VINTAGE (Ventricular Intramyocardial Navigation for Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Electrograms) Using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Catheters
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Enrolling by invitation
EDEN Intracardiac Electrogram Recording and Classifying System
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
nEw3 PAS Clinical Trial Leader study chair
Medtronic
129 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Arrhythmia and Bradycardia, run by Medtronic at 129 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 129 sites in United States, Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of device malfunctions (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2018.