AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 3NCT01063062

A Study With Tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (PICTURE)

A Phase 3 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 9 sites in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This single-arm, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the safety and tolerability and the efficacy in reducing disease activity of tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate in patients with active moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] and Methotrexate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
107 participants
Where
9 sitesEgypt
Study dates
28 Feb 2010to 17 Jan 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients ≥ 18 years of age
  • Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for at least 6 months (defined as a Disease Activity Score (DAS28) > 3.2 at screening)
  • Patients with active RA after more than 12 weeks of treatment with DMARDs
  • Patients with inadequate response to a stable dose of non-biologic DMARD

Who cannot join

  • Autoimmune disease other than RA. Patients with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis and able to tolerate methotrexate (MTX) and patients with Sjögren's Syndrome and RA are permitted
  • Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months following enrollment
  • Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 1 country.

9 sites in 1 country

Egypt9 sites
  • Alexandria University Hospital; Rheumatology

    Alexandria

  • Alexandria University

    Alexandria

  • Banha Educational Hospital; Rheumatology

    Banhā

  • Kasr El Ainy Hospital; Rheumatology

    Cairo, 11562

  • Ain Shams University Hospital; Rheumatology

    Cairo

  • Bab El Sheereya Hospital; Rheumatology

    Cairo

  • El Hussein University Hospital; Rheumatology

    Cairo

  • Kasr El Ainy Hospital

    Cairo

  • Manial Specialized Hospital; Rheumatology

    Cairo

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: A Single-arm, Open-label, Multicenter Study of Tocilizumab Monotherapy or in Combination With Methotrexate to Assess Safety and the Efficacy in Reducing Disease Activity in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Non-biologic DMARDs (PICTURE)

This single-arm, open-label, multicenter study evaluated the safety and tolerability and the efficacy in reducing disease activity of tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate in patients with active moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients were eligible to participate in this study if they are currently experiencing an inadequate response to a stable dose of a non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Patients received 8 mg/kg tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for a total of 6 infusions. The anticipated time on study treatment was 24 weeks. The target sample size was 50-200 patients.

Being tested
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], Methotrexate
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Drug

    8 mg/kg intravenous infusion every 4 weeks.

  • MethotrexateDrug

    methotrexate as per standard of care in clinical practice.

Study groups in NCT01063062
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
tocilizumabExperimentalParticipants received an 8 mg/kg tocilizumab intravenous (IV) infusion once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks (6 infusions). Participants taking concomitant methotrexate (MTX) at Baseline remained on a stable dose as per standard of care at the Investigator's discretion.
Receives: Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]; Drug: Methotrexate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Low Disease Activity

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Low Disease Activity was defined as a DAS28 score of < 3.2.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24)

  2. Time to DAS28 Low Disease Activity

    Time to DAS28 Low Disease Activity was defined as the time in days from the first infusion of study drug to the achievement of a DAS28 Score <3.2 units. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Low Disease Activity was defined as a DAS28 score of < 3.2.

    Measured: 24 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement

    DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement was defined as a DAS28 score reduction of at least 1.2 units from Baseline. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  2. Time to DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement

    Time to DAS28 Clinically Significant Improvement was the Time in days from the first infusion of study drug to the achievement of a DAS28 score reduction of at least 1.2 units. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Low Disease Activity was defined as a DAS28 score of < 3.2.

    Measured: 24 Weeks

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28 Remission

    DAS28 Remission was defined as a DAS28 score < 2.6 units. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  4. Time to DAS28 Remission

    Time to DAS28 Remission was the Time in days from the first infusion of study drug to the achievement of a DAS28 score < 2.6 units. The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10.

    Measured: 24 Weeks

  5. Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Low Disease Activity was defined as a DAS28 score of < 3.2.

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  6. C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein (CRP), a test for inflammation, at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. The serum concentration of CRP was measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL).

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  7. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

    Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), a test to assess inflammation, at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. ESR was measured in millimeters/hour (mm/hr).

    Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  8. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study and laboratory or clinical tests that resulted in a change in treatment or discontinuation from study drug were reported as adverse events. A SAE was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.

    Measured: 24 Weeks

  9. Number of Participants With AE and SAE Related Discontinuation

    The number of participants who stopped using the study drug because of an AE or a SAE. An AE was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study and laboratory or clinical tests that resulted in a change in treatment or discontinuation from study drug were reported as adverse events. A SAE was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.

    Measured: 24 Weeks

  10. Number of Participants With Serious Infections

    A serious infection was an infection that qualified as a Serious Adverse Event (SAE). A SAE was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.

    Measured: 24 Weeks

  11. Number of Participants With Elevated AST (SGOT) and ALT (SGPT)

    Blood was collected for aspartate aminotransferase (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase) [AST/SGOT] and alanine aminotransferase (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase) [ALT/SGPT], liver function tests, and were analyzed at a central laboratory. The number of participants with High AST (SGOT) or ALT (SGPT) levels at Week 24 is reported.

    Measured: Week 24

  12. Number of Participants With Elevated Total Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines

    Blood samples were collected for Total Cholesterol and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. According to Adult Treatment Profile III (ATPIII) guidelines the Total Cholesterol level in milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was categorized as: Desirable ( < 200), Borderline High (200- 239) or High (≥ 240). The number of participants categorized Borderline High or High at each time-point is reported.

    Measured: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  13. Number of Participants With Elevated HDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines

    Blood samples were collected for High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. According to Adult Treatment Profile III (ATPIII) guidelines the HDL Total Cholesterol level in milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was categorized as: Low (< 40) or High (≥ 60). The number of participants with category High at each time-point is reported.

    Measured: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  14. Number of Participants With Elevated LDL Cholesterol According to ATPIII Guidelines

    Blood samples were collected for Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. According to Adult Treatment Profile III (ATPIII) guidelines the LDL Cholesterol level in milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was categorized as: Optimal (< 100), Near Optimal/Above Optimal (100- 129), Borderline High (130- 159), High (160-189) or Very High (≥ 190). The number of participants categorized Borderline High, High or Very High at each time-point is reported.

    Measured: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  15. Number of Participants With Elevated Triglyceride According to ATPIII Guidelines

    Blood samples were collected for Triglyceride and were sent to a central laboratory for analysis. According to Adult Treatment Profile III (ATPIII) guidelines the Triglyceride level in milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was categorized as: Normal (< 150), Borderline High (150- 199), High (200- 499) or Very High (≥ 500). The number of participants categorized Borderline High, High or Very High at each time-point is reported.

    Measured: Weeks 0 (Baseline), 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Feb 2010
  3. Primary completion17 Jan 2011
  4. Study completion17 Jan 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
107 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01063062
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML22725
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
3 Feb 2010
Last updated
21 Aug 2017

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra] and Methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 9 sites in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Aug 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Low Disease Activity (time frame: Baseline to Week 24 (Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in