Relationship of Carbapenem Use to Carbapenem Resistant Gram-negative BacteriaNCT01075009
Predictors of Rates of Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria
An observational study of Relationship of Carbapenem Use to Carbapenem Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria continues to increase in US hospitals. This comes at a time when there are few new drugs in development that are active for these resistant organisms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Relationship of Carbapenem Use to Carbapenem Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to May 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Hospitalized adult patients
Who may be able to join
- Aggregated data from adult inpatients
Who cannot join
- Children
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
About this study
Official title: Predictors of Rates of Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in a Consortium of Academic Medical Center Hospitals.
Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria continues to increase in US hospitals. This comes at a time when there are few new drugs in development that are active for these resistant organisms. The implication is that we must learn to use the drugs that we have more wisely and develop new strategies that will preserve existing agents. Antimicrobial "stewardship" programs are one strategy that many hospitals are adopting to improve the quality of antimicrobial use. The goal of this project is to develop a consortium of US academic medical centers that will allow characterization of the relationships between antibiotic use and rates of resistance for gram-negative pathogens, and to help hospital devise new strategies that will modify antibiotic use and possibly delay or reduce resistance.
The specific hypotheses are:
- Hospitals with established or emerging resistance in gram-negative pathogens, including extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing organisms, carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE)and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa have a different pattern of antimicrobial drug use compared to hospitals with fewer of these organisms.
- Hospital use of ertapenem is not associated with the rates of carbapenem-resistant organisms.
Read the detailed description
Antibacterial drug use
Systemic antibacterial drug use in adult inpatients discharged between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010 was obtained from patient-level billing records. These data were aggregated and reported for each hospital as days of therapy per 1000 patient days (DOT/1000PD) as previously described [10]. Any dose of an antibiotic received by a patient during a 24 hour period is counted as one DOT. For example, administration of imipenem/cilastatin 1000 mg every 8 hours, or administration of 500mg every 6 hours, is counted as one DOT. We have recently reported advantages of measuring antibiotic use by DOTs versus the metric usually recommended, the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) [12].
Antimicrobial susceptibility
In year 2009 we requested the annual cumulative hospital antibiograms from the 50 hospitals for the years in which we had carbapenem drug use. The contact at each hospital was usually the antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist, but may also have included the infectious diseases physician(s), clinical microbiologist or infection control practitioner. We utilized antibiograms with a full calendar year of susceptibility reported for all clinical isolates (at least 30 isolates), the total number of isolates and the proportion of resistant isolates.
All hospitals received an on-line survey requesting additional information regarding susceptibility testing methods and antibiogram construction. We used the secure survey instruments provided by REDCap (Research electronic data capture; www.project-redcap.com) to send and compile survey responses. Specifically we inquired about the inclusion/exclusion of duplicate clinical isolates in the antibiogram, method(s) of susceptibility testing, policy regarding surveillance cultures and we attempted to verify that Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretative breakpoints were used for all years. As recommended by Schwaber we recorded both proportions and rates of carbapenem resistant P. aeruginosa [13]. The resistant proportion was the number of resistant isolates divided by total number of isolates, and the resistant incidence rate was the number of resistant isolates per 1000 adult patient days (PD).
- Keywords
- Antibiotics, Resistance, Epidemiology, Gram-negative bacteria, Epidemiology of antibiotic use
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Relationship of ertapenem use and carbapenem resistant P. aeruginosa
Measured: 2006-2011
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relationship of Carbapenem Use to Carbapenem Resistant Gram-negative BacteriaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Virginia Commonwealth UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ron E Polk, Pharm.D., Principal investigator, Virginia Commonwealth University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01075009
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PT104983
- Status last verified
- Jul 2014
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 9 Jul 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Pakyz AL, MacDougall C, Oinonen M, Polk RE. Trends in antibacterial use in US academic health centers: 2002 to 2006. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 10;168(20):2254-60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.20.2254.
PubMed 19001203Pakyz AL, Oinonen M, Polk RE. Relationship of carbapenem restriction in 22 university teaching hospitals to carbapenem use and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 May;53(5):1983-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01535-08. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
PubMed 19273670
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jul 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Predictors of Rates of Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in a Consortium of Academic Medical Center Hospitals.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01075009
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PT104983
- Keywords
- Antibiotics, Resistance, Epidemiology, Gram-negative bacteria, Epidemiology of antibiotic use
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria continues to increase in US hospitals. This comes at a time when there are few new drugs in development that are active for these resistant organisms. The implication is that we must learn to use the drugs that we have more wisely and develop new strategies that will preserve existing agents. Antimicrobial "stewardship" programs are one strategy that many hospitals are adopting to improve the quality of antimicrobial use. The goal of this project is to develop a consortium of US academic medical centers that will allow characterization of the relationships between antibiotic use and rates of resistance for gram-negative pathogens, and to help hospital devise new strategies that will modify antibiotic use and possibly delay or reduce resistance.
The specific hypotheses are:
- Hospitals with established or emerging resistance in gram-negative pathogens, including extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing organisms, carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE)and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa have a different pattern of antimicrobial drug use compared to hospitals with fewer of these organisms.
- Hospital use of ertapenem is not associated with the rates of carbapenem-resistant organisms.
Detailed description
Antibacterial drug use
Systemic antibacterial drug use in adult inpatients discharged between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2010 was obtained from patient-level billing records. These data were aggregated and reported for each hospital as days of therapy per 1000 patient days (DOT/1000PD) as previously described [10]. Any dose of an antibiotic received by a patient during a 24 hour period is counted as one DOT. For example, administration of imipenem/cilastatin 1000 mg every 8 hours, or administration of 500mg every 6 hours, is counted as one DOT. We have recently reported advantages of measuring antibiotic use by DOTs versus the metric usually recommended, the Defined Daily Dose (DDD) [12].
Antimicrobial susceptibility
In year 2009 we requested the annual cumulative hospital antibiograms from the 50 hospitals for the years in which we had carbapenem drug use. The contact at each hospital was usually the antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist, but may also have included the infectious diseases physician(s), clinical microbiologist or infection control practitioner. We utilized antibiograms with a full calendar year of susceptibility reported for all clinical isolates (at least 30 isolates), the total number of isolates and the proportion of resistant isolates.
All hospitals received an on-line survey requesting additional information regarding susceptibility testing methods and antibiogram construction. We used the secure survey instruments provided by REDCap (Research electronic data capture; www.project-redcap.com) to send and compile survey responses. Specifically we inquired about the inclusion/exclusion of duplicate clinical isolates in the antibiogram, method(s) of susceptibility testing, policy regarding surveillance cultures and we attempted to verify that Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretative breakpoints were used for all years. As recommended by Schwaber we recorded both proportions and rates of carbapenem resistant P. aeruginosa [13]. The resistant proportion was the number of resistant isolates divided by total number of isolates, and the resistant incidence rate was the number of resistant isolates per 1000 adult patient days (PD).
Study design
- Observational model
- Ecologic or community
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Hospitalized adult patients
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Aggregated data from adult inpatients
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Relationship of ertapenem use and carbapenem resistant P. aeruginosa
Time frame: 2006-2011
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jul 2014.
- Background: PubMed 19001203Pakyz AL, MacDougall C, Oinonen M, Polk RE. Trends in antibacterial use in US academic health centers: 2002 to 2006. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 10;168(20):2254-60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.20.2254.
- Background: PubMed 19273670Pakyz AL, Oinonen M, Polk RE. Relationship of carbapenem restriction in 22 university teaching hospitals to carbapenem use and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 May;53(5):1983-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01535-08. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ron E Polk, Pharm.D. principal investigator
Virginia Commonwealth University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Relationship of Carbapenem Use to Carbapenem Resistant Gram-negative Bacteria, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Relationship of ertapenem use and carbapenem resistant P. aeruginosa (time frame: 2006-2011). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01075009, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2014.